Dear All,
As you might have guessed from the subject line (!), I
am a new member. I recently found this esteemed list
from a reference on DPReview.
I currently own a Canon 20D and am preparing to switch
to Pentax, either to a K100D or possibly the upcoming
K10D (not the K10D if it turns out to
Linda and Charlie's matchbook collection:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/matchbooks.html
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Brendan MacRae wrote:
Any good? I'm thinking of picking one up and selling
the Vivitar Series 1 105mm f2.5.
I'm concerned about it being a cheap plastic blob. Is
it?
-Brendan
It's actually a D-FA lens with aperture ring and full 35mm
compatibility. Lighter build than the FA version,
On Aug 18, 2006, at 6:45 AM, Bertil Holmberg wrote:
What I would appreciate in a new body is the alternative to look down
into the viewfinder. This is possible with the Pentax 67, I believe.
Yes, with the waist-level finder. The thing I like about the 67
viewfinder is that it's big; I
On Aug 18, 2006, at 3:35 AM, Cotty wrote:
I have done this from my first days with inkjet. I bought a Dahl
rotary
trimmer (cuts up to A3) for fifty quid in 1999 and haven't looked
back.
One of the best investments I ever made - and still going strong on
the
original blade!
I print
In a message dated 8/17/2006 9:58:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The rumoured prices are quite steep, though; $1000 for the 18-50, and $1300
for the 50-135. Still, that's only $3500 or so for a K10D, battery grip,
and both the f2.8 zooms; I was anticipating a
I haven't commented on others' PESOs for about a week, but I will soon and
try to catch up. With that in mind...
I went out yesterday to photograph a famous landmark, which I will show
later, and also ended up photographing this. I am probably the only one that
will
like it. :-)
I often find
Dear All,
As you might have guessed from the subject line (!), I
am a new member. I recently found this esteemed list
from a reference on DPReview.
Welcome Doug!
Once you have joined, you are doomed to never leave ;-).
Greetings from Finland,
Antti-Pekka
On Aug 18, 2006, at 1:35 AM, Steve Sharpe wrote:
It still amazes me that I can do a better print with my
computer/scanner/inkjet than any lab I've ever used.
It doesn't surprise me at all, but I am surprised that you have the
patience to do all that scanning :)
- Dave
--
PDML
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:03 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
When I showed, I always had someone else cut the mats -
anyone who has witnessed what a klutz I am would agree I should do
that.
I'm not too fond of cutting mats as there's very little room for
error. It'd be a lot easier with the right
On Aug 17, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Real Epson service call, in which I was apparently
the first person ever to require a replacement waste ink tank -- it
wasn't user changeable because they figured no one would fill one in
the lifetime of the printer. On all the new models
This kind of folding is very common in South Africa on the Karroo. There
is an exposed 'fold' called the Laingsburg Dyke that runs for hundreds
of miles. Many of the Cape mountains have folds fifty or more metres deep.
Don W
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't commented on others' PESOs for
Op Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:34:33 +0200 schreef Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Simple solution. Put on more shifts. :-)
No, three shifts already means the factory is running 24h/day. To further
expand capacity you would have to invest in more machines, coslty in both
time and money.
From: Digital
On 8/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I often find myself photographing the land, dirt, rock, etc., next to road
sides. Especially where it has been cut away or where the erosion from a
pervious cut away (maybe long before) has made interesting patterns. Okay, I
am weird
--
G'day Doug,
As a start check out Graywolf's min-FAQ to help get you up to speed on
some of the acronyms other stuff.
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
Others will let you know who to believe and who not to.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/18/06, Douglas Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/17/2006 11:57:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This kind of folding is very common in South Africa on the Karroo. There
is an exposed 'fold' called the Laingsburg Dyke that runs for hundreds
of miles. Many of the Cape mountains have folds fifty or more
On Aug 18, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
I'll cut the inner hole in the mat to fit the image, but I'll also cut
the outer edge of the mat to fit a standard frame size because the
non-standard frames are either terribly expensive or I have to make
them
myself, including cutting
Op Fri, 18 Aug 2006 07:09:28 +0200 schreef John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just someone who tracks the announcements a little more closely.
The original Pentax lens roadmap did, indeed, show a 50-200 zoom.
In fact it showed two of them; the 50-200/f4-5.6 we've now seen,
and a later, more
In a message dated 8/18/2006 12:03:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interesting texture. Personally I think the contrast could be bumped
up a bit to help bring out the ochre colour
Dave
===
Okey, dokey, we aim to please.
No, I am not a dirty girl. I am a woman.
