Probably not, but my previous e-mail accounts worked that way and I can
be a creature of habit,
and I'm an engineer, the definition of which is:
Someone who'll spend two man weeks to devise a method to do a 5 minute
task preformed once a month in one minute...
or words to that effect.
This
steve harley wrote:
they whom i call P. J. Alling wrote:
Well now I the PDML messages I send in my Thunderbird inbox. I had
to set up another G-mail account, a couple of filters, and use about
triple the bandwidth or more to get them, but the end result looks
the way I want it to.
perhaps
Hi All,
Your opinion is needed: which of these shots work for you,
and which don't, and (if possible) - why.
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2009/IMGP7077.jpg
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2009/IMGP7077-2.jpg
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2009/IMGP7077-3.jpg
it's because as we get older, and as this little blue ball continues its
voyage through the darkness, infinity gets closer and closer.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
Behalf Of webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Sent: 03 June 2009 03:44
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: RE: SMC A* 300mm f4.0 no longer focuses to infinity!
it's because as we get older, and as this little blue ball continues its
voyage through the darkness, infinity gets closer and closer.
When we are young, our decisions are few, our
Oooohhh I like that.
So much so I'm going to steal it.
DS
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Wednesday, 3 June 2009 3:20 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: SMC A* 300mm f4.0 no longer focuses to
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: RE: SMC A* 300mm f4.0 no longer focuses to infinity!
Oooohhh I like that.
So much so I'm going to steal it.
Interesting that it's when I'm stinking drunk the Aussies find me brilliant.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
You make no sense the rest of the time.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Wednesday, 3 June 2009 3:27 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: SMC A* 300mm f4.0 no longer focuses to infinity!
-
2009/6/3 Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org:
In all your shots, I'm a bit bothered about the specular highlights. Flash?
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2009/IMGP7077.jpg
I think this one conveys the droplet pretty well. The arched highlight
at the top defines the droplet very nicely, and
2009/6/3 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
I don't like stupid machinery deciding what I can and cannot do.
You know, P. J., I think there have been people around saying roughly
the same thing ever since the wheel was invented. :-)
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
On 2/6/09, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
We arrived at judging HQ on Sunday morning to find one of the GFM
employees had equipped the stools at the judges table with fake
bearskin rugs from the gift shop (presumably as a reasonable
substitute for ermine). They also left some chocolate
I just had a similar problem with my K-500/4,5. It was unable to focus
at infinity. Maybe a bit soft at other focus distances too, but
infinity was the main problem.
I fiddled with it, and discovered that the front part of the lens had
unscrewed itself, moving the front element forward. It was
Bob W wrote:
it's because as we get older, and as this little blue ball continues its
voyage through the darkness, infinity gets closer and closer.
h if the universe is expanding wouldn't infinity be getting farther
and farther?
--
Christian
http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
--
On Jun 3, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
David Mann wrote:
A previous owner of my F*300 had taken some heavy machinery to the
foot to reduce its height.
Yikes! I like the foot because it gives me a good handhold when
I'm not using the monopod. With IS, it's an eminently
On 6/3/09, Luiz Felipe luiz.fel...@techmit.com.br wrote:
Rob, in a fast scan I can't see those stitching errors. For an automated
process, looks good.
Hi Team,
Thanks to all that commented (and those that didn't), I think I may
now be encouraged enough to make an effort to turn the
On Jun 3, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
One thing I have noticed is that the directional pad, because of the
larger LCD, is moved farther to the right, and I'm having some
slowness in getting used to that.
I think I'd like that. I occasionally bump the pad with my nose on my
K10D
Igor, among the first pack none works for me. I'll explain why. The
way you chose to frame the droplets is so that there is no sense of
dropping down. So all of them are more like statement of the fact
without much additional merit.
From the second pack the last one is most interesting. Mainly
On 5/28/09, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Good to hear from you Rob!
And thanks for the phone number. Somebody was wondering about cell-phone
reception at GFM - now we have a valid number we can use to test and compare
different carriers...
You guys are all talk ;-)
--
Rob
HI All,
I want to buy a couple of lenses. I've priced them locally and via
mail order from BH. If I buy locally it will cost me an extra AU$900
(after GST, shipping and currency exchange, etc). That's over half a
K7!
