Well, I finally have been able to secure a nice long Pentax telephoto
lens. The FA*250-600mm/f5.6 zoom!
I had been dreaming about the FA*600/4 ever since I started shooting
birds, but a good guy who lives in my region just happened to put
this fine lens up for sale since he wasn't shooting
So it does, William.
I'm not sure if this is normal or caused by the scratches, though.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af William
Robb
Sendt:
Nice photographs and event, Dario. Thanks for sharing.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Dario
Bonazza
Sendt: 16. marts 2007 14:55
Til:
Jay,
I decided that I might as well go for it and if it didn't work out I
could always sell it. Even though f5.6 is not as fast as I would
prefer and a zoom would not be as sharp as a prime, I figured the
flexibility of having the wide zoom range could come in handy and the
chances
like any other lens, its probably normal to be very
slightly softer wide open, which is what I see based
on those two photos. I doubt those very few scratch
marks are making the difference...
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jens Bladt
Nice shot, although a little crispy looking. Perhaps oversharpened a
bit? John Francis gets great results with this lens on his *istD.
Paul
On Mar 24, 2007, at 4:04 AM, Jay Taylor wrote:
Well, I finally have been able to secure a nice long Pentax telephoto
lens. The FA*250-600mm/f5.6 zoom!
I
Nice one. The moody light, fog and silhouetted bicyclist combine well
here. Good work.
Paul
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Pentaxians
this PESO and 11 more, some new ones, made it to the Pentax
Gallery today
an extremly low water level on the river Sihl and a bike :-)
Hi Boris,
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 06:43:52 +0200, Boris Liberman wrote:
Godfrey, this time I am thinking more about a reduced circle lens, such
as Tamron 18-200, or 18-250 or even Sigma 18-200...
I bought the Tamron 18-200 over a year ago, but have hardly
used it. It's auto-focus did not work very
My count is 26. If you refresh my page, you'll get a different count
every time. It dies on a file that has been apparently corrupted when
they uploaded it. I've told them several times. I suppose they'll
correct it eventually. Not important. But my point is that the
gallery is still very
Hi Jay,
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 01:04:00 -0700, Jay Taylor wrote:
Well, I finally have been able to secure a nice long Pentax telephoto
lens. The FA*250-600mm/f5.6 zoom!
Congrats, very nice find!
Even though f5.6 is not as fast as I would prefer
Right, I think the 5.6 is to slow to make it
Jay Taylor wrote:
Well, I finally have been able to secure a nice long Pentax telephoto
lens. The FA*250-600mm/f5.6 zoom!
Nice lens! You'll have a blast with it.
Oh yeah, this puppy is pretty heavy. I'm hoping my tripod (Benro
1327) is stout enough as well as the Wimberley Sidekick
In addition, Marnie first thought they were windmills, which they were but
only in _her_ mind.
Glad you liked the shot, Ann, and thanks for jumping in and saving me from
additional typing LOL
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/silos.html
Shel
[Original Message]
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL
Congratulations. Mega enablement indeed.
Be sure to show us more pictures. The one you showed is very good indeed.
Boris
Jay Taylor wrote:
Well, I finally have been able to secure a nice long Pentax telephoto
lens. The FA*250-600mm/f5.6 zoom!
I had been dreaming about the FA*600/4 ever
On Mar 24, 2007, at 5:27 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
[... ultra zooms ...]
It WOULD be a great one-lens solution for traveling, but
sofar I have always chickened out on really using it in
favor of better quality ones (often the limited primes :-)
Exactly ... I fantasize about having a one lens,
Thibouille wrote:
** First the pics:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2007/03/22/5892.html
*Note the *working* 645D. Note also that the little huh button? (not
the correct word I know) to open memory card door id the same as the
K10D. I suppose it would mean the 645D will have the
This is what I awoke to this AM in my backyard. Color or BW??
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/SpringSunriseweb.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/SpringSunrisewebBW.jpg
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Just took a look on Boz site to see what that looked like. Quite the
monster!
