Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread Alan Chan
Tell this to the potential customers who cannot try before they buy. Alan Chan http://www.pbase.com/wlachan Shouldn't we make our decision after taking some pictures with it? _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months

Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and PartialCoverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread Jim Apilado
I agree about the lens issue. Months ago I was excited about the Pentax digital offering because I, like others, thought all the K mount lenses I own would function on it. I'm not one who wants to ruin a perfectly good K mount lens by having it fall off the camera using the technique you

RE: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats andPartialCoverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread Alan Chan
Only if they are willing to do some serious markrting. Alan Chan http://www.pbase.com/wlachan 3. It's true that Pentax does have some reputation rebuilding to do. _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*

RE: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread Alan Chan
I think the appropiate marketing will keep the *ist D from became another loser, but unlikely to become a real winner. Alan Chan http://www.pbase.com/wlachan Me too. If Pentax were to spend a bit on marketing the *istD, it could be a real winner. Just the small size and AA battery use give it

Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread Alan Chan
Consider similar products like 10D D100 have been around for some time, 1 year seem generous indeed. However, Pentax have the tendency to slowly update their products and Pentax users are used to hold on to their cameras longer. *ist D users might be satisfied a little longer than Canon or

Re: OT:anyone made there own carriers

2003-08-21 Thread brooksdj
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The smooth side should be good enough you say then. I see what you mean about the felt atracting dust etc. Thats why your in Saskatchewan and im stuck in Ontario.vbg Dust is an issue here.

RE: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats andPartialCoverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread Bill Owens
AND, it is not just camera stores. Best Buy, Office Max, CompUSA, and other office and/or computer stores have quite a stock of digital cameras. Presumably they catch the casual shopper looking for a computer peripheral rather than the photographer looking for a new camera. I have not seen any

Re: For all Toronto and area photogs, this weekend is Buskerfest

2003-08-21 Thread brooksdj
TPDML? Where ?? I might be picking up my new vehicle Saturday.I'll know around 8:30am Dave

RE: gfm

2003-08-21 Thread brooksdj
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Some D10 users have mentioned to me that they have to shoot a bit earlier to get the action they want. It's not as fast as some other cameras but it's not so slow you

Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread Mark Roberts
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just (minutes ago) made a 12 x 18 inch print from one of my *ist-D shots from last weekend: (http://www.robertstech.com/graphics/pages/IMGP0068.htm) and all I can say is HOLY SH*T! Amazing! I could sell this as a fine art print next to any of my shots printed from

Re: Why is it...

2003-08-21 Thread Lon Williamson
Cameron, jeeze, it's so simple. Your momma dresses you funny. grin. -Lon Cameron Hood wrote: Threds about beer and the blackout can carry on unchecked, but if I mention a Mac I get screamed at? Which is more applicable to photography? I use my computer constanly for editing, printing

Pentax needn't care about 300D

2003-08-21 Thread Collin Brendemuehl
Why? Because they can only take one step @ a time. The 300D is more of an answer to Sony's similarly-priced fixed zoom unit. What has kept me away from a Pentax PS digital is one simple thing -- the lack of a dedicated flash shoe. They do a well at hitting the casual enthusiast market but no

Back in town and out again...

2003-08-21 Thread Cesar Matamoros II
Whew! Got back to the USA on Saturday night. Back home Monday night. I subscribed in time to hear about the Camera Clinic I missed at GFM :-( I had a friend take a shot with the Optio S to show why I could not make the clinic. Two shots and they were both blurry. I guess he could not stand

Re: Looking forward, may be far forward

2003-08-21 Thread T Rittenhouse
Not in the near future. Too many things need replacing to upgrade the sensor, related electronics, firmware, etc. The body itself is still relatively inexpensive compared to the electronics. Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto - Original Message - From: Boris Liberman

Re: 300D

2003-08-21 Thread T Rittenhouse
When you consider all the US bashing that goes on, at least our governments do not make more off what a merchant sells than the merchant does (except for booze, smokes, and gasoline). Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Pentax needn't care about 300D

2003-08-21 Thread Cotty
I expect by 1/1/04 we'll see a Pentax dslr @ the $250 price point with 4-6 Mp. *istD-5n. CRB Collin, I wanna sniff what you're sniffin there boy! Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ Free UK

Re: Views on the F 70-210

2003-08-21 Thread Anthony Farr
Kenneth, You can't always judge a thread by its title. Boris was considering a supplementary question, regarding an F 85/2.8 Soft for which he was awaiting delivery. The pertinent quote from his message (that you'll find in his part of the Original Message) is, But then I suppose it means that

Re: Pentax needn't care about 300D

2003-08-21 Thread Cotty
Wonder if it will arrive in time for either the sprint triathlon or the seafood and pirate festival I help put on in September... Anyway, I will be active on the list (promises, promises), but it will have to wait. I am headed to Bristol race track in Tennesse on Friday afternoon. And through

RE: any news?