The disadvantage is a USA warranty so I would have to ship it over if
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Just as my heart was hardening, on Sunday the spring fawns made there
appearance. Who can get angry at such cute critters?
http://danmatyola.blogspot.com/
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9283867size=lg
That first one is a classic
--
Christian
:-|
We can only dream of good service here in the Philippines ... where
Pentax bodies are assembled(!). If something goes wrong and it get
sent off to Japan!
Bong
2009/6/3 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
My K10D has contracted a focussing problem. Optimum sharpness in the
viewfinder and
Leon, may I please remind you the ill-fated DA* 16-50/2.8?
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Leon Altoff leon.alt...@gmail.com wrote:
HI All,
I want to buy a couple of lenses. I've priced them locally and via
mail order from BH. If I buy locally it will cost me an extra AU$900
(after GST,
My second 31mm (black) went tits up 2 weeks after I picked it up.
Warranty's are good.
Cheers,
Dave
2009/6/3 Leon Altoff leon.alt...@gmail.com:
HI All,
I want to buy a couple of lenses. I've priced them locally and via
mail order from BH. If I buy locally it will cost me an extra AU$900
2009/6/3 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
Which Tom or is any Tom good enough? What about Dick and Harry?
Why, a metric Tom, of course.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Infinity cant get farther away, its already
Further than than the farest.
J.C. O'Connell ( mailto:hifis...@gate.net )
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Christian
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 5:13 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 6/3/09, Leon Altoff leon.alt...@gmail.com wrote:
I like to support my local traders and importers, but $900 is a lot of
money and for something that is not likely to go wrong having an
international warranty is not much of a justification for spending it.
Does anyone have reasons for me
Cotty wrote:
On 2/6/09, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
We arrived at judging HQ on Sunday morning to find one of the GFM
employees had equipped the stools at the judges table with fake
bearskin rugs from the gift shop (presumably as a reasonable
substitute for ermine). They also left
Leon Altoff leon.alt...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to buy a couple of lenses. I've priced them locally and via
mail order from BH. If I buy locally it will cost me an extra AU$900
(after GST, shipping and currency exchange, etc). That's over half a
K7!
Is that including customs duties,
Hi Rob,
I am considering SDM lenses - 17-70 and 60-250. If they will price
match or at least come close I will happily give them my money. Do
you know who I need to contact or can you point me to the original
thread? The time to buy is soon given the state of our dollar and the
US dollar.
Hi Ralf,
There are no customs duties on photographic gear in Australia. There
is a 10% GST if the value is over AU$1,000 (including shipping) which
this would be. This makes bringing things in from overseas into
Australia interesting as it can work out cheaper to pay several lots
of shipping
In blog:
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2009/06/iridiscent-camouflage.html
Direct to image:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_VWBjZjc1fI4/SiQYWS8cvTI/Ajo/W2qNPxXGUCU/s1600-h/20090531-0011.jpg
or: http://turl.no/3ug
It's been a while since I took insect macros. CC most appreciated.
Jostein
--
I would have thought that as the universe expanded infinity got further
away...
Bob W wrote:
it's because as we get older, and as this little blue ball continues its
voyage through the darkness, infinity gets closer and closer.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
I had a problem like that with the M* version of this lens, the entire
front element group would unscrew and come entirely off. I never had
unsharp photos from it. because when I noticed it start to come un
screwed, I could just tighten it up again. The A* is solidly
connected. I'm not sure
Christian wrote:
Bob W wrote:
it's because as we get older, and as this little blue ball continues its
voyage through the darkness, infinity gets closer and closer.
h if the universe is expanding wouldn't infinity be getting
farther and farther?
Damn Christian beat me to it. I could
Leon Altoff wrote:
Has anyone ever had a lens go faulty under warranty?
Not a Pentax lens, though I did have a Sigma lens come undone
internally. They fixed it as quickly as Pentax has fixed the cameras
I've had to send in.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 6/3/09, Leon Altoff leon.alt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
I am considering SDM lenses - 17-70 and 60-250. If they will price
match or at least come close I will happily give them my money. Do
you know who I need to contact or can you point me to the original
thread? The time to buy is
An enjoyable set and nicely rendered. I like it that you've captured
people behind the scenes and others simply enjoying themselves rather
than concentrating on pure spectacle.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
That's really nice as it is but it would be interesting to see the
shadow effects on those furrows in more angled light.
Well seen.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:54
The VAT is usually the difference price.
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Leon Altoff leon.alt...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to buy a couple of lenses. I've priced them locally and via
mail order from BH. If I buy locally it will cost me an extra AU$900
(after GST, shipping and currency
On 6/3/09, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/blog/photos/gallery13/
More later, maybe.
