eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
I like having sexual objectification on the other foot now
and then, just for the sheer unusualness of it.
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
2009/11/2 mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com:
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
I like having sexual objectification on the other foot now
and then, just for the sheer unusualness of it.
Mark!
Foot fetishists are a weird breed.
DS
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Foot fetishists are a weird breed.
But they don't hurt a sole.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Cotty wrote:
Foot fetishists are a weird breed.
But they don't hurt a sole.
Only a heel would.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: OT PESO - NSFW Apparently!
Foot fetishists are a weird breed.
But they don't hurt a sole.
True, but they just don't seem instep with the times.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
On Nov 2, 2009, at 9:21 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Cotty
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: OT PESO - NSFW Apparently!
Foot fetishists are a weird breed.
But they don't hurt a sole.
True, but they just don't seem instep with the times
William Robb wrote:
From: Cotty
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 8:03 AM
Foot fetishists are a weird breed.
But they don't hurt a sole.
True, but they just don't seem instep with the times.
I consider them my arch enemies.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
paul stenquist wrote:
On Nov 2, 2009, at 9:21 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Cotty
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: OT PESO - NSFW Apparently!
Foot fetishists are a weird breed.
But they don't hurt a sole.
True, but they just don't seem
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Cotty
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: OT PESO - NSFW Apparently!
Foot fetishists are a weird breed.
But they don't hurt a sole.
True, but they just don't seem instep with the times.
one has to stay on one's
In a message dated 10/31/2009 2:20:08 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
ann...@nyc.rr.com writes:
This isn't a matter of political correctness in my view either. It
bothers me that she looks pregnant, as well.
ann
Bingo. The pose makes her look pregnant (thrusting her belly
Ann and Marnie,
She's not pregnant, it's just those Canon lenses giving you some distortion.
You and Dave all do some shooting with those don't you? :-)
Regards, Bo S.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:54 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 10/31/2009 2:20:08 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
In a message dated 11/2/2009 8:02:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
rf.sulli...@gmail.com writes:
Ann and Marnie,
She's not pregnant, it's just those Canon lenses giving you some
distortion.
You and Dave all do some shooting with those don't you? :-)
Regards, Bo S.
Acturallly, I
Marnie,
I was only half joking.
My first thought also was she's pregnant.
I chaulked it up to lens distortion, perhaps a wide angle too close?
Living with my wife thru her 3 pregnancies gives me a perspective.
Being pregnant is sexy on an intellectual level -
'I know what you've been doing',
but
ann sanfedele wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Cotty
Foot fetishists are a weird breed.
But they don't hurt a sole.
True, but they just don't seem instep with the times.
one has to stay on one's toes to keep up with the posts that degenerate
into pun threads
] On Behalf Of
eactiv...@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2009 10:54 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT PESO - NSFW Apparently!
In a message dated 10/31/2009 11:39:51 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
bruce.wal...@gmail.com writes:
Portraying someone as a sexual being first and a person second
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: OT PESO - NSFW Apparently!
Foot fetishists are a weird breed.
But they don't hurt a sole.
True, but they just don't seem instep with the times.
one has to stay on one's toes to keep up with the posts that degenerate
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Cory Waters cbwat...@bellsouth.net
Subject: Re: OT PESO - NSFW Apparently!
paul stenquist wrote:
On Nov 2, 2009, at 9:21 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Cotty
Subject: Re: OT
Foot fetishists are a weird breed.
But they don't hurt a sole.
True, but they just don't seem instep with the times.
I consider them my arch enemies.
Just get on the phone ankle them up.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Bob - that was hitting below the belt! :-)
ann
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Ann and Marnie,
She's not pregnant, it's just those Canon lenses giving you some distortion.
You and Dave all do some shooting with those don't you? :-)
Regards, Bo S.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:54 AM, eactiv...@aol.com
[...]
Marnie ;-) (re Trying to be sexy -- in many sexy shots women
are doing such trite things they look like parody to me.)
Men are generally very simple creatures when it comes to certain things.
Mind you, so are women.
It's just different things, and different types of trite.
Mr.
On Nov 2, 2009, at 08:32 , Mark Roberts wrote:
ann sanfedele wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Cotty
Foot fetishists are a weird breed.
But they don't hurt a sole.
True, but they just don't seem instep with the times.
one has to stay on one's toes to
In a message dated 11/2/2009 12:38:21 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
p...@web-options.com writes:
Men are generally very simple creatures when it comes to certain things.
