Thanks, Ann!
Lack of time to work on pics is the reason for the slow pace of posting.
Foiling your cheating is merely a fringe benefit!
Rick
> On Aug 4, 2018, at 8:00 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> Very nice- the framing and exposure seem just right for this sort of thing -
> I find the
Thanks, Dan.
> On Aug 4, 2018, at 7:33 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> I like the way you were able to incorporate the cupola, the chandelier and
> some of the stained glass windows. Not an easy feat. It give a feeling of
> the interior of the building as a whole. Nicely done.
>
>
> Dan
Very nice- the framing and exposure seem just right for this sort of
thing - I find the interior of the cathedral more
interesting and prettier than the exterior-
I notice you are peso'ing as you add to your gallery -- trying to foil
my cheating? :-)
ann
On 8/3/2018 10:01 PM, Rick Womer
I like the way you were able to incorporate the cupola, the chandelier and
some of the stained glass windows. Not an easy feat. It give a feeling of
the interior of the building as a whole. Nicely done.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:01
https://rickwomer.smugmug.com/AMS-to-CDG/Antwerp/Antwerp/i-Dqz89cF/A
Comments appreciated!
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
A couple of pointers for the area around Mt. Shasta itself:
http://42graphy.org/misc/2013-weed/
There is a lavender farm near Mt. Shasta (look it up). The 3rd photo in
this set is from there.
It's a nice (and rather romantic) place, - you might enjoy it.
Cheers,
Igor
PS. The town of
I'm about to head up towards Mt. Shasta for a tango workshop next
weekend. Afterwards I'll continue up to the Oregon Central Coast visit
Mom, then head up to Portland for a couple days. If all goes well, I'll
be able to leave a bit early, maybe even get a chance to play with my
camera a bit.
Textbook image. Perhaps not colourful but nevertheless immaculate. Some
birders concentrate on difficult SBJ's.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist
Sent: 18 March, 2018 8:51 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO Looking His Best
Junkos are generally not attractive
Well caught, Paul.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 18, 2018, at 8:59 PM, Subash Jeyan wrote:
>
> very nice Paul...
>
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 14:51:32 -0400
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>
>> https://www.photo.net/photo/18462845/
>
>
> --
> PDML
very nice Paul...
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 14:51:32 -0400
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> https://www.photo.net/photo/18462845/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
are just about
> solid grey and they dig around on the ground for the seeds other birds
> drop. The males are only a little bit better looking. All of them head
> north as soon as the weather turns warm here. This guy is somewhat of an
> exception. He has some nice feathers and he perch
Thanks Ken. A great day to spend some time outdoors.
Paul
> On Mar 18, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Ken Waller <kwal...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>
> Nice capture Paul.
>
>
> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@mac.com>
>> Subject: PESO Lo
Nice capture Paul.
-Original Message-
>From: Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@mac.com>
>Subject: PESO Looking His Best
>
>Junkos are generally not attractive birds. The females are just about solid
>grey and they dig around on the ground for the seeds other birds drop.
Junkos are generally not attractive birds. The females are just about solid
grey and they dig around on the ground for the seeds other birds drop. The
males are only a little bit better looking. All of them head north as soon as
the weather turns warm here. This guy is somewhat of an exception
t;>
>> -p
>>
>>
>> On 2/11/2018 9:36 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>>> The same as the previous photo, inverted for fun:
>>>
>>> https://www.photo.net/photo/18456655/Looking-Up-side-down
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>&
agree with Paul
ann
On 2/12/2018 1:35 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
That one's nice, too, but I like the first the best.
-p
On 2/11/2018 9:36 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
The same as the previous photo, inverted for fun:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18456655/Looking-Up-side-down
Comments?
Rick
That one's nice, too, but I like the first the best.
-p
On 2/11/2018 9:36 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
The same as the previous photo, inverted for fun:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18456655/Looking-Up-side-down
Comments?
Rick
--
Paul Sorenson
Studio1941
Sooner or later "different&qu
I like this! Cool interpretation of the MAM. Sorry that I wasn't able
to join you.
-p
On 2/11/2018 3:48 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
From our trip to Milwaukee in October, taken at the Museum of Art:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18456602/Looking-Up
(K-5, DA 17-70)
Comments appreciated!
Rick
Excellent!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Rick Womer <rickpic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From our trip to Milwaukee in October, taken at the Museum of Art:
>
> https://www.photo.net/photo/18456602/Looking-Up
>
The same as the previous photo, inverted for fun:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18456655/Looking-Up-side-down
Comments?
