I don't use Photobucket dot com so I'm not sure if this is a major change in
their licensing terms. Just in case it is a big change, I thought this bit
of information should be brought to the attention of those who do use the
service.
http://photobucket.com/terms.php (Effective 13 December 2006)
On Jan 13, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Y. Rowe wrote:
Photobucket does not claim any ownership rights in any User Content
that you
choose to post to the Site. After posting User Content to the Site,
you
continue to retain all ownership or license rights in your User
Content and
you continue
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:17:04PM -0500, Bob Shell wrote:
On Jan 13, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Y. Rowe wrote:
Photobucket does not claim any ownership rights in any User Content
that you
choose to post to the Site. After posting User Content to the Site,
you
continue to retain all
On 14/01/07, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone would be a fool to agree to that.
Thanks Bob, I use it but I certainly don't use it to host any images
that I wouldn't be prepared to loose (nor would any be potentially
attractive to the for that matter). Fact is if you make anything
Why not use a site where you're at least minimally protected?
Photo.net makes it clear that the photographer is the owner of the
copyright. And it's faster.
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 5:59 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 14/01/07, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone would be a fool
On 14/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not use a site where you're at least minimally protected?
Photo.net makes it clear that the photographer is the owner of the
copyright. And it's faster.
Because Photo.net so slow it's ridiculous here and it's very limited
if you don't
I don't consider a photo.net subsciption selling out. It's a very
nice format and well worth the $25 a year for virtually unlimited
upload space. Actually, PhotoBucket is much slower, at least from my
service. But I'm pleased to learn that I can buy rights to your
photos from
On 14/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't consider a photo.net subsciption selling out. It's a very
nice format and well worth the $25 a year for virtually unlimited
upload space. Actually, PhotoBucket is much slower, at least from my
service. But I'm pleased to learn that I
Priceless. It will be hanging in a Detroit gallery any day now:-).
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 9:29 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 14/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't consider a photo.net subsciption selling out. It's a very
nice format and well worth the $25 a year for
in the day makes me loathe to do it when I get home.
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: For those who use PHOTOBUCKET
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:56:25 -0500
I don't consider
in the day makes me loathe to do it when I get home.
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: For those who use PHOTOBUCKET
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:56:25 -0500
I don't consider a photo.net
Tom C wrote:
working with
computers in the day makes me loathe to do it when I get home.
I couldn't agree more... :-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
12 matches
Mail list logo
