On 26 Nov 2002 at 22:49, William Robb wrote:
Hi,
I am thinking of going from Win98SE to Windows XP (Pro?? not the
Home Edition, the one that costs real money).
Yes, avoid the home edition at all costs. Hacker's Paradise...
I am running a PIII 667 with gobs of RAM and lots of drive
FREE FILM!!!
yeah, i'm in ... (I use quite a bit of NPH) 120 please
-bc
On 26 Oct 2002 at 1:54, Cameron Hood wrote:
canipostnowandwillitmakeittothenethuhdougwillitwillithuhhuhwellwhatdoyouthin
kamibeingfilteredohlordynonononononono
On 18 Aug 2002 at 13:24, Chris Brogden wrote:
I borrowed my Pentax rep's 67II to try it out, and it did something
strange, so I'm wondering how typical this is. Halfway through a roll of
120, it blanked out the counter on the LCD, made me advance the film a
couple of frames as though it
On 19 Aug 2002 at 13:16, Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only time the camera has ever mis-counted film is when I've
loaded it wrong or forgotten to flip the pressure plate btwn
120 -- 220 or vice versa.
Brain
Kind of a silly mistake for a guy named Brain!
:-P
On 17 Aug 2002 at 11:06, Bob Rapp wrote:
If I were to restart and sacrifice my existing cameras and lenses, I would
be hard pressed to bypass Canon. Their present system and optics leave Nikon
lacking. Only because older optics can be used with present Nikon cameras
keep Nikon in the game.
I haven't had great luck with 4x6 prints from slides
either. Good sharpness, but the colors/contrast has
never been great. I've had great success with Fujichrome
prints, 11 x 14's from 35mm slides look stunning (they're
hand printed, tho - a bit costly but the results are totally
worth it).
Subject: Re: OT:What other brand camera could make you change systems
Leica, if they weren't so damned expensive.
- -Brendan MacRae
Canon EOS - I'm looking at one now, but the price
tag is a bit too much to choke down
I'll never part with the 67II... but I need more 35mm
I seem to remember just this morning there was a thread on
one of the Minolta scanners that was actually a 35mm
scanner but could also do MF (at a reduced resolution).
Anyone got further info on this one?
--BC
On 26 Jun 2002 at 11:55, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Mark,
Near as I can tell, JCO is
On 14 Apr 2002 at 11:55, Gabriel Bovino wrote:
Talk about waiting to the last minute
Done and done!
Too bad I can't deduct my Pentax purchases for 2001.
Oh, the joys of a part-time photography business -
it's also a GREAT tax writeoff...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
Stopped by one of the local photo suppliers
today just before they closed (actually they were
putting the key in to lock the door when I opened
it...)
I bought 20 rolls of 3200 delta in 120 format. The
sales guy said Hey - you're my last sale of the day
to which I replied, Cool! Do I get a
my $0.02
67II
Z1p
645n
mz-s
mz-5n
in no particular order.
Cheers!
BC
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On 25 Mar 2002 at 15:34, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
He's also interested in lenses in
the 150mm range, for portraiture...do any of our Brothers have
favourites?
For portraits definintely the 165 F4 LS for me.
Haven't bought mine yet (soon though) so I can't
remember whether or not an extension
On 23 Mar 2002 at 17:36, Steve Pearson wrote:
I'm looking to do some friends' (as well as possibly
some semi-pro) jobs/portraits in the near future. I
would like input from anyone who has a portable
lighting system. What type of equipment do you have,
how much will it cost me, etc.
Well,
On 24 Mar 2002 at 22:10, William Robb wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1340677858r=
0t=0showTutorial=0ed=1017020948indexURL=0rd=1
AARGG
say no more.
Brian
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
On 24 Mar 2002 at 20:09, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Here's one of my goose shots from this afternoon:
Yup, they can be rather challenging to shoot
http://www.bc-photo.com/images/oddgoose.jpg
-BC
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
Frits wrote:
While I was trying to capture some snow drops (flowers) in a landscape
photograph, I wanted to position my camera very low above the ground level.
My Bogen 3021 can go almost flat (legs spread out fully), but still with the
3047 head the lowest I can do from the ground to the
On 10 Jan 2002, at 11:37, Delano Mireles wrote:
Hi all,
I'm in the process of searching for a MF camera and was wondering if anyone
here shoots MF exclusively? Trying to decide if I should ditch my ZX-5n,
upgrade my digital olympus for snapshots and go MF for everything else. I'm
really
I had fun shaving my head this weekend!
After 3 years of having long hair I said Enough!
The locks are being donated to local wig maker,
who makes wigs on behalf of the BC Cancer Society
for cancer or burn victims.
(Actually, I set up the strobes and the backdrop, and
handed the camera to a
On 8 Jan 2002, at 17:29, Norman Baugher wrote:
I'm feeling that enablement pang in the pit of my stomach. I think I'm
going to be about USD750 poorer in the near
future...aaagggmust...fightit... I don't know about you guys,
but since I've had the 6x7, I find my 35mm stuff
On 17 Dec 2001, at 19:53, Len Paris wrote:
Stulling? What's that?
Oops thats STUNNING.
my fung is all tucked up...
Cheers!
Brain
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
On 26 Nov 2001, at 15:14, Mike Johnston wrote:
That's it. That's my perfect camera. Anything I left out?
Does it serve martinis?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Anyone have any definative words on this being discontinued?
I just checked with my Kodak rep, and he confirmed that T400CN has been
discontinued. Apparently BW+ (amateur, 24 exp.) and Portra 400BW (pro,
36 exp.) are very, very similar emulsions; T400CN was different from both
of them.
On 29 Oct 2001, at 9:38, Cory or Brenda Waters wrote:
There's a definite KA-chunk with the A3000 ..
Start with the 67 - that's one earth-shattering KA-CHUNK!!
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Hey guys,
I just checked out the Kodak website to try to confirm
the rumors that T400cn is discontinued, but nothing's
there...
Where did you get this info? Sure the Portra 400 film
is listed as well, but this is listed as for printing on
professional color negative papers while T400CN is
On 23 Oct 2001, at 20:03, Cotty wrote:
But I don't really do landscapes. People. And that's 35 mil all over it.
Rambling,
Cotty
I dunno, I LOVE shooting people in 6 x 7. Since I got my 67II,
I almost don't like using 35mm anymore. Formal portraits,
casual portraits, kids portraits,
On 1 Oct 2001, at 7:29, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Brian Campbell (pm) wrote:
How much was the 45mm going for per day, if you don't mind me asking?
It was $25 per day, and $100 per week - around the same as in
Vancouver.
They have a website which lists all their rental prices,
http
26 matches
Mail list logo