Marnie
I'd give it a few months more to decide. If they are going to introduce USM
lenses it will be a logical explanation for why they have stopped producing a
lot of long lenses. They may be planning to revive them with USM.
DagT
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You know I am getting seriously tempted
Yesterday is the new tomorrow:
http://tinyurl.com/r4h3g
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/03/garden/03tintype.html?ei=5090en=d0e
da54f7c974c10ex=1312257600partner=rssuserlandemc=rsspagewanted=all
--
Cheers,
Bob
[...]
I'm also considering that I should learn some fine art
processes,
Tom,
If you don't care, why do you keep attacking Pentax? Why did you bother
to respond to my post?
You are truly the Nabob of Negativity when it comes to Pentax.
John
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:59:10 +0100, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey you ARE attacking me with words like that.
At 03:08 PM 18/08/2006, Marnie wrote:
In a message dated 8/18/2006 12:03:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interesting texture. Personally I think the contrast could be bumped
up a bit to help bring out the ochre colour
Dave
===
Okey, dokey, we aim to please.
No, I am
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/17 Thu PM 11:08:20 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Kodachrome processing: Ambiguous press release
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Kodachrome processing: Ambiguous press release
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:03:00 +0100, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd give it a few months more to decide. If they are going to introduce
USM lenses it will be a logical explanation for why they have stopped
producing a lot of long lenses. They may be planning to revive them
with USM.
I'm about to buy a new pc, probably based on the Athlon 64 dual processor
chip, and am wondering whether WMC offers any advantages over XP Pro.
Any thoughts?
John
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Anthony Farr wrote:
My Jobo Autolab just got put into storage for 3-4 months while our house is
completely stripped and renovated. When we return I'll have a very nice
indoor :-) workspace which will include my darkroom.
Uhhh, did you leave off he 0's?
Didn't you mean 30-40 months? g
Only
Fra: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:03:00 +0100, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd give it a few months more to decide. If they are going to introduce
USM lenses it will be a logical explanation for why they have stopped
producing a lot of long lenses. They
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/17/2006 9:58:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The rumoured prices are quite steep, though; $1000 for the 18-50, and $1300
for the 50-135. Still, that's only $3500 or so for a K10D, battery grip,
and
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Scott Loveless wrote:
You spelt honorable wrong.
6/3/05 and his last post was 6/21/05.
Wow, you have 21 months in America?
Don't you guys ever, like, sleep?
Kostas :-P
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
If the image circle is designed for APS-C, then the lenses will be smaller
and lighter than those designed for 35mm. So they WILL be small and
light, relatively speaking.
But, like you, I hope they have USM. We shall know in good time.
John
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:41:15 +0100, DagT [EMAIL
They will be smaller of you compare field of view (as a 135 2.8 is much smaller
than a 200mm 2.8), but if you compare with the same focal length with the same
maximum aperture the front element will be the same no matter how small the
sensor is.
DagT
Fra: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If
We're going cat-sitting (as if you could make a cat sit). Well,
really it's house-sitting but we'll be looking after the four
resident cats, and maybe even have a bit of a holiday as well.
Please don't work out the K10D mystery until after I get back :)
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 18/08/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even if they're not making a huge profit on this camera's apparent
popularity, they are putting people on the Pentax track. Many of them
will buy lenses. That will make them likely repeat customers. Lens
investment is a great thing if you're
Of course there will be bottom feeders as well. But there will be some
serious hobbyists as well. Tthe more cameras you sell, the more
loyalists you attract.
On Aug 18, 2006, at 6:30 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 18/08/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even if they're not
I actually managed to kill the paper feeds of two 2200s under warranty, so I
never ran into that problem -- they sent me new ones.
For the record, they were running about eight hours a day, seven days a week.
-Original Message-
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Printer
The house is expected to be handed back to us about 12th December, but in
any case after 18th Jan the penalty clauses are invoked and the builder
would have to pay us $300 per week past that date.
One of the joys of having an architect broker the contract :-)
Regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters
To: Pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 8:12 PM
Subject: When is it going to end?
When is the damned embargo due to end, I'm really sick of Aaron's sadistic
little game.
Also, how much do you think an *ist-D will go for once the new
On 18/08/06, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When is the damned embargo due to end, I'm really sick of Aaron's sadistic
little game.
:-)
Also, how much do you think an *ist-D will go for once the new camera is
announced?
A big SFA just like your GBs of CF cards
--
Rob Studdert
Whoa, easy cowboy! I don't see Aaron's posts as sadistic. He merely
wanted us to know there was something special coming. We turned it into
a game. And we know more now than we did a week ago.
