yeah, but if it was a only a finder/lens interaction issue
then the captured photos wouldnt show the same problem,
but they do. I still think there is something signifigantly
different/worse with regards to this lens compared to
most other pentax lenses I have used and thats a lot.
jco
As I recall, Arnold Stark did a comparison of most all of the 85mm lenses
and had posted the real life results. Is that page still active?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 1:10 PM
On Apr 26, 2007, at 7:23 PM, Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:
John, I believe the problem is that the printer thinks the ink
absorption
pads are full and it refuses to print more before they are replaced
(trying
to prevent overflow).
This was my first thought as well, as I've had mine do the
On Apr 27, 2007, at 8:11 PM, William Robb wrote:
I saw that too. Presumably they were done with the Windows version
and wanted to get it out for business reasons, but it's always a pain
when companies don't do simultaneous releases.
At least for once you don't get to gloat about your
On Apr 27, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
As I expected, the M85/2 stands up very well compared to the much
newer, and
much more expensive glass.
The DA70/2.4 seems to exhibit the least smooth bokeh, I definitely
wouldn't call the 85/2 bokeh bad in that series.
The DA70
On Apr 27, 2007, at 2:53 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Most IT departments block blogs, they're in the same category as porn.
No, blogs are worse. I can actually understand why people might want
to look at porn :)
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Apr 27, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Bob W wrote:
I don't have much personal padding in that
area though, so the saddle has to accommodate my sit bones quite
directly.
I recently had to replace the seat on my single-speed and found one
which is designed specifically to support the rider on the sit
On Apr 28, 2007, at 6:13 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
FWIW - those wheel mounted reflectors hummed on my Cannondale - I
finally
took them off.
All new bikes here are required to have those wheel-mounted
reflectors when they're sold. My brother-in-law is a bike mechanic
and he finds them
On Apr 28, 2007, at 8:18 AM, Cotty wrote:
Hummers are fine. It's the screamers I can't stand. Univega Ram and
I've
changed brake pads twice and they all do it. resorted to lubing the
rim
which gets rid of the noise but makes stopping...well, interesting.
Try tilting the pads slightly so
On Apr 28, 2007, at 3:11 PM, William Robb wrote:
At least for once you don't get to gloat about your Mac
(I'm trying to be funny)
They're using the Windows release to find all the bugs... the Mac
version will actually work :)
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks Marnie!
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:10:45 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=233
and
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?list=8
--
Jan van Wijk;
I have several Automatic aperture M42
lenses that are Automatic aperture mode
only ( they dont have auto/manual mode
switches ). Anybody know of a way to
keep the rear pin depressed without
destroying or damaging these lenses?
( no superglue or bending pins, etc).
I want to try/test them on
On 27/4/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I couldn't find a Mac version. Is it not available. That would be
very bizarre, considering how many graphics professionals use a Mac
platform.
To me, it reinforces the view that Pentax has no intention of assuming
any appeal within the
have you tried this lens with a bellows instead
of tubes? I have used the bellows takumar and
many other bellows lenses from 80mm to 150mm on digital with zero
problems whatsoever. The tubes may be causing those reflections...
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi John,
I will try that. Thanks,
Bob
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 5:14 PM
Subject: RE: M42 adaptor and the K10D
have you tried this lens with a bellows instead
of tubes? I
On 28/04/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27/4/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I couldn't find a Mac version. Is it not available. That would be
very bizarre, considering how many graphics professionals use a Mac
platform.
To me, it reinforces the view that Pentax has
pong
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Indeed.
I'd love to see their DL stats WRT Mac vs Windows software, I'd bet
Mac would be far less than 5% and I'm not a betting man. ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
We probably should be happy enough a company with such small
ressources supports Mac as well as Pentax does.
--
Thibault Massart aka
I've been hunting this for a long time. They are pretty hard to get close
to.
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=306547 (at my good
site)
K10D and K-500/4,5
Experimented a bit with lightening the background. But I decided I liked it
best this way.
Comments appreciated.
Ok
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6602677.stm
Paul Smye-Rumsby, who lives in Dover, said: It was about 08.15 when
suddenly the bed shook violently. I thought my wife had got cramp or
something
Obviously a man who's never read Cosmo.