Gotta catch up on a lot of things that were left undone while I was
away at the mountain.
There's some poster prints in them thar falls!
Very nicely captured in pixels!
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:09 -0400, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I felt like I was really in a rut this past weekend using my 28-105
zoom, so just for the fun of it I stuck my old 19mm Vivitar manual
focus on and had a blast!
Sometimes trying something a little different is
On 6/3/09, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
The VAT is usually the difference price.
The 55/1.4 currently costs AU$1,599.00 (inc 10% GST) from one of the
better web/brick-n-mortar suppliers, that's a measly US$1,299.00 at
todays rates.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
tbei...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Figured how to put a few shots on my site:
http://www.beilbyvisualarts.com/id7.html
Very nice stuff, indeed!
Did you also experience the best shots taken after 3:00 p.m. Saturday
phenomenon?
;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Came across this on the NY Times.
Four different photographers - four different views of the man against the tank
- their recollections of the moment...
http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/behind-the-scenes-tank-man-of-tiananmen/?hp
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Unfortunately, I posted those images on an old blog I haven't used for
a long time, and it cut off the right side of all the images. I hope
this is better:
http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?webtag=djm1963
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Title is self explanatory. Does anyone know what it is?
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/mysterycar.html
Thanks
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
William Robb wrote:
Title is self explanatory. Does anyone know what it is?
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/mysterycar.html
Thanks
William Robb
Rusty
_
Christian
http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Very interesting photos - really liked them, the first is my favorite.
You live in a very interesting place, Daniel. Keep posting...
LF
Daniel J. Matyola escreveu:
Last week, I spent a lot of time on my little rose garden in front of
our house. I pruned and fertilized the surviving rose
On 6/3/09, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Title is self explanatory. Does anyone know what it is?
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/mysterycar.html
Do you have a better picture of the emblem on the grill? That could
potentially be helpful.
--
Scott Loveless
Cigarette-free since
I live in New Jersey. If you have ever watched The Sopranos or The
Real Housewives of New Jersey, then you know just how interesting.
Thanks for looking, and thanks for your kind comments. Yes, the first
image is the best, but I like the last two because that is the way I
most often see them --
William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Title is self explanatory. Does anyone know what it is?
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/mysterycar.html
Thanks
What does the badge on the side say?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Very nice image and a very interesting insect.
Dab
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:13 AM, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote:
In blog:
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2009/06/iridiscent-camouflage.html
Direct to image:
snip
--
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:00:49 -0400
From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com
Subject: Re: GFM shots from Ted
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Message-ID: 3usc25tmct0obb3q71pt366gc9p5uf2...@4ax.com
Content-Type: text/plain;
On Jun 3, 2009, at 6:06, Leon Altoff wrote:
The disadvantage is a USA warranty so I would have to ship it over if
anything went wrong. Has anyone ever had a lens go faulty under
warranty?
I've only ever owned ONE lens that had a warranty.. and I used it.
My DA* 16-50 had a screw go loose in
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:40 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Bob Sullivan
Not enough deer butt in that one...
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:54 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
wrote:
From: Cory Waters
Forgot an a there... Stef is A natural. ?REALLY good mushroom
P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Which begs the question, does anyone have experience with a reputable
and capable repair service that has the equipment to columnate a lens
properly after tearing it down for repair?
Collimate. I hate to think what columnation would do
PJ,
I can recommend Eric Hendrickson also known as Pentaxrepair on the internet.
He's an experienced Pentax repair guy from Chicago now retired in Tennessee.
http://pentaxs.com/index.html
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:11 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought
Just got a roll of slide film scanned in. Here are a few 67 shots of
the same waterfall you've probably seen before:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/waterfall/
No cropping or exposure compensation (not even Levels or Curves
adjustments yet). These are just what you'd see if you put
thePrintFile
It does look a bit smaller than the K10D but bigger than the istD
which was to small for me.
I find the K10D and the D200 just about right for my sausage fingers.:-)
I stopped the video just before the end, but i would be concered about
flash capabilities. I have trouble with the K10D and 360,
Any one try it with a flash.??
Dave
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
Desjardins, Steve wrote:
Doug,
How does it feel in your hands? I was very fond of the *ist D and DS but
less so of the K10D. I'm kind of hoping for a cross between the *ist D and
the
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
That's really nice as it is but it would be interesting to see the
shadow effects on those furrows in more angled light.