Enjoy it. :-)
If you don't mind my asking, what does something like that cost these
days?
Godfrey
On Mar 24, 2007, at 1:04 AM, Jay Taylor wrote:
Well, I finally have been able to secure a nice long Pentax
Last Sunday Marnie and I took a drive to Napa, and as you may know from
some of her posted pics, we came across this old, abandoned train station.
It's interesting to note - at least for me, anyway - that I photographed
this very same station on my first ever trip to Napa in 1968. I'm sure
that
Jay, I cannot access the link. All I get is Forbidden. Strange, as others
seemingly have been able to see it.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
10 cornia's, 1 kidney half a liver.
Cheers,
Dave
On 3/24/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just took a look on Boz site to see what that looked like. Quite the
monster!
Enjoy it. :-)
If you don't mind my asking, what does something like that cost these
days?
Godfrey
On
It would be nice if the convenient option would also be amongst your best
lenses ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Exactly ... I fantasize about having a one lens, minimum weight/size
kit for traveling convenience, but when it comes down to going on a
trip, I always
Delightful. Definitely color, perhaps a wee bit brighter in the
midrange. A push up on the middle of the rgb curve would give you
that. Would a tiny bit of counterclockwise rotation help here? Not
sure.
Paul
On Mar 24, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
This is what I awoke to this AM
Any info on size, weight, sensor?
I like the idea that there appears to be two tripod mounts - bottom and
side. Or am I mistaken on that?
Shel
** First the pics:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2007/03/22/5892.html
*Note the *working* 645D.
Jay,
I'm told I'm forbidden to view the link.
Rick
--- Jay Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I finally have been able to secure a nice long
Pentax telephoto
lens. The FA*250-600mm/f5.6 zoom!
I had been dreaming about the FA*600/4 ever since I
started shooting
birds, but a good
Size and weight are more or less like the film version.
Kodak 31-megapixel sensor. Compare sensor size with the one of the K10D:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/parts/image_for_link/86843-5892-9-1.html
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
lol ... Well, if I decide that I can take just one lens like I often
did with the Hasselblad 903SWC, it was definitely also my best lens
and pretty convenient... ;-)
G
On Mar 24, 2007, at 7:55 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It would be nice if the convenient option would also be amongst
your
Works for me.
Nice picture Jay.
Cheers,
Dave
On 3/24/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay,
I'm told I'm forbidden to view the link.
Rick
--- Jay Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I finally have been able to secure a nice long
Pentax telephoto
lens. The
Delightful. Definitely color, perhaps a wee bit brighter in the midrange. A
push up on the middle of the rgb curve would give you that. Would a tiny bit
of counterclockwise rotation help here? Not sure.
Paul
Thanks Paul.. I will try the suggestions. Of course a lot is always lost in
a web
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I like the idea that there appears to be two tripod mounts - bottom and
side. Or am I mistaken on that?
Yep two tripod mounts. If you put a QR plate on each one, it makes
flipping between vertical and horizontal very easy and maintains the
balance on the tripod. The
I think we discussed this at some point in the past month. Based on
Pentax releasing a new D-FA 55 mm lens, it looks like it will be a
1.2x crop on 645 format, which means the current lens range would
need to be extended by one more wide to achieve the same maximum FoV
as the Pentax 645
Hi,
So, about what are the dimensions of the 645 and about how much does it
weigh? How big is it compared to a K10D?
I wish I had a pay grade for the 645D to be outside of LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
I think we discussed this at some point in the past month. Based
Me too. not available on this server.(?)
Jack
--- Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay,
I'm told I'm forbidden to view the link.
Rick
--- Jay Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I finally have been able to secure a nice long
Pentax telephoto
lens. The FA*250-600mm/f5.6
- Original Message -
From: Christian
Subject: Re: Mega-Enablement: FA*250-600/5.6
I just found out how expensive these long lenses are... The lens itself
is pricey, but then you need some pretty expensive accessories (gimbal
mounts, etc) if you don't already have them!