Mind you, so are women.
It's just different things, and different types of trite.
Mr. Darcy
===
I kinda
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Desjardins, Steve desjard...@wlu.edu wrote:
snip If a gay male photographer objectifies a male model is it sexist?
Yes.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Safety issues, i think not.:-)
Great shot, well lit and tasteful in my opionion
Dave
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:28 PM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day All,
This shot was booted out of one of my Flickr groups for contravening
their safe image rules:
In a message dated 10/31/2009 11:39:51 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
bruce.wal...@gmail.com writes:
Portraying someone as a sexual being first and a person second sounds
more like objectification than sexism. And objectification is something
we do all the time, especially we photographers. We
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:38 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Why is it sexist? I think it's mildly erotic and has sexual connotations,
but I don't find it demeaning to either sex. If a man opens his shirt and
lowers his pants a bit, is that sexist as well?
Does something
My man cans are heaps sexy!
On 01/11/2009, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:38 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
wrote:
Why is it sexist? I think it's mildly erotic and has sexual connotations,
but I don't find it demeaning to either sex.
frank theriault wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:38 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Why is it sexist? I think it's mildly erotic and has sexual connotations,
but I don't find it demeaning to either sex. If a man opens his shirt and
lowers his pants a bit, is that sexist as
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
My dictionary just says this for sexist: ``prejudice, stereotyping, or
discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex.''
That sounds pretty demeaning to me.
That's one definition. Another is
apparently chose how she wanted to be portrayed. Should we
deny her that freedom of expression? Political correctness is out of
control.
Paul
On Oct 31, 2009, at 4:05 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Bruce Walker
bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
My dictionary just says
in
a beautiful face and nice hair. Should she cover those as well? She
apparently chose how she wanted to be portrayed. Should we deny her that
freedom of expression? Political correctness is out of control.
Paul,
Please read what I said.
I didn't use the word demeaning, Bruce did (in response
in
a beautiful face and nice hair. Should she cover those as well? She
apparently chose how she wanted to be portrayed. Should we deny her
that
freedom of expression? Political correctness is out of control.
Paul,
Please read what I said.
I didn't use the word demeaning, Bruce did (in response
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 5:46 PM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Sexist has negative implications. And to describe an artful photo like the
one Savage presented as sexist is political correctness run amok. But
that's my opinion, and you are entitled to yours.
Political correctness
On Oct 31, 2009, at 5:59 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 5:46 PM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
wrote:
Sexist has negative implications. And to describe an artful photo
like the
one Savage presented as sexist is political correctness run amok.
But
that's my
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 6:09 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I'm glad you agree!
Cheers to that, buddy.
The only way we'll resolve this is at a beer summit. Maybe if I make
it to Chi-town for that pdml thingie we'll discuss it over a cold one.
Until then, I think we've
see Savage's photo as demeaning in any way. The model was an
attractive lady and was presented as such. The rendering and pose were
artful. Is it wrong to enjoy the beauty of her figure? Many take
pleasure in
a beautiful face and nice hair. Should she cover those as well? She
apparently chose
On 2009-10-31 15:46 , P N Stenquist wrote:
Sexist has negative implications. And to describe an artful photo like
the one Savage presented as sexist is political correctness run amok.
But that's my opinion, and you are entitled to yours.
i'm with Frank here; who says artful and sexist must be
On Oct 31, 2009, at 6:26 PM, steve harley wrote:
On 2009-10-31 15:46 , P N Stenquist wrote:
Sexist has negative implications. And to describe an artful photo
like
the one Savage presented as sexist is political correctness run
amok.
But that's my opinion, and you are entitled to yours.
From: frank theriault
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 5:46 PM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Sexist has negative implications. And to describe an artful photo like the
one Savage presented as sexist is political correctness run amok. But
that's my opinion, and you are entitled to
From: ann sanfedele
well I wrote David off list but I can't resist commenting here...
Frankly, I don't like the photo on any level... but if David shot it for
a very specific reason for the model, that's a different thing.
The plain fact is I'm guessing that the reason it got booted or refused
On 26/10/09, paul stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
If a man
opens his shirt and lowers his pants a bit, is that sexist as well?
If I did it, there would be an uprising.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
2009/10/28 Cotty cotty...@mac.com:
On 26/10/09, paul stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
If a man
opens his shirt and lowers his pants a bit, is that sexist as well?
