the filters, Elements
can be fun for that. Some of the stuff on the digital darkroom list, I
already own., but I just threw the list out there to see if I'd
forgotten anything if folks offered any product recommendations.
Cheers, Christine
Understood. Well, if you already own both programs, then it makes
2010/3/16 John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com:
I should know this, but either I don't or I've completely forgotten it.
How difficult is it to change the configuration of a RAID 5 from three disks
to four disks ... or from four to five ... once you have the data on there?
For example, if I
2010/3/16 John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com:
How much hassle is it? Can I just add the disk and let the controller
automatically re-configure the stripes? Or am I going to have to back the
data up somewhere else temporarily and start over?
oh, couple more things:
NEVER trust ONE system with
for that. Some
of the stuff on the digital darkroom list, I already own., but I just threw
the list out there to see if I'd forgotten anything if folks offered any
product recommendations. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
Christine, I'll comment just on few points:
On 3/13/2010 4:37 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
*At the Computer*
-Photoshop Elements
Do you *really* need Elements if you have Lightroom? Just a question to
ponder, really.
-Cd/dvd burner for digital back-up
I pray you reconsider. May be BluRay
2010/3/13 Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com:
If you're gonna go apeshit on storage anyway, remember it's cheap. Consider
doing a RAID 10 or RAID 0+1 array to reduce your OMG I need my backups
exposure. Keep one or two replacement drives, replace failures immediately,
and you won't have
Is that why most art directors have cut up fingers? ;-)
I do that too, actually, for some one-off bits but the Rototrim is
more consistent when you're trying to cut a dozen prints to exactly
the same dimensions. Lock down a guide for cut one, make all twelve,
lock down a guide for cut two, make
From: eckinator
RAID 5 has n-1 slack with a minimum disk count of 3, i.e. you lose the
space of one disk but never more than one third of the physical space
you paid for. The quota improves every time you add another disk. RAID
5 will tolerate the loss of one disk so again a spare disk is a
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
*At the Computer*
-Photoshop Elements
Do you *really* need Elements if you have Lightroom? Just a question to
ponder, really.
I do 90%+ of my editing in Lightroom nowadays, but there are
invariably some details on some
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:47:59PM +0200, Boris Liberman wrote:
Christine, I'll comment just on few points:
On 3/13/2010 4:37 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
*At the Computer*
-Photoshop Elements
Do you *really* need Elements if you have Lightroom? Just a question to
ponder, really.
Yes -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
*At the Computer*
-Photoshop Elements
Do you *really* need Elements if you have Lightroom? Just a question to
ponder, really.
I do 90%+ of my editing in Lightroom nowadays, but there are
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:58 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I do 90%+ of my editing in Lightroom nowadays, but there are
invariably some details on some photos that need a pixel editor to
work on most efficiently. Again, it's a case of right tools for the
right job.
On the 10%
On 3/16/2010 5:39 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com wrote:
*At the Computer*
-Photoshop Elements
Do you *really* need Elements if you have Lightroom? Just a question to
ponder, really.
I do 90%+ of my editing in Lightroom nowadays,
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: Digital Darkroom
Godfrey: Calumet Photo has the Moab Leather binders 12 x 13 for
$59.99--and you're right! they look very nice!
http://www.calumetphoto.com
You want a Rototrim paper cutter, standard of the industry. Pick one
size larger than what you think you need. I bought 15 inch, should
have gotten 24 inch.
LIke most art directors, I cut prints using a box cutter with a fresh blade and
a t-square on a mat-room cutting board with one-inch
On 2010-03-13 04:11 , John Sessoms wrote:
I'm talking about something like this:
NAS - http://tinyurl.com/ykqwync
one of the better deals among cheap NAS solutions is this 4-drive unit;
lets you do RAID 5, easy to service:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0012J0MYW/
(also
On 12/3/10, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Gang-print
I saw this once - it was disgusting!!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: Christine Aguila
I desperately have to get my digital darkroom organized, so I made a quick
list of stuff. Can you guys think of anything that I might be overlooking?
*At the Computer*
-Double back-up hard drives
*Print Preparation*
-High end paper cutter (*)
-Cutting Mat
From: Christine Aguila
Hi Doug: Yep, good advice about off-site back-up; I'll have to factor that
into the list. Big thanks for reminding me!
Actually, I do a lot of printing, and I had to do some mounting a few weeks
ago as well--hadn't done that in a while--course I don't have a mounting
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
Just thought I'd throw this out there. Anybody got a catcher's mit on? :-)
Big cheers, Christine
Not one mention of alcohol. Some dark room.
