On Apr 22, 2009, at 16:46 , Bruce Dayton wrote:
FWIW, I am quite astigmatic - I wear corrective contacts and I have
no trouble at all focusing on stock *istD, K10D and K20D screens - do
it all the time. Maybe with glasses any movement of the lens pushing
against the finder could cause a
EVF with a mirror camera? Lose the pentaprism and keep the mirror? Lose
the prism and mirror but keep the camera otherwise the same??
The moment I think of EVF I also think of a mirror-less camera, with a
distance from lens mount to sensor as reduced as possible, with new
lenses to exploit
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:48, Graydon wrote:
I would shed no tears for the lack of a pop-up flash myself.
As someone who frequently uses the wireless function to fire two external
flashes using the pop-up flash, I
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:14:41AM -0300, Luiz Felipe scripsit:
EVF with a mirror camera? Lose the pentaprism and keep the mirror?
Lose the prism and mirror but keep the camera otherwise the same??
Keep the direct optical path to the viewfinder; lose the moving mirror
and shutter.
Ideally,
On Apr 23, 2009, at 9:00, Graydon wrote:
I'm not expecting a revolution either, but, Hoya needs one, and Mike
Johnson deferred his camera #2 recommendation today; This is awkward,
but I'm going to have to hold off with #2 until about this time next
month. Still collecting data. What can I
Graydon wrote:
You know of any other plausibly-better-than-A mid-level 4/3 or APS-C
DSLR of the brand of your choice -- which is recommendation #3 --
that's going to be announced in a month? I'm certainly not as
well-plugged into the rumour mill as I could be.
Not announced in a month, but
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:38:39AM -0500, Charles Robinson scripsit:
On Apr 23, 2009, at 9:00, Graydon wrote:
I'm not expecting a revolution either, but, Hoya needs one, and Mike
Johnson deferred his camera #2 recommendation today; This is awkward,
but I'm going to have to hold off with #2
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:49:40AM -0400, Mark Roberts scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
You know of any other plausibly-better-than-A mid-level 4/3 or APS-C
DSLR of the brand of your choice -- which is recommendation #3 --
that's going to be announced in a month? I'm certainly not as
well-plugged
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Graydon o...@uniserve.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:14:41AM -0300, Luiz Felipe scripsit:
EVF with a mirror camera? Lose the pentaprism and keep the mirror?
Lose the prism and mirror but keep the camera otherwise the same??
Keep the direct optical
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:20:23AM -0400, Adam Maas scripsit:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Graydon o...@uniserve.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:14:41AM -0300, Luiz Felipe scripsit:
EVF with a mirror camera? Lose the pentaprism and keep the mirror?
Lose the prism and mirror but
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Graydon o...@uniserve.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:20:23AM -0400, Adam Maas scripsit:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Graydon o...@uniserve.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:14:41AM -0300, Luiz Felipe scripsit:
EVF with a mirror camera? Lose
I'm trying to figure out if we're still talking about the new camera
or if it's about AF vs MF and matte vs split-prism.
In any case, and seeing as you all asked, I would like a matte screen
with a central micro-prism--no split prism for me, thank you.
Basically, I'd like an SA-23 from the LX
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to figure out if we're still talking about the new camera
or if it's about AF vs MF and matte vs split-prism.
snip
Hey, this is PDML.
We could be talking about all of those things at once.
Or none of those things.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:36:51PM -0400, Graydon wrote:
With the shipped matte screen of the K20D, I saw the image as sharp when
it (from the camera point of view) was not; it looks like if the plane
of focus was 5cm wide, I'd see the image as sharp over between 20cm and
50cm (depending on
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:39:16PM -0700, John Celio wrote:
Here's one of the macro photos:
http://www.neovenator.com/2009/04/pixel-therapy.html
Shot with the K10D, Pentax Helicoid extension tube (fully extended),
three vivitar extension tubes (can't remember the sizes), Pentax Macro
I recently acquired the SMC Pentax Dental Closeup attachment lenses
for use with their K/M 100mm/4.0 macro lenses. The one attachment lens
that goes greater than 1:1 on the stock macro lens is great for shots
like this.
Ill have to take and post some sample photos once my server problem gets
...but is it a full frame gasket??? :-)
LF
Larry Colen escreveu:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:36:51PM -0400, Graydon wrote:
With the shipped matte screen of the K20D, I saw the image as sharp when
it (from the camera point of view) was not; it looks like if the plane
of focus was 5cm wide, I'd
I remember reading at the page something about North Dakota... now
that's some extension...