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>From our trip to Milwaukee in October, taken at the Museum of Art:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18456602/Looking-Up
(K-5, DA 17-70)
Comments appreciated!
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, ple
Dale doesn't have stripes
ann
On 10/13/2017 1:08 PM, John wrote:
On 10/12/2017 15:51, Paul Stenquist wrote:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18429784/Looking-for-Dale
Cute, but how do you know that's not Dale looking for Chip? 8-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
On 10/12/2017 15:51, Paul Stenquist wrote:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18429784/Looking-for-Dale
Cute, but how do you know that's not Dale looking for Chip? 8-)
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
ting birds.
>
> Paul via phone
>
>> On Oct 12, 2017, at 11:23 PM, Ken Waller <kwal...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Nice capture Paul, did you pay him to pose with peanuts ?
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu
Very nice! The angle of the rock gives him an alert and attractive posture.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@mac.com> wrote:
> https://www.photo.net/photo/18429784/Looking-for-Dale
>
> -
ssage-
>> From: Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@mac.com>
>> Subject: PESO: Looking for Dale
>>
>> https://www.photo.net/photo/18429784/Looking-for-Dale
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml
Nice capture Paul, did you pay him to pose with peanuts ?
-Original Message-
>From: Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@mac.com>
>Subject: PESO: Looking for Dale
>
>https://www.photo.net/photo/18429784/Looking-for-Dale
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http:
Thanks, Cotty.
Paul via phone
> On Oct 12, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Steve Cottrell <co...@seeingeye.tv> wrote:
>
> On 12/10/17, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> https://www.photo.net/photo/18429784/Looking-for-Dale
>
> Haha - lovely shot.
>
took me a minuute to get that one... :-)
ann
On 10/12/2017 3:51 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18429784/Looking-for-Dale
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
On 12/10/17, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>https://www.photo.net/photo/18429784/Looking-for-Dale
Haha - lovely shot.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and
|| (O) |Live Broadcast News
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Disc
https://www.photo.net/photo/18429784/Looking-for-Dale
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
from last weeks visit to Chicago:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/looking-out-the-window
Or on flickr:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/markcassino/35995158580
https://www.flickr.com/photos/markcassino/36223856042
Q7
06 telephoto on the first image (hotel window)
02 standard zoom
it could be nicer,
I don't know if contrast is the dial to frob though.
Cheers,
Rick
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Mark C<pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
Two more photos from last weeks visit to Chicago:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/looking-out-the-window
Or on
PM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
Two more photos from last weeks visit to Chicago:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/looking-out-the-window
Or on flickr:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/markcassino/35995158580
https://www.flickr.com/photos/markcassino/36223856042
Loving these, and the river one!
ann
On 8/5/2017 6:08 PM, Mark C wrote:
Two more photos from last weeks visit to Chicago:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/looking-out-the-window
Or on flickr:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/markcassino/35995158580
https://www.flickr.com/photos
hicago:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/looking-out-the-window
Or on flickr:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/markcassino/35995158580
https://www.flickr.com/photos/markcassino/36223856042
Q7
06 telephoto on the first image (hotel window)
02 standard zoom on the second (shaded
net> wrote:
> Two more photos from last weeks visit to Chicago:
>
> http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/looking-out-the-window
>
> Or on flickr:
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/markcassino/35995158580
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/markcassino/36
Two more photos from last weeks visit to Chicago:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/looking-out-the-window
Or on flickr:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/markcassino/35995158580
https://www.flickr.com/photos/markcassino/36223856042
Q7
06 telephoto on the first image (hotel
Should be ULH corner .
-Original Message-
>From: Ken Waller <kwal...@peoplepc.com>
>Sent: Jul 10, 2017 11:41 PM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
>Subject: Re: Looking for feedback on a PESO
>
>Makes a very nice abstract as posted.
>
&g
I think it is cropped too tight on the top... and since it is nearly
colorless, a black and white version might make me like it a bit more..
The curve is nice, but the lack of contrast and the blandness of color
keep me from loving it.
ann
On 7/11/2017 5:53 AM, Jostein wrote:
Larry,
Without
Larry,
Without the original frame it's hard to tell what compromises I would
have made in the cropping if it was mine. So just a couple of
observations... :-)
The arc of the stones works very well as a main motif in the
composition. The way they are angled to the left make them look like a
://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" <webstertwenty...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Looking for feedback on a PESO
It's a nice composition. It's the kind of thing you might see printed big
and hung in a boardroom.