--
Regards,
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I like it. I would have moved the tree just a bit to the left,
though. I find it a bit too centered.
Bob
On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Godfrey, may I suggest that you add a bit of vignetting to this image.
It seems to really ask for some probably even heavy
Thanks, William.
Can you tell us abou the shutter speed? I'm not sure if some bokeh I
don't like much are caused 'cos the subject moved or because of the
bokeh the lens provides.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML
On 28/04/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I promised Tom C that I would try to do a bokeh comparison between the
A85/1.4, M85/2, FA77 and DA70 lenses.
I had a few moments between supper and getting bombed, so here goes:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/m852bokeh/852bokeh.html
Of course the 70 gives you more DOF. Thus, a bit crisper.
Paul
On Apr 27, 2007, at 11:24 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 28/04/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I expected, the M85/2 stands up very well compared to the much
newer, and
much more expensive glass.
The DA70/2.4
Well done. You might push up the middle of the RGB curve a wee bit to
brighten the midrange tones.
Paul
Paul
On Apr 28, 2007, at 5:02 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
I've been hunting this for a long time. They are pretty hard to get
close
to.
On 28/04/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not peeved, but I want it for my studio. The Mac with two
monitors sits about ten feet from my usual camera position, and I've
already obtained a long USB cable. All that's missing is the
software. I've used the old version with the D,
I'm not peeved, but I want it for my studio. The Mac with two
monitors sits about ten feet from my usual camera position, and I've
already obtained a long USB cable. All that's missing is the
software. I've used the old version with the D, and it worked nicely
but it was quite slow, given
Thank you Paul :-)
A stupid question: Why?
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Finaly
Well done. You might push up the middle of the
Splat. (Hey keep that thing out of my soup!)
Tim Øsleby wrote:
pong
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 28/04/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that resource. My cable is about three meters long. But
now I know I can't go much longer than that. If I need a more distant
camera position, I'll have to use a laptop.
Or a powered hub as a buffer.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE
Thanks for that resource. My cable is about three meters long. But
now I know I can't go much longer than that. If I need a more distant
camera position, I'll have to use a laptop.
Paul
On Apr 28, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 28/04/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim, you've been holding out on us! Look it's Daffy!
*http://tinyurl.com/322x5w
Nice below shot by the way.
*
Tim Øsleby wrote:
I've been hunting this for a long time. They are pretty hard to get close
to.
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=306547 (at my good
site)
K10D
Nope. I imagine you could make a m42-K adapter with a spring to depress
the pin. It would take careful design and would probably still
interfere with something in future cameras even if it could be built to
not interfere with anything in present cameras.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I have
More likely the Mac release will be wrong in whole new ways...
David Mann wrote:
On Apr 28, 2007, at 3:11 PM, William Robb wrote:
At least for once you don't get to gloat about your Mac
(I'm trying to be funny)
They're using the Windows release to find all the bugs... the Mac
I felt the shot was missing some detail in the birds feathers due to
lack of midrange brightness. But that's subjective of course.
Paul
On Apr 28, 2007, at 8:30 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Thank you Paul :-)
A stupid question: Why?
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From:
The Ds was much faster. I can't remember exactly what functions didn't
work properly, (green button probably).
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm not peeved, but I want it for my studio. The Mac with two
monitors sits about ten feet from my usual camera position, and I've
already obtained a long
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Don't Walk
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/dontwalk.html
===
Sorry, William, doesn't do a thing for me.
Thank god for that..
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: Re: M85mm f2.0 bokeh
Thanks, William.
Can you tell us abou the shutter speed? I'm not sure if some bokeh I
don't like much are caused 'cos the subject moved or because of the
bokeh the lens provides.
As the camera was tripod mounted,
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: M85mm f2.0 bokeh
Of course the 70 gives you more DOF. Thus, a bit crisper.
I left the camera position static and cropped the 70mm and 77mm images to be
similar to the 85mm images.
As the camera: subject/background ratio wasn't
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070427155646
--
new photos ever so often... http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Nothing to worry about. I never photograph flies.
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: ping
Splat. (Hey keep that thing out of my soup!)
Tim
Just been laying low, til it blows over.
I'm addicted.
Daffy is a nice chap, but it's not my picture.