Well seen.
Cheers
Brian
Yes, i agree. I drove by this morning, and the tree is looking more
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:01 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Title is self explanatory. Does anyone know what it is?
Well used.??
Dave
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/mysterycar.html
Thanks
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
05, 06 and 10 look great.
Dave
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Just got a roll of slide film scanned in. Here are a few 67 shots of
the same waterfall you've probably seen before:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/waterfall/
No cropping or exposure
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:43 PM, webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Just what the subject says. I was out walking with a relatively full
kit and I spied what I thought was a Cormorant, but turned out to be
what looked like a diving duck of some kind. I mounted the the F 1.7x
adapter and the
Igor,
I like the 5th shotof the 1st batch the best.
There seems to be a bit of extra sharpness to the flower.
Having the drop in sharp focus is great, but I need more of the flower
itself in sharp focus.
Also, the white highlights are a bit distracting.
Can you simplify the background?
Regards,
Spent almost two weeks in the area one winter looong ago, mostly indoors
in bed... and found no deer around, only people - granted, some people
are strange indeed. :-)
Other than that I kept to that wild and dangerous island nearby, patches
of NC, GA, FL, SC, NE and DF... and never staying as
Jostein,
Always a nice image when you get the stripes on the antenna!
I appreciate how the iridescence is mirrored in the leaf.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:13 AM, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote:
In blog:
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2009/06/iridiscent-camouflage.html
Direct
Mark Roberts wrote:
Just got a roll of slide film scanned in. Here are a few 67 shots of
the same waterfall you've probably seen before:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/waterfall/
No cropping or exposure compensation (not even Levels or Curves
adjustments yet). These are just what you'd see if
Well, they are mostly a threat to flowers and shrubs, but they are
also host to deer ticks, which spread Lime disease. That has been a
major health concern around here, and a lot of people I know have been
affected -- by being infected.
My township hire hunters to thin our the local herd in the
Looks like a 2 year old Chrysler PT Cruiser - Of course, this one is
in better shape than most... :)
--
Bruce
Wednesday, June 3, 2009, 7:01:13 AM, you wrote:
WR Title is self explanatory. Does anyone know what it is?
WR http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/mysterycar.html
WR Thanks
WR
Oh so nice...
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Just got a roll of slide film scanned in. Here are a few 67 shots of
the same waterfall you've probably seen before:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/waterfall/
No cropping or exposure compensation (not
Rob,
It's good to have you back!
Lynn and I still talk of the tour of Sydney you gave us one night.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/3/09, Luiz Felipe luiz.fel...@techmit.com.br wrote:
Rob, in a fast scan I can't see those
All good stuff, Mark. Beautifully exposed! I gave a positive review of what was
either 3309 or 10 when posted earlier. I did, however, feel the slightest
twinge of guilt for not grading it down a nit notch for the OOF foreground
leaves.
Silly I suppose, but that piece of log debris in the
Jack Davis wrote:
All good stuff, Mark. Beautifully exposed! I gave a positive review of what
was either 3309 or 10 when posted earlier. I did, however, feel the slightest
twinge of guilt for not grading it down a nit notch for the OOF foreground
leaves.
Silly I suppose, but that piece of log
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:01:13AM -0600, William Robb wrote:
Title is self explanatory. Does anyone know what it is?
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/mysterycar.html
Thanks
William Robb
CarGeek
It's a 1949-1953 Ford Prefect E493A
Sigh (GFM envy...) stuck with events and cookie cutter portraiture
projects except for a recent pop-rock concert which makes life
interesting:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/sets/72157618957762781/
The fun part is I got to shoot with my son Khalil who was in his
environment (like I'm
The K-7 is deeper than the *ist-D (although mostly because the hand
grip is significantly larger), but aprt from that it's practically
the same size (a mere 2mm wider and higher).
If you felt the *ist-D was too small, you might feel the same way
about the K-7.
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 10:46:17AM
Oh, I see. Hadn't considered the breeze to have been the problem. Their
proximity to the camera and the fact that I don't see it in any other area,
lead me to that conclusion.
WRT the log, guess I just bother more easily. ;-)
Jack
--- On Wed, 6/3/09, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Great capture, nice OOF background too.
Regards,
John
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of AlunFoto
[alunf...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 June 2009 13:13
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - iridiscent camouflage
In blog:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: SMC A* 300mm f4.0 no longer focuses to infinity!