I expect that a good *istD will be worth $400 to $500 after the
announcement, which is pretty close
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When is the damned embargo due to end, I'm really sick of Aaron's sadistic
little game.
Some says 12. september, others say 13. September or 14 September or even
15. September. Mis september seem pretty certain.
Pål
--
Just guess it. Some of us has.
Otherwise the game will not end before the specifications of the K10D are
finally revealed by Pentax.
I thought it was quite entertaining and fun - one of the best threads in a
long time. So many creative answers!
Afterall, ir's not that many features that will make
- Original Message -
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd give it a few months more to decide. If they are going to introduce
USM lenses it will be a logical explanation for why they have stopped
producing a lot of long lenses. They may be planning to revive them with
USM.
Oficial date is Sept 14
Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
cbwaters
Sent: 18 August 2006 12:29
To: Pdml@pdml.net
Subject: When is it going to end?
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters
To: Pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday,
- Original Message -
From: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I believe the 'more expensive' one from the first roadmap transmogrified
into the 60-250/4 rumour. The constant f/4 was never in the roadmap, it
was only referred to as 'high performance D FA telezoom', IIRC. Someone on
So how do you explain the fact that a Pentax 110 1:2.8 50mm is about 1/4
the size of a Pentax 1:2.8 50mm in K-mount?
John
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:35:13 +0100, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They will be smaller of you compare field of view (as a 135 2.8 is much
smaller than a 200mm 2.8),
Brendan MacRae wrote:
RIP Kodachrome 1935 - 2006. What a run...
Of course, I need to remind all of you that I've been
hearing about Kodachrome's final demise for about 20
years. In fact, I remember that in 1992 when I was in
film school, Kodak had announced (as they did
virtually every quarter)
Bill Lawlor wrote:
I'll be coming over to digital when the K10D hits the market. Does anyone on
the list have an opinion about the Russian Zenitar 16mm/2.8 lens for
digital, or 35mm, format?
Great fun lens. Well-built. Escellent value for money.
As Bob Walkden, I believe, once said about a lens,
Yes and no - I do not have a Pentax MF (yet), but I do have two Pentacon Six
TL's and a number of great lenses (Schnieder, Zeiss).
And I just won (ebay) two Voigtländer Perkeo 1, 6x6 folding cameras - for
on the road :-)
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype:
Can I buy your *istD for SFA? ;-)
That's all there is in the kitty now the builders are moving in.
Regards,
Anthony Farr
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Digital
Image Studio
Sent: Friday, 18 August 2006 9:46 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss
Do we?
Dave
On 8/18/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And we know more now than we did a week ago.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
cbwaters wrote:
how much do you think an *ist-D will go for once the new camera is
announced?
I don't know: I'm not gonna sell mine!
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The size of the mirror, or in other words: the distance from the lens mount to
the film/sensor, does play a part in shorter lenses, but the width stays the
same. Remember that aperture is simply the ratio between focal length and lens
diameter. As long as you dont have retrofocus or telecentric
David Mann wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
[...] mat to fit a standard frame size because the non-
standard frames are either terribly expensive or I have
to make them myself, including cutting the glass.
Cutting the glass is the best part :) Just make sure
Our extensions should be finished about then too and, yes, there will be an
improved darkroom/laundry. I've only got a CPP though.
We also went with an architect which has been the best move ever. So much
less stress as he deals with the builder when things go wrong.
Regards,
Paul Ewins
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the image circle is designed for APS-C, then the lenses will be smaller
and lighter than those designed for 35mm. So they WILL be small and
light, relatively speaking.
According to the roadmap the two 2.8 zooms are
On Aug 17, 2006, at 8:56 PM, Bill Lawlor wrote:
I'll be coming over to digital when the K10D hits the market. Does
anyone on
the list have an opinion about the Russian Zenitar 16mm/2.8 lens for
digital, or 35mm, format?
I have one and use it on my Canon 10D via adapter. Of course it is
On 8/18/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'vejust been looking around the Kodak web site
(http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/prodSupportIndex.jhtml)
Under the Films heading there's a listing for Color Transparency
Films: E-Family (Ektachrome) but nothing for the K
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:17 PM, David Mann wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 6:45 AM, Bertil Holmberg wrote:
What I would appreciate in a new body is the alternative to look down
into the viewfinder. This is possible with the Pentax 67, I believe.
Yes, with the waist-level finder. The thing I like
Douglas Newman wrote:
Dear All,
ARRHHH! ANOTHER DOUG!
