Re: OT Not quite astro stuff

What Henk said. Thanks for that! m > On Jan 9, 2024, at 3:47 AM, Henk Terhell wrote: > > Fascinating video! > > Op 2024-01-09 om 06:43 schreef mike wilson: >> I'm wondering why the EV/screen failed... >> https://youtu.be/SxkA82wORtw?si=QqvpvOW8eOgOi9XX -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail

Re: OT Not quite astro stuff

Fascinating video! Op 2024-01-09 om 06:43 schreef mike wilson: I'm wondering why the EV/screen failed... https://youtu.be/SxkA82wORtw?si=QqvpvOW8eOgOi9XX -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

OT Not quite astro stuff

I'm wondering why the EV/screen failed... https://youtu.be/SxkA82wORtw?si=QqvpvOW8eOgOi9XX -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Digression alert: Quite a nice place to be dead

Are you dead sure about this ? -Original Message- From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Sent: Jun 29, 2021 3:35 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Digression alert: Quite a nice place to be dead As far as I could tell all the people I photographed in the cemetery were still alive

Re: Quite a nice place to be dead

Thanks! > On 29 Jun 2021, at 18:22, ann sanfedele wrote: > > what a nice set! You had the perfect light for this sort of thing.. I'm too > lazy to cherry pick (pun intended) but mainly I like the ones best without > living people in them > > ann > > >> On 6/26/2021 6:00 PM, Bob Pdml

Re: Quite a nice place to be dead

what a nice set!  You had the perfect light for this sort of thing.. I'm too lazy to cherry pick (pun intended)  but mainly I like the ones best without living people in them ann On 6/26/2021 6:00 PM, Bob Pdml wrote: …if that’s what you have to be. I at last had the chance today to visit a

Re: Digression alert: Quite a nice place to be dead

nt: Jun 29, 2021 3:35 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Digression alert: Quite a nice place to be dead > > > As far as I could tell all the people I photographed in the cemetery were > still alive. But you can never be sure - I didn’t take any pulses or hold >

Re: Digression alert: Quite a nice place to be dead

Of corpse he is! > On Jun 29, 2021, at 10:41 AM, Ken Waller wrote: > > Are you dead sure about this ? > > -Original Message- > From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Sent: Jun 29, 2021 3:35 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Digression alert: Qu

Re: Digression alert: Quite a nice place to be dead

As far as I could tell all the people I photographed in the cemetery were still alive. But you can never be sure - I didn’t take any pulses or hold up any mirrors. > On 29 Jun 2021, at 00:12, Nolan Hinshaw wrote: > >> >> https://www.icloud.com/sharedalbum/#B0IGWZuqDGsjeIu > > This reminds

Digression alert: Quite a nice place to be dead

On Jun 26, 2021, at 15:00, Bob Pdml wrote: > > …if that’s what you have to be. > > I at last had the chance today to visit a cemetery close to where I live. It > is a closed cemetery, which means they’re no longer taking long-stay > residents, and it is now maintained as a wildlife reserve.

Re: Quite a nice place to be dead

Bob, another very nice set. I particularly like the last shot with the with the wildflowers. The headstones are similar to those in Woodland Cemetery, where I’ve done a lot of shooting in the last year and a half. It is maintained by a non-profit corporation and volunteers. It is almost full,

Re: Quite a nice place to be dead

... and an even better place to be alive... Bulent - http://celasun.wordpress.com/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/ http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bulentcelasun

Re: Quite a nice place to be dead

Highgate is divided by a road (Swain's Lane if I remember). The top part where all the rich & famous are buried with very ostentatious headstones, angels, etc. seemed better but they wanted £35 to get in there. Views of London from the very top. We visited the low part at only £15. Remember

Re: Quite a nice place to be dead

Thanks. I blame Apple. It’s using the iCloud shared album feature. It’s the first time I’ve used it, and as far as I can see there’s no way to embed the info, or have it number them automatically. Sorry. > On 27 Jun 2021, at 03:01, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > That's a lovely set, BobW.

