--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:08:30PM -0700, Brendan
MacRae wrote:
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:18:02PM -0400,
Christian
wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever size sensor Pentax uses in the K1D, we can
be sure it will work with DA lenses. They wouldn't
be introducing a full line of expensive lenses for
cameras that can't use them. So FF is definitely a
no go.
Paul
That's a good point, Paul. I was thinking
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 10, 2007, at 3:01 AM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
I talk to him all the time and he's really
craving the
quality that he's seeing from guys on his Canon
forums. I've subscribed myself to one and have
seen
some of this work and it blows
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So not only did Al Gore invent the internet, Bill
Clinton made DSLRs profitable. Gotta hand it to
those Dems. They've got the high tech stuff covered.
Oh, Paul...what hath thou wrought?
ducking
-Brendan
-- Original message
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm with Brendan on this one. I think he's
presented his opinion in a sound
and rational manner and that he's just getting
bashed around because it's
not that of a cheerleader.
If Pentax had a FF body at a reasonable price, I bet
the vast majority
show relative resolutions at
different quailities of the same sensor? I need to get
a hold of a camera with a different sensor and run it
through it's paces and see if I notice a difference.
-Brendan
On 5/10/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED
is lost
in the downsizing
process, don't you think? Otherwise I don't
understand why you want a
FF size sensor? Maybe the difference that you are
seen have to do with
glass and postprocessing?
On 5/10/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Fernando Terrazzino [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae
Subject: Re: Pentax - Selling HQ and Apparently
Drops 645D
Thanks, Tom. It's funny how some presume so much.
I
love Pentax. I love the K10D. So, kill me if I
also
want the company
--- Pawel Bartuzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan MacRae pisze:
Thanks, Tom. It's funny how some presume so much.
I
love Pentax. I love the K10D. So, kill me if I
also
want the company to be able compete with the big
guys
and offer gear of an even higher caliber.
-Brendan
Really solid photograph, Paul.
I can't decide which is better, the creamy background
or the crisp foreground.
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damn. The list is going to hell. First it's the
homeless, then
children, now flowers. Can't anyone post some solid
landscapes?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax To Sell Tokyo HQ, Quit Low-Profit Ops To
Lift Corp Value
TOKYO (Nikkei)--Pentax Corp. plans to sell its
Tokyo headquarters and
withdraw from less profitable businesses under
strategies the camera maker
has
crafted to block a takeover bid
that would really get me excited
at this point. I won't buy another 4/3 camera unless
it could be shown to be a huge improvement over the
current models.
-Brendan
-- Original message
--
From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 01:45:24PM -0700, Brendan
MacRae wrote:
A full frame DSLR would sell in huge numbers vs. a
MF
digicam anyday...even if it were a piece of crap.
That doesn't seem to be true. While the Canon 5D is
selling
reasonably
.
Brendan MacRae wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was never indicated that the K1D would be full
frame. It will merely be an upgrade from the
K10D,
which suits me just fine.
Paul
Yeah, that's why I said hypothetical FF sensor.
I'm hoping if they do release a K1D
--- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For most people, the (significant) extra cost of
the
larger
sensor just isn't worth it.
For most people, yes. For most serious
photographers...that may be another story
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:18:02PM -0400, Christian
wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For most people, the (significant) extra cost
of the
larger
sensor just isn't worth it.
For most people
will go on
ebay -- or to one of my children. It's the cycle.
Paul
On May 9, 2007, at 7:37 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was never indicated that the K1D would be full
frame. It will merely be an upgrade from the
K10D,
which suits me just fine.
Paul
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, of course. Canon makes and sells more
cameras
than any other DSLR maker. They have lots of
choices
to compete with the extra cost of the 5D.
For most people, the (significant) extra cost of
the
larger
sensor just isn't worth
.
Paul
In that case I wouldn't buy one. Or, I would end up
selling it right away.
-Brendan
On May 9, 2007, at 9:05 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
Fair enough. I will amend...I won't by another
APS-C
sized sensor camera.
-Brendan
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually
--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/05/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I must, I must! But, I would think it would be
closer to 3K...but who knows? Canon's are going to
be
cheaper, it's true.
I think you are closer to the mark but the question
Quite a good gallery, Godfrey. Good conversions.
-Brendan
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Working my way through the photos I made in SF on
Friday, I put
together a small set of 12 BW renderings.
http://www.gdgphoto.com/sfstreet/
Comments, critique and thoughts
Gotta get a big lens.
