Looks like we'll see an updated 645D sooner or later, featuring CMOS sensor
technology:
http://press.hasselblad.com/press-releases/2014/2014-01-21_h5d-50c.aspx
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML
Nothing for granted, of course. I wrote that just because:
1 - A new CMOS sensor means a new generation of MF cameras. If Ricoh want to
stay in that business (and I understand they want), they have to keep on
pace.
2 - If Hasselblad now has a CMOS sensor suitable for them, Pentax can have
On 1/21/2014 9:21 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Looks like we'll see an updated 645D sooner or later, featuring CMOS
sensor technology:
http://press.hasselblad.com/press-releases/2014/2014-01-21_h5d-50c.aspx
Dario
That's interesting, but someone is going to have to explain how
Hasselblad's new
The line between the dots (that Dario is connecting) is that the
manufacturer that is making the CMOS sensor to be used in the
Hasselblad is SONY. That is not insignificant.
http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/126702-hasselblad-reveals-first-medium-format-cmos-sensor-opening-the-door-for-other
price to come down.
I don't think there is any question that a 645D II will be coming out
sometime in 2014. I think putting a CMOS in makes sense, but I'm
wondering if it can be done at the original price point of the 645D
(which was $9995, if memory serves).
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Darren
That's interesting, but someone is going to have to explain how
Hasselblad's new sensor means anything about the 645D?
Competition ?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: John johnsess...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: CMOS sensor for MF
Both arguments apply equally well to why Ricoh should be bringing out a
full-frame Pentax DSLR. Do you see that on the horizon as well?
On 1/21/2014 10:46 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Nothing for granted, of course. I wrote that just because:
1 - A new CMOS sensor means a new generation of MF
John,
Ricoh CURRENTLY HAS a Pentax MF digital system to keep updated with
competition.
That does not apply to FF.
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: John
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:58 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: CMOS sensor for MF
Both arguments apply
not apply to FF.
Dario
-Messaggio originale- From: John
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:58 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: CMOS sensor for MF
Both arguments apply equally well to why Ricoh should be bringing out a
full-frame Pentax DSLR. Do you see that on the horizon
, Dario Bonazza wrote:
John,
Ricoh CURRENTLY HAS a Pentax MF digital system to keep updated with
competition.
That does not apply to FF.
Dario
-Messaggio originale- From: John
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:58 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: CMOS sensor for MF
Both
-Messaggio originale- From: John
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:58 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: CMOS sensor for MF
Both arguments apply equally well to why Ricoh should be bringing out a
full-frame Pentax DSLR. Do you see that on the horizon as well?
On 1/21/2014 10:46 AM
Ricoh may want to stay in that business, but the 645D needed a refresh
two years ago, so the question is will it be viable for them.
On 1/21/2014 10:46 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Nothing for granted, of course. I wrote that just because:
1 - A new CMOS sensor means a new generation of MF
For those who are technically inclined and would like to figure out
pro's and con's for CMOS sensors vs. CCD ones:
http://www.dalsa.com/corp/markets/ccd_vs_cmos.aspx
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML
8 x 8 (202mm x 205mm) CMOS sensor
captures with 1/100th the light required by a DSLR sensor
can theoretically do 60 fps video at 0.3 lux (about half of bright
moonlight)
In a quick look, I don't see a mention of the pixel resolution
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008
Now that would be a point and shoot. ;-) imagine what it costs.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
8 x 8 (202mm x 205mm) CMOS sensor
captures with 1/100th the light required by a DSLR sensor
can theoretically do 60 fps video at 0.3 lux (about half
From: Doug Franklin
8 x 8 (202mm x 205mm) CMOS sensor
captures with 1/100th the light required by a DSLR sensor
can theoretically do 60 fps video at 0.3 lux (about half of bright
moonlight)
In a quick look, I don't see a mention of the pixel resolution
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 6:17 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Cool. Wonder how much for a 202mm x 254mm?
They are using 12 inch wafers, so 8 by 8 with diagonal at 8*root2 which
is about 8*1.4 = 11'2 is about as big as will fit. 8 by 10 gives 100 + 64
for squares, root 164 for the
On 2010-09-03 18:44, Sandy Harris wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 6:17 AM, John Sessomsjsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Cool. Wonder how much for a 202mm x 254mm?
They are using 12 inch wafers, so 8 by 8 with diagonal at 8*root2 which
is about 8*1.4 = 11'2 is about as big as will fit. 8 by 10
From: Sandy Harris
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 6:17 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Cool. Wonder how much for a 202mm x 254mm?