If I did it, there would be an uprising.
Don't take the little blue pill beforehand.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cotty wrote:
On 26/10/09, paul stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
If a man
opens his shirt and lowers his pants a bit, is that sexist as well?
If I did it, there would be an uprising.
Speak for yourself!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:28:44AM +0800, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
This shot was booted out of one of my Flickr groups for contravening
their safe image rules:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4046339515/
Direct link (~130kb):
LMAO. At my age it would just be appalling.
Why is it sexist? I think it's mildly erotic and has sexual
connotations, but I don't find it demeaning to either sex. If a man
opens his shirt and lowers his pants a bit, is that sexist as well?
Paul
Heck, I'd think he'd just finished
On Oct 26, 2009, at 18:28, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
This shot was booted out of one of my Flickr groups for contravening
their safe image rules:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4046339515/
You can keep these OT PESOs coming any time you like, David. Thank
you!
-Charles
...glove??? what glove??? ;-)
lf
paul stenquist escreveu:
On Oct 26, 2009, at 9:01 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: David Savage
Subject: OT PESO - NSFW Apparently!
G'day All,
This shot was booted out of one of my Flickr groups for contravening
their safe image
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:02:00AM -0500, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Oct 26, 2009, at 18:28, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
This shot was booted out of one of my Flickr groups for contravening
their safe image rules:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4046339515/
You can keep
G'day All,
This shot was booted out of one of my Flickr groups for contravening
their safe image rules:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4046339515/
Direct link (~130kb):
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2723/4046339515_98f01c5b1f_o.jpg
I can't understand why.
:-)
Enjoy.
Cheers,
Dave
G'day All,
This shot was booted out of one of my Flickr groups for
contravening their safe image rules:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4046339515/
Direct link (~130kb):
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2723/4046339515_98f01c5b1f_o.jpg
I can't understand why.
:-)
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Probably because it encourages piracy
Aaaar, mateys!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:28 PM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day All,
This shot was booted out of one of my Flickr groups for contravening
their safe image rules:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4046339515/
Direct link (~130kb):
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: OT PESO - NSFW Apparently!
G'day All,
This shot was booted out of one of my Flickr groups for contravening
their safe image rules:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4046339515/
Direct link (~130kb):
http://farm3
Really? That's ridiculous. You can post it on photo.net.
Excellent shot. I like the light and the look.
Paul
Paul
On Oct 26, 2009, at 7:28 PM, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
This shot was booted out of one of my Flickr groups for contravening
their safe image rules:
On Oct 26, 2009, at 8:51 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:28 PM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com
wrote:
G'day All,
This shot was booted out of one of my Flickr groups for contravening
their safe image rules:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4046339515/
Direct link
On Oct 26, 2009, at 9:01 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: David Savage
Subject: OT PESO - NSFW Apparently!
G'day All,
This shot was booted out of one of my Flickr groups for contravening
their safe image rules:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4046339515
Why is it sexist? I think it's mildly erotic and has sexual
connotations, but I don't find it demeaning to either sex. If a man
opens his shirt and lowers his pants a bit, is that sexist as well?
Paul
Heck, I'd think he'd just finished Thanksgiving dinner...
paul stenquist wrote:
On Oct
Pentax.jp:
http://www.pentax.jp/english/imaging/digital/slr/others.html
RiceHigh sez: Since the K200D was put onto the market in fall
February 2008 [...], the product life of it is only 9 months.
http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2008/12/k200d-discontinued.html
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
This doesn't surprise me much. The K200D is just too much like the
K2000 to justify having both in the line. I expect the replacement for
the K20D is waiting to be released sometime between January and March,
what with the major price drop and significant discounting we've seen.
I won't
Yes, since the release of the K2000D, it was only a matter of time.
Having two entry-level models in the line up doesn't make a lot of
sense.
That Pentax Japan page is quite interesting. It has all of the product
catalogs for the models released since the *istD - it's interesting to
look at the
Indeed but if I were you, I'd look for any kind of serious information
elsewhere.
Forget RiceHigh as soon as you can.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
Every message I send to the list with a link, whether it be a paw or
peso, has been blocked. My apologies if they all show up at once. I
think I tried to send a PESO message about five times over the last
twenty hours. Don't know where they're blocked. I thought at first it
was the Comcast
It's just you Paul. We all voted and um... you're off the island.
