filter
used in conjunction with a screw on #25 red filter. Stacked filters
in
an attempt to get a black sky.
This, again, is another shot of the Sutter Buttes taken from the
dissecting Pass Road.
Lx, A-28~80 f/3.5-4.5, Kodak T-Max 100. Camera rested on a fence
post.
Comments welcomed
wrote:
This another image taken with the use of the Cokin grad gray filter
used in conjunction with a screw on #25 red filter. Stacked filters
in
an attempt to get a black sky.
This, again, is another shot of the Sutter Buttes taken from the
dissecting Pass Road.
Lx, A-28~80 f
Hi Jack
This certainly works well for me in black and white. That dramatic
sky is perfectly balanced by the fence line running off into the
distance.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It was bound
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/28 Fri AM 03:38:22 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Pass Road
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=152
Backdrop for a cowboy movie. _Very_
and not very artistic.
Don
mike wilson wrote:
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/28 Fri AM 03:38:22 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Pass Road
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=152
Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/28 Fri AM 03:38:22 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Pass Road
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=152
Backdrop for a cowboy movie. _Very_ painted
You've identified the major points for me, also.
Thanks much!
Jack
--- Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jack
This certainly works well for me in black and white. That dramatic
sky is perfectly balanced by the fence line running off into the
distance.
Cheers
Brian
Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/28 Fri AM 03:38:22 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Pass Road
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=152
Backdrop for a cowboy movie. _Very_ painted
wilson wrote:
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/28 Fri AM 03:38:22 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Pass Road
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=152
Backdrop
think. But I'm a bit of a
philistine and not very artistic.
Don
mike wilson wrote:
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/28 Fri AM 03:38:22 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Pass Road
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
http
wilson wrote:
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/28 Fri AM 03:38:22 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Pass Road
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=152
On 7/28/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=152
Nice one Jack.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Nice to hear!
Thanks!
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/28/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=152
Nice one Jack.
Dave
--
PDML
Love the composition and perspective. Nice in gray scale. Have a feeling
it would render nice in color too.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Pass Road
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:38:22 -0700 (PDT
render nice in color too.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Pass Road
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA
On 7/27/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=152
Stunning, dramatic sky, great comp, perfect exposure.
I think that covers about everything. Great photograph.
I guess this means you're not going to colorize it for me??? :-)
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO: Pass Road
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks, Tom
If I'm clear on this, you like it. G
I'm thoroughly complimented.
THANKS!
Jack
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/27/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO: Pass Road
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks, Tom.
Pleasing words to read!
Shot on Kodak T-Max 100. That area is a sea of gold tinged
beige/flax
colored dry grass. The Golden California you've heard about
I agree. Excellent.
Paul
On Jul 28, 2006, at 5:50 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On 7/27/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=152
Stunning, dramatic sky, great comp,
Thanks! Meaningful comments.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. Excellent.
Paul
On Jul 28, 2006, at 5:50 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On 7/27/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
This another image taken with the use of the Cokin grad gray filter
used in conjunction with a screw on #25 red filter. Stacked filters in
an attempt to get a black sky.
This, again, is another shot of the Sutter Buttes taken from the
dissecting Pass Road.
Lx, A-28~80 f/3.5-4.5, Kodak T-Max 100
It was bound to happen again..just a matter of a short time.
AAA!!
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=152
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
PDML
I shot this a couple weeks ago with my Kenlock Auto 135 f2.8 screwmount
on Aaron's LX, while having a Beer at the Jersey Giant in downtown
Toronto. Silvertone notAPX 400 in Rodinal 1:25.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/175798210/
And a larger version for non-flickrites:
On 6/27/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot this a couple weeks ago with my Kenlock Auto 135 f2.8 screwmount
on Aaron's LX, while having a Beer at the Jersey Giant in downtown
Toronto. Silvertone notAPX 400 in Rodinal 1:25.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/175798210/
And a larger
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/27/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot this a couple weeks ago with my Kenlock Auto 135 f2.8 screwmount
on Aaron's LX, while having a Beer at the Jersey Giant in downtown
Toronto. Silvertone notAPX 400 in Rodinal 1:25.
Hi all,
Here is another winding road pano (same road, a bit *before* the big curve).
http://www.lacouture.nom.fr/gallery/v/pano/lacets-small.jpg.html
BTW, I'd greatly appreciate if someone could tell me what is the GFM
mentioned earlier.
And here a vertical taken at about the same place
GFM = GrandFather Mountain.
It is a high point in the Appalachian Mountains in North Carolina
which has been turned into an Eco-preserve and private park. It is
the site of an annual Nature Photography weekend that many of us are
attending. It includes a smaller bit of winding road up
Bob Sullivan wrote:
GFM = GrandFather Mountain.
On 4/15/06, Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, I'd greatly appreciate if someone could tell me what is the GFM
mentioned earlier.