Re: Quite a nice place to be dead

Thanks. This one is maintained by volunteers. They have some before and after photos showing how the Friends organisation has transformed it from an overgrown condition by clearing brambles etc. which formed a canopy. Now that light can get to the floor the flowers can grow. Some cover remains

Re: Quite a nice place to be dead

That's a lovely set, BobW. There are a few in there that are just superb. Minor presentation criticism: There doesn't seem to be a useful way provided to identify *which* of the photos I like, short of making a screen grab and embedding them into a document. No file name, picture number, or

Re: Quite a nice place to be dead

An interesting gallery. At least it's not a complete jungle. Parts of Highgate Cemetery which I visited some years ago were virtually impenetrable. Our local Muni have been "maintaining" the town environs as a nature reserve for some years. Alan C On 27-Jun-21 12:00 AM, Bob Pdml wrote: …if

Re: Quite a nice place to be dead

Nice set! Paul > On Jun 26, 2021, at 6:01 PM, Bob Pdml wrote: > > …if that’s what you have to be. > > I at last had the chance today to visit a cemetery close to where I live. It > is a closed cemetery, which means they’re no longer taking long-stay > residents, and it is now maintained as

Quite a nice place to be dead

…if that’s what you have to be. I at last had the chance today to visit a cemetery close to where I live. It is a closed cemetery, which means they’re no longer taking long-stay residents, and it is now maintained as a wildlife reserve. Today was an open day.

GESO "Not quite a dumpster fire" a short photo story

"Not quite a dumpster fire" a short photo story There’s a small homeless encampment on the lawn at Grand and Harrison in Oakland. While I was walking back to the dance event from lunch, I took some photos of this small bit of drama unfolding: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellar

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

I guess that's worse than when I was trying out RawTherapee and it would crash every time I tried to open a directory with K20D raw files in it. I've been using DxO Optics Pro, and haven't had any system problems with it.  I'm still using version 9, which is kind of old, currently they've

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

As I said, it's not an option *if you wish* to go to current operating system, or *have to* because you need a new system which will only run Catalina or later. There's absolutely nothing wrong with sticking to an older system with older software and hardware to maintain compatibility, as long

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

Am 01.01.20 um 00:48 schrieb Godfrey DiGiorgi: LR 6.14 is not an option for macOS users if they wish to go to current operating system (macOS X 10.15.x Catalina) or if they buy a new Apple system because it will come with Catalina installed. There'll be no Catalina here as long as I can

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

Thanks for the link! LR 6.14 is not an option for macOS users if they wish to go to current operating system (macOS X 10.15.x Catalina) or if they buy a new Apple system because it will come with Catalina installed. I suspect the way to get your Affinity Photo edits back into Lightroom is to

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

There is a long thread on the YouTube video comparing LR alternatives: Fstoppers article of today: https://fstoppers.com/post-production/what-photo-processing-software-right-you-441252?utm_source=FS_RSS_medium=RSS_campaign=Main_RSS On YT this video is: https://youtu.be/8jTuqbGSikE Several

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

I also started with PSE9. Gave it away. Still wonder why I wasted my money on the upgrade. Alan C On 31-Dec-19 06:26 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: I am still using Elements 9. Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Mon, Dec 30, 2019

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

I am still using Elements 9. Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 11:10 PM Alan C wrote: > I've read this thread with interest & I can say that fortunately I have > never felt "held to ransom". > > Elements 13

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

I've read this thread with interest & I can say that fortunately I have never felt "held to ransom". Elements 13 (ACR 9.0) still does an excellent job for me. By first running the DNG image files through the Adobe DNG converter which includes all the cameras & lenses post PSE13, the EXIF is

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

I did some daytime and sunset panos to test that out, and I'm afraid that PR2020 completely fell over on the panoramas. I could send you links to jpegs if you want. In the end, I've decided that as much as I would like to switch away from LR6, PR2020 just isn't quite ready. As I said,

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

> On Dec 30, 2019, at 7:04 AM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote: > > Silly old me wrote: > >> And then IT happened. PR crashed. > > And yet again... > > Second time in less than a day vs. never in almost 10 years with > Lightroom. Took half an hour's work with it as on the next start all > changes

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

> On Dec 30, 2019, at 2:51 AM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote: > > > I've re-activated my old LR6 for the time being. The only thing that > irritates me is that in its start-up screen LR6 now shows as "Creative > Cloud Lightroom CC 2015.6.1" and I'm more than a little concerned about > what will

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

I too felt ON1 had a really nice product on first glance, and I do like some of its capabilities. But it isn't what I was looking for. G > On Dec 30, 2019, at 7:04 AM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote: > ... > Sorry, ON1, but I don't shell out my shekels for beta software. Pity, > really, it looked

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

Silly old me wrote: And then IT happened. PR crashed. And yet again... Second time in less than a day vs. never in almost 10 years with Lightroom. Took half an hour's work with it as on the next start all changes made to that picture were gone. Sorry, ON1, but I don't shell out my shekels

Re: Free at last! - or maybe not quite...