They are using 12 inch wafers, so 8 by 8 with diagonal at 8*root2 which
is about 8*1.4 = 11'2 is about as big as will fit. 8 by 10 gives 100 + 64
for
upon how you want to
look at it.. but the difference between CMOS and CCD is not relevant.
The issue is that Lightroom does not have any calibration tables for
the K7 as yet, AFAIK. So the thing to do is get the DNG Profile
Editor, shoot a couple of controlled tests with a Macbeth Color
Checker
On Jul 30, 2009, at 10:26, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The issue is that Lightroom does not have any calibration tables for
the K7 as yet, AFAIK. So the thing to do is get the DNG Profile
Editor, shoot a couple of controlled tests with a Macbeth Color
Checker or equivalent, and create a good
Adobe has worked out K7 specs for PSCS4 ACR. RAW images open nicely in
that converter.
Paul
On Jul 30, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jul 30, 2009, at 10:26, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The issue is that Lightroom does not have any calibration tables for
the K7 as yet, AFAIK. So
On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:22 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Adobe has worked out K7 specs for PSCS4 ACR. RAW images open nicely
in that converter.
Paul
Lightroom 2.4 lists support for the K-7. Out of curiosity, is this the
version used that renders the K-7 RAW files so poorly?
On Jul 30, 2009,
Matthew Montgomery matt...@electricjunk.com wrote:
Lightroom 2.4 lists support for the K-7. Out of curiosity, is this the
version used that renders the K-7 RAW files so poorly?
Quite so. Here at least.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog :
On Jul 30, 2009, at 13:32, Matthew Montgomery wrote:
On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:22 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Adobe has worked out K7 specs for PSCS4 ACR. RAW images open nicely
in that converter.
Paul
Lightroom 2.4 lists support for the K-7. Out of curiosity, is this
the version used that
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson
Subject: Re: CMOS vs. CCD colours?
On Jul 30, 2009, at 13:32, Matthew Montgomery wrote:
On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:22 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Adobe has worked out K7 specs for PSCS4 ACR. RAW images open nicely in
that converter.
Paul
William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm running 2.4 also. My K7 DNGs are perhaps a tad warmer than those from my
K20, but it certainly isn't objectionable.
Any tendency of blue skies veering towards cyan? This is my main prob.
Difference between Lightroom 2.4 for Mac and Windows? Mac Dual
- Original Message -
From: Ralf R. Radermacher
Subject: Re: CMOS vs. CCD colours?
Any tendency of blue skies veering towards cyan? This is my main prob.
Difference between Lightroom 2.4 for Mac and Windows? Mac Dual G5 under
10.5.7 here.
I'll have to check that for you. I won't
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:38 PM, William Robbwar...@gmail.com wrote:
Any tendency of blue skies veering towards cyan? This is my main prob.
Difference between Lightroom 2.4 for Mac and Windows? Mac Dual G5 under
10.5.7 here.
I'll have to check that for you. I won't be able to do so until
Ralf,
I'm not having any problems with Lightroom 2.4, but I installed the
2.3 to 2.4 upgrade at the same time I got the K-7. My recollection is
that Adobe had me install the same fix as Paul S is using for PSCS4
ACR and RAW images. Hope this helps.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:22
More specifically, Adobe recommended installing an update to get
Photoshop Elements 7.0 to recognize K-7 DNG's. I'm running PS
Elements 5.0 but did the upgrade anyway. Colors are fine in both
Lightroom 2.4 and Elements 5.0 on my Windows machine.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:19
After using a K10D for a few years I find that the colours I'm getting
from my new K-7 are a trifle odd, to put it mildly.
Particularly my sky colours now look like 1950's bathroom tiles. Some
awful cyanish cast that I have only had with the K10D in severely
overexposed shots. Grey sky comes out
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 07:50:54PM +0200, Ralf R. Radermacher scripsit:
[sky looks like bathroom tile]
The camera is set to AWB, just like the K10D, as well. Colours space in
both cases is Adobe RGB.
The times I've seen something like that have been the white balance
being set to tungsten in
2009/7/29 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
After using a K10D for a few years I find that the colours I'm getting
from my new K-7 are a trifle odd, to put it mildly.
Particularly my sky colours now look like 1950's bathroom tiles. Some
awful cyanish cast that I have only had with the K10D
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
After using a K10D for a few years I find that the colours I'm getting
from my new K-7 are a trifle odd, to put it mildly.
Particularly my sky colours now look like 1950's bathroom tiles. Some
awful cyanish cast that I have only had with the K10D in severely
Ralf,
Do you shoot PEF?