2003-08-21 Thread zoomshot
-Original Message- From: Frits Wuthrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 August 2003 16:07 To: Pentax-Discuss Subject: any news? I have been un-subscribed due to my move since 27 July. Is there any news since then? How about the *ist D ? Frits Official release date 29/08/12,

Re: Pentax needn't care about 300D

2003-08-21 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 15:50:02 +0100 Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jumping Jupiter! And the rest was totally unimportant. I laffed for few minutes straight. I am still chuckling... Cotty, you got me on this one... Boris _ C!!! . http://www.jeans.mts.ru

Re: New Toy

2003-08-21 Thread Ryan Charron
Hey David, Did it knock? It certainly couldn't ring the doorbell it's not tall enough. Perhaps a 1200mm f8 could ring the doorbell however? Maybe I should order one to find out. Na, I think a new car would be a better investment. Unsincerely, Ryan --- David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread Dan Scott
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 01:37 AM, William Robb wrote: Nikon has a more reasonable product turnover, they seem to have real technical improvements before the release a new camera. Pentax will probably chug along with the *ist D for a couple of years before releasing another digital SLR

Re: any news?

2003-08-21 Thread Mark Roberts
Frits Wuthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been un-subscribed due to my move since 27 July. Is there any news since then? How about the *ist D ? Oh, a bit :-) Supposed to be hitting the streets (in the U.S.) next month. Price of $1699 for camera body, $1899 with the 18-35 zoom. A few of us

Re: Way OT - Mid-life Crisis

2003-08-21 Thread Dan Scott
Hi Frank, I just read this (taking me awhile to catch up on my PDML). It's a bummer, especially having to temporarily move away from your kids. But hey, like you saidit's big opportunity, too (got to be better than ending up a flat, frozen popsicle). Hang in there. Dan On Thursday, August

SMC=A 200/4

2003-08-21 Thread Christian Skofteland
Anybody have this lens? I'm looking at buying one to replace my 200/4 M. Is it as good as the M? Stan's page has no comments for it. Please don't comment on the A* Macro or FA* Macro. They are way out of my league. Thanks! Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread Paul Stenquist
Mark Roberts wrote: I just (minutes ago) made a 12 x 18 inch print from one of my *ist-D shots from last weekend: Hi Mark, What was the dpi of that image at 12 x 18?

Re: any news?

2003-08-21 Thread Frits Wuthrich
Thanks Mark. Is that $1699 the street price? Thanks for posting the images, can't wait to hold a *ist D in my hands and try it out, including getting an enlargement. Frits On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 20:04, Mark Roberts wrote: Frits Wuthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been un-subscribed due

Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread Mark Roberts
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Roberts wrote: I just (minutes ago) made a 12 x 18 inch print from one of my *ist-D shots from last weekend: Hi Mark, What was the dpi of that image at 12 x 18? I assume you mean ppi (pixels per inch) output resolution? Since the *ist-D maximum

Re: A coincidence, I hope.

2003-08-21 Thread brooksdj
Hey, Anthony, H Knowing Aaron a bit, as I do, I doubt that he's 35 yet - could be, but I think he's younger. Agreed But, I realized that it wasn't him when I read about this fellow running two blocks. That's not the Aaron we all know! vbg

PDN article

2003-08-21 Thread Butch Black
Hi guys; There's an article on Schneider and his lost POY awards at PDN http://pdnonline.com He was the guy that spoke at GFM. Butch Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself. Hermann Hess (Demian)

Re: 300D

2003-08-21 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 4:56 AM Subject: Re: 300D A 20% markup would make it about 585. Bill, I might think I had died and gone to heaven. 20%? - I dream of 20% Around here mark ups on camera equipment

Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Alan Chan Subject: Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses) A couple of years seem a looong period for digital cameras. This is the company that kept the LX in the lineup for 20 years we are talking about. William

Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Dan Scott Subject: Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses) I wish mostly for Pentax to catch up with technologies already on the market, and (gasp) actually innovate once in awhile. Refinement of existing

Re: any news?

