Re: PESO - Discreet Delivery

...and crushes the customer before he can file a complaint. http://photo.net/photos/RickW On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: > And then the door opens from within and the parcel falls over... > > On 12 Aug 2016 05:05, "Rick Womer"

Re: PESO - Discreet Delivery

And then the door opens from within and the parcel falls over... On 12 Aug 2016 05:05, "Rick Womer" wrote: > "Mr. Smith? I'm showing that we delivered your 400-1200 zoom lens and > tripod yesterday. I can't imagine what happened to them." > > (K-5, DA 50-200) > > Rick > >

Re: PESO - Discreet Delivery

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18273241 Sorry about that! Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Bill wrote: > On 8/11/2016 8:04 PM, Rick Womer wrote: >> >> "Mr. Smith? I'm showing that we delivered your 400-1200 zoom lens

Re: PESO - Discreet Delivery

On 8/11/2016 8:04 PM, Rick Womer wrote: "Mr. Smith? I'm showing that we delivered your 400-1200 zoom lens and tripod yesterday. I can't imagine what happened to them." (K-5, DA 50-200) Rick The link is very discreet as well -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

PESO - Discreet Delivery

"Mr. Smith? I'm showing that we delivered your 400-1200 zoom lens and tripod yesterday. I can't imagine what happened to them." (K-5, DA 50-200) Rick -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

n > > Rick > http://photo.net/photos/RickW > > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem > <mailer-dae...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: >> >> col...@brendemuehl.net >> &

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

> Colin, off-list messages to you are bouncing: >> >> The error that the other server returned was: >> 550 5.0.0 <col...@brendemuehl.net>... User unknown >> >> Rick >> http://photo.net/photos/RickW >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Mail Del

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

Colin, off-list messages to you are bouncing: The error that the other server returned was: 550 5.0.0 <col...@brendemuehl.net>... User unknown Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-dae...@googlemail.com> wrote

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

known >>> >>> Rick >>> http://photo.net/photos/RickW >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem >>> <mailer-dae...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> Delivery to the following recipient failed per

Re: Delivery status notification

Anyone else receiving such notices? Jack - Original Message - From: Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@comcast.net To: Davis, Jack jdavi...@comcast.net Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:05:41 AM Subject: Delivery status notification This is an automatically generated Delivery

Re: Delivery status notification

I haven’t seen it… On Oct 9, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote: Anyone else receiving such notices? Jack - Original Message - From: Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@comcast.net To: Davis, Jack jdavi...@comcast.net Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:05:41

Re: Delivery status notification

Thanks, Stan. Jack - Original Message - From: Halpin, Stan s...@stans-photography.info To: PDML pdml@pdml.net Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:59:03 AM Subject: Re: Delivery status notification I haven’t seen it… On Oct 9, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote

Re: Delivery status notification

No Jack, and I just commented on Alan's photo as a test. Regards, Bob S. On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote: Anyone else receiving such notices? Jack - Original Message - From: Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@comcast.net To: Davis, Jack jdavi

Re: Delivery status notification

- Original Message - From: Davis, Jack jdavi...@comcast.net To: PDML pdml@pdml.net Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 8:03:49 AM Subject: Re: Delivery status notification Thanks, Stan. Jack - Original Message - From: Halpin, Stan s...@stans-photography.info To: PDML pdml@pdml.net

Re: Delivery status notification

Thanks, Bob! Jack - Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com To: PDML pdml@pdml.net Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 8:11:20 AM Subject: Re: Delivery status notification No Jack, and I just commented on Alan's photo as a test. Regards, Bob S. On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9

Re: Delivery

- Original Message - From: Davis, Jack jdavi...@comcast.net To: PDML pdml@pdml.net Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 8:17:31 AM Subject: Re: Delivery status notification Thanks, Bob! Jack - Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com To: PDML pdml@pdml.net Sent

OT Bicycle Delivery

I was pointed to this gallery of folks delivering things on their bikes. Interestingly, none of them seem to be riding fixies. http://shanghaiist.com/2011/09/27/gallery_totems_by_alain_delorme.php -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: PESO: The Delivery