OK, list god is Doug Brewer, so by positional preference and imperial
fief, he gets just plain old Doug. I staked a claim on DougF years
ago. I've started calling up the militia in case I have to defend the
borders.
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 18/08/06, Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wick! That's the term I couldn't remember. Thanks
Doug. Very fine explanation. You'd think I could
remember that since my wife is a print production
manager.
The effect is generically known as dot gain in the
The 820 clogs on a regular basis. It's used erratically, but isn't idle
for any extended periods.
In the 'prox four years I've owned it, the printing speed has slowed by
about 50%. Still produces surprisingly good images.
Time to replace it, however, with another Epson. Something with 11x16
We also went with an architect which has been the best move ever
Glad to hear this. Motre people should do likewise.
Regards
Jens Bladt, architect m.a.a.
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Paul
Ewins
Sendt: 18.
Marnie,
I enjoy looking it over and thinking of it as, maybe, a topography shot
from a U-2.
I'd mess with saturating various colors and let the results determine a
'winner'. Perhaps a little too homogeneous as is.(?)
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't commented on others' PESOs for
Kodak has announced that they will stop developing Kodachrome 40 (as they
have already stoped producing it).
The last chance of getting a Kodachrome Super 8 film deveolped in Lausanne
is sometime next month.
http://www.super8site.com says:
Wie lange können K40-Super-8-Filme in Lausanne noch
Anthony Farr wrote:
My point is that the profile needs to be applied before the data enters the
digital domain, early in the a/d conversion. It needn't matter that the
voltage rise is squared (if that's what you mean) as the brightness rises,
as long as it's a constant and predictable
In a message dated 8/18/2006 6:24:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,
I enjoy looking it over and thinking of it as, maybe, a topography shot
from a U-2.
I'd mess with saturating various colors and let the results determine a
'winner'. Perhaps a little too homogeneous
.-)
We did that when we extended our appartment into the attic, and the architect
saved us more money than we paid him. A good deal for everyone except the
people who tried to fool us. I like the phrase No, it is already in the
contract, you cannot send that extra bill. .-)
DagT
Fra:
Yes.
-- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do we?
Dave
On 8/18/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And we know more now than we did a week ago.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Aug 18, 2006, at 5:59 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
The 820 clogs on a regular basis. It's used erratically, but isn't
idle
for any extended periods.
In the 'prox four years I've owned it, the printing speed has
slowed by
about 50%. Still produces surprisingly good images.
Time to replace
Thanks to those who have discussed telephotos. Since that is MY interest.
Beginning to think about selling some Canon gear. Beginning to feel more
Pentaxian again.
Exciting times.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I wrote:
According to the roadmap the two 2.8 zooms are covering the APS size; they
are DA lenses. The 60-250/4 is a D FA lens and hence full frame. You can bet
that the coming telephotos are full frame too as it makes no sense making
them DA lenses.
REPLY:
I'm talking about the roadmap
Oh. I see. Why?
Regards,
Anthony Farr
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ryan
Brooks
Sent: Friday, 18 August 2006 11:37 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Tonal gradation in shadows - The $67 Question?
Anthony Farr
In a message dated 8/13/2006 9:17:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rest easy Ann. The St. Claire Hotel (now a Best Western Inn) is alive
and well on Chicago's Ohio Street. Shot it this morning on my way to
breakfast. No room to shoot on the narrow street, so I used the
In a message dated 8/14/2006 1:38:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Comments appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Kenneth Waller
Whoa! Really, really nice. It does now look a little oversaturated to
In a message dated 8/16/2006 8:42:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I won the Detroit News Photo Contest for week 8 in the landmarks category.
This is the same contest that Ken Waller won a few weeks ago. I learned of the
contest through Ken's post. My winning entry is the
In a message dated 8/14/2006 2:39:41 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Guys n Gals,
Hmmm, I haven't posted anything for a while, but I've been digging
through photos taken over the summer. So here is one of them. Taken at
round 6 of the British Super Bikes at Mallory Park in
In a message dated 8/13/2006 10:36:41 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.mindspring.com/~megazip/PESO_--_natureneedsacrutch.html
Folding Beach Chair$25.00 at Job Lot.
Aluminum Side Table $59.95 at IKEA.
Sunburst Ornament $21.99 at Pier One.
Crutch to keep
Cool.
Dave
On 8/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes.
-- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do we?
Dave
On 8/18/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And we know more now than we did a week ago.
--
Ditto. I like it too. And ditto what Paul said, re sharpening. I like
backlight nature stuff, and I like the teeny weeny spider thread on this one
too.