Christian wrote:
Bob W wrote:
it's because as we get older, and as this little blue ball continues its
Either of these two appeal to me more than the rest, because the water
droplet is the center of attention, and has a better image contained
therein.
On Jun 2, 2009, at 23:22 , Igor Roshchin wrote:
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2009/IMGP7084.jpg
Recorded in my list of quotes with depth and meaning. Thanks. Or
something.
Should that be a Mark?
On Jun 3, 2009, at 00:20 , William Robb wrote:
When we are young, our decisions are few, our choices infinite. The
more we choose, the more we limit our choices. Infinity becomes
finite,
- Original Message -
From: John Francis
Subject: Re: OT: help identifying this car
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:01:13AM -0600, William Robb wrote:
Title is self explanatory. Does anyone know what it is?
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/mysterycar.html
Thanks
William Robb
On Jun 3, 2009, at 02:13 , Christian wrote:
Bob W wrote:
it's because as we get older, and as this little blue ball
continues its
voyage through the darkness, infinity gets closer and closer.
h if the universe is expanding wouldn't infinity be getting
farther and farther?
You are
None of the two batches work for me ;+{
You've included too much distracting background, although the second batch
is somewhat better in this regard.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org
Subject: PESO - water droplet
Nice capture, but I'd crop out about a third from the LH edge giving some
room to the antennae.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO - iridiscent camouflage
In blog:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:40 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
The K-7 is deeper than the *ist-D (although mostly because the hand
grip is significantly larger), but aprt from that it's practically
the same size (a mere 2mm wider and higher).
If you felt the *ist-D was too small, you
All very nice. Excellent work!
Paul
On Jun 3, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
--- On Wed, 6/3/09, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com
Subject: Pentax 67 - More waterfall shots
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, June 3,
Today, I would define infinity in Pentax terms as
The number of years remaining before Pentax releases
A full frame DSLR camera
J.C. O'Connell ( mailto:hifis...@gate.net )
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Joseph McAllister
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:32 AM, tbei...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
snip
You better believe it! I don't think I had recovered from the night before
till after 3:00 PM. I felt I was trying to force myself to do the work for
the contest, but then I would remember raising my hand and vowing to: Not
Nice to see. The first and last ones are good.
Dave
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, I posted those images on an old blog I haven't used for
a long time, and it cut off the right side of all the images. I hope
this is better:
Interesting. The first time I looked at these photos on the old blog,
they were fine. Now when I go back to see what you meant by it cut
off the right side they are in fact cut off. Hm…
On Jun 3, 2009, at 06:56 , Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Unfortunately, I posted those images on an old
Love the colours in this and how you have the head and antenna infront
of the other leaf, to hi lite that feature.
Dave
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:13 AM, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote:
In blog:
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2009/06/iridiscent-camouflage.html
Direct to image:
Nice set. I like 3306 the best.
Is that a 100% viewfinder on the 67 ?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com
Subject: Pentax 67 - More waterfall shots
Just got a roll of slide film scanned in. Here are a few 67
Very nice gallery and well rendered.
Dave
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
A small set of street photos from the Greek Festival at Saint Nicholas Greek
Orthodox Church in San Jose:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/sets/72157619035288055/
All
Please don't put down PT''s, my five year old PT made the trip to GFM
without a hiccup. Don't want it's feelings hurt.
Ted
snip
--
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:17:40 -0700
From: Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
Subject: Re: OT: help identifying this
Say what you will about the PT's mediocre design, build or handling,
but they lasted as long in Chrysler's catalog for a reason. Useful
design and a reasonable balance between reliable and cheap to fix. The
PT's arguably the best cheap car of the last decade, especially at
current pricing.
-Adam
Mark, I prefer 7d903308. The exposure looks perfect to me and you can do
what you want with it in post. I really like your composition and the tonal
range is outstanding. My only problem is, and not just your shots but
everyone I know of, is the lack of a new way to represent or capture the
The funny part it was aimed at car buffs and young adults
But failed there and instead it became a big hit with the silver haired
retirees crowd
J.C. O'Connell ( mailto:hifis...@gate.net )
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
I saw a few shots done with the onboard. Close ( 2-3 ft), no hot spots,
blown highlights, ok, if you want to use the onboard. I would think a
dedicated flash would fare as well or probably better. I do know that once
it was in my hand, my hand didn't want to release it's grip. Fit my hand
like
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