When I
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: SMC-K 4/45-125mm
So it does, William.
I'm not sure if this is normal or caused by the scratches, though.
Regards
It's an older lens, from a time when designs weren't quite as good. I'd bet
its pretty normal. Unless the front
Does anyone know anything about this lens. It is a big mirror lens.A
local person has one for sale in brand new shape with case,Pentax
mount ? Thanks Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The lens seems to be very good on digital.
Jay Taylor wrote:
Well, I finally have been able to secure a nice long Pentax telephoto
lens. The FA*250-600mm/f5.6 zoom!
I had been dreaming about the FA*600/4 ever since I started shooting
birds, but a good guy who lives in my region just
Snap judgment, it works better in color.
Walter Hamler wrote:
This is what I awoke to this AM in my backyard. Color or BW??
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/SpringSunriseweb.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/SpringSunrisewebBW.jpg
Walt
--
Entropy
In a message dated 3/23/2007 12:13:43 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/forever.htm
Marnie, that's an awesome photo! It doesn't have a single focal point
or main subject. No compositional elements at
Thanks to Cotty for the link to renamer4mac. It works just like
ckremname on my PC, except
for 1 small extra step. No big deal.
Now, if i can find a mad4mac web page maker. I tried iview last fall
but wasn't to fond of it. Mind you it was a version for the PC.
Anyone have something i they use,
Here's a page of specifications:
http://www.floatograph.com/645v.html
It's bigger than a K10D by a healthy bit, but not so big as to be
unmanageable for hand held shooting. Kind of a lot to carry around
much, however.
Godfrey
On Mar 24, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi,
In a message dated 3/23/2007 1:35:07 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That works well, but I would prefer it to have less blur in the
foreground. Martin Scorsese often uses the effect of filling the
entire frame with a single colour - he did it very effectively with
red
In a message dated 3/24/2007 8:51:28 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's a page of specifications:
http://www.floatograph.com/645v.html
It's bigger than a K10D by a healthy bit, but not so big as to be
unmanageable for hand held shooting. Kind of a lot to carry
DREAMI'd buy the digital version in a heartbeat/DREAM
That's what happens when you're in an active REM state LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Here's a page of specifications:
http://www.floatograph.com/645v.html
It's bigger than a K10D by a healthy bit, but not so
Dave -
You might look at JAlbum. There is a version compiled for Windows only
and a cross-platform version that requires Java...and it's free.
http://jalbum.net/
Paul
David J Brooks wrote:
Thanks to Cotty for the link to renamer4mac. It works just like
ckremname on my PC, except
for 1
Very nice subject composition although I agree with Paul - it does have an
extra crispy look to it.
FWIW I have a used Gitzo 1410 tripod for sale, that I've used with my 600mm
FA - it'll handle all the 35 mm stuff you can put on it medium/large
format gear to boot. If interested contact me
Very nice subject composition, but I find the blank sky a real distraction
for me.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO:low water level
Nice one. The moody light, fog and silhouetted bicyclist combine well
here. Good work.
I just found out how expensive these long lenses are... The lens itself
is pricey, but then you need some pretty expensive accessories (gimbal
mounts, etc) if you don't already have them!
Same here!
I spent almost another third of the cost of my new 600mm FA on tripod, head
backpack
Honestly Walter, neither one work for me. They both make nice scenes but my
eyes keep wandering around looking for something to concentrate on.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Spring Morning
This is what I awoke to this AM in
Nice work Shel.
I like them both for the simple graphic nature color. Both have the look
of crafted images.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Napa Train Station
Last Sunday Marnie and I took a drive to Napa, and as you may
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like the idea that there appears to be two tripod mounts - bottom and
side. Or am I mistaken on that?
You're not mistaken - Pentax has done that with the 645 ever since the
original version of 1984. Very useful.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hi Ken,
Thanks for looking and for your comments.