J/k
evil grin
CW
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 9:23 AM
Subject: links apparently blocked
Every message I
I don't know why this should change without your express input, but
maybe you're mailer is including links as html rather than ascii text.
I'd check it's settings.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Every message I send to the list with a link, whether it be a paw or
peso, has been blocked. My
, plenty of
mails containing links which still manage to get through?
- Original Message
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2007 3:23:43 PM
Subject: links apparently blocked
Every message I send to the list
PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 9:23 AM
Subject: links apparently blocked
Every message I send to the list with a link, whether it be a paw or
peso, has been blocked. My apologies if they all show up at once. I
think I tried to send
You've been DECLINED ? Pentax intervention maybe? (huge wet sputter)
Jack ;-))
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every message I send to the list with a link, whether it be a paw or
peso, has been blocked. My apologies if they all show up at once. I
think I tried to send a
On Dec 1, 2007 11:23 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it be the list?
Yes...the blacklist...which you're on.
:-)
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 9:23 AM
Subject: links apparently blocked
Every message I send to the list with a link, whether it be a paw or
peso, has been blocked. My apologies if they all show up at once. I
think I tried to send a PESO message about five times over the last
In a message dated 12/1/2007 6:32:14 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Every message I send to the list with a link, whether it be a paw or
peso, has been blocked. My apologies if they all show up at once. I
think I tried to send a PESO message about five times over
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:23:43 -0500
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it be the list? I'm
scratching my head.
Paul
Paul,
try a post with a link and CC yourself and some list folk. (I am
willing) then maybe the problem can be identified if its a formatting
thing.
Bran
--
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:23:43AM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Every message I send to the list with a link, whether it be a paw or
peso, has been blocked. My apologies if they all show up at once. I
think I tried to send a PESO message about five times over the last
twenty hours. Don't
It cannot be html formatting. I've got two arguments to back this up:
1) together with my GESO about the Esparron lake in Provence, I had sent other
2 mails. They were both formatted *exactly* like the one that got through on
PDML, yet they got lost somewhere... (Plus, I explicitely set Yahoo
Thanks for the suggestions. I've never had a problem before, and I
haven't changed mail servers. I did update the Opsys but that
shouldn't have changed my mail settings. I did review my preferences
and noticed that the box for rich text was checked. I changed it to
plain text, and I'll try
Thanks John.
On Dec 1, 2007, at 2:21 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:23:43AM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Every message I send to the list with a link, whether it be a paw or
peso, has been blocked. My apologies if they all show up at once. I
think I tried to send a PESO
Thanks Brian. I'll do that.
Paul
On Dec 1, 2007, at 1:41 PM, Bran Everseeking wrote:
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:23:43 -0500
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it be the list? I'm
scratching my head.
Paul
Paul,
try a post with a link and CC yourself and some list folk. (I am
In an email to Ken, a couple weeks ago, I sent him a link (I will dig
to find that one back) which he translated as Tokina being owned by
Kenko.
I will find back the link.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML
Margus
Männik
Sendt: 9. maj 2007 23:56
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Pentax - Selling HQ and Apparently Drops 645D
Hi all,
even if they drop medium format digital (BTW, I do not see word
digital here) camera line, it does not affect 99% of us. I feel myself
as very enthusiastic pentaxian
From:
Jens Bladt
Couldn't Tokina make lenses for Pentax, even if the Hoya merger is off?
It's not religion - just business!
Tokina didn't offer their co-designed lenses in Pentax mount, and
lately, it seems like they aren't offering any new lenses in Pentax
mount. Seems like they didn't
Everyone is still assuming that Hoya owns Tokina, based on my recent
research the only connection's are the 1.) Tokina probably buys some
Hoya blanks for grinding, 2.) Hoya and Tokina both have the same US
distributor. Other than that there seems to be no other public
connection. (They may
After all, some say in several years time hardly any pro will be
shooting still pictures - so we can see times when there won't be any
camera above intermediate. :-)
http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0704/the-coming-earthquake-in-photography.html
Pawel
Paul Stenquist pisze:
The sales of
On 13/5/07, Pawel Bartuzi, discombobulated, unleashed:
After all, some say in several years time hardly any pro will be
shooting still pictures - so we can see times when there won't be any
camera above intermediate. :-)
http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0704/the-coming-earthquake-in-
P. J. Alling
Everyone is still assuming that Hoya owns Tokina, based on my recent
research the only connection's are the 1.) Tokina probably buys some
Hoya blanks for grinding, 2.) Hoya and Tokina both have the same US
distributor. Other than that there seems to be no other public
From:
P. J. Alling
Everyone is still assuming that Hoya owns Tokina, based on my recent
research the only connection's are the 1.) Tokina probably buys some
Hoya blanks for grinding, 2.) Hoya and Tokina both have the same US
distributor. Other than that there seems to be no other public
Jens Bladt
Couldn't Tokina make lenses for Pentax, even if the Hoya merger is off?