2003-08-21 Thread Cotty
Thanks for posting the images, can't wait to hold a *ist D in my hands and try it out, including getting an enlargement. Frits old boy, from what we've been reading here lately, you hold that *ist D in your hands and you'll definitely get an enlargement. :-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ ||

Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and PartialCoverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread cyberstudio
The higher level camera is harder to figure. Maybe not too different than the istD, but with a higher res sensor (a bigger sensor would require a whole new viewfinder system), full mechanical coupling, USB 2.0, and better firmware. Ciao, Graywolf

Re: SMC=A 200/4

2003-08-21 Thread Doug Franklin
Hi Christian, On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 14:39:09 -0400, Christian Skofteland wrote: Anybody have this lens? I'm looking at buying one to replace my 200/4 M. Is it as good as the M? I have the SMC-A 200/4, but I've never used the M version, so I can't offer a comparison. I've been very happy with

Re: PDN article

2003-08-21 Thread T Rittenhouse
And from my point of view he did nothing that changed the meaning of the photographs. Getting rid of a distracting background is a long long way from cloning in someone who wasn't there. I think this is all coming about because people are now buying digital cameras. Almost all of them come with

RE: SMC=A 200/4

2003-08-21 Thread Simon King
Hi Christian, I'm looking at buying one to replace my 200/4 M. Is this for *ist compatibility? I ask because that's what I'm doing at the moment. I wonder if the price of A glass will go up and M down? Cheers, Simon -Original Message- From: Doug Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SMC=A 200/4

2003-08-21 Thread Christian Skofteland
- Original Message - From: Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Christian, Is this for *ist compatibility? I ask because that's what I'm doing at the moment. I wonder if the price of A glass will go up and M down? Cheers, Simon Why yes it is! *ist-D to be more acurate. I'm

Re: Way OT - Mid-life Crisis

2003-08-21 Thread Dan Scott
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 01:04 PM, Dan Scott wrote: That was supposed to be off list. :-(

Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses)

2003-08-21 Thread Dan Scott
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 05:13 PM, William Robb wrote: Dan, they have been selling buggy whips to people who are too darned stubborn to buy into horseless carriages for about 15 years now. This is their market. William Robb Looking at my gear, I can see that's truebut even I'd be in

What pentax are you? (WAS: RE: *istD and the future)

2003-08-21 Thread Simon King
Cotty challenged... Now if I was a Pentax, what model would I be? Dare I say an ME super; Middle aged, still in good working order and enjoy a regular servicing? Simon PS There's a line in there about works best when lubricated, but I didn't want to go there... -Original Message-

test 2

2003-08-21 Thread William Robb
test 2

Re: SMC=A 200/4

2003-08-21 Thread Fred
I wonder if the price of A glass will go up and M down? I'm thinking that A prices will go up and Ms and Ks down. My thoughts, too. I know that I'm looking at some of my ol' pre-A lenses in a new light (so to speak - g). I've been lucky in one regard - Over a period of time now I've been

Re: PDN article

2003-08-21 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: T Rittenhouse Subject: Re: PDN article And from my point of view he did nothing that changed the meaning of the photographs. Getting rid of a distracting background is a long long way from cloning in someone who wasn't there. I think this is all coming

Re: test 2

2003-08-21 Thread Brendan
Did I pass? --- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: test 2 __ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

Re: test 2

2003-08-21 Thread William Robb
No, you failed test 1 William Robb - Original Message - From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:02 PM Subject: Re: test 2 Did I pass? --- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: test 2

Re: test 2

2003-08-21 Thread Brendan
:-( --- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, you failed test 1 William Robb - Original Message - From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:02 PM Subject: Re: test 2 Did I pass? --- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]

FS: (update) 35mm and 645 bodies and lens, etc.

2003-08-21 Thread Stan Halpin
Return privileges on everything. [Shipping cost via USPS Priority Mail will be added.] $10 SC-21 LX Finder screen, good condition. In box in (mismatched) case with tool and instructions. This one is the original that came in LXen - a ground glass field with a central small microprism grid. $15

*ist-D Brochure

2003-08-21 Thread Stan Halpin
Not sure how long it has been there, but Pentax USA now has a 4-page brochure on the D available as a .pdf from the website (to supplement the spec sheet that has been up for several days.) Detailed photos of camera controls, etc. Stan

Re: PDN article

2003-08-21 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Doug Franklin Subject: Re: PDN article On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 20:56:14 -0600, William Robb wrote: But where do you draw the line? Do you draw it at no editorializing? Just a bit? And who decides if the content has effectively changed? To me, that's the