What do you mean by crafted images?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Kenneth Waller
Nice work Shel.
I like them both for the simple graphic nature color.
Both have the look of crafted images.
- Original Message -
From: Shel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/forever.htm
Marnie, that's an awesome photo! It doesn't have a single focal
point or main subject. No compositional elements at all, really.
It just *is*. Zen
There were some problems with my images in that the description were mixed
up for several of them I advised Carolyn she acknowledged they were
working on that. In a day or two all was fine.
My page show 44 images they all show. Most are in landscape wildlife.
I only wish they'd supply
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:46:13 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
My count is 26. If you refresh my page, you'll get a different count
every time. It dies on a file that has been apparently corrupted when
they uploaded it.
Hmm, corrupted in their database you mean ?
You may be able to
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Just took a look on Boz site to see what that looked like. Quite the
monster!
Enjoy it. :-)
If you don't mind my asking, what does something like that cost these
days?
Godfrey
Godfrey,
I actually managed to hang onto both my kidneys for the time being.
But I
In a message dated 3/24/2007 10:09:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm a great believer in what I'd call the Blink
(http://www.gladwell.com/blink/) theory of photo interpretation: An
immediate first impression of wow means a lot more than all the
analysis,
In a message dated 3/24/2007 9:50:04 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Honestly Walter, neither one work for me. They both make nice scenes but my
eyes keep wandering around looking for something to concentrate on.
Kenneth Waller
==
What he said.
Marnie aka Doe
Walter Hamler wrote:
Jay, I cannot access the link. All I get is Forbidden. Strange,
as others
seemingly have been able to see it.
Walter,
Not sure why you can't connect to the link, but here is the address
to my PBase site where you can view it:
What do you mean by crafted images?
IMO - Crafted image = a well thought out, planned executed image, more
than a mere photo; the work of an educated photographer taking the time to
consider all the parameters.
the effects on the final image.
It a term I've come to appreciate am just
Walter,
Not sure why you can't connect to the link, but here is the address to my
PBase site where you can view it:
That's better! Thanks Jay.
They all look great to me, especially the woodpecker. That will be a nice
addition to the lens stable.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Just took a look on Boz site to see what that looked like. Quite the
monster!
Enjoy it. :-)
If you don't mind my asking, what does something like that cost these
days?
Godfrey
Godfrey,
I actually managed to hang onto both my kidneys for the time being.
But I
Shel,
I really like both of these. Especially the tonal
range in the wider shot. There's horizontal, vertical
and oblique angles everywhere but the framing seems to
contain everything without it looking busy.
-Brendan
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last Sunday Marnie and I took a
Help!
My USB ports have pretty much stopped working. The only device they'll
recognize is my old Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer.
It start a couple nights ago, when the computer pretty much froze while I
was trying to shut it down. I had to shut it down by holding down the power
button til
In a message dated 3/24/2007 10:50:46 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My USB ports have pretty much stopped working. The only device they'll
recognize is my old Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer.
It start a couple nights ago, when the computer pretty much froze while I
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:21:03AM -0700, Jay Taylor wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Just took a look on Boz site to see what that looked like. Quite the
monster!
Enjoy it. :-)
If you don't mind my asking, what does something like that cost these
days?
Godfrey
Godfrey,
I
I've never seen one, it's considered a cult classic. It's supposed to
be close focusing, sharp and contrast for a mirror tele. IIRC the lens
mount isn't interchangeable so it will only work on the camera it's made
for. (I don't know that last part for sure however).
You can read a bit about
John Celio wrote:
What version of windows are you using?
Help!
My USB ports have pretty much stopped working. The only device they'll
recognize is my old Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer.
It start a couple nights ago, when the computer pretty much froze while I
was trying to shut it down.
Thanks so much. So glad you enjoyed the pics.
Shel
Why in Hell should I have to Press 1 for English?!!!