Painful reminder of my rotator cuff surgery! Well timed, Dan. Jack ;) --- On Thu, 6/23/11, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com Subject: PESO: The Delivery To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011, 12:35

Re: The Delivery

: The Delivery http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=mainwebtag=djm1963entry=105 Comments are welcome. -- Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: PESO: The Delivery

...@gmail.com Subject: PESO: The Delivery To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011, 12:35 PM http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=mainwebtag=djm1963entry=105 Comments are welcome. -- Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola

Re: The Delivery

From: Steven Desjardins It always amazes me that pitchers actually have to ice their arm after a normal outing to help them heal quicker for their next slot in the rotation. On an oddly connected tangent, have you read The Strange Case of Siddharta Finch by George Plimpton? I've read Ball

Re: The Delivery

How about The Bronx Zoo, by Sparky Lyle? Sparky is actually the manager of the minor league team that plays in this park: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13514684 . He is as colorful as ever. Dan On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:36 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote: From:

PESO: The Delivery

http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=mainwebtag=djm1963entry=105 Comments are welcome. -- Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,

Re: The Delivery

Ouch! Looks like it hurts. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com Subject: PESO: The Delivery http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=mainwebtag=djm1963entry=105 Comments

Re: The Delivery

. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com Subject: PESO: The Delivery http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=mainwebtag=djm1963entry=105 Comments are welcome. -- Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net

Re: The Delivery

Message - From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com Subject: PESO: The Delivery http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=mainwebtag=djm1963entry=105 Comments are welcome. -- Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail

RE: K-7 set-up on delivery

To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K-7 set-up on delivery Hi Bob - My K7 arrived from BH yesterday. I hadn't noticed, but it is set up like yours - Contrast and Sharpness up a notch.I did some macro work with the camera and A* 200 macro lens today - fabulous camera! - MCC   - Original

Re: K-7 set-up on delivery

- Original Message - From: Desjardins, Steve Subject: RE: K-7 set-up on delivery This has me curious. Are the JPEGs any better on the K7 than the K10D/20D? I do my snapshots in JPEG and I turn the sharpness up a notch. That picture of my dog you just commented on was taken from

Re: K-7 set-up on delivery

have been excellent. I thought the rendering on Bill's dog pic was superb, BTW. Paul On Jul 12, 2009, at 10:20 AM, William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: Desjardins, Steve Subject: RE: K-7 set-up on delivery This has me curious. Are the JPEGs any better on the K7 than

Re: K-7 set-up on delivery

On Jul 11, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote: I have noticed that my K-7 was set-up not 'zeroed out'. The image quality on Contrast and Sharpness was 'up' one notch. Is this the case for others of you with a new K-7? Yes, that's how mine arrived. Haven't shot any jpegs yet and probably

Re: K-7 set-up on delivery

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:53 AM, paul stenquistpnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: Yes, that's how mine arrived. Haven't shot any jpegs yet and probably won't. But Kenny boy says we should.:-) Is this Pentax's reaction to being accused of 'soft' images? Interested in your take on your jpegs

Re: K-7 set-up on delivery

Dave, I shot a handful of jpegs in the kitchen (incandscent light at sunset). They were quite snappy and colorful, even a bit blue near the window light. At jpeg quality 3, the jpegs were 6-7meg. At highest quality (4) they were 8-9 meg. In the morning I got better light and shot RAW+ (DGN's

Re: K-7 set-up on delivery

David J Brooks wrote: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:53 AM, paul stenquistpnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: Yes, that's how mine arrived. Haven't shot any jpegs yet and probably won't. But Kenny boy says we should.:-) Is this Pentax's reaction to being accused of 'soft' images?

Re: K-7 set-up on delivery

To: PDML pdml@pdml.net Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 12:15:23 AM Subject: K-7 set-up on delivery I have noticed that my K-7 was set-up not 'zeroed out'. The image quality on Contrast and Sharpness was 'up' one notch. Is this the case for others of you with a new K-7? Is this Pentax's reaction to being

K-7 set-up on delivery

I have noticed that my K-7 was set-up not 'zeroed out'. The image quality on Contrast and Sharpness was 'up' one notch. Is this the case for others of you with a new K-7? Is this Pentax's reaction to being accused of 'soft' images? Doing shooting and reading, but nothing like Bill R. or Paul S.