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: PESO -
Leon,
Very interesting photos and equipment.
I'm happy to see what the camera can be coaxed into doing.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/27/07, Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mark,
These are some pictures from last weekend. I haven't cropped them,
though I normally would. All are taken with
Do you know where I'd find a powered hub? Are they expensive?
Paul
On Apr 28, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 28/04/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that resource. My cable is about three meters long. But
now I know I can't go much longer than that. If I
Indeed it does. All those bokehs look fine to me. :-)
I would guess that John's bad bokeh is an anomaly of the particular
circumstances and conditons when the shot was taken .
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: remote assistant 3
Do you know where I'd find a powered hub? Are they expensive?
I picked one up at Wal-Mart. They aren't rare, or expensive.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Roman, I for one can really relate to what you have expressed.
Well said, Roman, very well said!
Boris
Roman wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070427155646
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby
Subject: Re: PESO - Finaly
Just been laying low, til it blows over.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: M85mm f2.0 bokeh
Indeed it does. All those bokehs look fine to me. :-)
I would guess that John's bad bokeh is an anomaly of the particular
circumstances and conditons when the shot was taken .
John who?
William Robb
--
PDML
Refering to the PDML flames.
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Finaly
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby
Subject: Re: PESO
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I have several Automatic aperture M42
lenses that are Automatic aperture mode
only ( they dont have auto/manual mode
switches ). Anybody know of a way to
keep the rear pin depressed without
destroying or damaging these lenses?
( no superglue or
I say what I said before, any shots with this
lens that dont show bad bokeh are just
shots that dont reveal its bad bokeh. I can
take photos all day long with it that dont
reveal its bad bokeh, but I can also take some
that do because it IS bad bokeh compared to
most Pentax lenses when the the
No,this assumption is wrong, DOF is
constant only for same fstop and
MAGIFICATION (in camera ). If he
used same camera position and fstop
and only changed lenses, the shorter
lenses will have same perspective
in the shots but with MORE Depth
of field than the longer lenses.
DOF is a function of
Certainly what you state regarding DOF is true. I believe though the writer
was not making a dogmatic absolute statement of scientific fact. He was
generalizing.
As the camera: subject/background ratio wasn't altered, DOF should be
SIMILAR for all four lenses.
I'm pretty sure he knows that
nope, I do not agree that his post was correct
with regards to the reasoning
and implied something else because he specifically stated the REASON
that the DOF would be similar was because
the camera distance wasnt changed to
maintain same subject/background distance, only
the lenses were. Yes,
Secondly, whether hes making a scientific statement
or dogmatic whatever, or just generalizing, its
still WRONG, because the DOF isnt kept same OR similar
by changing focal lengths if you keep the same camara
postion, it **changes*** with focal length if you
do that.
jco
-Original
Roman, Sorry to see the troubles... Regards, Bob S.
On 4/28/07, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070427155646
--
new photos ever so often... http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
J. C. O'Connell a écrit :
I have several Automatic aperture M42
lenses that are Automatic aperture mode
only ( they dont have auto/manual mode
switches ). Anybody know of a way to
keep the rear pin depressed without
destroying or damaging these lenses
You can modify an M42/K adapter:
4.3 ... you guys sure make a big fuss over something that, here, we just
sleep through. We had a 4.3 a few weeks ago and not even the cats were
concerned. I guess it's what you're used to.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob W
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6602677.stm
Paul
Those of us who live in California can only smile.
I've never heard of 4.3 ever doing any real damage.
What are those houses made of anyway, spit and bailing
wire?
BTW, funny one, Bob.
;-]
-Brendan
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6602677.stm
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: RE: M85mm f2.0 bokeh
Certainly what you state regarding DOF is true. I believe though the
writer
was not making a dogmatic absolute statement of scientific fact. He was
generalizing.
As the camera: subject/background ratio wasn't
Thank You very much, I didnt think of doing
it like this but it looks simple/cheap enough. Only
drawback is two different ones might be
needed for large vs small rear element M42
auto only lenses, but thats much better than
not being able to use them at all on digital
until a M42 DSLR is
I haven't been able to access my gmail account via a web browser for a
couple of days now ( Temporary Error (502)). Not a real problem, as they are
still forwarding mail to my accesscomm account. Anyone else on gmail having
problems or are they just picking on me?