Am 29.12.19 um 03:44 schrieb Godfrey DiGiorgi: There are simply so many things that are far far easier to get done quickly and efficiently with Lightroom than with Photo RAW , I gave up on On1 Photo RAW as a suitable replacement. I worked at it pretty seriously for three weeks,

Re: Not quite Vivian Maier but pretty cool anyway

neat -- rather erwittian, I'd say  - definitely witty ann On 2/26/2019 8:13 PM, Postmaster wrote: I just stumbled on this BBC News article from last year about a found suitcase full of photos and negatives. https://www.bbc.com/news/in-pictures-43782267 -- ann sanfedele photography

Re: Not quite Vivian Maier but pretty cool anyway

Some fine images in that article. Thanks for sharing. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:13 PM Postmaster wrote: > I just stumbled on this BBC News article from last year about a found > suitcase full of photos and negatives. >

Not quite Vivian Maier but pretty cool anyway

I just stumbled on this BBC News article from last year about a found suitcase full of photos and negatives. https://www.bbc.com/news/in-pictures-43782267 -- Mark Roberts - Photography and Multimedia www.robertstech.com 617-522-0174 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Not quite OT: Pentax MX + Acros 100 + Caffinol developer

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:17 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > Beautiful image and great to find a way to develop film non-toxically - I > guess it has been around for a while.. > have a very fuzzy recollection of someone mentioning coffee as a developer - > whether here or in an old

Re: Not quite OT: Pentax MX + Acros 100 + Caffinol developer

Beautiful image and great to find a way to develop film non-toxically - I guess it has been around for a while.. have a very fuzzy recollection of someone mentioning coffee as a developer - whether here or in an old photo mag I can't remember. Alwasy did use white vinegar well diluted for a

Re: Not quite OT: Pentax MX + Acros 100 + Caffinol developer

Another post from around the same time (same author) http://caffenolcolor.blogspot.com/p/published-23rd-march-2012-it-is-more-or.html On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Darren Addy wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:17 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: >>

Re: Not quite OT: Pentax MX + Acros 100 + Caffinol developer

Like every other tool, if used correctly, a stove top percolator can make good workmanlike coffee, not that I'd drink it by choice, mind youm but it would do in a pinch. I'd have to be pinched hard enough to leave quite a bruise to drink instant. On 1/14/2016 2:32 PM, Bruce Walker wrote

Re: Not quite OT: Pentax MX + Acros 100 + Caffinol developer

On 2016-01-14 12:32 , Bruce Walker wrote: On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Darren Addy wrote: On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: I'm really glad to see that folks have found a way to use up instant coffee instead of drinking

Re: Not quite OT: Pentax MX + Acros 100 + Caffinol developer

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Darren Addy wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: >> I'm really glad to see that folks have found a way to use up instant >> coffee instead of drinking it. > > As a coffee snob who hand

Re: Not quite OT: Pentax MX + Acros 100 + Caffinol developer

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > Very cool, Darren. My wife tolerates a lot from me, even new lenses, > but she would draw the line if I ever mentioned roasting my own beans. > :) It isn't hard and only requires a minimum of equipment. Some people

Re: Not quite OT: Pentax MX + Acros 100 + Caffinol developer

I've got that lens and if you can't get a really sharp detailed image with 100 ISO B film with it you're doing something wrong. On 1/13/2016 9:39 PM, Darren Addy wrote: I know we have a few film & self-development afficianados here so... This is not my image, but I'm using it as a springboard

Re: Not quite OT: Pentax MX + Acros 100 + Caffinol developer

Yep, this is the image that made me lust after the SMC K 30mm f/2.8 and I gave up the SMC K 28mm f/3.5 to get it. To my embarrassment, I haven't tried to take a single image with it over the past year and a half. I'll need to correct that soon. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:44 PM, P.J. Alling

