_
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Miserere
[miser...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 December 2010 04:51
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K-5 Focusing Speed -- My Opinion [Scanned][Spam score:8%]
On 6 December 2010 09:05, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
As part
- Mensaje original
De: Miserere miser...@gmail.com
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: lun,6 diciembre, 2010 15:05
Asunto: K-5 Focusing Speed -- My Opinion
As part of my on-going K-5 review, I updated the focusing section:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/12
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Jaume Lahuerta jlah...@yahoo.com wrote:
This, and your sensor blobs warning makes you the perfect 'un-enabler' (or is
it
'de-enabler'?)
Disabler?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On 12/7/2010 4:17 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
Disabler?
Disenabler seems more appropriate to my warped sense of humor /grin/.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
On Dec 7, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
- Mensaje original
De: Miserere miser...@gmail.com
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: lun,6 diciembre, 2010 15:05
Asunto: K-5 Focusing Speed -- My Opinion
As part of my on-going K-5 review, I updated
On 12/7/2010 4:27 PM, P N Stenquist wrote:
Low light autofocus is much improved in the K-5, but mainly with the
SDM lenses. In regard to the sensor blobs, this shouldn't be a
problem a month or two down the road, as Pentax (and/or Sony) will
undoubtedly take steps to resolve the problem, and
On Dec 7, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 12/7/2010 4:27 PM, P N Stenquist wrote:
Low light autofocus is much improved in the K-5, but mainly with the
SDM lenses. In regard to the sensor blobs, this shouldn't be a
problem a month or two down the road, as Pentax (and/or Sony) will
On 12/7/2010 4:43 PM, P N Stenquist wrote:
I agree Boris. it's alway better to wait. However, I don't like to
wait to sell my oldest body, because once the new camera is released,
it becomes a generation older and loses value. And with a big job on
my schedule, I needed a backup, so I dove right
?
Jack
--- On Tue, 12/7/10, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: K-5 Focusing Speed -- My Opinion
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2010, 6:31 AM
On 12/7/2010 4:27 PM, P N Stenquist
wrote:
Low light
On 12/7/2010 4:47 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Good advice! Difficult to time, but the longer you wait the better
the chance of avoiding the blob and, also, realizing a lower
purchase price. It is, however, an exercise in self control. :( Do
you suppose that later production will negate the need to
- Mensaje original
De: P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: mar,7 diciembre, 2010 15:43
Asunto: Re: K-5 Focusing Speed -- My Opinion
On Dec 7, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 12/7/2010 4:27 PM, P N Stenquist
Good plan. I will continue not to purchase the K5.
Paul's right. Whoever wanted to buy K-5 /right here right now/ is better
hold their horses. This is what I plan on doing.
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Low light autofocus is much improved in the K-5, but mainly with the SDM
lenses.
Miserere hasn't yet had a chance to test the K-5 AF with any SDM
lenses but that situation will be rectified later this afternoon.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 7 December 2010 09:21, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/7/2010 4:17 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
Disabler?
Disenabler seems more appropriate to my warped sense of humor /grin/.
Boris
How about shooter-in-the-footer? My Master Plan was to have all of you
purchase a K-5 through my
On 6 December 2010 09:05, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
As part of my on-going K-5 review, I updated the focusing section:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/12/01/review-pentax-k-5/#focusing
My conclusions about focusing speed seem to differe from everyone
else's. Opinions welcomed!
On Dec 7, 2010, at 11:51 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 6 December 2010 09:05, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
As part of my on-going K-5 review, I updated the focusing section:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/12/01/review-pentax-k-5/#focusing
My conclusions about focusing speed seem to
As part of my on-going K-5 review, I updated the focusing section:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/12/01/review-pentax-k-5/#focusing
My conclusions about focusing speed seem to differe from everyone
else's. Opinions welcomed!
Cheers,
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
BTW, I really like the image of the skater on that page.
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
As part of my on-going K-5 review, I updated the focusing section:
Miserere, I must say that with K-7 my impressions were similar. It was
somewhat better or slightly better but not omg better. I am thinking
that general improvement came from the decrease of the microadjustments
when the lens would arrive to approximate focus. K10D seems to need few
more steps
I find the biggest advantage of K-5 autofocus is that it's able to lock in with
relatively little light. As you note, continuous autofocus is better, but spot
autofocus is also able to lock onto moving objects much more easily than was
that of the K-7. I've used only SDM lenses thus far -- the
On Dec 6, 2010, at 8:12, Boris Liberman wrote:
Miserere, I must say that with K-7 my impressions were similar. It was
somewhat better or slightly better but not omg better. I am thinking that
general improvement came from the decrease of the microadjustments when the
lens would arrive to
Thanks for your efforts here.
Dave
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
As part of my on-going K-5 review, I updated the focusing section:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/12/01/review-pentax-k-5/#focusing
My conclusions about focusing speed seem to differe
I read your description, otherwise I have no opinion, I'm still using a
K20D.
The difference in motor sound could be accounted for from the difference
in body composition.
On 12/6/2010 9:05 AM, Miserere wrote:
As part of my on-going K-5 review, I updated the focusing section:
On 6 December 2010 10:06, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I read your description, otherwise I have no opinion, I'm still using a
K20D.
The difference in motor sound could be accounted for from the difference in
body composition.
I was wondering about that, but they don't
Hi,
I'd like to say some words about the difference between K20D and K-5.
Often I do test cameras head-to-head i.e. I do use both at the same
conditions simultaneously. This time I used the other way and abandoned
my old trusty K20D for a three days. Completely. Simply took K-5 and
got used
Hi,
at least the motor spare part codes are different :)
BR, Margus
On 12/06/2010 5:58 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 6 December 2010 10:06, P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I read your description, otherwise I have no opinion, I'm still using a
K20D.
The difference in motor sound
Thanks Margus. Tomorrow I'm going to meet up with Mark and test his
DA* 16-50 on my K10D and the K-5 to confirm the improvement.
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
2010/12/6 Margus Männik
On Dec 6, 2010, at 10:58 AM, Miserere wrote:
On 6 December 2010 10:06, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I read your description, otherwise I have no opinion, I'm still using a
K20D.
The difference in motor sound could be accounted for from the difference in
body composition.
On 6 December 2010 17:21, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 10:58 AM, Miserere wrote:
On 6 December 2010 10:06, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I read your description, otherwise I have no opinion, I'm still using a
K20D.
The difference in
On 12/6/2010 5:04 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
My experience is a lot better just for the simple fact that the K10D
backfocused A LOT with my F50 f/1.7 lens, and would not focus AT ALL
with the 16-50 when zoomed entirely out to 16mm. K7 focuses
accurately and quickly with both.
-Charles
30 matches
Mail list logo