William Robb
--
PDML
In a message dated 4/28/2007 7:11:57 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Refering to the PDML flames.
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
=
Filter. Most of us are filtering now. I'd say about 80-90%. Or even higher.
Ergo, no flames. You can come out of hiding.
Marnie
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby
Subject: Re: PESO - Finaly
Refering to the PDML flames.
I hadn't realized there were flames going on.
Ignorance can be bliss.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
David, if you ever find something on how to reset the counter please post
here. My 220 is doing the same thing, although I am still able to print so
far. Eventually it will refuse, I guess.
In the meantime I do have the 1800 and it is almost new.
I did a quick look on the web and only found
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: remote assistant 3
I'm way more concerned about the second delay now on the new pro grade
zooms. First it was March/April, then June and now later than that.
--
Ditto.
It would be nice if they get the rest of the
In a message dated 4/27/2007 7:07:38 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm way more concerned about the second delay now on the new pro grade
zooms. First it was March/April, then June and now later than that.
--
Bruce
Ditto.
Marnie aka Doe
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - Finaly
Filter. Most of us are filtering now. I'd say about 80-90%. Or even
higher.
Ergo, no flames. You can come out of hiding.
It's nice actually. I'm having a nice conversation with Tom, Thibouille and
a few
In a message dated 4/23/2007 1:39:48 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,
along with the other suggestions you've had, you might also want to
consider a Thermarest. They pack up very small, and are much lighter
and more comfortable than a picnic blanket. Mine weighs
I thought I had that utility somewhere on my system. But apparently no
longer. It will not only reset the cleaning pad count, but the ink count
too, so you can use all the ink in your cartridges. If you do that you
need to watch it so you replace them as soon as they start skipping.
That means
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=17435full=1
Please be honest and brutal.
Thanks.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
http://www.ssclg.com/epsone.shtml
Walter Hamler wrote:
David, if you ever find something on how to reset the counter please post
here. My 220 is doing the same thing, although I am still able to print so
far. Eventually it will refuse, I guess.
In the meantime I do have the 1800 and it is
Not at all: works pretty well here.
Maybe an ISP problem ?
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
WR has got this all wrong. DOF for a given camera postion
(keeping the subject/background ratio the same)
and a given f-stop VARIES with focal length used because the in-camera
magnification (ratio of object sizes to lens image sizes ) changes
if you change the focal length and keep he camera in
I'm fine
dave
On 4/28/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been able to access my gmail account via a web browser for a
couple of days now ( Temporary Error (502)). Not a real problem, as they are
still forwarding mail to my accesscomm account. Anyone else on gmail having
With my old monitor, I just spray it with Windex. The surface of a LCD
screen appears much more fragile and mine now has spots (I confess, I
sometimes
eat at the computer).
Any suggestions?
TIA, Marnie aka the messy eater :-)
-
Warning: I am
Why are you fuzzy and everything elso much sharper
Another of the shots done in digital but I may not have done on film.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 4/28/2007 10:04:17 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm way more concerned about the second delay now on the new pro grade
zooms. First it was March/April, then June and now later than that.
--
Ditto.
It would be nice if they get the rest of
It's on your side Bill, all fine in Chicago. Regards, Bob S,
On 4/28/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fine
dave
On 4/28/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been able to access my gmail account via a web browser for a
couple of days now ( Temporary Error
I wouldn't through it out.
William Robb wrote:
I promised Tom C that I would try to do a bokeh comparison between the
A85/1.4, M85/2, FA77 and DA70 lenses.
I had a few moments between supper and getting bombed, so here goes:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/m852bokeh/852bokeh.html
--
On Apr 28, 2007, at 10:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With my old monitor, I just spray it with Windex. The surface of a
LCD
screen appears much more fragile and mine now has spots (I
confess, I sometimes
eat at the computer).
Any suggestions?
I use a microfiber cloth. Just make
Nice except for the OOF guy with the camera... :-P
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=17435full=1
Please be honest and brutal.
Thanks.
Boris
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl
I use lens cleaning fluid and a paper towel.