PESO - Fruit Delivery, Kensington Market

http://tinyurl.com/5gb5y4 http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SIchPWI14XI/Cs0/ZV-q32Zjyko/s1600-h/july_23_08+002.jpg Comments welcome. cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: PESO - Fruit Delivery, Kensington Market

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:12:15 -0400, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: http://tinyurl.com/5gb5y4 http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SIchPWI14XI/Cs0/ZV-q32Zjyko/s1600-h/july_23_08+002.jpg Comments welcome. Very Theriaultian Perhaps he's moving quicker than it seems.

Re: PESO - Fruit Delivery, Kensington Market

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:12:15 -0400, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: http://tinyurl.com/5gb5y4 http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SIchPWI14XI/Cs0/ZV-q32Zjyko/s1600-h/july_23_08+002.jpg Comments welcome.

Re: PESO - Fruit Delivery, Kensington Market

Now that's more like the Knarf I know ! Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PESO - Fruit Delivery, Kensington Market http://tinyurl.com/5gb5y4 http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SIchPWI14XI/Cs0

Re: PESO - Fruit Delivery, Kensington Market

Had to look at this one a couple of times. It looks like you have managed to make the delivery guy look slow, and the world around look like they are the ones in motion. Good job. Dave On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:12 AM, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://tinyurl.com/5gb5y4 http

Is there anything more distracting than Out for Delivery?

Sometimes I think that the online tracking for UPS is more of a curse than a blessing. I keep refreshing that page waiting for my box to arrive... as if hitting F5 over and over will make the thing show up sooner. A watched pot never boils is hopefully not A watched UPS truck never

Re: Is there anything more distracting than Out for Delivery?

- Original Message - From: Charles Robinson Subject: Is there anything more distracting than Out for Delivery? Sometimes I think that the online tracking for UPS is more of a curse than a blessing. I keep refreshing that page waiting for my box to arrive... as if hitting F5

Re: Is there anything more distracting than Out for Delivery?

It beats DHL; their way of describing the status of a package makes no sense. Out for Delivery may be frustrating, but at least it's clear. On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Charles Robinson wrote: Sometimes I think that the online tracking for UPS is more of a curse than a blessing. I keep

Re: Is there anything more distracting than Out for Delivery?

- Original Message - From: Micah B. Kleit Subject: Re: Is there anything more distracting than Out for Delivery? It beats DHL; A friend of mine works for DHL. Apparently, it is an acronym for Driver Hopelessly Lost. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Is there anything more distracting than Out for Delivery?

What's really frustrating is when it says 'out for delivery' all day, and then switches to 'failed delivery - nobody home'. Especially when you have been watching for it all day! Regards, Bob S. On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sometimes I think

Re: Peso: Sedan Delivery

I do envy you, Mister Robb ;-). I like old cars. They seem to have character unlike modern boxes. Boris On 4/26/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Regina has a very good climate for preserving automobiles, and it is not uncommon during the warm months to see restored or customized

Re: Peso: Sedan Delivery

- Original Message - From: Boris Liberman Subject: Re: Peso: Sedan Delivery I do envy you, Mister Robb ;-). I like old cars. They seem to have character unlike modern boxes. I'll make a point of hunting them this year. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Peso: Sedan Delivery

To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Peso: Sedan Delivery Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:45:26 -0600 - Original Message - From: Boris Liberman Subject: Re: Peso: Sedan Delivery I do envy you, Mister Robb ;-). I like old cars. They seem to have character unlike modern

Peso: Sedan Delivery

Regina has a very good climate for preserving automobiles, and it is not uncommon during the warm months to see restored or customized vintage cars on the street. A couple of days ago, I spotted this gem. http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/deliveryvan.html Technical: K10/ 70mm f/2.4