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
On 2010-03-12 22:34, paul stenquist wrote:
I wouldn't be happy without printing from time to time. [...]
To me, printing is an essential part of the process and the
only way in which one can fully appreciate a photo.
While I, personally, agree with you, I've known quite a few amateur
On 2010-03-12 23:19, Christine Aguila wrote:
30 years ago I once mounted a few photos with a home
iron. I don't know if I could do that with inkjet prints. Anybody know?
I'll have to give it a test probably.
Hmmm, I don't know. I've always used spray-on adhesive and a cold,
rubber roller to
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Doug Franklin
jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
On 2010-03-12 22:34, paul stenquist wrote:
I wouldn't be happy without printing from time to time. [...]
To me, printing is an essential part of the process and the
only way in which one can fully appreciate a
From: Doug Franklin
On 2010-03-12 23:19, Christine Aguila wrote:
30 years ago I once mounted a few photos with a home
iron. I don't know if I could do that with inkjet prints. Anybody know?
I'll have to give it a test probably.
Hmmm, I don't know. I've always used spray-on adhesive and a
- Original Message -
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: Digital Darkroom
From: Doug Franklin
On 2010-03-12 23:19, Christine Aguila wrote:
30 years ago I once mounted a few photos with a home
iron. I
Thanks for the links for back up drives. Very much appreciated.
As to mat cutting, don't think that will be for me. I can already imagine I
wouldn't be very good at it.
Thanks, John! Big cheers, Christine
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
that in the mix.
Big thanks cheers, Godfrey! Suggestions and tips very much appreciated.
Christine
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: Digital Darkroom
*Printing
I desperately have to get my digital darkroom organized, so I made a quick
list of stuff. Can you guys think of anything that I might be overlooking?
Obviously, some of this stuff I have, some of it will have to wait, but I
thought I'd get a dream list going. If anyone has any suggestions
prices, and
it's very similar to Gold Fibre Silk -- just slightly heavier stock and a bit
more texture.
Paul
On Mar 12, 2010, at 9:37 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
I desperately have to get my digital darkroom organized, so I made a quick
list of stuff. Can you guys think of anything that I
On 2010-03-12 21:37, Christine Aguila wrote:
*At the Computer*
-Double back-up hard drives
If it ain't off-site, it ain't a backup. Figure in external hard drives
that you can backup to, then rotate among several physical locations.
The .PEF files are your negatives. I have three. One is
On 2010-03-12 22:03, paul stenquist wrote:
A good list.
The more hard drive space you can afford, the better. I now have nine drives
and about 4 terabytes of space -- and Im running out. I'm going to park some
full drives and plug in a few new ones.
If you're gonna go apeshit on storage
On Mar 12, 2010, at 10:25 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2010-03-12 22:03, paul stenquist wrote:
A good list.
The more hard drive space you can afford, the better. I now have nine drives
and about 4 terabytes of space -- and Im running out. I'm going to park some
full drives and plug in a
On 2010-03-12 22:25, Doug Franklin wrote:
No down time, no lost data. As long as only one drive dies at a time,
you don't lose anything. The firmware can fix up the new drive in
the background, so it doesn't even get in the way.
Reworded that a little bit to make it clear the firmware can do
for black and white
the Gold Fiber Silk for Color--though I reverse it as well.
Big thanks and cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: Digital Darkroom
.
Big cheers and thanks, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: Digital Darkroom
On 2010-03-12 21:37, Christine Aguila wrote:
*At the Computer*
-Double
*Printing*
-Exhibit quality printer
-3 full sets of ink for above
-storage space for above printer parts
-good stable printer stand
-printer cover
-Low-end printer for 4 x 6 proofs
- full sets of ink for above
-Paper Stash
13 x 19 inch:
Ilford Gold Fiber Silk
Epson Velvet Fine Art
8 ½
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello frank,
Fun shot. He even has a 'digital' watch.
Thanks, Bruce.
And thanks to everyone else who commented.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hello frank,
Fun shot. He even has a 'digital' watch.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, October 31, 2008, 11:14:49 AM, you wrote:
ft Now they're portable:
ft http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2008/10/digital-darkroom.html
ft Recently spotted at a local coffeehouse.
ft Comments welcome.
ft
Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 2:14 PM
Subject: PESO - Digital Darkroom
Now they're portable:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2008/10/digital-darkroom.html
Recently spotted at a local
Now they're portable:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2008/10/digital-darkroom.html
Recently spotted at a local coffeehouse.
Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank (who's not so happy with the rendering because his digital
darkroom is hobbled without PS)
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept
Now they're portable:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2008/10/digital-darkroom.html
Recently spotted at a local coffeehouse.
Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank (who's not so happy with the rendering because his digital
darkroom is hobbled without PS)
The laptop looks portable
Isn't that just grand scale chimping?
On Oct 31, 2008, at 12:14 , frank theriault wrote:
Now they're portable:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2008/10/digital-darkroom.html
Recently spotted at a local coffeehouse.
Comments welcome.
Joseph McAllister
Pentaxian
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
frank theriault wrote:
Now they're portable:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2008/10/digital-darkroom.html
Recently spotted at a local coffeehouse.
Frank, it's been a couple of years since you've come to the Nature
Photography Weekend at GFM. Every table in the restaurant looks like
On 10/31/08, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
Now they're portable:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2008/10/digital-darkroom.html
Recently spotted at a local coffeehouse.
Frank, it's been a couple of years since you've come to the Nature
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank, it's been a couple of years since you've come to the Nature
Photography Weekend at GFM. Every table in the restaurant looks like that on
Saturday afternoon!
Everyone's grown a long white beard?
;-)
cheers,
frank
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:47 PM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank, it's been a couple of years since you've come to the Nature
Photography Weekend at GFM. Every table in the restaurant looks like that on
Clogged nozzles
Paper feed is in accurate
Check it or try different settings.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. februar 2006 19:10
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Digital darkroom
Just a short reply on the general topic -
The best reference I've see for this is Wayne Fulton's web site
http://www.scantips.com
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On Feb 11, 2006, at 5:19 PM, William Robb wrote:
I was happy with the first properly profiled print off my new
Epson, and that was gotten by setting the thing to automatic.
I had good results straight away with my 2100, but after I ran the
alignment procedure the results were even
David Mann wrote:
On Feb 11, 2006, at 5:19 PM, William Robb wrote:
I was happy with the first properly profiled print off my new Epson,
and that was gotten by setting the thing to automatic.
I had good results straight away with my 2100, but after I ran the
alignment procedure the
Aaaargh...Just got the replacement Epson R2400 printer just to experience
that this one also give horizontal stripes (paper in portrait position),
although not as pronounced as the first one. Everything is different from
when I had the first sample: the software is new, printer driver is new,
Turn off fast printing if it's on. If you're using glossy paper,
don't use the best photo setting. Drop it to Photo RPM if it's an
option.
On 2/10/06, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaaargh...Just got the replacement Epson R2400 printer just to experience
that this one also give
You shouldn't be scanning your negative at 360 dpi. You do want to END UP with
a ready for the printer image that's sized at 360 dpi. For example, an 11 x 17
image area at 360 dpi would be about 72 megabytes. To arrive at that kind of
resolution, you'd have to scan a 645 negative at a
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you're using glossy paper,
don't use the best photo setting. Drop it to Photo RPM if it's an
option.
It won't let me do that! I can select Photo RPM. After I've pressed the OK
button and go back and check again the
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You shouldn't be scanning your negative at 360 dpi. You do want to END UP
with a ready for the printer image that's sized at 360 dpi. For example,
an 11 x 17 image area at 360 dpi would be about 72 megabytes. To arrive at
that kind of
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Digital darkroom frustrations!
Aaaargh...Just got the replacement Epson R2400 printer just to experience
that this one also give horizontal stripes (paper in portrait position),
although not as pronounced as the first one. Everything
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Turn off fast printing if it's on. If you're using glossy paper,
don't use the best photo setting. Drop it to Photo RPM if it's an
option.
It turns out that it can be done after all. Aparently it isn't enough to
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You shouldn't be scanning your negative at 360 dpi. You do want to END UP
with a ready for the printer image that's sized at 360 dpi. For example,
an 11 x 17 image area at 360 dpi would be about 72 megabytes. To arrive at
that kind of
Pal, I haven't used your scanner, but mine has similar stuff. I just
tell mine to scan real stupid, at either ~50MB (8 bit) or ~100MB (16 bit)
and then go to Photoshop. Photoshop shows the image having a lot of
DPI but at the real 35mm neg picture size of about 1 x 1.5 inches.
I don't think it
I don't use the Nikon scanner, but I have found with my Epson 3200 that I get
best results by scanning at the full 3200 dpi and downsizing in PhotoShop.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
On Feb 11, 2006, at 8:05 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
Nikon suggest in the brochure for the scanner to set the output
size of the scan to the printing size (eg A4), and set DPI to 360.