Bob
On Apr 28, 2007, at 1:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With my old monitor, I just spray it with Windex. The surface of a
LCD
screen appears much more fragile and mine now has spots (I
confess, I sometimes
eat at the computer).
Any
On Apr 28, 2007, at 12:08 AM, Cotty wrote:
I couldn't find a Mac version. Is it not available. That would be
very bizarre, considering how many graphics professionals use a Mac
platform.
To me, it reinforces the view that Pentax has no intention of assuming
any appeal within the photo
Most folks do confuse f-stop with aperture, I sure used to. However,
they are not the same thing. So you are mistaken here (I have not looked
at the Wikipedia article to see if it is correct or not).
I am not going to go through all this again, folks, look in the
archives; or better yet, get
Since the 70mm has a slightly smaller aperture opening at f/4.0 than the
85's, it should have a slightly greater DOF. However, since marked
f-stops are never very accurate, it probably is within the DOF spread of
the 85mm's.
-graywolf
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
SSC Service Utility for Epson Stylus Printers
http://www.ssclg.com/epsone.shtml
Maris
graywolf wrote:
I thought I had that utility somewhere on my system. But apparently no
longer. It will not only reset the cleaning pad count, but the ink
count too, so you can use all the ink in your
This is the one I use:
BELKIN HI-SPEED USB 2.0 7-PORT HUB - F5U237V1
http://www.compuplus.com/i-Belkin-Hi-Speed-USB-20-7-Port-Hub-
F5U237V1-1009184~.html?sid=3cqlm3fld06kb2s
or
http://tinyurl.com/2fhw82
$28. Very reliable, very fast, and the design allows stacking two of
them in the same
I use Everclear from the liquor store, that way I do not have to worry
about running out of booze grin. Although after a couple of friend
were over I did run out of lens cleaner, but the is another story. The
great thing is it costs me $10 a pint instead of $10 an ounce and seems
to do a better
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=17435full=1
Please be honest and brutal.
Thanks.
Boris
I'll have the 8oz rump with chips and a pint of bitter please!
I like the picture too.
Cheers,
Drew.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
graywolf wrote:
I use Everclear from the liquor store, that way I do not have to worry
about running out of booze grin. Although after a couple of friend
were over I did run out of lens cleaner, but the is another story. The
great thing is it costs me $10 a pint instead of $10 an ounce and
On Apr 28, 2007, at 2:33 PM, graywolf wrote:
The
great thing is it costs me $10 a pint instead of $10 an ounce and
seems
to do a better job.
That's still $ 80 per gallon. Damned expensive for ethanol!!! And
they want us to run our cars on this
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Yes they are, Paul. I think I paid eight bucks for mine at CompUSA.
Most, if not all, external USB hubs are powered. Just check that it
comes with a wall wart.
-graywolf
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Do you know where I'd find a powered hub? Are they expensive?
Paul
On Apr 28, 2007, at 8:50 AM,
No, I prefer Henry McKenna (a single barrel Kentucky Bourbon), or
Kilbeggan (an Irish whiskey) when I can afford it.
However, if you water Everclear down it is just like the other stuff
proof wise. In fact Everclear and pineapple juice (torpedo juice) was
the preferred drink of Marines in the
A man after my own heart, My preferred tipple is Johnny Walker Black
Label or Famous Grouse Special reserve ;-)
Cheers,
Drew.
graywolf wrote:
No, I prefer Henry McKenna (a single barrel Kentucky Bourbon), or
Kilbeggan (an Irish whiskey) when I can afford it.
However, if you water
Cotty wrote:
On 27/4/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
The gears are turning, folks. Who's bringing their bike to GFM? Maybe
we can have a race after the park closes and call it The First Annual
Grandfather Mountain Downhill 'Yer Going Home in a Body Cast' Bicycle Race.
Was in San Francisco early this morning, climbed the hill to Twin
Peaks and captured this view ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/21.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Subtract the tax and you're getting closer to fuel prices. The problem
is that it takes about 1 1/4 gallons of petroleum fuel to produce 1
gallon of ethanol from corn or soy beans. It's a bad trade. It's like
losing money on every sale and making up the difference on volume...
Bob Shell
David Mann wrote:
No, blogs are worse. I can actually understand why people might want
to look at porn :)
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