[Original Message]
From: Brendan MacRae
I really like both of these. Especially the tonal
range in the wider shot. There's horizontal, vertical
and oblique angles everywhere but the
There are times that I have wished for a larger format than 35mm and even
the formats on 120/220 film. For whatever reason - and the reasons varied
at different times - I could not see getting and using a large format
camera, even a small large format camera, like a 4x5. With the possible
coming
I'm coming to appreciate the term as well. It's certainly sounds more
appealing than Nice capture or Good grab.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Kenneth Waller
What do you mean by crafted images?
IMO - Crafted image = a well thought out, planned executed
image, more than a mere photo;
Heck when I recommend reading maybe I should actually read it. The lens
uses a T mount so it should fit any camera.
Lets correct some English shall we. contrast should be contrasty
You can read a bit about the *Sigma 500mm f4.0 Ultratell* at Monaghans
3rd party 35mm lens megasite.
The
That link works! Very nice. I wonder--does the shake
reduction let you shoot hand-held, or is the lens just
too heavy?
Rick
--- Jay Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walter Hamler wrote:
Jay, I cannot access the link. All I get is
Forbidden. Strange,
as others
seemingly have been
What version of windows are you using?
XP Pro on an Alienware laptop (about three and a half years old now)
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
First I would suspect your USB card inside your computer has worked loose
a
bit. But then I don't know if you have a USB card. But cards can work
loose
and cause major problems.
I forgot to mention my computer is a laptop, so the USB ports (I believe)
are connected directly to the
I have been using this MZ-30 camera (now its obsolete) of course since long. It
started giving some message on its LCD when I switch it on. It shows me the
message Av-- and keeps blinking, nothing happens, i cannot see any other
message and cannot click the shutter button.
If you need more
In a message dated 3/24/2007 11:46:58 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tried that. Tried three days, five days, and a week back, but every time it
came back saying System restore unsucessfull, no changes were made to your
system between that date and now. The only
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:30:08AM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
There are times that I have wished for a larger format than 35mm and even
the formats on 120/220 film. For whatever reason - and the reasons varied
at different times - I could not see getting and using a large format
camera,
John Celio wrote:
First I would suspect your USB card inside your computer has worked loose
a
bit. But then I don't know if you have a USB card. But cards can work
loose
and cause major problems.
I forgot to mention my computer is a laptop, so the USB ports (I believe)
are
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:48:33AM -0700, Siddheshwar Lohar wrote:
I have been using this MZ-30 camera (now its obsolete) of course since long.
It started giving some message on its LCD when I switch it on. It shows me
the message Av-- and keeps blinking, nothing happens, i cannot see any
On 3/24/07, Siddheshwar Lohar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using this MZ-30 camera (now its obsolete) of course since long.
It started giving some message on its LCD when I switch it on. It shows me
the message Av-- and keeps blinking, nothing happens, i cannot see any other
message
Siddheshwar Lohar escribió:
I have been using this MZ-30 camera (now its obsolete) of course since long.
It started giving some message on its LCD when I switch it on. It shows me
the message Av-- and keeps blinking, nothing happens, i cannot see any other
message and cannot click the
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:39:17AM -0700, Rick Womer wrote:
That link works! Very nice. I wonder--does the shake
reduction let you shoot hand-held, or is the lens just
too heavy?
I'd never consider trying to use that lens hand-held; it's
just too heavy (and too unwieldy). But I'd expect the
Hi,
has anybody tried one of these yet?
http://www.zeroimage.com/web2003/EntryPage/entryFrameset.htm
They sell them (next to the Holgas, Lomos and Leicas) at the
Photographers' Gallery in London, and they're not at all expensive.
I'm tempted by the 4x5 version.
--
Regards,
Bob
--
PDML
Nice lens that.
The barrel looks strangely flat, as if it's a piece of cardboard or
something.