LF
Larry Colen escreveu:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:39:16PM -0700, John Celio wrote:
Here's one of the macro photos:
http://www.neovenator.com/2009/04/pixel-therapy.html
Shot with the K10D, Pentax
- Original Message -
From: Luiz Felipe
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
...but is it a full frame gasket??? :-)
It's a simulated gasket.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/uploads/post-1970-1240400101_thumb.jpg
Really doubt this is fake. This also confirms current rumours.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/uploads/post-1970-1240400101_thumb.jpg
Really doubt this is fake. This also confirms current rumours.
Look kids, a real pentaprism
William Robb
--
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:13:45AM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
- Original Message - From: Thibouille Subject: 21th may is the
day for the new Pentax DSLR.
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/uploads/post-1970-1240400101_thumb.jpg
Really doubt this is fake. This also confirms current
penta- is part of the link(?)
J
--- On Wed, 4/22/09, Graydon o...@uniserve.com wrote:
From: Graydon o...@uniserve.com
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 7:23 AM
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at
http://sturly.com/y7d if you prefer :)
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
penta- is part of the link(?)
J
--- On Wed, 4/22/09, Graydon o...@uniserve.com wrote:
From: Graydon o...@uniserve.com
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
- Original Message -
From: Graydon
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
Look kids, a real pentaprism
And we kids may detect this how?
Trapezoidal silhouette? Front of the viewfinder housing slopes like a
1915 battleship turret? Base of the viewfinder
On 22/4/09, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
It looks like the front of an LX prism. I'm hoping (presuming this is for
real) that it is a higher specified body than the K20D with no pop up flash
(which I happen to detest).
Do I need to season my hat?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
On 22/4/09, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
It looks like the front of an LX prism. I'm hoping (presuming this is for
real) that it is a higher specified body than the K20D with no
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:21:52AM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
- Original Message - From: Graydon
Look kids, a real pentaprism
And we kids may detect this how?
Trapezoidal silhouette? Front of the viewfinder housing slopes like a
1915 battleship turret? Base of the viewfinder
On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:48, Graydon wrote:
I would shed no tears for the lack of a pop-up flash myself.
As someone who frequently uses the wireless function to fire two
external flashes using the pop-up flash, I would miss having the pop-
up flash on the camera.
-Charles
--
Charles
- Original Message -
From: Graydon
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
The prospect of a nother couple hundred bucks to the Catzeye folks makes
me sad, though.
Damn. I should have bought the cheaper graphics card. I'd forgotten about
that aspect of new
Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte screen.
--
Christian
http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte screen.
Mind if I ask why?
I could not begin to use manual focus successfully with the shipped
matte screen of the K20D.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Graydon o...@uniserve.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte screen.
Mind if I ask why?
I could not begin to use
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:48, Graydon wrote:
I would shed no tears for the lack of a pop-up flash myself.
As someone who frequently uses the wireless function to fire two
external flashes using the pop-up flash, I would miss having the pop-up
flash on the camera.
While I do agree they get in the way sometimes, I find a proper
(diagonal, not too large) split very useful. Assuming interchangeable
screens, my default would be a split, the secondary matte. Assuming no
interchangeable, would select the split over the matte - small margin
and sad about it.
- Original Message -
From: Graydon
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte screen.
Mind if
On Apr 22, 2009, at 11:58, William Robb wrote:
I don't know how the guys using the cheap Canons with their trash
viewfinders manage.
Point, press button, click, done.
If you're not using manual focus, you don't really need much in the
way of viewfinders!
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson
Hear, hear! Back in the pre-AF days, I always had to get a camera
with interchangeable screens so I could get a plain matte screen in
it. I find the split prism to get in the way.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 9:05:06 AM, you wrote:
C Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism
I have a friend who uses the lower end Canons. She has told me more
than once that she really has to rely on the AF - manual focus isn't
a real option - especially in dimmer light.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 9:58:00 AM, you wrote:
WR - Original Message -
WR I have a very
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Adam Maas a...@mawz.ca wrote:
But a good matte screen intended for manual focus is arguably the penultimate
focusing screen.
And a microprism is the ultimate.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte screen.
Mind if I ask why?
I could not begin to use manual focus successfully with the shipped
matte
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
And a microprism is the ultimate.
My old Praktica (long since stolen) had a lovely hybrid screen:
A split screen centre surrounded by a micro-prism ring.
The best of both worlds, in my book.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is
William Robb wrote:
I don't know how the guys using the cheap Canons with their trash
viewfinders manage.
Superior autofocus? :-)
drop and cover!
--
Christian
http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graydon
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
For me,
On Apr 22, 2009, at 12:29, frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
And a microprism is the ultimate.
My old Praktica (long since stolen) had a lovely hybrid screen:
A split screen centre surrounded by a micro-prism ring.
The best of both
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I have a friend who uses the lower end Canons. She has told me more
than once that she really has to rely on the AF - manual focus isn't
a real option - especially in dimmer light.