-Brendan
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
K10D, 600mmFA f4.0, 1/160, f4.0, 400 ISO on Gitzo
1548 tripod with Kirk King
Cobra Head.
Comments appreciated.
Kenneth Waller
--
Say hello to Finn Christopher MacRae. Born on Cinco de
Mayo @ 15:57PST.
http://www.primelensphoto.com/finn.jpg
7lbs 6.4 oz, 21 inches long. My wife really had no
pain meds. This wasn't her choice, there just wasn't
time. Her doctor almost didn't make it to the delivery
room...made for an
never easy to go without
sleep for days on end, but I'll manage.
;-]
-Brendan
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - It's a boy!
Say hello to Finn Christopher MacRae. Born on
Cinco de
Mayo @ 15:57PST.
http
me, and I'll sue you is all I
had to say. End of
story. May your Finn be a winner in every way.
Paul
On May 7, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
Say hello to Finn Christopher MacRae. Born on
Cinco de
Mayo @ 15:57PST.
http://www.primelensphoto.com/finn.jpg
7lbs 6.4 oz, 21
the heck!
-Brendan
On 5/7/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a great story, thanks!
To be honest, I wasn't worried that the doctor
didn't
make until the very end. We had two nurses and a
respiratory therapist in the room. Plus, I helped
out
with the first one so I
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like I'll be taking over the PUG sometime in
the near future.
I've recently registered http://www.pdmlpug.org for
hosting purposes and
thought I would toss a few ideas to the list in
hopes of getting a bit
of feedback.
Currently
Really nice shot, Christian. You nailed it. Very
interesting pose for him, too.
-Brendan
--- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in South Texas for three days shooting birds on
a ranch in the Rio
Grande valley.
Here's a quick snap from this morning's shoot:
http://tinyurl.com/362cen
Thanks, Marnie.
I love events like that, and not just because I love
cars. There's a picture every ten feet.
-Brendan
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/29/2007 9:33:00 P.M. Pacific
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like 2, 7 and 8 the most. 2 is really nice.
It looks like you had some hard decisions on what to
crop based on the very tall nature of the composition
of a few.
-Brendan
--- Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My previous visit to Israel was in 1968. Being 18,
rebellious, and newly
Good lookin' rottie, Bill.
I keep asking my wife if we can get one and she keeps
saying, no.
Telling her that their tails are bobbed like a Corgi's
and that they're short hairs isn't working either.
;+[
-Brendan
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those of you who are not on my
This is my fav out of all of this series.
Good composition and good sky.
-Brendan
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And another mustard field. Look hard, it's there.
;-) If I knew how to do
panoramas, today would have been a good day for
one.
Very good example of effective blur.
Good on ya, Frank.
-Brendan
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm glad to see that digital does motion blur, OOF
blur and dynamic
tilt just as well as film!
;-)
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=ISuB53uBVA
Comments always
Thanks, William.
-Brendan
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae
Subject: GESO - Hot Rods in the sun
http://www.primelensphoto.com/car%20show/index.html
Excellent gallery.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
You get what you can, eh?
Good one.
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Went out to do some street photography today. Shot
another damn
bird:-). The DA50-200 of course.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5910039
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Funny!
-Brendan
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A local headshop:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=r5DHpi2sc6
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Good one, Frank.
-Brendan
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or: I thought I had room
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=jGGBdePISt
Comments always welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Ours have been out and are all wasting away now.
Nice one.
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A beautiful spring day in Michigan. My tulips are
popping out all
over. Grace is pleased.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5910081
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Gee, I don't know, I could sure take three full days
of that...and themsome!
-Brendan
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would someone in the UK kindly ring the Sun and tell
them to update the page3 photos? They've had the
same one on their home page for three days straight
and I
Thanks, Frank.
The sun was great but, unfortunately, the air was full
of pollen which ruined many a shot as most of the cars
were covered in it.
;-[
-Brendan
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/30/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a few from a car show that I
Here's a few from a car show that I just happened to
attend over the weekend downtown. I didn't know it was
happening ahead of time but saw it from the freeway on
another errand and went back to grab my gear.
These are not shots for typical motorheads. I've been
to quite a few shows and you can
Good one, Mark.
Great sky, very dramatic.