-
JSessoms:
Tokina didn't offer their co-designed lenses in Pentax mount, and
lately, it seems like they aren't offering any new lenses in Pentax
mount. Seems like they didn't want to compete with
John Sessoms wrote:
From:
P. J. Alling
Everyone is still assuming that Hoya owns Tokina, based on my recent
research the only connection's are the 1.) Tokina probably buys some
Hoya blanks for grinding, 2.) Hoya and Tokina both have the same US
distributor. Other than that there seems
Oh wow, once again I thought I was retro and find that I am really
avantgarde with my cute little (OK, not so little at 8# ea) cassette
recorders...
GRIN!
Cotty wrote:
On 13/5/07, Pawel Bartuzi, discombobulated, unleashed:
After all, some say in several years time hardly any pro will be
THK is a US corporation that distributes their products. There seems to
be no equivalent in Japan.
John Sessoms wrote:
From:
P. J. Alling
Everyone is still assuming that Hoya owns Tokina, based on my recent
research the only connection's are the 1.) Tokina probably buys some
Hoya blanks
On 14/05/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THK is a US corporation that distributes their products. There seems to
be no equivalent in Japan.
Doesn't the world stop at the US boarders?
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, but if you live in Boston everything West of the Hudson is
insignificant. (Is there really a continent on the other side of Cape Cod?
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 14/05/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THK is a US corporation that distributes their products. There seems to
P.J.:
No, but if you live in Boston everything West of the Hudson is
insignificant. (Is there really a continent on the other side of Cape Cod?
My wife, who was born in Boston and grew up on the coast south of there,
describes New Englanders as the world's most sophisticated provincials.
Joe
From:
Digital Image Studio
On 14/05/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THK is a US corporation that distributes their products. There seems to
be no equivalent in Japan.
Doesn't the world stop at the US boarders?
Nope. Nor at the borders.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Well, they said photography would replace painting...
To an extent, they were right but also wrong in many ways.
I suppose a great quality video will capture all the possible
pictures at a scene, but at a sunset?
And I think editing and cropping to find the best pictures will be
pretty tedious.
From:
J. C. O'Connell
If I understand this correctly and Pentax is
no longer pursuing a 645D body/system, then
this is GREAT news because it puts much more
pressure on them to come up with a FF DSLR
I don't think you understand it correctly. According to one article I
read, Pentax is
and Apparently Drops 645D
Irrefutable logic!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever size sensor Pentax uses in the K1D, we can be sure it will
work with DA lenses. They wouldn't be introducing a full line of
expensive lenses for cameras that can't use them. So FF is definitely
a no go
prominently. I don't know if this is happening
everywhere, but it's certainly obvious here in Michigan.
Paul
On May 10, 2007, at 11:12 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Pentax - Selling HQ and Apparently Drops 645D
But they're also well
Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/05/10 Thu PM 02:19:48 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax - Selling HQ and Apparently Drops 645D
Irrefutable logic!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever size sensor Pentax uses in the K1D, we can be sure it will
work
On May 10, 2007, at 9:27 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Precisely. One of the major purposes of the Canon 1Ds-II isn't just to
sell , well, the Canon 1Ds-II, it's to sell boatloads of Rebels. A
high-end camera goves you the street cred to move your low end
cameras.
You got that right. That's
On 11.05.2007, at 13:10 , Bob Shell wrote:
They probably should
have gone ahead and produced the full frame digital in spite of the
problems with the Philips chip.
Contax did it... and they went out of business two years ago.
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 11/05/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. But in terms of retail exposure, it's gotten much better for
Pentax in the last six months. You couldn't find a Pentax *ist camera
in any of the local camera stores. But since the introduction of the
K series, they've been in the
101 - 200 of 408 matches
Mail list logo