On 7/10/201
What he said.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
On 7/10/2017 6:40 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
It's a pleasant scene with interesting detail and an excellent composition.
Paul via phone
On Jul 10, 2017, at 8:45 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
There is a sense of tranquility.
It
Damn - forgot to hit Reply List...hope this gets it back on track.
I think it was better with the water included. It needs the wider view
to emphasize the line of the rocks leading to the water and loses
something with just the rocks and sand.
-p
On 7/10/2017 6:42 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
It's a nice composition. It's the kind of thing you might see printed
big and hung in a boardroom.
Thanks
On 7/10/2017 2:42 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
A lot of the time when I post a photo, I know why I like it. This is
one that I don't have a good understanding of its
It's a nice composition. It's the kind of thing you might see printed
big and hung in a boardroom.
On 7/10/2017 2:42 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
A lot of the time when I post a photo, I know why I like it. This is
one that I don't have a good understanding of its strengths and
weaknesses, which
Thanks Dan, also Paul, and others who looked or will look.
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
There is a sense of tranquility.
It resembles a zen garden to some extent.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Rick Womer wrote:
Larry, that's beautiful. The curving line on rocks and the quiet beach
are very tranquil;, the pools with the blue reflections are very
intriguing.
My only suggestion would be to trim a bit off the top; the thin strip
of ocean is distracting.
Thank you very much. I
Larry, that's beautiful. The curving line on rocks and the quiet beach
are very tranquil;, the pools with the blue reflections are very
intriguing.
My only suggestion would be to trim a bit off the top; the thin strip
of ocean is distracting.
Cheers,
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Mon,
It's a pleasant scene with interesting detail and an excellent composition.
Paul via phone
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 8:45 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> There is a sense of tranquility.
>
> It resembles a zen garden to some extent.
>
>
> Dan Matyola
>
There is a sense of tranquility.
It resembles a zen garden to some extent.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> A lot of the time when I post a photo, I know why I like it. This is one
> that I
A lot of the time when I post a photo, I know why I like it. This is
one that I don't have a good understanding of its strengths and
weaknesses, which is why I didn't post it earlier. However a friend
just commented positively about it on flickr, so I thought I'd give it a
try. I cropped a
33 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> A shadow caused by heavy backlight makes this guy look transparent as he
>> perches on a blue metal wire hanger. Some interesting stuff going on with
>> lens flare/bokeh as well.
>>
>> https://www.photo.net/photo/18378995/you-looking-
going on with lens
flare/bokeh as well.
https://www.photo.net/photo/18378995/you-looking-at-me-
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Yep. Took me a while to figure out what I was looking at. At first I wondered
if the wing was transparent!
> On Apr 24, 2017, at 3:49 PM, Jack Davis <jdavi...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Yeah. Somewhat confusing. (?)
>
> J
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Apr 2
ng on with
> lens flare/bokeh as well.
>
> https://www.photo.net/photo/18378995/you-looking-at-me-
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and f
A shadow caused by heavy backlight makes this guy look transparent as he
perches on a blue metal wire hanger. Some interesting stuff going on with lens
flare/bokeh as well.
https://www.photo.net/photo/18378995/you-looking-at-me-
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017, at 05:44 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> There were two pics that I was always enamored with.
> One was "Old Masters"
> Joseph J. McAllister
> http://pug.komkon.org/00marc/oldmasters.htm
>
> The other I can't find. It was an old man walking in the fog.
> I think it was in
There were two pics that I was always enamored with.
One was "Old Masters"
Joseph J. McAllister
http://pug.komkon.org/00marc/oldmasters.htm
The other I can't find. It was an old man walking in the fog.
I think it was in England.
Anyone recall it? Same era as the Old Masters.
--
PDML
On 14/2/17, Stanley Halpin, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I like the look and feel of the lens, I like the results. But do I
>really need this when I have the D FA 24-70mm f2.8?
>Well, but then I think about fixed-focal shooting, and what a nice set
>of primes I have in the 20/2.8, 24/2.0, 35/2.0,
> On Feb 14, 2017, at 1:52 PM, Stanley Halpin
> wrote:
>
> FWIW, I have a ZK 35mm f2.0 T* which I have used sparingly. Never having
> owned a Pentax 35mm, I can’t make any sort of comparison.
>
> I like the look and feel of the lens, I like the results. But do I
FWIW, I have a ZK 35mm f2.0 T* which I have used sparingly. Never having owned
a Pentax 35mm, I can’t make any sort of comparison.
