On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:43 PM, frank theriault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Matthew Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Well, all I have on my side is a couple of degrees in physics,
>> experience teaching optics labs, references to Kodak literature and
>> textb
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Matthew Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, all I have on my side is a couple of degrees in physics,
> experience teaching optics labs, references to Kodak literature and
> textbooks. Since you have a full quiver of capital letters, you must
> be right.
Yes,
On Nov 13, 2008, at 20:45, John Sessoms wrote:
I don't think the difference between 18-35 & 20-35 would be that
much of a problem.
Availability might be more of a problem. I couldn't find the FA
20-35 listed at KEH, B&H, Adorama or on Ebay. KEH does have the
Sigma lens.
A local shop
Matthew,
Listen to Bill Robb. Lots of us have blocked posts from JC O'Connell.
Other, moderated lists have kicked him out for his boorish behavior.
He never gives in, right or wrong, and always has to have the last
word, IN CAPS!!!
Don't wrestle in the mud with pigs.
You'll get dirty and they like
My wife has the Leica D-Lux 3. A very fine camera with the exception
that is has no viewfinder. If you or yours want a hold-at-arms-length
digicam, this would be a very fine choice.
stan
On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:24 AM, Amita Guha wrote:
I have two auctions on ebay this week. Both items in exce
Thanks Frank, Ann, Jack, Dave, and Brian for the feedback.
Brian, the light thru the deciduous trees and leaves in Fall is my
favorite time
of year in North America. It is just a spectacular display, often too short.
I can't get enough of it and have lots of samples of it now.
Regards, Bob S.
On
Just have to share this with the group! :-)
There is a factory in Northern Minnesota which makes the Tickle Me
Elmo toys. The toy laughs when you tickle it under the arms.
Well, Lena is hired at The Tickle Me Elmo factory and she reports for
her first day promptly at 8:00 AM.
The next day at
Dank je Jos,
I am glad you liked it !
- Mensaje original
De: Jos from Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Enviado: viernes, 14 de noviembre, 2008 17:08:56
Asunto: Re: November PUG is up
Thanks Scott, for the work done!
All are nice, but the four that work best
On 11/14/08, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since you have a full quiver of capital letters, you must
> > be right.
>
>
> You must be new here.
MARK!!!
--
Rhetoric is a poor substitute for action, and we have trusted only to
rhetoric. If we are really to be a great nation,
Thanks Scott, for the work done!
All are nice, but the four that work best for me are:
--> The little bird by David Brooks
--> Red Umbrella by Jaume Lahuerta
--> Høst (= Autumn I guess?) by Toralf
--> Lake Mathieson and Fox Glacier by Peter McIntosh
Thanks all for posting!
Greetz Jos
S
I have two auctions on ebay this week. Both items in excellent condition.
Leica D-Lux 3:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270301668263
Epson P-4000 image tank:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270301676059
Amita
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 14/11/08, Dario Bonazza, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Hi folks,
>
>Here's a gallery of concert pictures of Ana Popovic & band, shot by me a few
>months ago:
>http://www.dariobonazza.com/anae.htm
>
>Is there any picture you like? Which ones would you pick? Thanks.
7, 12, 16.
12 is fab.
--
C
2008/11/15 Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 11/14/08, Matthew Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:27 AM, JC OConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > WRONG, FORMAT HAS NOTHING TO WITH DOF WHICH IS A FUNDAMENTAL IMAGE
>> > PROPERTY.
>> > DOF IS DETERMINED BY MAG
On 11/14/08, Matthew Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:27 AM, JC OConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > WRONG, FORMAT HAS NOTHING TO WITH DOF WHICH IS A FUNDAMENTAL IMAGE
> > PROPERTY.
> > DOF IS DETERMINED BY MAGNIFICATION AND F-STOP, FORMAT AND PRINT SIZE HAS
> >
2008/11/14 William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Matthew Hunt"
> Subject: Re: FA 1.4/50mm tested by DPReview
>
>
>
>> Well, all I have on my side is a couple of degrees in physics,
>> experience teaching optics labs, references to Kodak literature and
>> textbook
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Hi folks,
Here's a gallery of concert pictures of Ana Popovic & band, shot by me
a few months ago:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/anae.htm
Is there any picture you like? Which ones would you pick? Thanks.