Part of the problem with AF these days and lower-end bodies is the
lower-end lenses used
Rather sexy, isn't it?
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?act=Attachtype=postid=51169
Dario
- Original Message -
From: William Robb war...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new
Bruce Walker wrote:
One of the more important features in the K20D that pushed me to upgrade
from the K100Ds was being able to use the PUF as a flash controller. Up
until then I never used the PUF and was considering gluing or taping it
down so it wouldn't pop up when I occasionally hit the
Look kids, a real pentaprism
And we kids may detect this how?
Trapezoidal silhouette? Front of the viewfinder housing
slopes like a
1915 battleship turret? Base of the viewfinder housing
almost as wide as
the inner diameter of the lens mount? Protruding, rather
than
You, also, expressed my thought very well, Mark.
Jack
--- On Wed, 4/22/09, Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu wrote:
From: Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2009,
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte screen.
Mind if I ask why?
Never did like the splitters. Too fiddly and given to blacking out.
Give
- Original Message -
From: Christian
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
William Robb wrote:
I don't know how the guys using the cheap Canons with their trash
viewfinders manage.
Superior autofocus? :-)
drop and cover!
Say that on forum-neurotica
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:29:18PM -0400, frank theriault scripsit:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
And a microprism is the ultimate.
My old Praktica (long since stolen) had a lovely hybrid screen:
A split screen centre surrounded by a micro-prism ring.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Graydon o...@uniserve.com wrote:
Is that different from what the Katz-eye screens do? (From the
description it sounds like the same thing...)
I don't know. Never looked through one.
I was merely commenting on generic split screen versus micro-prism
versus
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:28:22PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte
screen.
Mind if I ask why?
I could not
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 02:32:07PM -0400, frank theriault scripsit:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Graydon o...@uniserve.com wrote:
Is that different from what the Katz-eye screens do? (From the
description it sounds like the same thing...)
I don't know. Never looked through one.
Fair
Doug, using fast lenes the split is the better option, for me. I really
hate when I can't change it for the matte for the long and dark lenses.
But 90% of my pics are taken with lenses 5.6 or brighter.
LF
Doug Brewer escreveu:
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:31:01PM -0400, Adam Maas scripsit:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Graydon o...@uniserve.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a
My big issue is that I don't want to have to focus first and then
compose. Having the focus aid stuck in the middle of the screen
requires me to have to point it at the subject (almost never dead
center), focus, now shift and compose. With a nice matte, all I have
to do is compose and focus at
Graydon wrote:
Which is certainly a good thing, but _how_? What about the matte screen
indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane of focus,
or similar?
Ummm, because the image in the viewfinder looks sharp? Your eye and
brain indicate that it's in focus sending a signal
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Graydon o...@uniserve.com wrote:
What about the matte screen
indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane of focus,
or similar?
On a good matte screen (among the screens I had for my LX was a
grid-enscribed matte screen) objects seem to snap
Luiz Felipe wrote:
Doug, using fast lenes the split is the better option, for me. I really
hate when I can't change it for the matte for the long and dark lenses.
But 90% of my pics are taken with lenses 5.6 or brighter.
LF
sure. Doesn't stop them from being fiddly.
I'm a
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:58:00AM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
I have a very good matte screen for my Nikon F2 that makes the screens
going into modern cameras look like a wet shower curtain. My major
problem with focusing now is that the viewfinders are so bloody small.
Dim as a burnt
With the split screen, I always felt more confident of primary focus. I'd often
pick the edge, twig or branch I especially wanted in sharp focus.
I've used matte and had it work OK, but never quite with the comfort as when
using split screen.
Jack
--- On Wed, 4/22/09, Doug Brewer
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:15:24PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
Which is certainly a good thing, but _how_? What about the matte
screen indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane
of focus, or similar?
Ummm, because the image in the viewfinder looks sharp?
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:29:18PM -0400, frank theriault scripsit:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
And a microprism is the ultimate.
My old Praktica (long since stolen) had a lovely hybrid screen:
A split screen centre
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:16:38PM -0400, frank theriault scripsit:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Graydon o...@uniserve.com wrote:
What about the matte screen
indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane of focus,
or similar?
On a good matte screen (among the screens
Which is certainly a good thing, but _how_? What about the matte screen
indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane of focus,
or similar?
Ummm, because the image in the viewfinder looks sharp? Your eye and
brain indicate that it's in focus sending a signal to your right
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:15:24PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
Which is certainly a good thing, but _how_? What about the matte
screen indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane
of focus, or similar?
Ummm, because the image in the viewfinder
On 22/4/09, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
Your eye and
brain indicate that it's in focus sending a signal to your right index
finger to trip the shutter.
Mark!
Nice T-shirt.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 22/4/09, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm a look-around-the-frame kinda guy
Mark.