If you take a look at
http://nutdriver.org/GFM2004.shtml
you'll find links to photos
Patrice,
The first photo shows very well the convoluted
landscape and winding road, but lacks a center of
interest--the eye just keeps wandering around it.
In the second photo, I have an urge to drag the frame
to the left. The dark far right doesn't add anything,
and it looks as though
I like shot #1. There is so much of interest in it. I love mountain roads.
Tom C.
From: Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Another winding road pano
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:26:39 +0200
Hi all,
Here
On Apr 15, 2006, at 3:26 AM, Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) wrote:
Here is another winding road pano (same road, a bit *before* the
big curve).
http://www.lacouture.nom.fr/gallery/v/pano/lacets-small.jpg.html
Another lovely scenic of this location. Nicely done!
And here a vertical taken
Thank you Doug and Bob for this info, and for the links.
Nice to put a face on names I see in the list.
Patrice
2006/4/15, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bob Sullivan wrote:
GFM = GrandFather Mountain.
On 4/15/06, Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, I'd greatly
Rick Womer a écrit :
Patrice,
The first photo shows very well the convoluted
landscape and winding road, but lacks a center of
interest--the eye just keeps wandering around it.
True. I prefer the other pano with the big curve, too.
In the second photo, I have an urge to drag the frame
Hi!
Here is another winding road pano (same road, a bit *before* the big
curve).
http://www.lacouture.nom.fr/gallery/v/pano/lacets-small.jpg.html
BTW, I'd greatly appreciate if someone could tell me what is the GFM
mentioned earlier.
And here a vertical taken at about the same place
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. Why you chose photosight for displaying of your work?
German www.fotocommunity.de has turned into an awful place where the
admins watch on while a bunch of free-member trolls indulge in insults
and racism. So, I deleted my pictures there.
Photosight
Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW. I also had a look at the photosight.ru pages. I really wish I had an
umbrella thingy like the one you have at avator picture. A cute setup.
These are readily available from any ... well... how do you call them...
baby supply stores? Originally, they're
cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...are those small towers common there?
They are indeed. There are hundreds if ot thousands across the country.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries -
Great composition. Very austere and lonely feeling.
Tom C.
Been trying to decide what to upload next while I was listening to some
old Dire Straits album and browsing through a series of pictures taken a
few weeks ago on a leisurely stroll through frosty Belgium. :-)
Nice composition. I like the somber mood.
On 3/26/06, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been trying to decide what to upload next while I was listening to some
old Dire Straits album and browsing through a series of pictures taken a
few weeks ago on a leisurely stroll through
Hi!
Been trying to decide what to upload next while I was listening to some
old Dire Straits album and browsing through a series of pictures taken a
few weeks ago on a leisurely stroll through frosty Belgium. :-)
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1344831
Someone has asked, so for the
Been trying to decide what to upload next while I was listening to some
old Dire Straits album and browsing through a series of pictures taken a
few weeks ago on a leisurely stroll through frosty Belgium. :-)
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1344831
Someone has asked, so for the
? To get critics?
I found some good links on your homepage to b/w work, thanks.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Ralf R. Radermacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 10:19 PM
To: Pentax Mailingliste
Subject: PESO: Telegraph Road
Been trying to decide what
: Pentax Mailingliste
Emne: PESO: Telegraph Road
Been trying to decide what to upload next while I was listening to some
old Dire Straits album and browsing through a series of pictures taken a
few weeks ago on a leisurely stroll through frosty Belgium. :-)
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php
@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 3:18 PM
Subject: PESO: Telegraph Road
Been trying to decide what to upload next while I was listening to some
old Dire Straits album and browsing through a series of pictures taken a
few weeks ago on a leisurely stroll through frosty Belgium. :-)
http
Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if it was that bright then but for my monitor
settings (Eizo CRT) I would try to darken the photo a bit.
Oh, anyone else to confirm this? I've just recalibrated my monitor and
now you have me wondering if anything might have gone wrong.
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice. The building looks like our transformer buildings (now long
gone).
This is a transformer building. There are dozens like this one in the
region and it looks as if many of them were still in use.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG -
Nice,
Good composition. Good feel to the shot
Dave
Quoting Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Been trying to decide what to upload next while I was listening to some
old Dire Straits album and browsing through a series of pictures taken a
few weeks ago on a leisurely stroll through frosty
freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Ralf R. Radermacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26. mars 2006 22:19
To: Pentax Mailingliste
Subject: PESO: Telegraph Road
Been trying to decide what to upload next while I was listening to some
old
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/4766448.stm
I thought these looked a bit Annsan-ish. Check out #4 in particular if
you have her book.
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My guess is only the D-FA for the 645D will have aperture ring,
while all others (being DA) won't.