I like the look and feel of the lens, I like the results. But do I really need
this when I have the D FA 24-70mm f2.8?
Well, but then I think about fixed-focal
A planar is sharp enough to create wood shavings...
On 1/24/2017 2:42 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
On 24 Jan 2017, at 10:34, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 24/1/17, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed:
I used to have an M 50/1.4 and a Zeiss T* 50/1.4 when I had the Contax
kit. I
On 24 Jan 2017, at 10:34, Steve Cottrell wrote:
>
> On 24/1/17, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> I used to have an M 50/1.4 and a Zeiss T* 50/1.4 when I had the Contax
>> kit. I preferred the Zeiss,
>
> What's the difference between a Planar and a Tessar?
No
On 24/1/17, Ralf R Radermacher, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The Tessar is a four-element lens with a maximum aperture of 2.8, the
>Planar has six or seven elements and opens up to 1.4.
>
>The Tessar had its hayday when a lack of efficient lens coatings acted
>in favour of designs with less
Purely coincidentally, Planar optical scheme was invented by Zeiss. So,
like it or not, most if not all 50/1.4 lenses have some Zeiss Inside (tm).
On 24 Jan 2017 13:17, "Ralf R Radermacher" wrote:
Am 24.01.17 um 11:34 schrieb Steve Cottrell:
What's the difference between a
Am 24.01.17 um 11:34 schrieb Steve Cottrell:
What's the difference between a Planar and a Tessar?
The Tessar is a four-element lens with a maximum aperture of 2.8, the
Planar has six or seven elements and opens up to 1.4.
The Tessar had its hayday when a lack of efficient lens coatings
On 24/1/17, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I used to have an M 50/1.4 and a Zeiss T* 50/1.4 when I had the Contax
>kit. I preferred the Zeiss,
What's the difference between a Planar and a Tessar?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video
On 24/1/17, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I used to have an M 50/1.4 and a Zeiss T* 50/1.4
[snip]
Thanks Bob - much appreciated
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
PDML
One can't disagree with you Zos especially if one had pots of money or
were a PRO or were an old fart like me.
But foot in mouth, may I add that in todays use and throw world -
repairs difficult & expensive - plastics are just as good as metal.
In fact space age plastics are stronger than steel -
> On 22 Jan 2017, at 16:36, Steve Cottrell wrote:
>
> On 22/1/17, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> KEH.com has a ZK 50mm f1.4 T* for a not outrageous price. "A" mount
>> equivalent. I'd buy it but I'm broke at the moment.
>
> How do you think it compares
Taken with
Pentax K5 with Zeiss ZS 50mm f1.4 T*
https://flic.kr/p/LWcBnk
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 23/1/17 3:35 am, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 22/1/17, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
KEH.com has a ZK 50mm f1.4 T* for a not outrageous price. "A" mount
Leitz on a Leica, not Zeiss.
regards, Anthony
On 24 January 2017 at 01:30, Godfrey DiGiorgi
wrote:
> Bipin,
>
> Is there some point to this post? I'm mystified.
>
> G
>
>
> > On Jan 22, 2017, at 10:44 PM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
> >
> > 70 Years or more
Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 23/1/17, Zos Xavius, discombobulated, unleashed:
Which is going to be worth more in 10 years? Plastic samyang lenses or
bulletproof metal and glass zeiss ZK glass? Zeiss is a good investment
no matter what.
I agree.
But I would point out that my Samyang 12/2 is
Fair enough. :)
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 23/1/17, Zos Xavius, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Which is going to be worth more in 10 years? Plastic samyang lenses or
>>bulletproof metal and glass zeiss ZK glass? Zeiss is a good investment
On 23/1/17, Zos Xavius, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Which is going to be worth more in 10 years? Plastic samyang lenses or
>bulletproof metal and glass zeiss ZK glass? Zeiss is a good investment
>no matter what.
I agree.
But I would point out that my Samyang 12/2 is not made of plastic.
--
Hmm. Well, what is your personal experience in proof of this allegation? I have
used Pentax lenses extensively, as well as lenses from Nikon, Olympus, Canon,
and Panasonic amongst others, as well as a number of both Leica and Zeiss
lenses.
My experience shows me that: Regardless of
Which is going to be worth more in 10 years? Plastic samyang lenses or
bulletproof metal and glass zeiss ZK glass? Zeiss is a good investment
no matter what.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
> Sorry Godfrey for mystifying you.
>
> The last line is pretty
Sorry Godfrey for mystifying you.
