Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-05 Thread David J Brooks
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Joseph McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks even better now. Of course we've aged at the same rate she has, except in our minds. : ) On Dec 4, 2008, at 15:35 , David J Brooks wrote: On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Joseph McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-04 Thread P. J. Alling
Cascading Style Sheets. An easy to update every page on a web site when you want to change the look and feel. To give the appearance of new content without changing anything of substance really, seems to be their major use, or maybe I'm just too cynical. PN Stenquist wrote: Thanks again.

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-04 Thread David J Brooks
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dreamweaver, its a nightmare. and 14 javascripts btw, I'd love to meet the designer :) I'd rather meet Heather Locklear. Dave Scott Loveless wrote: On 12/3/08, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your site uses css so theres no

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-04 Thread Feroze
As long as Angelina Jolie still looks like she does, no other woman can do it for me :) David J Brooks wrote: On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dreamweaver, its a nightmare. and 14 javascripts btw, I'd love to meet the designer :) I'd rather meet

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-04 Thread Joseph McAllister
On Dec 4, 2008, at 09:16 , David J Brooks wrote: I'd rather meet Heather Locklear. Someone watched Leno last night, eh? Joseph McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-04 Thread John Sessoms
From: PN Stenquist Thanks for the help Feroze. I didn't know I was encouraging downloads, but it doesn't really matter if someone does download the photos. All my packages come with a full set of hi-res files, and all of these are from weddings that are paid in full. Might matter to the

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-04 Thread David J Brooks
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Joseph McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 4, 2008, at 09:16 , David J Brooks wrote: I'd rather meet Heather Locklear. Someone watched Leno last night, eh? Nope, mush past my bed time. T J Hooker reruns Dave Joseph McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-04 Thread Joseph McAllister
Looks even better now. Of course we've aged at the same rate she has, except in our minds. : ) On Dec 4, 2008, at 15:35 , David J Brooks wrote: On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Joseph McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 4, 2008, at 09:16 , David J Brooks wrote: I'd rather meet

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-03 Thread Feroze
Your site uses css so theres no limit to the type of editing you want to do. The pics load pretty slow for me and I'm on a adsl line. Perhaps its gallery script you using, have you tried lightbox? Why are you encouraging downloads? PN Stenquist wrote: i put together a wedding photography

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-03 Thread PN Stenquist
Thanks for the help Feroze. I didn't know I was encouraging downloads, but it doesn't really matter if someone does download the photos. All my packages come with a full set of hi-res files, and all of these are from weddings that are paid in full. I'm technically ignorant when it comes to

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-03 Thread Feroze
I don't know how copyright works over on that side of the pond, but here in SA the copyright to the photo still belongs to the photographer unless the contract states otherwise. I'm a full time graphic designer and have had people pitch up for an interview with work that I've designed in their

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-03 Thread PN Stenquist
Thanks again. What does css mean? My contracts state that all photos become the property of the bride and groom, but I retain the right to use them in my portfolio and for advertising. A lot of the local wedding photographers work that way. It's less messy. You charge an initial package

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-03 Thread Paul Sorenson
You may want to restate that in such a way that you specify that you retain the copyright but are granting them unlimited reproduction rights for their personal use. You might also include that by signing the contract they are also providing you with a model release. Who knows, some day you

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-03 Thread Merlin Who
CSS = cascade style sheet HTML is the data, CSS is how they look... (it is recomended to separate data and design in web page). HTML is filled in by author, CSS is usually made by web page designer (or template maker). It is not that hard to make your own CSS but there are many problems with

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-03 Thread Scott Loveless
On 12/3/08, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your site uses css so theres no limit to the type of editing you want to do. The pics load pretty slow for me and I'm on a adsl line. Perhaps its gallery script you using, have you tried lightbox? Take a look at the page source. Paul's site is

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-03 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 12/3/2008 8:12:46 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://www.w3schools.com/CSS/ Hope this helps... Merlin === I used them for learning CSS. Agreed, best around. Marnie :-) - Warning: I am

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-03 Thread Feroze
dreamweaver, its a nightmare. and 14 javascripts btw, I'd love to meet the designer :) Scott Loveless wrote: On 12/3/08, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your site uses css so theres no limit to the type of editing you want to do. The pics load pretty slow for me and I'm on a adsl line.

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-03 Thread Merlin Who
Maybe som problems can cause the fact that some javascripts are loaded from other website :D And yes, the designer should be punished - if not for CSS then for javascript for sure... On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dreamweaver, its a nightmare. and 14 javascripts

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-02 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 12/1/2008 2:34:12 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm up and running. It's a bit pretentious, but so are young

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-02 Thread PN Stenquist
On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 12/1/2008 2:34:12 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm up and

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-02 Thread David J Brooks
Paul Nice page, and i don't mind the picture you have there now, however there are several BW ones in your gallery that would fit fine as well. Bob, his prices are fine, (just in case i have to hire Paul in 2010.:-)) Dave On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:33 PM, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-02 Thread frank theriault
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:52 PM, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Several of the thumbs won't show on my screen. Other than that, I like the presentation and the photos. What I meant is that the thumbs show, but when clicked upon they don't show as enlargements. Also, when navigating

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-02 Thread frank theriault
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:33 PM, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm up and running. It's a bit pretentious, but so are young Michigan brides:-). Any feedback

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-02 Thread PN Stenquist
Hmmm. i'll have to check that out. It works on my Mac, but I'll have to try on my daughter's PC. Thanks for the input. Paul On Dec 2, 2008, at 4:54 PM, frank theriault wrote: On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:52 PM, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Several of the thumbs won't show on my

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-02 Thread frank theriault
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:03 PM, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm. i'll have to check that out. It works on my Mac, but I'll have to try on my daughter's PC. Thanks for the input. I'm running Mozilla Firefox on a PC (don't ask me any more questions than that) it it makes any

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-02 Thread Eactivist
I should have said, you need something to make someone pick you rather than some other wedding photographer. Sounds better. (I felt it came across kind of heavy.) Later, Marnie :-) - Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored.

OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-01 Thread PN Stenquist
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm up and running. It's a bit pretentious, but so are young Michigan brides:-). Any feedback is welcome. It's here: http://www.paulstenquist.com I also set

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-01 Thread Rick Womer
: From: PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Wedding Photography Website To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Monday, December 1, 2008, 5:33 PM i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-01 Thread PN Stenquist
: Wedding Photography Website To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Monday, December 1, 2008, 5:33 PM i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm up and running. It's a bit pretentious, but so

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-01 Thread Cotty
On 1/12/08, PN Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed: i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm up and running. It's a bit pretentious, but so are young Michigan brides:-). Any feedback is welcome. It's

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-01 Thread Bob Sullivan
Paul, I would lose the reflections under the picture gallery. They begin OK, but get tedious after a while. Your prices are too low. Otherwise, it looks good to me. Regards, Bob S. On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:33 PM, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i put together a wedding photography website.

Re: OT: Wedding Photography Website

2008-12-01 Thread PN Stenquist
Thanks Bob. I don't know if there's a way to eliminate the reflections. This is a template site, and they come with the package. Yes, my prices are too low, but they're higher than they once were. Paul On Dec 1, 2008, at 8:19 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: Paul, I would lose the reflections under