Adds something.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
==
I like this. Nice composition, and the lighting works. It feels a little
crispy. Perhaps
Thanks Marnie.
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 8/16/2006 8:42:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I won the Detroit News Photo Contest for week 8 in the landmarks category.
This is the same contest that
In a message dated 8/17/2006 11:14:17 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linda and Charlie's matchbook collection:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/matchbooks.html
Shel
==
I'd like it better with less shine, Shel. So I guess I mean less reflection
or direct lighting
Anthony Farr wrote:
Oh. I see. Why?
Because, you've obviously figure out something that electrical engineers
and physicists have missed for 20 years. Congrats!
-Ryan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 8/15/2006 3:09:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ahh! Short back and sides, like? Here it is once more, cropped more at
the top, a little from the right, with the brightness pulled down a
bit in curves.
Anthony Farr wrote:
The house is expected to be handed back to us about 12th December, but in
any case after 18th Jan the penalty clauses are invoked and the builder
would have to pay us $300 per week past that date.
One of the joys of having an architect broker the contract :-)
Regards,
Valued comments.
Thanks, Godfrey
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 5:59 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
The 820 clogs on a regular basis. It's used erratically, but isn't
idle
for any extended periods.
In the 'prox four years I've owned it, the printing speed
On 18/08/06, Anthony Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I buy your *istD for SFA? ;-)
That's all there is in the kitty now the builders are moving in.
No, maybe finally I'll have a back-up body of sorts. :-/
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL
When my wife pointed out the architect's fee to manage the building
contract, and questioned its necessity, I asked her just how much more than
that fee a builder might gouge out of us once the back of the house was torn
out and we were dependent upon him. We retained the architect without any
Thanks, Marnie,
I look at this image and honestly try to find evidence of over
sharpening. Maybe I just don't know what I'm looking for.
The horns are lined with hair like fuzz and tiny water droplets emit
needle sharp 'stars', but I can't detect any grainy edges or pixelation
in finer threads
In a message dated 8/18/2006 8:02:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks, Marnie,
I look at this image and honestly try to find evidence of over
sharpening. Maybe I just don't know what I'm looking for.
The horns are lined with hair like fuzz and tiny water droplets emit
Paul, Congratulations!!!
On Aug 16, 2006, at 11:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I won the Detroit News Photo Contest for week 8 in the landmarks
category. This is the same contest that Ken Waller won a few weeks
ago. I learned of the contest through Ken's post. My winning entry
is the
get XP pro unless you're trying to tie your new PC to your
entertainment center.
On 8/18/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm about to buy a new pc, probably based on the Athlon 64 dual processor
chip, and am wondering whether WMC offers any advantages over XP Pro.
Any thoughts?
Right, Adam. I just left off the FA Part. I won't buy
a lens without a f-stop ring since I shoot a great
deal in Aperture Priority. I just don't want a plastic
lens that's going to break the first time it's used.
-Brendan
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
Any good?
Not at all. In fact I don't know the working of an a/d converter beyond
that they take a stream of voltage readouts from the sensor and perform some
voodoo ceremony upon it, whereupon the voltage levels at each photosite are
assigned brightness levels of 0 - 255 for 8 bit files, or 0 - 4095 for
Thanks to everyone, BTW, for their help and input.
I've been reading all of these just not replying to
all.
-Brendan
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 5:59 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
The 820 clogs on a regular basis. It's used
erratically, but isn't
idle
I've gone through several Epson printers over the years and here are
some observations:
- The pro models tend to clog less than the consumer models ---
it could just mean that the pigment-based inks clog less than the dye-
based ink. My 2200 *might* clog if I leave it turned off for a month.
Which is why I try to stay out of the more techno
threads. They make my head hurt.
I'm better at, say, that's a nice shot, or muy
stinko, compadre.
-Brendan
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 18/08/06, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wick!
Oh, absolutely. Kodak has wanted to kill Kodachrome
for a lng time now.
One less albatross.
-Brendan
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
RIP Kodachrome 1935 - 2006. What a run...
Of course, I need to remind all of you that I've
been
hearing about
Me like.
I especially like the one that says, Class Is a Clean
Truck.
LOL,
Brendan
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linda and Charlie's matchbook collection:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/matchbooks.html
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
D'oh, I'm apparently receiving posts out of order. After sending this
please explain to Ryan, THEN I find his references in my inbox. No wonder
his response seemed a little sharp.
Sorry Ryan, I'll go and get my explanations from those links now.
Regards,
Anthony Farr
-Original
1 - 100 of 276 matches
Mail list logo