Amazon K10D Delivery Date

Amazon tells me that my K10D is now scheduled to ship between December 1 and December 10. Paul -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Amazon K10D Delivery Date

When did you place your order? I placed mine two days ago. My status page at Amazon says shipping Nov 9- Nov 16. But their K10D page says the camera will be released on January 15th... It's all a bit confusing... j On 11/3/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amazon tells me that my

Re: Amazon K10D Delivery Date

I placed my order September 15. My original shipping date was October 15 to 25th. I bet you'll get an update soon. Paul On Nov 3, 2006, at 7:12 PM, Juan Buhler wrote: When did you place your order? I placed mine two days ago. My status page at Amazon says shipping Nov 9- Nov 16. But their

Re: Amazon K10D Delivery Date

I just looked at Amazon. They now claim the RELEASE Date is January 15. On 11/3/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amazon tells me that my K10D is now scheduled to ship between December 1 and December 10. Paul -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Amazon K10D Delivery Date

I rechecked my order. Still showing delivery date of 12-5 to 12-19, shipping date as indicated below. However, I did order very early. Paul On Nov 3, 2006, at 9:40 PM, Perry Pellechia wrote: I just looked at Amazon. They now claim the RELEASE Date is January 15. On 11/3/06, Paul

Re: Amazon K10D Delivery Date

The Nikon people went through the same thing with the D200(me included) dates pushed back etc, etc, I'm sure it will be a good camera. Internal or external VR, you guys will love it. Dave Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I rechecked my order. Still showing delivery date of 12-5

Re: Re: Delivery Failure Messages

From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/02/03 Fri AM 05:55:44 GMT To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: Delivery Failure Messages It's somebody subscribed to the list from an account that incorrectly reports delivery failures to the original submitter, not to the 'envelope

Re: Delivery Failure Messages

On Feb 3, 2006, at 12:55 AM, John Francis wrote: It's somebody subscribed to the list from an account that incorrectly reports delivery failures to the original submitter, not to the 'envelope from' address. This is a failure commonly found in poorly written mail systems. Oh, I see

Re: Delivery Failure Messages

On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Bob Shell wrote: On Feb 3, 2006, at 12:55 AM, John Francis wrote: It's somebody subscribed to the list from an account that incorrectly reports delivery failures to the original submitter, not to the 'envelope from' address. This is a failure commonly found in poorly

Re: Re: Delivery Failure Messages

On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:16:23AM +, mike wilson wrote: From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/02/03 Fri AM 05:55:44 GMT To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: Delivery Failure Messages It's somebody subscribed to the list from an account that incorrectly

Re: Delivery Failure Messages

On 2/3/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, I see, Italian ethnic jokes are allowed on this list... Bob Did I miss something here? I looked at all the posts, and didn't see anything remotely offensive. cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri

Delivery Failure Messages

So far both messages I have sent to the PDML today have also resulted in my receiving a Delivery Failure e-mail notification for the following (as cut pasted) from the e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The sending address was [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone else receiving something similar? Tom C

Re: Delivery Failure Messages

- Original Message - From: Tom C Subject: Delivery Failure Messages So far both messages I have sent to the PDML today have also resulted in my receiving a Delivery Failure e-mail notification for the following (as cut pasted) from the e-mail: I just set a mail filter to delete

Re: Delivery Failure Messages

I've gotten them too. I thought maybe I had a virus but McAfee didn't find anything. -- Original message -- From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] So far both messages I have sent to the PDML today have also resulted in my receiving a Delivery Failure e-mail

Re: Delivery Failure Messages

both messages I have sent to the PDML today have also resulted in my receiving a Delivery Failure e-mail notification for the following (as cut pasted) from the e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Delivery Failure Messages

- Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff Subject: Re: Delivery Failure Messages Having received a few I finally just blocked the domain. My way is being more fun.. William Robb

Re: Delivery Failure Messages

Thanks for the tip, Bill. I love the way you evil geniuses think. g On 2/2/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Tom C Subject: Delivery Failure Messages So far both messages I have sent to the PDML today have also resulted in my receiving

Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

Who the hell is studio griffanti, and why is mail to this list going to them??? Bob Begin forwarded message: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: February 2, 2006 6:50:02 PM EST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) This is an automatically generated Delivery

RE: Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

http://www.job-net.it/pg/offerta.job-net?14767 Shel [Original Message] From: Bob Shell Who the hell is studio griffanti, and why is mail to this list going to them???