Is this a good idea and what is gained (if anything) over using
the output size you get from the scanner at
Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Turn off fast printing if it's on. If you're using glossy paper,
don't use the best photo setting. Drop it to Photo RPM if it's an
option.
It turns out that it can be done after all. Aparently it isn't enough to
What Mark said. Once you get it right, it seems so simple. But it's
always been a tough haul for me to get to that first really good print.
Paul
On Feb 10, 2006, at 9:27 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Turn off fast
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Digital darkroom frustrations!
What Mark said. Once you get it right, it seems so simple. But it's always
been a tough haul for me to get to that first really good print.
Gads. I must have low standards.
I was happy
On Feb 10, 2006, at 6:27 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Keep at it. It takes a while to get any new photo printer set up and
configured properly. I usually burn through an entire set of ink
cartridges before I really get things under control. :)
Hmm. I don't know what is causing Pål's problems. I
On 2/11/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 10, 2006, at 6:27 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Keep at it. It takes a while to get any new photo printer set up and
configured properly. I usually burn through an entire set of ink
cartridges before I really get things under control.
Anything's better than a religious/political debate:
http://www.21gradi.com/Software/start.php?lingua=ENG
Sorry Mac-heds
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986,
This one time, at band camp, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anything's better than a religious/political debate:
http://www.21gradi.com/Software/start.php?lingua=ENG
Somehow, having a monitor on in the darkroom does not appeal to me
Kevin
-
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: OT A twist on the digital darkroom
Anything's better than a religious/political debate:
http://www.21gradi.com/Software/start.php?lingua=ENG
Does it have a built in safelight?
William Robb
I would guess it would depend on how closely they are watching what
you're doing...
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anything's better than a religious/political debate:
http://www.21gradi.com/Software/start.php?lingua=ENG
Somehow,
Just been sent this url, probably been posted before but worth bookmarking;
http://www.normankoren.com/printer_calibration.html#TestPrint
Lots of good stuff here.
Regards,
Ziggy
After five years of loyal service and constant use, my Mac G3 300 died.
The cause of death is unknown at this time, but it wouldn't boot even
with a system disc in the CD drive and all the other drives
disconnected. Probably a mother board failure.Since most of my work is
now scanned color images
Wheww! Thanks. I thought I'd missed one!
keith == due for a new CPU soon... Have a G3 300, like Paul. Looking
at G4 towers. Used.
Cotty wrote:
Nice one Paul. I'm green with envy. My Photoshop station is a Blue and
White G4 450
...Of course, that should read:
G3 450 :-)
Cheers,
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Keith Whaley wrote:
Wheww! Thanks. I thought I'd missed one!
keith == due for a new CPU soon... Have a G3 300, like Paul. Looking
at G4 towers. Used.
My $72 G3 became a modern, useful computer with the addition of a $100
used G4/500 CPU. Browse ebay for a cheap CPU
I'm still running 9.2 and PhotoShop 6 on the new G4. I'm in no hurry to
go to OSX. That's one reason I didn't opt for the G5.
Paul
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
on 24.07.03 14:13, Cotty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Of course, that should read:
G3 450 :-)
I knew that :-) Mine is still
On a somewhat related side note, I know find myself with a powerbook to
sell. I have a limited opportunity to downsize to a 12 model and as I
find myself carrying my 'book around more I'm looking forward to the
reduction in weight.
Given that, I now have my 1-year-old 15 titanium G4 powerbook
After five years of loyal service and constant use, my Mac G3 300 died.
The cause of death is unknown at this time, but it wouldn't boot even
with a system disc in the CD drive and all the other drives
disconnected. Probably a mother board failure.Since most of my work is
now scanned color images
If you use the right printer for 4 x 6 prints, you can beat the cost of lab
prints. Try the HP Photosmart 100, 130, or the most current 4 x 6 printer.
Great 4 x 6 prints but, remember, it won't print anything larger. I do all
of my 4 x 6 prints on it and do the big prints on the Epson.
Len
I have an Epson 2000P. I've been printing with it for 6 months or so and
haven't kept a close tab on the costs but it appears I can do an 8X10 print
for around a $1.00/print ink costs and around $0.80/print photo paper costs.
I consider this a bargain.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message
Kenneth,
8X10's are cheaper than the lab. It is 4X6 paper that is the problem.
