Thanks, those photos show it off very well.
> On 1 Sep 2019, at 02:03, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> Olympus makes extremely good lenses. I've always found them to be on par with
> Zeiss and Leica lenses, at least their pro-line lenses. :)
>
> I looked through photos I've posted on Flickr made
Olympus makes extremely good lenses. I've always found them to be on par with
Zeiss and Leica lenses, at least their pro-line lenses. :)
I looked through photos I've posted on Flickr made with the E-M1 and 50-200mm
lens. Seems I use the EC-14 teleconverter with this lens a lot of the time,
Thanks, Godfrey. I like the Olympuses (Olympoi?), and the lenses are really
excellent - it has felt rather a shame not to have used the FT ones for so
long.
I had a dig around after sending the email, and discovered that Oly, not
surprisingly, make an adapter, the one you mention, so I have
Thanks
> On 31 Aug 2019, at 20:52, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> I was recently given an EPL1 and picked up a couple of Fotasy adapters,
> probably because they were the least expensive I could find. They seem to
> work fine.
>
> Bob Pdml wrote on 8/31/19 12:32 PM:
>> ...which is the best make?
>>
Thanks. That's made of aluminium, which isn't a good match with steel... not on
bicycles, anyway, and I don't want to be smearing copper grease on my bayonet
before I mount. I read somewhere that the aluminium ones leave microscopic
splinters in the lens mouth, and I think I'd rather not take
Thanks. Which adapter are you using?
> On 31 Aug 2019, at 22:54, Vier wrote:
>
> Before you buy anything, try to do some test shots with the adapter,
> autofocus speed varies A LOT with different lenses.
>
> My main camera is an Olympus EM5, and with adapted 4/3 lenses autofocus
> speed and
Hi Bob!
I have a lot of experience with the E-M1 ... still have mine. It and the E-M1
II are truly excellent cameras.
The E-M1 (and mark II) differ from all the other Olympus bodies in that they
are the only ones that have the phase detect sencels on the imager chip and
focus the FourThirds
On 31/8/19, Steve Cottrell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Quality is good and no loose bits on mine. Sturdy release mech, good
>fit, what's not to like. Cheap enough that I bought an adapter for each
>lens and left them on.
I should add that all of my lenses are manual focus - I don't own any
On 31/8/19, Bob Pdml, discombobulated, unleashed:
>There seems to be no end of presumably Chinese-made adapters out there,
>but I have no idea if any of them are any good. So if those of you who
>engage in body-glass promiscuity of this persuasion could give me some
>tips I'd be very grateful.
I
Before you buy anything, try to do some test shots with the adapter,
autofocus speed varies A LOT with different lenses.
My main camera is an Olympus EM5, and with adapted 4/3 lenses autofocus
speed and accuracy is terrible at best. Half the times I can’t lock focus,
and the times I get it right
I was recently given an EPL1 and picked up a couple of Fotasy adapters,
probably because they were the least expensive I could find. They seem
to work fine.
Bob Pdml wrote on 8/31/19 12:32 PM:
...which is the best make?
I had a small windfall, so I have bought me an Olympus E-M1 II +
...which is the best make?
I had a small windfall, so I have bought me an Olympus E-M1 II + 12-40/2.8 lens
to take cycling with me, replacing the Fuji X20 that is becoming increasingly
difficult to peer through.
I have already an Olympus E-3, which I haven't used for years, and a set of
very
12 matches
Mail list logo