-Brendan
--- Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got a little time to play today, so I went down to
Sacred Heart Church in
East Sacramento. The church is a really nice
example of local brick
architecture from early in the last century:
Those of us who live in California can only smile.
I've never heard of 4.3 ever doing any real damage.
What are those houses made of anyway, spit and bailing
wire?
BTW, funny one, Bob.
;-]
-Brendan
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6602677.stm
Paul
Proof that it works...and works well.
-Brendan
--- Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just had to try the old David Hamilton trick -
applyin vaseline to the
front lens - or more correctly - to the UV-filter.
Only I used butter.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/475636591/
Photographed
Nice one, Godfrey.
-Brendan
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was in San Francisco early this morning, climbed the
hill to Twin
Peaks and captured this view ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/21.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
enjoy
I like them both, Walt, but because the giraffe photo
is more interesting (more original), I'd go with that
one.
-Brendan
--- Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/OrlandoandMoon.jpg
Not bad, Drew. And with the kit lens, too.
-Brendan
--- drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry, more flowers.
http://www.rileyelf.free-online.co.uk/peso3/
Cheers,
Drew.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
that, it does not
touch me.
Hope you don't mind.
Boris
Brendan MacRae wrote:
Taken the other day when I was trying to shoot the
Art
Deco City Hall building in downtown Grass Valley,
CA.
I found this instead:
http://www.primelensphoto.com/alley/index.html
Converted
Thanks, Ann.
Tomorrow, I try again to shoot City Hall.
-Brendan
--- ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
Taken the other day when I was trying to shoot the
Art
Deco City Hall building in downtown Grass Valley,
CA.
I found this instead:
http
it with a
6x7...
Norm
Brendan MacRae wrote:
Taken the other day when I was trying to shoot
the Art
Deco City Hall building in downtown Grass Valley,
CA.
I found this instead:
http://www.primelensphoto.com/alley/index.html
Converted to black and white in Photoshop
Looks like a good solution, Godfrey. It's really
similar in size to my Lowepro Nova 4.
As much as I like the case...I like your lenses
better!
;-]
-Brendan
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My big kit bag search has proven to be very
successful.
I didn't want to just shoot
Walt, at this size, the blur is not noticeable at all.
Nice shot. I like that you framed the left of the
image with the thorny plant. Better sense of place.
-Brendan
--- Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This guy was very tame and allowed me pretty close
with the 100mm f3.5
Macro. iso
It's pretty much a no brainer, Walt.
But a couple things:
There's a slot in the grip that will hold the rubber
contacts cover that you will remove from the camera. I
only mention it because some have mentioned that they
didn't notice this.
Also, in operation, you may notice that either the
It comes with a manual.
-Brendan
--- Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Bill and Brendan for some more good points to
remember. I am assuming
from Brendan's comments that the grip comes with a
manual, so that should
make any other questions I may have a little easier.
Thanks
Taken the other day when I was trying to shoot the Art
Deco City Hall building in downtown Grass Valley, CA.
I found this instead:
http://www.primelensphoto.com/alley/index.html
Converted to black and white in Photoshop.
-Brendan
__
Do You
--- J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
think about it for a second, if
region free players or cross regioned
players were available legally
anywhere, the entire region coding
system would make no sense to
designa and implement!
At a place in SF where I used to work, we sold a
Thanks, Maris.
It's too dark on my PC monitor...time to calibrate
again. It looks just right on my MAC.
-Brendan
--- Maris V. Lidaka Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A good photo, and a very good conversion.
Maris
Brendan MacRae wrote:
Taken the other day when I was trying to shoot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Love the dark tones, but overall it's a little dark
overall. (Mac OS
X viewing with Safari)
Godfrey
On Apr 19, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
It's too dark on my PC monitor...time to calibrate
again. It looks just right on my MAC.
http
Joe,
Really nice work here.
Two favs are Out of My Way and Last Hope Last Out.
-Brendan
--- J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I added more photos to the photo,net page if
anyone wants to
have a look and say what they think.Thanks Joe
www.photo.net/photos/pjjdxn
--
PDML
as 32639 R,
32639 G, 32639 B.
Your gamma setting might shift that center point
and/or might affect
being able to see all the gray steps on one end or
the other.
Godfrey
On Apr 19, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
It may be a bit dark, but I like it.
I think my monitor
I do, too. I also think the black page makes the photo
appear even darker.
Thanks.
-Brendan
--- Maris V. Lidaka Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is a bit dark, but I like this particular image
being dark.