Not quite OT: Pentax MX + Acros 100 + Caffinol developer

I know we have a few film & self-development afficianados here so... This is not my image, but I'm using it as a springboard for this thread. Since the photographer used a Pentax camera (MX) and lens (SMC 30mm f/2.8) it isn't OT. The image (which blew me away for multiple reasons):

Re: Not quite OT: Pentax MX + Acros 100 + Caffinol developer

I'm really glad to see that folks have found a way to use up instant coffee instead of drinking it. Pretty impressive results too. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Darren Addy wrote: > I know we have a few film & self-development afficianados here so... > > This is not

Re: Not quite OT: Pentax MX + Acros 100 + Caffinol developer

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > I'm really glad to see that folks have found a way to use up instant > coffee instead of drinking it. As a coffee snob who hand grinds my own beans every morning in a Zassenhaus manual coffee grinder (I also do home

Re: Not quite FSF: FZ-35 (was Re: OT: My first Leica experience (2 images))

Can heartily recommend the X-S1. It's my travel camera - has been dragged around Europe for 5 weeks just recently, and has been through the south pacific prior to that. AF has an infrequent hiccup, but all else has been good. Ciao, Pete Mac in Melbourne On 29 June 2013 04:54, Aahz Maruch

Not quite FSF: FZ-35 (was Re: OT: My first Leica experience (2 images))

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013, Walt wrote: On 6/27/2013 2:24 PM, Zos Xavius wrote: I had both a panasonic fz-28 and fz-35. I think the v-lux 1 is the same as an fz-50. They all had great, great optics that more than made up for the noisy sensors panny was using. When they switched from CCD to MOS (which

Re: Not quite OT the mirrorless party.

On 18/12/12, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO7rxitFLZg Good laugh! Thanks -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Producion --www.seeingeye.tv _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: Not quite OT the mirrorless party.

Quoting P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO7rxitFLZg Pentax - Late to the party again... Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: Not quite OT the mirrorless party.

Very silly stuff. :-) On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:00 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO7rxitFLZg -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link

Re: Not quite OT the mirrorless party.

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote: Quoting P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO7rxitFLZg Pentax - Late to the party again... Sad 'cause it's true. :) -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Not quite OT the mirrorless party.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO7rxitFLZg -- Buy a Leica to get the full “Leica Experience”, (a quick reduction of funds in the bank account). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link

The K-r has arrived and I'm quite impressed

cramps in my right hand during intense shooting sessions. Michael seems to be quite impressed, at least by his standards. Unlike myself, he usually has a totally unemotional attitude towards technical equipment. He's spent the whole evening with the manual and testing the video functions. At least

Re: Not Quite Winter

of winter and after the last leaf has fallen. http://donspix.posterous.com/too-late-for-fall-but-not-quite-winter-photo#!/ CC fire away. I quite like that - nicely composed. It looks a tad oversaturated but slanting light can give that sort of 'glow' to grasses. However, the sky looks a bit

Not Quite Winter

-late-for-fall-but-not-quite-winter-photo#!/ CC fire away. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Not Quite Winter

- Original Message - From: Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com Subject: Not Quite Winter I took everyone's comments on my Behind the green window at face value. I would like to thank everyone for their time and their honesty. Today's effort is just a simple landscape of Midwest before

Re: Not Quite Winter

On Dec 2, 2011, at 13:19 , Don Guthrie wrote: Today's effort is just a simple landscape of Midwest before the 1st storm of winter and after the last leaf has fallen. http://donspix.posterous.com/too-late-for-fall-but-not-quite-winter-photo#!/ CC fire away. Though the colors may

Re: Not Quite Winter

Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com Subject: Re: Not Quite Winter On Dec 2, 2011, at 13:19 , Don Guthrie wrote: Today's effort is just a simple landscape of Midwest before the 1st storm

Re: Not quite your garden variety

nice gallery of mouth-watering goodies there... I particularly like (from a photo angle) the one steve said was gaillardia - and the one of the tree branches... ann On 10/15/2011 03:11, steve harley wrote: on 2011-10-13 13:15 Igor Roshchin wrote But they all came from a garden in Urals.