I put ink cost around around 20-30 cents. To keep under the 50 cent
threshhold of lab cost on 4X6 reprint, that means the paper needs to
be 20 cents or less. About the cheapest I have found for quality
paper is 30
Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: OT - digital darkroom - printing...
Kenneth,
8X10's are cheaper than the lab. It is 4X6 paper that is the problem.
I put ink cost around 20-30 cents. To keep under the 50 cent
threshhold of lab cost on 4X6 reprint
---
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 5:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - digital darkroom - printing...
I have an Epson 2000P. I've been printing with it for 6
months or so and haven't kept a close tab
vintage- at an ink cost of $0.30/print and 4X6
KW borderles photopaper @ around $0.25/sheet.
KW Kenneth Waller
KW - Original Message -
KW From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KW To: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KW Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 7:04 PM
KW Subject: Re: OT - digital
Hello,
A question for digital darkroom users who do printing frequently ...
what is the cost of the print for say 8*10 size ?
Of course, it will vary depending on printer, paper and inks and that is
what I am trying to figure out.
I have a HP PC and 932 printer. The ink-set costs around US
There were 3 pro nature photographers at Grandfather Mountain this weekend.
All 3 said Epson, Epson and Epson.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Anand DHUPKAR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 8:13 PM
Subject: OT - digital darkroom - printing...
Hello
.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Anand DHUPKAR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 8:13 PM
Subject: OT - digital darkroom - printing...
Hello,
A question for digital darkroom users who do
printing frequently ...
what is the cost
- digital darkroom - printing...
Hello,
A question for digital darkroom users who do
printing frequently ...
what is the cost of the print for say 8*10
size
?
Of course, it will vary depending on printer,
paper and inks and that is
what I am trying to figure out
Hi,
My estimate using an Epson 2200, dedicated strictly for printing photos and
using Photo paper, is $2.34 an 8x10. I figure I get 30 prints per lt cyan
and lt magenta, 40 prints per photo black and lt black, and 60 prints per
cyan, magenta and yellow. Paper is $.50 per sheet (Ilford gallerie
Stop gloating it's unbecomming
At 10:00 PM 12/13/2002 +, you wrote:
That might seem like a long time, but most of
it is in Photoshop work (dust spots, levels adjustment, unsharp mask)
Ahh, dust spots. I remember those.
Vbg
Digicot
Free UK
Okay, it's official: I suck at doing digital darkroom stuff.
I saw others' complaints about the time required to do the post
processing digitally instead of handing it off to a lab to do
wet, and even with that in mind I'm too slow. And whether it's
lack of skill, lack of tools, or both
or otherwise, and doing anything other than shipping them off to
a lab.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/13/02 02:29PM
Okay, it's official: I suck at doing digital
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, it's official: I suck at doing digital darkroom stuff.
I saw others' complaints about the time required to do the post
processing digitally instead of handing it off to a lab to do
wet, and even with that in mind I'm too slow. And whether it's
Study and practice are indeed the keys.
*nod* That's why I stuck that bit in.
I've been giving prints as Christmas gifts and have no trouble going from
insert the slide into the scanner to print emerges from the inkjet
printer in about 30 minutes.
I had some try to minimize my 5 o'clock
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 2:29 PM
Subject: Digital Darkroom
Okay, it's official: I suck at doing digital darkroom stuff.
I saw others' complaints about the time required to do the post
processing digitally instead
I still have not done a lot of scans(fear,lack of time,who can
tellg)
I don't have to do TO much with the files from the D1.A little more
if they are shot in cloudy conditions.
But i too need more experience.Go fiqure in the digital age,i'm
taking darkroom classes:)
Dave
Pentax User
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 10:39 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Ditto. And you have to be willing to do that in the digital darkroom.
Even with PhotoShop history you can only go back so far. Sometimes I
get
so skewed I just figure it'w better to start over with the raw scan.
And
I always
Norm Baugher wrote:
How do I keep the monitor from fogging my film?
Norm
Put your pet lizard back in his cage :)
annsan
Best answer yet.
At 12:21 PM 10/15/2002 -0400, you wrote:
Norm Baugher wrote:
How do I keep the monitor from fogging my film?
Norm
Put your pet lizard back in his cage :)
annsan
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Norm Baugher wrote:
How do I keep the monitor from fogging my film?
Safelight filter? ;)
Open the camera back in full sunlight to pre fog it.
BR
-Original Message-
From: Norm Baugher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:56 PM
To: PDML
Subject: Digital Darkroom Question
How do I keep the monitor from fogging my film?
Norm
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