PC with a calibrated (2 days ago most recently) NEC
LCD.
Maris
Brendan MacRae
David,
Valley of Fire, right?
Here's a couple I took there back in 1990. Scanned
from Kodak Ektar 100 negative film.
I think this one is of the mountain right behind that
beehive (the area that you can't see in your shot):
http://www.primelensphoto.com/mountains.jpg
This is one from inside
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 5:24 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
It's been so long since I originally set the
parameters for my ColorVision spyder that I can't
remember the why's and wherefore's of my settings.
Much of it was probably recommended
The res is definitely better at the 6400 dpi
resolution. But the file sizes are getting big.
My question is, are you pulling out the grain, as
well? One of the things I've noticed when scanning
black and white is that going full tilt boogie for
resolution ends up giving me detail but with grain.
The third one of the Capital is a doosy.
-Brendan
--- Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For you old camera enthusiasts: I reinvigorated my
grandmother's old Kodak
Vest Pocket Model B by having Jurgen Kreckel replace
the disintegrated paper
bellows (don't ask how much it cost). I just
Hi Alex.
Welcome.
Aperture simulators, huh? Are you trying to pick a
fight?
You may need to prove to some here that you're not
actually a spy working for Hoya ;-]
It's a long story...but welcome!
-Brendan
--- AlexG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm new to the list. Just got my
I like the moodiness of this one, Godfrey.
-Brendan
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The behinder I go, the aheader I get.
Continuing my exploration through photos I made in
London, September
2001, this one appealed to me a lot.
Swim across the Atlantic Ocean 3,462 mi
chortle
-Brendan
--- mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. go to www.google.com
2. click on maps
3. click on get directions
4. type New York, NY in the first box (the from
box)
5. type London in the second box (the to box)
6.
into.
Thanks.
Boris
Brendan MacRae wrote:
Since Aperture handles this well enough, I'm going
to
use it to display my PESO's. I posted this with
just
one shot earlier, but I added four more.
Let me know what you think of the layout and
whatnot.
Thanks.
http
You're right, Boris.
The index page is goofy on Firefox. Mine shifts the
index view all the way to right. The detail view is
fine.
I'll see if I can mess with it.
Thanks again for the heads-up.
-Brendan
--- Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks, Boris.
I'll take a look as I run
Thanks, Marnie.
I've reduced the exif info to just the basics.
The thumbnails would be smaller with more images. So,
I thought since I had the room I'm make them a bit
bigger. With more files, I'll reduce their size or
maybe just find a standard size that works.
-Brendan
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I noticed that it was just the window size.
When I shortened it on my larger monitor it looks
fine.
Thanks.
-Brendan
--- Maris V. Lidaka Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Comes out fine under Firefox on my Dell PC - 19 LCD
monitor @ 1280 x 1024
pixels.
Maris
Brendan MacRae wrote:
You're
] On Behalf Of
Brendan MacRae
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 12:53 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Full frame lenses and the K10D, CA
anyone?
http://www.primelensphoto.com/CA.jpg
This is the reddish fringe I have in more than a few
shots. However, I also have the more typical purple
--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/04/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a 100% crop from nearly the dead center of
the
image.
Interesting, that means that it's not the normal
transverse chromatic
aberration that becomes more visible as you move
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:24 PM 14/04/2007, Brendan MacRae wrote:
--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 14/04/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a 100% crop from nearly the dead center
of
the
image.
Interesting
--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/04/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, ACR is completely ineffectual with this one.
Some of the Photoshop tips I've seen can make a
dent...but not enough of one.
The answer is get some decent APO lenses I guess
.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5846580size=lg
Paul
On Apr 14, 2007, at 12:53 AM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
http://www.primelensphoto.com/CA.jpg
This is the reddish fringe I have in more than a
few
shots. However, I also have the more typical
purple
fringe in this shot
Thanks, Bruce.
I've bookmarked the page in IE.
One of the things I've found is that I'm really
starting to enjoy Aperture a lot. It's much more
photographer focused (pun intended). It's a blast
going through my dng's very quickly and easily (now
that OSX finally supports the K10D). Much, much
http://www.primelensphoto.com/tulips/index.html
Created right out of Aperture. The full version is a
tad large (file sizewize, 600+KB), but only 900 pixels
wide. Exif included. Shot with the 85mm f1.4.
Not a bad web page for a built-in freebe app. I think
I'll use it more often than the lame ass
Thanks, Dave.