The operation of the aperture lever in the 645 system is the other way
round from the K-mount lever. Maybe this design is
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 11:27:11PM -0500, Mishka wrote:
i think they are leveraging that with small limited lenses
quite nicely. if there was a choice, usm or small primes,
i would pick the second. perhaps that's not what pros
need -- than i'm happy pentax is not pro oriented.
best,
mishka
LOL I don't think we're too far apart on many things ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
How is it that we agree so much on some things, Shel? ;-)
Godfrey
On Feb 23, 2006, at 8:50 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Some people care about specs, others care about making
Why shouldn't the pancakes be considered as pro lenses?
I'm wondering is they are aiming at the old rangefinder market. A lot of pros
liked Leica M6 because of their compact size and good lenses...
DagT
fra: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i think they are leveraging that with small limited
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, John Francis wrote:
There's a DA 50-135/2.8 on the way as well.
Looks like 2006 is going to be expensive.
Not really, it's a DA.
But they plan a DFA55/2.8. I will buy it in a flash. Not.
Kostas
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Feb 23, 2006, at 10:52 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
I guess it does. Their conservatism however does little now for the
photography that I like to pursue. ...
And what kind of photography is that, really? Have you defined it?
Yes, but you deleted
, it wouldn't be a small one.
Tom C.
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Lens Road Map revised
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:31:47 -0500
Tom C wrote:
I don't see how you can call it under-spec'd compared to Canon
(especially
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/24 Fri AM 09:57:53 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Lens Road Map revised
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, John Francis wrote:
There's a DA 50-135/2.8 on the way as well.
Looks like 2006 is going to be expensive
What's wrong with the 55/2.8? It is for the 645D,
after all - according to the english version of that
roadmap.
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But they plan a DFA55/2.8. I will buy it in a flash.
Not.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Jon Myers wrote:
What's wrong with the 55/2.8? It is for the 645D,
after all - according to the english version of that
roadmap.
Thanks, I read that later on. What is wrong is that it would benefit
from not being on the same roadmap as the K-mount products.
Kostas
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That make sense. It will be the new standard lens. The D FA label
probably
(almost certainly) indicate that it will be full frame and that it will
fit
film 645 as well. That strongly indicate that it have aperture ring
I don't see a definition for a kind of photography in that quote,
Kostas. I see a statement relating to a kind of equipment. What kind
of PHOTOGRAPHS is the equipment intended to make? That's photography.
Godfrey
On Feb 24, 2006, at 2:09 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
And what kind of
photography. In it Rob expands that
for that type of photographs he needs a combination of low noise in
high ISO and bright lenses. He concludes that Pentax is not moving
towards this direction. The subject of the thread is Lens Road Map
revised.
And don't shout, I read even without it.
Kostas
On 2006-02-24 06:08, Paul Stenquist wrote:
You can get two of the new Pentax for the price of one 5D. Or you could
make a sizable down payment on the 645D, which apparently will be much
higher spec than the 5D.
So the new roadmap indicates:
- 'consumer cameras' use APS sized sensors and
The lens mount for the new pro camera is not PK, it's the 645 mount. And the
sensor isn't 35mm full frame. It's somewhere in between that and 645. The DFA
lens on the chart is apparently a 645 mount lens.
-- Original message --
From: Martin Trautmann [EMAIL
On 2006-02-24 16:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The lens mount for the new pro camera is not PK, it's the 645 mount.
How do you know?
And the sensor isn't 35mm full frame.
I suppose that it's not really 35 mm. 36x24 mm - ø 43 mm,
60:45 @ 43 mm - 34.6 x 26.0 mm
That's 4 % more area ;-)
I
-- Original message --
From: Martin Trautmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2006-02-24 16:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The lens mount for the new pro camera is not PK, it's the 645 mount.
How do you know?
Pentax made that clear when they announced this camera some
that for that type of photographs he needs a combination of low
noise in high ISO and bright lenses. He concludes that Pentax is
not moving towards this direction. The subject of the thread is
Lens Road Map revised.
You do a lot of interpretation for the words low light work ...
Rob didn't say that he
*ist D ( or successor)
+DA 40 F2.8
+DA 21 F3.2
+DA 70 F2.4
Together they mean that in my next fight with British Airways over carry-on
weight, I'll win (again). These can just about all go in a pocket.
Joe
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:57:53AM +, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, John Francis wrote:
There's a DA 50-135/2.8 on the way as well.
Looks like 2006 is going to be expensive.
Not really, it's a DA.
So's the 12-24, and that's almost into four figures.
The 10-17
John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:57:53AM +, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, John Francis wrote:
There's a DA 50-135/2.8 on the way as well.
Looks like 2006 is going to be expensive.
Not really, it's a DA.
So's the 12-24, and that's almost into four
I think Kostas' point was that he won't buy DA glass.
