Their web site goes on for pages showing every available color
combination. snark Pentax has the most extensive line of DSLRs in
existence! Eat your heart out Canon!/snark
Ok, serious observation and poll question.
Is anyone else still disappointed that there is no provision for an
optional
On 6/18/2013 1:02 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Ok, serious observation and poll question.
Is anyone else still disappointed that there is no provision for an
optional EVF on the new Full Frame Q7?
Not me. I'm a weird amalgamation of neophyte and Luddite. I didn't start
taking photos with any actual
On Jun 18, 2013, at 2:02 PM, P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone else still disappointed that there is no provision for an optional
EVF on the new Full Frame Q7?
--
No
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Quoting P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
Their web site goes on for pages showing every available color
combination. snark Pentax has the most extensive line of DSLRs in
existence! Eat your heart out Canon!/snark
Ok, serious observation and poll question.
Is anyone else still
No, not for that camera. I keep daydreaming of a Q-Pro or Q-Limited with
controls laid out for an enthusiast, rather than a casual snapshotter, and
higher quality lenses. That one would need an EVF. In my daydream the EVF
replaces the built in flash and pops up/folds out when needed.
Paul
Optio X:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0408/04082401pentax_optiox.asp
Optio S5i:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0408/04082402pentax_optios5i.asp
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
BTW, the other new release by Pentax is the Optio S50.
Now, in _simple_ terms, what is the difference between the S5 and the S50?
Or, for that matter, the S4 and the S40?
I don't want the specifications, I can go to dpreview for that, but a few
sentence description of how they differ.
Pentax
--- Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Now, in _simple_ terms, what is the difference
between the S5 and the S50?
Or, for that matter, the S4 and the S40?
I don't want the specifications, I can go to
dpreview for that, but a few
sentence description of how they differ.
snip
The S50 is a standard PS digital. The S5 is the minature (Altoid tin size)
pocket camera. Or is it the other way around?
--
Keith Whaley wrote:
BTW, the other new release by Pentax is the Optio S50.
Now, in _simple_ terms, what is the difference between the S5 and the S50?
Or, for that matter,
The S5 is the 5 MP version of the S4. And, since the S4 will fit the can, I
assume the S5 will as well...
keith
graywolf wrote:
The S50 is a standard PS digital. The S5 is the minature (Altoid tin
size) pocket camera. Or is it the other way around?
Of course, in camera IS would only work with the digital cameras, but
that seems to be the way of the world right now.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John wrote:
All I see them saying is that there will still be some lenses made for
the 35mm market. And we've got a pretty good idea what they will be -
lower-priced FA-J lenses (without the aperture ring);
It is definitely more than FA-J lenses. The new lenses will have
On 23 Dec 2003 at 15:08, Pål Jensen wrote:
You may be right. However, I do believe focal lenght is transmitted to the body
by all Pentax AF lensesor is it only FA lenses?
Anyway, moving sensor is a much more elegant solution for IS on a DSLR as it
eliminate all the optical problems
Have you guys seen this? It may be old news but I've been off-line for awhile.
According to Pop Photography:
With its *ist D certainly the compact, lightweight winner of all digital SLRs, Pentax
vows to move in two directions: even smaller, lighter, less expensive digital SLRs
(Pentax: there's
It is old news, and can be translated into some obvious statements:
They´ll have to compete with 300D but they´ll keep a line of more
advanced cameras
They´ll have to come up with some kind of image stabilization
They´ll make some lenses that are compatible with film cameras
Not much information
Dag wrote:
It is old news, and can be translated into some obvious statements:
They´ll have to compete with 300D but they´ll keep a line of more
advanced cameras
They´ll have to come up with some kind of image stabilization
They´ll make some lenses that are compatible with film cameras
Welcome back.
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
making all your lenses into IS lenses.
(snip)
Pål
Welcome home Pål.
My guess is that the motion sensor of an in-the-body IS would need to have
some lens data, particularly the exact focal length, to calculate and
I agree there is information there. What's esp intriguing are the new
35mm (non-aps) lenses. Its a stretch, but me thinks that it might be a
hint that there is potentially a full frame dslr in pentax's future.
Pål Jensen wrote:
Dag wrote:
It is old news, and can be translated into some
Boy, is that a stretch.
All I see them saying is that there will still be some lenses made for
the 35mm market. And we've got a pretty good idea what they will be -
lower-priced FA-J lenses (without the aperture ring); the rest of the
quoted article strongly suggests that Pentax will continue
The only concern is that full frame DSLR with Minolta like AS is not quite
possible.
Yours regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I agree there is information there. What's esp intriguing are the new 35mm
(non-aps) lenses. Its a stretch, but me thinks that it might be a hint
that
21 matches
Mail list logo