Re: Delivery Failure Messages

Yes, a couple times. Jack --- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So far both messages I have sent to the PDML today have also resulted in my receiving a Delivery Failure e-mail notification for the following (as cut pasted) from the e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The sending address

Re: Delivery Failure Messages

- Original Message - From: Scott Loveless Subject: Re: Delivery Failure Messages Thanks for the tip, Bill. I love the way you evil geniuses think. g If this was the first time he caused this William Robb

Re: Delivery Failure Messages

It's somebody subscribed to the list from an account that incorrectly reports delivery failures to the original submitter, not to the 'envelope from' address. This is a failure commonly found in poorly written mail systems.

Re: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice)

Bob W wrote: [ from Knarf ] Isn't that the stuff that men used to put in their hair to, you know, like slick it down? Back in the 50's and 60's, there was Brylcreem and Vitriol, IIRC (I was only a kid then). No - you must be thinking of Victrola... you're both off the mark

Re: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice)

--- Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're damn right Antonio! What does vitriol mean? Norm Norm, Isn't that the stuff that men used to put in their hair to, you know, like slick it down? Back in the 50's and 60's, there was Brylcreem and Vitriol, IIRC (I was only a kid then). HTH,

Re: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice)

--- Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now Mr. Owens, are you suggesting that it would be Antonio's fault? My good man, I'm sure you don't really mean that. Norm Norm, You sarcastic bastard. Do you have to turn everything into a for or against scenario? Why don't you just

OT: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice)

Hi Doug, Well I have been using the internet since Telnet and IRC, some 20 years ago and all I can say is that there is something wrong with this list. Emails are clearly not getting through. I am not the only one to experience this. Instead of berating me for raising the issue, or blaming me

Re: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice)

08, 2004 8:11 AM Subject: OT: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice) Hi Doug, Well I have been using the internet since Telnet and IRC, some 20 years ago and all I can say is that there is something wrong with this list. Emails are clearly

Re: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice)

any thought to the idea that maybe the problem is at your end? Bill - Original Message - From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:11 AM Subject: OT: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure

Re: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice)

In my humble opinion, this list is tops in service compared to others I participate in. I second Dan's comments without reservation. Otis Wright. Daniel J. Matyola wrote: I, for one, have had no problems with this list, although there have been problems from time to time on other lists to

Re: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice)

On 8 Jul 2004 at 10:24, Norm Baugher wrote: You're damn right Antonio! What does vitriol mean? It's empathy, tolerance, compromise and integration that he doesn't understand :-( Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice)

Well Rob, when you are debating a subject you normally have a different opinion to some other folks, so I dont really see how integration would be relevant. As to empathy, tolerance and compromise, it is very hard to feel any of those when you are the subject of an ongoing torrent of abuse and

Re: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice)

Amazing! I said nothing against anyone. I expressed an opinion, and then stated that Doug and the others who manage the list and the PUG deserve our gratitude. Where was the vitriol in my post? Why do you question my honesty? You may be the most highly sensitive and argumentative person I

Re: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice)

Amazing! I said nothing against anyone. I expressed an opinion, and then stated that Doug and the others who manage the list and the PUG deserve our gratitude. Where was the vitriol in my post? Why do you question my honesty? You may be the most highly sensitive and argumentative person I

Re: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice)

This is amazing. I've suddenly become a member of the OTEMAILBROWSERBYE mailing list without even subscribing. How can they do that? Tom C.

RE: OT:Parcel delivery.