Some fine concert pix there. I really like 4, 5, 7, 8 & 13.
-bmw
-
Hi folks,
Here's a gallery of concert pictures of Ana Popovic & band, shot by me a few
months ago:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/anae.htm
Is there any picture you like? Which ones would you pick? Thanks.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/p
Just getting back on the ibook, and read your instructions.
Will try this out in just a few momnents.
I need to finish my tea. I need strenght for this.
Dave
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 13, 2008, at 4:18 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
>
>>>
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Hunt"
Subject: Re: FA 1.4/50mm tested by DPReview
Well, all I have on my side is a couple of degrees in physics,
experience teaching optics labs, references to Kodak literature and
textbooks. Since you have a full quiver of capital letters, you m
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:27 AM, JC OConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WRONG, FORMAT HAS NOTHING TO WITH DOF WHICH IS A FUNDAMENTAL IMAGE
> PROPERTY.
> DOF IS DETERMINED BY MAGNIFICATION AND F-STOP, FORMAT AND PRINT SIZE HAS
> NOTHING TO DO WITH DOF WHICH IS RELATIVE SHARPNESS OF FOREGROUND AND
WRONG- format is the size of the image captured from the lens,
changing the format or the size of the print does NOT change
the depth of field created by the lens image. PERIOD.
JC O'Connell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behal
B.S. in capitols. DOF is format and print size independent.
JC O'Connell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthew Hunt
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:06 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: FA 1.4/50mm tested
P.S. THATS ALL HOGWASH. All you have to do is shoot a portrait
with a wide f-stop like F2 and blur out the background and shoot
again at F22 with sharp clear background to see the effect of
DOF and KNOW that it doesnt matter what print size you use,
the print size has nothing to do with DOF, DOF is
WRONG, FORMAT HAS NOTHING TO WITH DOF WHICH IS A FUNDAMENTAL IMAGE
PROPERTY.
DOF IS DETERMINED BY MAGNIFICATION AND F-STOP, FORMAT AND PRINT SIZE HAS
NOTHING TO DO WITH DOF WHICH IS RELATIVE SHARPNESS OF FOREGROUND AND
BACKGROUND
COMPARED TO PLANE OF FOCUS.
JC O'Connell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Hunt"
Subject: Re: FA 1.4/50mm tested by DPReview
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:26 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, it depends purely on the magnification ratio and alowable COC.
Focal length doesn't matter, nor does subject dist
Play all you want. I objected to the attack on Godders, who was, as
usual, only trying to help.
Paul
On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
On 11/13/08, PN Stenquist, the list moderator, says I can't play
anymore:
Godders is our Mac problem solver. He's come to my rescue many
t
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:26 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, it depends purely on the magnification ratio and alowable COC.
> Focal length doesn't matter, nor does subject distance.
Your statement is only an approximation, useful for close subject
distances. See:
http://
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Hunt"
Subject: Re: FA 1.4/50mm tested by DPReview
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:29 PM, JC OConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In that case, FF and aps format would be the SAME DOF,
neither one would have "deeper" dof. And print size is
not a factor e
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:09 PM, JC OConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dof HAS ZILCH to do with format, its all about
> magnification which is object size vs image size.
> object size vs image size ignores format.
> That said, if you are using the same lens
> focal length, and same distance of
No habla Espanol.
>
> From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2008/11/13 Thu PM 08:45:26 GMT
> To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'"
> Subject: RE: OT Feedback
>
> Que?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of mike wilson
> > Sent: 1
On 13/11/08, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
>But, all seriousness aside, I was in the camera store today, and there
>was a guy who was trying out a Sony video cam that had an adapter to
>take Nikon lenses. Or, I guess he already had the camera & adapter and
>was trying out various Nikon
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