Re: Not quite your garden variety

on 2011-10-15 12:58 Igor Roshchin wrote Different varieties of Gaillardia seem to look similarly (e.g. some photos of Gaillardia aristata and Gaillardia pulchella look practically the same, - but maybe they were not correctly identified?). some species can't be distinguished from a photo, and

Re: Not quite your garden variety

I liked _IR32219 most. Especially the creamy background there... Bulent - http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/ http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/bulentcelasun 2011/10/13

Re: Not quite your garden variety

On Thursday, October 13, 2011 3:15 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: But they all came from a garden in Urals. well, except the last one. http://42graphy.org/galleries/garden-2011/ I am not overly happy with 2-3 of them, but I kept them in this gallery nevertheless.

Re: Not quite your garden variety

should probably re-process that shot nov I've got a better monitor, and can see room for quite a bit of improvement) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow

Re: Not quite your garden variety

on 2011-10-13 13:15 Igor Roshchin wrote But they all came from a garden in Urals. well, except the last one. http://42graphy.org/galleries/garden-2011/ I am not overly happy with 2-3 of them, but I kept them in this gallery nevertheless. i enjoy looking at how people look at gardens;

Re: Not quite your garden variety

on 2011-10-15 00:43 John Francis wrote I can't help, either. Mind you, I'm pretty certain it's closely related to this one I asked about some four years ago: http://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/PAW.php?name=PAW0727style=1year=ALL that's a Gaillardia cultivar too -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: Not quite your garden variety

On 13/10/2011 21:15, Igor Roshchin wrote: But they all came from a garden in Urals. well, except the last one. http://42graphy.org/galleries/garden-2011/ I am not overly happy with 2-3 of them, but I kept them in this gallery nevertheless. Your comments, criticism, and suggestions are

Re: Not quite your garden variety

-process that shot nov I've got a better monitor, and can see room for quite a bit of improvement) They both look like varieties of yellow cone flowers. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link

Re: Not quite your garden variety

Thanks to everybody who looked and commented! (Some individual responses are interspersed below) Sat Oct 15 03:11:36 EDT 2011 steve harley wrote: on 2011-10-13 13:15 Igor Roshchin wrote But they all came from a garden in Urals. well, except the last one.

Re: Not quite your garden variety

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 01:13:37AM -0600, steve harley wrote: on 2011-10-15 00:43 John Francis wrote I can't help, either. Mind you, I'm pretty certain it's closely related to this one I asked about some four years ago: http://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/PAW.php?name=PAW0727style=1year=ALL

Re: Not quite your garden variety

Sat Oct 15 17:32:47 EDT 2011 John Francis wrote: I still need to identify these flowers, if anyone can help: http://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/PAW.php?name=PAW0829style=1year=ALL http://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/PAW.php?name=PAW1036style=1year=ALL I suspect it is one of lilies, but I don't know which

Re: Not quite your garden variety

on 2011-10-15 15:32 John Francis wrote I still need to identify these flowers, if anyone can help: http://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/PAW.php?name=PAW0829style=1year=ALL it may be a Tulipa hybrid, but i'm not that familiar with those http://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/PAW.php?name=PAW1036style=1year=ALL

Not quite your garden variety

But they all came from a garden in Urals. well, except the last one. http://42graphy.org/galleries/garden-2011/ I am not overly happy with 2-3 of them, but I kept them in this gallery nevertheless. Your comments, criticism, and suggestions are welcome. Also, I would appreciate if

Re: Quite an LX kit...

Now I know how to offer my collection of LX's and kit. WOW! On Apr 4, 2011, at 08:09 , Darren Addy wrote: Now that the auction is over, I thought I would post this for those that didn't see it:

Quite an LX kit...

Now that the auction is over, I thought I would post this for those that didn't see it: http://cgi.ebay.com/Pentax-LX-SLR-Film-Camera-Collection-/230601513108?pt=Film_Camerashash=item35b0ebd894#ht_4096wt_1039 or http://bit.ly/hrMVqV Yowza. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Quite an LX kit...

OMG. Did any of us buy it? On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote: Now that the auction is over, I thought I would post this for those that didn't see it:

Re: Quite an LX kit...

I probably should have linked to the full description, like this: http://bit.ly/f2bMxr I think the seller really got pretty good money for his auction. Not like the buyer stole it. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from

Re: Quite an LX kit...

On 4/4/11, Darren Addy, discombobulated, unleashed: Now that the auction is over, I thought I would post this for those that didn't see it: http://cgi.ebay.com/Pentax-LX-SLR-Film-Camera-Collection-/230601513108? pt=Film_Camerashash=item35b0ebd894#ht_4096wt_1039 or http://bit.ly/hrMVqV That's a

Re: Quite an LX kit...