Good pickings in this thread.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Graydon o...@uniserve.com wrote:
What about the matte screen
indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the
plane of focus,
or similar?
On a good matte screen (among the screens I had for my LX was a
grid-enscribed matte screen) objects seem
Beattie Intenscreens are still around as http://www.display-optics.com/products_35mm-format_pentax.htm
but I think they only have old new stock on hand. LX and PZ-1.
If we all scream at them they may put out a model for the K10/20/xx
model cameras. Eh?
On Apr 22, 2009, at 12:23 , Graydon
Christian wrote:
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:15:24PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
Which is certainly a good thing, but _how_? What about the matte
screen indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane
of focus, or similar?
Ummm, because the image in
Thibouille wrote:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/uploads/post-1970-1240400101_thumb.jpg
Really doubt this is fake. This also confirms current rumours.
We all know the diameter of K-bayonet, so I decided to calculate the
body size. It's approximately 120-125mm wide - in other words it's the
I would shed no tears for the lack of a pop-up flash myself.
As someone who frequently uses the wireless function to fire two external
flashes using the pop-up flash, I would miss having the pop- up flash on
the camera.
Me too. I find it far too useful as a flash controller to buy a
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Peter Loveday pe...@loveday.org wrote:
I would shed no tears for the lack of a pop-up flash myself.
As someone who frequently uses the wireless function to fire two external
flashes using the pop-up flash, I would miss having the pop- up flash on the
And I agree with that first part. If the photo is some very close
portrait, the movement from placing the focus aid (or the AF target)
from the eye to elsewhere (assuming the eye as point of focus) when I
re-compose the shot may get me either focus trouble or a waste of time
and a perfect
On Apr 22, 2009, at 13:21 , Toralf Lund wrote:
Christian wrote:
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:15:24PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
Which is certainly a good thing, but _how_? What about the matte
screen indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the
plane
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:33:04PM -0700, Joseph McAllister scripsit:
On Apr 22, 2009, at 13:21 , Toralf Lund wrote:
I'm also find it hard do choose the appropriate step on on the
viewfinder focus setting (on the one body I have where there is
actually such a setting.)
I think this is
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:33:04PM -0700, Joseph McAllister scripsit:
On Apr 22, 2009, at 13:21 , Toralf Lund wrote:
I'm also find it hard do choose the appropriate step on on the
viewfinder focus setting (on the one body I have where there is
actually such a setting.)
I
On 22/4/09, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have hyperopia, myopia and astigmatism
And all that time I thought you were just winking at me.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
Cotty wrote:
On 22/4/09, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have hyperopia, myopia and astigmatism
And all that time I thought you were just winking at me.
Dude, I'm lucky to actually see you...
--
Christian
http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
FWIW, I am quite astigmatic - I wear corrective contacts and I have
no trouble at all focusing on stock *istD, K10D and K20D screens - do
it all the time. Maybe with glasses any movement of the lens pushing
against the finder could cause a problem?
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, April 22,
Christian - remember, this is Cotty you are responding to. Do you
really mean to say I'm lucky to actually see you?
Being around Cotty made me appreciate the advantages of being able to
remove my (heavily corrected) contact lenses and going blind...
(astigmatism, presbyopia, and myopia).
Ok, good point. How about I'm lucky to be able to see anything... much
less you.
--
Christian
http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
Stan Halpin wrote:
Christian - remember, this is Cotty you are responding to. Do you really
mean to say I'm lucky to actually see you?
Being around Cotty made
I selected the start of this thread and I then did a sort by Subject.
Read the thread. The next message in my mail stash coincidentally was
from early December - Subash quoting a Pentax executive as follows:
Next year, we are planning to launch some three types, including
minor design
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:33:46PM -0500, Stan Halpin scripsit:
I selected the start of this thread and I then did a sort by Subject.
Read the thread. The next message in my mail stash coincidentally was
from early December - Subash quoting a Pentax executive as follows:
Next year, we are
- Original Message -
From: Graydon
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
Which is why I, who think the K20D is a comfy compact size with splendid
ergonomics, am not wailing about the prospect of a significantly smaller
camera.
I'm just morally certain they'll
I second that. I use the pop up flash in controller only mode for
off camera flash. I'd hate to have to buy a accessory to do the same
thing. gs
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:48, Graydon wrote:
I would shed no tears for the
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:15 PM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graydon Subject: Re: 21th may is the
day for the new Pentax DSLR.
Which is why I, who think the K20D is a comfy compact size with splendid
ergonomics, am not wailing about the prospect
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:15:47PM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
- Original Message - From: Graydon Subject: Re: 21th may is
the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
Which is why I, who think the K20D is a comfy compact size with
splendid ergonomics, am not wailing about the prospect of a
92 matches
Mail list logo