I had never seen this yellow/red variety B4.
-Brendan
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice colours.
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/15/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.primelensphoto.com/tulips/index.html
Created right out of Aperture
--- J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thumbnails are
useless for critical evaluation of which shots to
use
and which shots to delete
Untrue. In Aperture, I can zip through my thumbs,
easily resize them, and even use the loupe tool to
inspect them for sharpness. The loupe works great
Bob, I like it. It like the desaturated color. But,
there are some wierd hickeys or something in the top
(is this a scanned neg?). Also some moire in the sky.
-Brendan
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
this is the only shot I've taken today that I quite
like:
I've heard of splitting hairs...
Sheesh!
-Brendan
--- J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse me, but if you resize them , they AINT thumbs
anymore!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brendan MacRae
Sent: Saturday, April 14
?
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brendan MacRae
Sent: 14 April 2007 21:36
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: On the Beach
Bob, I like it. It like the desaturated color.
But,
there are some wierd
a
digital photo. What's a hickey?
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brendan MacRae
Sent: 14 April 2007 21:36
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: On the Beach
Bob, I like it. It like the desaturated color
Since Aperture handles this well enough, I'm going to
use it to display my PESO's. I posted this with just
one shot earlier, but I added four more.
Let me know what you think of the layout and whatnot.
Thanks.
http://www.primelensphoto.com/tulips/index.html
-Brendan
--- Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since Aperture handles this well enough, I'm going
to
use it to display my PESO's. I posted this with
just
one shot earlier, but I added four more.
Let me know what you think of the layout and
whatnot.
Thanks.
http
Good Lord, man...don't do it.
Way too much money for that camera.
Get some good glass instead. Or, spend it on a M6 or
M7 and a couple of lenses.
-Brendan
--- Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As some of you know, I've been missing my Leica
rangefinder since I
returned to Pentax in 2004
What's the deal with film camera lenses and chromatic
aberration on the K10D?
Shooting wide open is a nightmare for me. Is anyone
else seeing this issue? Is it endemic with film lenses
plus the smaller sensors? It can't stricly be a
function of older glass since I have seen ED IF lenses
having
--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/04/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's endemic with most lenses, digital sensors just
tend to exacerbate
the problem, different coatings would make little
difference as the
source is lens aberrations. Fortunately CA
Really nice one, Paul. Good work.
It looks like you lucked out with the paper reflecting
right onto his face. Good and contrasty, a real a
black and white image.
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5845273
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
--- J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CA is not usually correctable by stopping down.
You're probably experiencing some other kind
of problem if simple stopping down totally fixes
it...
jco
What it did was minimize it to the point where viewed
full size it's no longer really
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When CA is the problem, ACR can fix it. But in most
digital images,
what you're seeing is not CA, it's fringing. You can
fix it with
replace color and the clone tool. A bit more work
than a quick-fix
CA correction but worth the effort most
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan, I'm living in a very sunny country and I am
shooting in all
times of day. The only lens that gives me really
visible CA is 80-320.
All others (31, 43, 50/1.7, 77, 28-105, 17-35 FE,
FAJ 18-35, Tamron
28-75, F 80-200/4.7-5.6, Sigma
--- J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
like I said before, thats probably not
CA, it's something else.
jco
Rob says it's sensor blooming. All I know is that some
call it, rightly or wrongly, CA. Whatever it's called,
I just want it to go away.
;-]
-Brendan
Good point, Mark.
In fact, I could really care less about it except that
I've had some rejections because of it. Now, are the
inspectors looking past 100%? I have no idea, but
probably so.
For my own peace of mind, I'm trying to get to the
bottom of something that will, in the end, make me a
http://www.primelensphoto.com/CA.jpg
This is the reddish fringe I have in more than a few
shots. However, I also have the more typical purple
fringe in this shot as well, complicating the fix, as
it were.
-Brendan
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:24 PM 14/04/2007, Brendan MacRae
Dramatic shot, Toine.
-Brendan
--- Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fire spitter:
http://leende.net/peso/20070409
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Rod
__
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brendan MacRae
Hey gang...
Well, I had some issues with dust, as we all do, and
took a look around at sensor cleaners
- Rod
__
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brendan MacRae
Hey gang...
Well, I had some issues with dust, as we all do, and
took a look around at sensor cleaners
601 - 700 of 1210 matches
Mail list logo