If you do, maybe it's worth an exposure to test if DNG is any
different, just to test if the software has got the file format wrong.
Notice also that Pentax has sometimes been criticised for producing a
magenta cast in low colour temp settings, and with the K-7 there's a
. I suspect you'll be
able to dig out the exact number of that setting before I do.
My suspicions went rather in the direction of CCD vs. CMOS behaviour. I
had a K20D for two weeks, just before I got the K-7, and I had similar
troubles getting the sky to look right.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher
PSCS4 supports K7 RAW files, and they open looking very normal and
nice in that software's ACR converter. The k7 files generally don't
require as much tweaking as did those from the K20D, although that's
primarily the result of more predictable exposure.
Paul
On Jul 29, 2009, at 2:59 PM,
What happens if you shoot a greycard and color balance in PS?
--
The first step is learning to take great photos,
the second step is learning to throw away ones that are merely good.
Larry Colen l...@red4est.comhttp://www.red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Apropos to the recent question about CCD vs CMOS, with the K20D used as
an example.
http://tinyurl.com/2fczxs
http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9860021-39.html?part=dtxtag=nl.e703
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
CCD vs CMOS, with the K20D used as
an example.
http://tinyurl.com/2fczxs
http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9860021-39.html?part=dtxtag=nl.e703
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Derby: Thanks for posting this. Now I've been schooled on something I
didn't know much about. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:38 PM
Subject: New CMOS sensors
What are the pro's and con's of CMOS and CCD sensors?
It is something I should know, and I even remember reading about it,
but I don't remember.
So, I'd appreciate if someone can either post a link to or list them
here.
Additionally, a specific question:
which one should (theoretically) show
CMOS is lower power, lower heat and inherently noisier, but with
easier to control noise characteristics.
-Adam
On 1/23/08, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the pro's and con's of CMOS and CCD sensors?
It is something I should know, and I even remember reading about it,
but I
I dont know if there is any difference between them as far as noise
per unit area of silicon for one photosite, but I'm wondering if CMOS
provides a different fill factor for the whole chip that gives it an
advantage via more silicon per photosite, if indeed CMOS has a better
fill factor.
On 1
Gonz wrote:
I dont know if there is any difference between them as far as noise
per unit area of silicon for one photosite, but I'm wondering if CMOS
provides a different fill factor for the whole chip that gives it an
advantage via more silicon per photosite, if indeed CMOS has a better
fill
Either way, i can spell them both, so i'm ok
Dave
On Jan 23, 2008 5:00 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gonz wrote:
I dont know if there is any difference between them as far as noise
per unit area of silicon for one photosite, but I'm wondering if CMOS
provides a different fill
In a message dated 8/21/2007 8:55:36 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's funny that all the hundrdes of 1000's of Digital Rebel owners don't
seem to be complaining. There must be something about the camera that makes
up for it.
Tom C.
===
The viewfinder
On 9/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no preference between the K100D (which I have now) and the 300D. They
are both good cameras.
Yeah but...but...Pentax has better lenses!
g,dr
Cheers,
Dave.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Not quite the same, Cory. For operation of the current DSLRs, the
cycle of activity starts with the mirror down, sensor initialized and
ready to go. For a Live View mode, the shutter has to be closed, the
sensor reset to the capture mode, and then the exposure cycle
started. If in continuous
Well I just came back from a long sunny weekend at the races in Virginia
and the LCD was nearly useless for anything but text. I tried hats,
umbrellas, dug a hole, etc. My friend is in Scotland for the summer and
she uses her LCD all the time. Maybe that British weather is useful for
something
On Aug 23, 2007, at 5:33 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
... Unless there is a physical, mechanical linkage between the mirror,
shutter, and focus motor (unlikely). ...
In Pentax DSLR cameras, the operation of the iris actuation, mirror
and shutter mechanisms are mechanically linked very tightly
I more usually need a shade to see through the optical finder of my
SLR cameras as, with glasses, light leaking around the finder in
sunny circumstances makes it harder to see the image and information
display than an LCD display using my hand as a shade. In extreme
situations, however, a
... Unless there is a physical, mechanical linkage between the mirror,
shutter, and focus motor (unlikely). ...
In Pentax DSLR cameras, the operation of the iris actuation, mirror
and shutter mechanisms are mechanically linked very tightly together.
The iris actuation system can operate as
Maybe I would adapt, but for me most situations are either too fast to
be checking the LCD or slow enough to just pop off a few shots and look.