The last line is pretty clear "go ahead and buy a Zeiss Lens for $
when you can buy
similar or better ones for much less".
Someone was expounding the Zeiss Lens for Pentax DSLRs. No doubt Zeiss
make great
lenses. But all I was saying is that you can buy
Bipin,
Is there some point to this post? I'm mystified.
G
> On Jan 22, 2017, at 10:44 PM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
>
> 70 Years or more ago Zeiss and the Germans made good lenses - perhaps
> the best - as there were no others making lenses then!!??
> The Russians and the
70 Years or more ago Zeiss and the Germans made good lenses - perhaps
the best - as there were no others making lenses then!!??
The Russians and the Japanese stepped in to slowly match Zeiss and
later exceed them.
They were followed by the Koreans who made equally good optics.
And now the Chinese
On 22/1/17, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I don't have direct evidence for the Zeiss only reviews and reputation.
>That said, the Pentax, in fact all Pentax 50mm/55mm* are classic
>designs. A bit soft wide open, softer in the corners on film. Stop down
>to f4.0 or 5.6 and they
I don't have direct evidence for the Zeiss only reviews and reputation.
That said, the Pentax, in fact all Pentax 50mm/55mm* are classic
designs. A bit soft wide open, softer in the corners on film. Stop down
to f4.0 or 5.6 and they become sharp as hell, but I expect you noticed
this. This
On 22/1/17, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>KEH.com has a ZK 50mm f1.4 T* for a not outrageous price. "A" mount
>equivalent. I'd buy it but I'm broke at the moment.
How do you think it compares optically to the Pentax M50/1.4 ?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast,
KEH.com has a ZK 50mm f1.4 T* for a not outrageous price. "A" mount
equivalent. I'd buy it but I'm broke at the moment.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
John Francis wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:41:08AM -0500, John Francis wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:08:46AM +, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 17/12/16, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the
niche of my 18-250,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:41:08AM -0500, John Francis wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:08:46AM +, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> > On 17/12/16, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >
> > >Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the
> > >niche of my 18-250, being
.mitch...@which.net>
>Subject: Re: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
>
>If you can live with manual focus, there's the good old 70-210 F4.
>I've seen them going for 30-50 GBP. So good value, reasonably fast and
>quite compact.
>
>Chris
>
>On 18 December 2016 at 20:14,
length? Surely with the K1 having such a
>> good sensor, using what can only ever be an inferior lens (with such a
>> large zoom range) is counter-productive?
>
>
> OK, I'm not looking for a full frame equivalent of the 18-250, in a sense I
> already have one, the sigma 50-500.
I don't know. The 70/200 is obviously good and a stop faster than the 60-250,
but I already have the latter. I may sell it and the 50-135 some day, but I'm
not in a hurry.
Paul via phone
> On Dec 18, 2016, at 11:25 PM, Larry Colen wrot
> 59-145
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
Alan C wrote:
"Interesting. I've found that Nicole's 55-300 is quite pleasantly sharp."
I agree but at f8 the 100-300 is just as sharp.
Unfortunately, most of the time that I'd be using it would likely be
doing things like photographing musicians, in which case I wouldn't want
anything
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The 60-260 vignettes a bit on full frame, but It's not enough to trouble me.
It's been my go to lens for years now on aps-c and full frame. It's excellent.
The 150-450 is astounding. But it's much bigger and heavier. If you're serious
about shooting critters, go for
m: Larry Colen
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 6:03 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
Alan C wrote:
Having read this thread with interest, I would say the 60-250 is your
best bet but it is not cheap. You could add a 1.4x too! Pa
e- From: Larry Colen
> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:33 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
>
> Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the niche of
> my 18-250, being reasonably long, if not
Alan C wrote:
Having read this thread with interest, I would say the 60-250 is your
best bet but it is not cheap. You could add a 1.4x too! Paul had great
success with this combination. I have an FA 100-300 which I used before
I acquired an HD 55-300. Despite the glowing reviews for the
Read this (right down to the end).
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/da--60-250-modification-for-full-frame-56581
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Bill
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 5:50 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
essage- From: Larry Colen
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:33 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the niche of
my 18-250, being reasonably long, if not particularly fast, but will sti
what the back end
looked like.
Alan C
-Original Message- From: Larry Colen
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:33 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the
niche of my 18-250
t; Alan C
>
> -Original Message- From: Larry Colen
> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:33 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
>
>
> Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the niche of
> my 1
it no
better than the under-rated 100-300 which can be had for a song.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:33 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens
101 - 200 of 1962 matches
Mail list logo