On 04/04/2011 10:23 AM, Darren Addy wrote: I probably should have linked to the full description, like this: http://bit.ly/f2bMxr I think the seller really got pretty good money for his auction. Not like the buyer stole it. He got most of it for free. That auction has some of the best glass

Re: Quite an LX kit...

I bet he would like the RE-35 flexisensor. On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:29 PM, William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/04/2011 10:23 AM, Darren Addy wrote: I probably should have linked to the full description, like this: http://bit.ly/f2bMxr I think the seller really got pretty

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

From: Cotty On 16/2/11, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed: You've still got it, Cot. So you say - I just wish I could find it ;) Still, if you have any luck, by the time you do, they'll have found a cure for it. 8^D - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG -

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote: On 15/2/11, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed: I hate you. The hate is mutual Cool. cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

You've still got it, Cot. -- Christian http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com http://birdofthemoment.blogspot.com On 2/14/2011 7:20 PM, Cotty wrote: 4 pics from a stroll in Oxford today. First shots from these hands in a long time. Girl on bike heavily cropped. This from a 4 megapixel camera -

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

On 16/2/11, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed: You've still got it, Cot. So you say - I just wish I could find it ;) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

On 14/2/11, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed: The blonde with the mike is cute. In case you hadn't noticed. Me? Pfa. How did you know his name was mike? :) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.cottysnaps.com

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

On 14/2/11, Ken Waller, discombobulated, unleashed: I especially like your choice of DOF. Thanks Ken and all for the kind words. Shooting digital with a manual focus at that focal length (even with a 1.3x crop) on the street is murder. The kissing couple especially was difficult as I didn't

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

You still got it, Cotty /grin/. On 2/15/2011 2:20 AM, Cotty wrote: 4 pics from a stroll in Oxford today. First shots from these hands in a long time. Girl on bike heavily cropped. This from a 4 megapixel camera - I was impressed. http://cottycam.posterous.com/43077056 -- Cheers, Cotty

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

All great images, Cotty. I particularly like the 4th one, the bike shot. It looks like she's about the joust or play chicken with the guy in the background. Chris Sheppard Zenfolio: http://csheppard.zenfolio.com/ Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/photodiversions/ Blog:

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

Me? Pfa. How did you know his name was mike? http://instantrimshot.com/ -- Cheers,  Cotty ___/\__ ||   (O)  |     People, Places, Pastiche --      http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

On 15/2/11, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed: Me? Pfa. How did you know his name was mike? http://instantrimshot.com/ LOL -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote: 4 pics from a stroll in Oxford today. First shots from these hands in a long time. Girl on bike heavily cropped. This from a 4 megapixel camera - I was impressed. http://cottycam.posterous.com/43077056 Enjoyed them all, well

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

Damn, I miss that place--in some ways. Nice pix! Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW --- On Mon, 2/14/11, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote: 4 pics from a stroll in Oxford today. First shots from these hands in a long time. Girl on bike heavily cropped. This from a 4 megapixel camera - I was

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

From: Steven Desjardins Those good. The blonde with the mike is cute. In case you hadn't noticed. She's probably asking Who's the dirty old man with the camera and why is he taking my picture? BTDT-GTTS On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote: 4 pics from a

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote: 4 pics from a stroll in Oxford today. First shots from these hands in a long time. Girl on bike heavily cropped. This from a 4 megapixel camera - I was impressed. http://cottycam.posterous.com/43077056 I hate you. Especially

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

You've not lost your touch. Neither has the *85 ƒ1.4. The cyclist(s) look like modern day knights preparing to joust. She'd better hurry! On Feb 14, 2011, at 16:20 , Cotty wrote: 4 pics from a stroll in Oxford today. First shots from these hands in a long time. Girl on bike heavily cropped.

Re: Quite Excited - PESOs

On 15/2/11, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed: I hate you. The hate is mutual ;-))) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Quite Excited - PESOs

4 pics from a stroll in Oxford today. First shots from these hands in a long time. Girl on bike heavily cropped. This from a 4 megapixel camera - I was impressed. http://cottycam.posterous.com/43077056 -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche --

  1   2   3   4   >