I usually check the histogram once I get in a new lighting situation or
if I think the meter can't handle it. I have the enlarge button set to
the max so
With the capability of Live View and MF Assist, you have your choice
to use what's appropriate when you want to, that's all. If you've
never used a camera that has the facility, you can't know how it will
be useful to you ... it is a paradigm shift.
Regards battery life:
The Panasonic L1
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
With the capability of Live View and MF Assist, you have your choice
to use what's appropriate when you want to, that's all. If you've
never used a camera that has the facility, you can't know how it will
be useful to you ... it is a paradigm
A lot of the new point 'n shoot digitals don't even have a viewfinder
anymore. The only way you can compose the image is to look at the little
TV screen on the back.
Yes, they're just great with daylight coming from behind you, much the
same reason the K10D screen based menu settings are
On Aug 22, 2007, at 6:43 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Not to pick nits here, but 1500mAh is not a measure of battery
energy capacity unless the voltage is known. It's similar to
saying My
car gets 35 miles per. If the gallon are understood (e.g. AA NiMH
chemistry), it's a good way of
On Aug 22, 2007, at 8:07 AM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
A lot of the new point 'n shoot digitals don't even have a
viewfinder
anymore. The only way you can compose the image is to look at the
little
TV screen on the back.
Yes, they're just great with daylight coming from behind you, much
On 8/22/07, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A lot of the new point 'n shoot digitals don't even have a viewfinder
anymore. The only way you can compose the image is to look at the little
TV screen on the back.
Yes, they're just great with daylight coming from behind you, much
You excel at picking nits.
It's unimportant, Cory. What's important is that the differential
between shooting with the Live View enabled vs the optical finder
alone is not that enormous. If the minutiae of the battery
specification is that important to you, you could have looked it up
I think that sensor (which has to support video mode) and the mirror
problem (it's in the way) are the main culprits.
OTOH, it's basically a free addition since it doesn't require
anything other than software, so I'm surprised it's taken this long to be
included.
-Cory
--
Thibault
On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Yes, I have a tendency to pick nits particularly on pet
peeves. Battery misinformation is one such pet peeve. It was not a
personal attack, simply pointing out that such a piece of
information is
useless for the point trying to be
to an unusable level. And
I'm ignorant of these issues. I'd imagine the CCD's are more
difficult to read out this way than CMOS sensors. One doesn't need
anywhere near full resolution to display on the LCD.
then there is all the mechanical coordination required for a DSLR to
manage
On Aug 22, 2007, at 7:53 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
I'm ignorant of these issues. I'd imagine the CCD's are more
difficult to read out this way than CMOS sensors. One doesn't need
anywhere near full resolution to display on the LCD.
I don't know what these distinctions would
]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 12:29 PM
Subject: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
It seems that we already know what will Sony use in their upcoming
mid-end Alpha which shoould appear at the begining of september. It
incorporates some very
On 22/08/07, Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must be missing something. What is the point of Live View with a
DSLR?
It could be handy if it includes a histogram and responds to exposure
controls. :-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
On Aug 21, 2007, at 7:01 AM, Steve Desjardins wrote:
I must be missing something. What is the point of Live View with a
DSLR?
1- Exact, precise 100% coverage framing
2- Live histogram display for dynamic exposure adjustment
3- Critical focusing aids if the camera implements image
: 3 LCD with Live View.
Cheers,
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 12:29 PM
Subject: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
It seems that we already know what will Sony
On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:18, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
My Panasonic L1 has Live View and all the above features. It is a
fantastic aid in various kinds of work, kind of an ideal hybrid. Use
the optical reflex viewfinder for what it's best at, use the LCD
display for what it's best at, and gain a
From:
William Robb
- Original Message - From: Dario Bonazza Subject: Re: New
12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
And the EOS 40D has been introduced, so that we can figure out the
next trend: 3 LCD with Live View.
Excellent, it should filter down to us sometime around 2014.
William
]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 12:29 PM
Subject: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
It seems that we already know what will Sony use in their upcoming
mid-end Alpha which shoould appear at the begining of september. It
incorporates some very
@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:39:10 -0400
It's a feature.
There's no point really... Wait a minute, have you looked down a
Digital Rebel's viewfinder lately?
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I must be missing something. What is the point of Live View
Too late, the end of the world comes before that...
http://www.greatdreams.com/end-world.htm
John Sessoms wrote:
From:
William Robb
- Original Message - From: Dario Bonazza Subject: Re: New
12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
And the EOS 40D has been introduced, so that we
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:39:10 -0400
It's a feature.