Graywolf wrote: Boy am I glad I am out of the work force. Did I ever mention the time I got a bad work review, so I just quit trying to do my job. Just came in, sat there, and was friendly to everyone. Ignored the job description completely. Did no actual work. They told me how much I

RE: OT:Parcel delivery.

frank theriault wrote: Well, Malcolm, you're right. The culture of I just want this off my desk should change. Problem, it's not so easy a fix as one might think. With the advent of computers, receptionists must now be much more than a pretty face to smile at the business men who

Re: OT:Parcel delivery.

Malcolm Smith wrote: frank theriault wrote: Well, Malcolm, you're right. The culture of I just want this off my desk should change. Problem, it's not so easy a fix as one might think. With the advent of computers, receptionists must now be much more than a pretty face to smile at the

Re: OT:Parcel delivery.

When something is done incorrectly, and there's only two ways to do it, right and wrong, there IS a wrong way. Now, it's up to the boss or supervisor or parent, or whomever, to soft pedal the word and insist that it be done correctly. I think you're trying to avoid instilling in students of any

RE: OT:Parcel delivery.

Keith Whaley wrote: When something is done incorrectly, and there's only two ways to do it, right and wrong, there IS a wrong way. Now, it's up to the boss or supervisor or parent, or whomever, to soft pedal the word and insist that it be done correctly. I think you're trying to avoid

Re: OT:Parcel delivery.

that insurance pays. John On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 07:12:31 +0100, Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William Robb wrote: They have decided that it is more profitable to screw up and lose the delivery. Their insurance coughs up the replacement cost, and in all likelyhood they will deliver the replacement

Re: OT:Parcel delivery.

- Original Message - From: John Forbes Subject: Re: OT:Parcel delivery. Insurance isn't free. Their insurance only covers the replacement cost because they are paying a premium. The premium is based on claims experience, and it will cover not just the full cost of all expected

RE: OT:Parcel delivery.

. the 2nd excess policy only picking up claims from say GBP1 million to GBP3 million and so on. How this package works to a parcel delivery company for continual lower level claims (although you would require the cover in the event of the loss of say, a distribution hub), would be interesting to note

RE: OT:Parcel delivery.

to wherever', should be in the business of aiming for 100% success, not by nature of being at the top of the list of agents to call. If such businesses have to think, Hmmm... Is this an in town or out of town delivery? Do I call UPS or the local guys? Is this overnight, or one hour service

Re: OT:Parcel delivery.

You hit that nail on the head, Frank. frank theriault wrote: And, to be honest with you (as someone who works in the business), I can tell you that the average receptionist or mailroom staffer really doesn't care if the package gets delivered. They care if the package gets off their desk.

Re: OT:Parcel delivery.

fee. That probably came about because their customer service manager was active on the rec.photo groups, so heard a lot of complaints that would never have gotten to him otherwise. -- Malcolm Smith wrote: Why should any delivery company change it's performance figures if the senders don't much

RE: OT:Parcel delivery.

and as the customer, why shouldn't the person paying have the choice of delivery? Malcolm

Re: OT:Parcel delivery.

+0100, Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William Robb wrote: They have decided that it is more profitable to screw up and lose the delivery. Their insurance coughs up the replacement cost, and in all likelyhood they will deliver the replacement. It's called profiting from ones

RE: OT:Parcel delivery.

shopping business, which I believe will generate a big chunk of change for the delivery services. The problem, for the consumer, is that the courier companies are probably going to offer good deals to large mail order companies to be their exclusive shipper. Since the almighty dollar talks, once

RE: OT:Parcel delivery.

The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT:Parcel delivery. Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 14:46:00 -0500 Frank wrote: UPS won't

RE: OT:Parcel delivery.

it depends on the value of the items being sent - think of the threads here about choices of delivery from camera stores on high value items - but if you are sending something to someone, it has a value. Why should any delivery company change it's performance figures if the senders don't much care

RE: OT:Parcel delivery.

, it really was worth about a thousand dollars back then, and who knows what today. Your friend has my heart felt sympathy. Ouch! What a way for a first edition to go. This parcel delivery business really baffles me. It wasn't that long ago when the adverts of the various companies

  1   2   >