The picture are nicely taken - well crafted, as someone said - and
convey a sense of emptiness well. However, the station doesn't feel
abandoned to me. It looks as though perhaps it's maintained as a
Fri Mar 23 15:32:09 EDT 2007
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mar 23, 2007, at 12:11 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Eactivist at aol.com wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/forever.htm
Marnie, that's an awesome photo! It doesn't have a single focal point
or main subject. No
Rick Wormer wrote:
That link works! Very nice. I wonder--does the shake
reduction let you shoot hand-held, or is the lens just
too heavy?
Rick
Rick,
I'm a pretty big guy with decent size arms. I tried it once, but it
started wearing on me after just a few shots. I haven't tried it with
A friend of mine in Lost Angeles has one of them and was working with
it a couple of years ago. I think it's the same camera. His was the
120 film version with the very short lens. Produces some beautiful
stuff.
Godfrey
On Mar 24, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Bob W wrote:
Hi,
has anybody tried
So i played around again to day. Rainy and sty so what better thing to do.:-)
Snag still when setting the epson profiles, then i realized i had not
unzipped the profiles i downloaded during installation, they were
still on the desktop.
All i was getting was epson rgb etc.
Using those and
On Mar 24, 2007, at 7:51 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Last Sunday Marnie and I took a drive to Napa, and as you may know
from
some of her posted pics, we came across this old, abandoned train
station.
It's interesting to note - at least for me, anyway - that I
photographed
this very
Don't fell to bad, our helicopter hit our boat, so we're down to 3
guys in the army, if they don't call in sick.
On 3/19/07, Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I realized that since I joined back I haven't really posted any
photos. Anyway some favorites from a recently concluded
On Mar 21, 2007, at 7:41 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/IMGP5086w2.jpg
Thank everybody who looked at the image!
Many more thanks for the kind words
(unfortunately - almost no real critique ...).
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Mar 24, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Jay Taylor wrote:
If you don't mind my asking, what does something like that cost these
days?
I actually managed to hang onto both my kidneys for the time being.
But I did have to sell off my Tokina 400 AT-X, Pentax FA 50/1.4,
Pentax K 500/4.5 and 645K adapter
Nice. What Ken said.
On Mar 24, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
What do you mean by crafted images?
IMO - Crafted image = a well thought out, planned executed
image, more
than a mere photo; the work of an educated photographer taking the
time to
consider all the parameters.
Speaking of mega-enablement:
I'm looking for an FA*300/2.8
Just in case anyone knows of or finds one for sale.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Mar 24, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/IMGP5086w2.jpg
Thank everybody who looked at the image!
Many more thanks for the kind words
(unfortunately - almost no real critique ...).
Well, what sort of real critique were you looking for?
- There's
The 2400 will print on premium luster (along with velvet fine art, my
favorite Epson paper) or premium semigloss with no bronzing. You
might see a bit of bronzing on premium glossy.
Paul
On Mar 24, 2007, at 3:54 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
So i played around again to day. Rainy and sty so what
XP pro does a pretty good job of handling USB. Unlike some earlier
versions of Windows. It may well be a hardware problem.
John Celio wrote:
What version of windows are you using?
XP Pro on an Alienware laptop (about three and a half years old now)
John
--
John Celio wrote:
First I would suspect your USB card inside your computer has worked loose
a
bit. But then I don't know if you have a USB card. But cards can work
loose
and cause major problems.
I forgot to mention my computer is a laptop, so the USB ports (I believe)
are connected
Mark,
You are probably aware that BH presumably accepting orders, but
just in case:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=SearchA=detailsQ=sku=7is=REG
I guess you are looking for a used one at a lower price.
Igor
Sat Mar 24 16:23:47 EDT 2007
Mark Roberts wrote:
Speaking of
Well I have it and did a couple of shots with it. I will post shortly
to http://www.photo.net/photos/jddxn
Just a couple of quick shots with the ist D..Joe
At 02:38 PM 3/24/07, you wrote:
Heck when I recommend reading maybe I should actually read it. The lens
uses a T mount so it should fit
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