There's no point really... Wait a minute, have you looked down a
Digital
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:03:10 -0400, P. J. Alling wrote
They've never seen a good viewfinder on a DSLR? (Customer in
BigBox/Camera Store: Which camera should I buy? Salesdroid: Heres a
Digital Rebel, it's made by Canon, they sell the most cameras
therefor they're the best at everything.
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:03:10 -0400
They've never seen a good viewfinder on a DSLR? (Customer in
BigBox/Camera Store: Which camera should I buy? Salesdroid: Heres a
Digital Rebel, it's made by Canon, they sell the most cameras therefor
they're
on the recording
medium.
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:18:45 -0700
On Aug 21, 2007, at 7:01 AM, Steve Desjardins wrote:
I
at the
subject.
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:03:10 -0400
They've never seen a good viewfinder on a DSLR
The primary reason for less than 100% viewfinder coverage with SLR
reflex optical systems is cost of manufacture and the resulting price
to the users. Optical systems built to this standard require larger,
heavier components with more rejects and more accuracy in assembly by
a
/nothing less.
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:42:56 -0700
The primary reason for less than 100% viewfinder
the
viewfinder is to see the scene one will capture. In a perfect world
it would
be nothing more/nothing less.
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from
pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:39:10 -0400
It's a feature.
There's no point really... Wait a minute, have you looked down a
Digital Rebel's viewfinder lately?
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I must be missing something. What is the point
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
IMO, not having 100% coverage in a viewfinder is a far more serious issue
than it being a little dim for one's tastes. Of course we've all gotten
used to it, but I fail to see why, all things
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of P. J. Alling
Sent: 21 August 2007 16:47
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
Too late, the end of the world comes before that...
http
:07 PM
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
On 22/08/07, Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must be missing something. What is the point of Live View with a
DSLR?
It could be handy if it includes a histogram and responds to exposure
controls. :-)
--
Rob Studdert
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
It seems that we already know what will Sony use in their upcoming
mid-end Alpha which shoould appear at the begining of september. It
incorporates some very interesting noise cancelling technologies. All
is here:
On 22/08/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard that said before, but what kind of tolerances are we talking
about? I would think that's it's not as expensive as it may seem, but is
used as a value-added feature to raise the price on the high-end bodies.
Not arguing with you, but it
Har!
Mark Roberts wrote:
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
It seems that we already know what will Sony use in their upcoming
mid-end Alpha which shoould appear at the begining of september. It
incorporates some very interesting noise cancelling technologies. All
is here:
- Original Message -
From: Tom Cakalic
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
It's funny that all the hundrdes of 1000's of Digital Rebel owners don't
seem to be complaining. There must be something about the camera that
makes
up for it.
You must not hang out on any
@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:25:00 -0600
- Original Message -
From: Tom Cakalic
Subject: Re: New 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony
It's funny that all the hundrdes of 1000's of Digital Rebel owners don't
seem to be complaining
From:
P. J. Alling
They've never seen a good viewfinder on a DSLR? (Customer in
BigBox/Camera Store: Which camera should I buy? Salesdroid: Heres a
Digital Rebel, it's made by Canon, they sell the most cameras therefor
they're the best at everything. Customer: Duh, OK) New camera owner
On 22/08/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A lot of the new point 'n shoot digitals don't even have a viewfinder
anymore. The only way you can compose the image is to look at the little
TV screen on the back.
Yes, they're just great with daylight coming from behind you, much the
same
You've got to get an after market screen shade. Of course they don't
seem to exist for the K10d yet...
http://www.internationalsupplies.com/delkin/popup.htm
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 22/08/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A lot of the new point 'n shoot digitals don't even
On 22/08/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've got to get an after market screen shade. Of course they don't
seem to exist for the K10d yet...
Yes, but I didn't seem to need one to set the drive mode or bracketing
options on my *ist D.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
Times change...
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 22/08/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've got to get an after market screen shade. Of course they don't
seem to exist for the K10d yet...
Yes, but I didn't seem to need one to set the drive mode or bracketing
options on
It seems that we already know what will Sony use in their upcoming
mid-end Alpha which shoould appear at the begining of september. It
incorporates some very interesting noise cancelling technologies. All
is here:
http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/200708/07-072E/index.html
Will it find
On 20/08/07, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that we already know what will Sony use in their upcoming
mid-end Alpha which shoould appear at the begining of september. It
incorporates some very interesting noise cancelling technologies. All
is here:
Interesting to me is the fact that it is a CMOS and not a CCD anymore.
Seems everybody shitfs (or tries to) to CMOS.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