-Adam
I think that's all we're going to see in PK mount. I'm fine with that.
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Kostas' point was that he won't buy DA glass.
-Adam
I think that's all we're going to see in PK mount. I'm fine with that.
Paul
Makes sense, since I don't expect Pentax to introduce any 35mm cameras
in the future, and also don't expect the film offerings
Hi!
Ladies and gents, I am rather puzzled by two Pentax limited lenses - the
most modern ones - the 40 mm and 70 mm. I see no other reason for their
introduction except size and may be price. Pentax already produces
outstanding 43 and 77 mm limited lenses. They work very well on *istD
and on
I agree. They will be about as compact as an old range finder with
lenses having corresponding fields of view.
DagT
Den 24. feb. 2006 kl. 18.31 skrev jtainter:
*ist D ( or successor)
+DA 40 F2.8
+DA 21 F3.2
+DA 70 F2.4
Together they mean that in my next fight with British Airways over
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:44:23PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Kostas' point was that he won't buy DA glass.
-Adam
I think that's all we're going to see in PK mount. I'm fine with that.
Paul
I'd say that the announcement of DA f2.8 zooms which replace the
previous
On Feb 24, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Ladies and gents, I am rather puzzled by two Pentax limited lenses
- the most modern ones - the 40 mm and 70 mm. I see no other reason
for their introduction except size and may be price. Pentax already
produces outstanding 43 and 77 mm
Hi!
Why do I feel that they are trying to beat the dead horse by labeling
those lenses limited...
I never did get what Limited was supposed to mean anyway, vs the FA*
labeling. Silly games in naming.
Godfrey, remember in Men In Black (the first one), when Will Smith is
passing that exam?
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ladies and gents, I am rather puzzled by two Pentax limited lenses - the
most modern ones - the 40 mm and 70 mm. I see no other reason for their
introduction except size and may be price.
But size and price are very
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:57:53AM +, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, John Francis wrote:
There's a DA 50-135/2.8 on the way as well.
Looks like 2006 is going to be expensive.
Not really, it's a DA.
So's the 12-24, and that's
On 2006-02-24, at 20:20, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I never did get what Limited was supposed to mean anyway, vs the
FA* labeling. Silly games in naming.
For me FA* were high performance lenses with modern build quality
(mixture of plastic and metal) while Limiteds are from old school -
no
On 2006-02-24, at 19:55, Boris Liberman wrote:
Ladies and gents, I am rather puzzled by two Pentax limited lenses
- the most modern ones - the 40 mm and 70 mm. I see no other reason
for their introduction except size and may be price. Pentax already
produces outstanding 43 and 77 mm
On 24 Feb 2006 at 8:01, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't see a definition for a kind of photography in that quote,
Kostas. I see a statement relating to a kind of equipment. What kind
of PHOTOGRAPHS is the equipment intended to make? That's photography.
Just butting in here for a minute,
Hello Rob,
Based on your description, am I to interpret that the issue with
bodies has mostly to do with High ISO/Low Noise? Essentially a larger
sensor becomes the real solution from the body side of things. That
would mean either a full frame sensor or a MF body. So Nikon is no
help to you
On 2006-02-25, at 00:51, Rob Studdert wrote:
Just butting in here for a minute, my photographic endeavours
include quite a
lot of mid-high energy concert photography these days, and as a
consequence
generally I find myself shooting in very low light/poor quality
light environs.
Static low
On 24 Feb 2006 at 20:39, Pål Jensen wrote:
But size and price are very important market niches. I think it is brilliant
except that I am reluctant to buy lenses without aperture rings.
Better get used to it, I'd be surprised to hear that you're expecting aperture
rings on many of the lenses
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 24 Feb 2006 at 20:39, Pål Jensen wrote:
But size and price are very important market niches. I think it is
brilliant
except that I am reluctant to buy lenses without aperture rings.
Better get used to it, I'd be surprised to hear that you're expecting
aperture
rings
On 24 Feb 2006 at 15:02, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Rob,
Based on your description, am I to interpret that the issue with
bodies has mostly to do with High ISO/Low Noise? Essentially a larger
sensor becomes the real solution from the body side of things. That
would mean either a full
On Feb 24, 2006, at 8:14 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Pentax seem now simply hell bent on heading
done the pretty/compact/light niche end of the market, and that's not
where I
want to go.
I don't know about pretty. I guess they're okay. And some of the new
lenses seem to be upgrades in speed --
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/lens/roadmap.pdf
DA16-50/2.8!
Cheers,
Ken
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:20:47PM -0500, K.Takeshita wrote:
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/lens/roadmap.pdf
DA16-50/2.8!
Now we know why there's a rebate on the 16-45/4
There's a DA 50-135/2.8 on the way as well.
Looks like 2006 is going to be expensive.
On 23 Feb 2006 at 21:20, K.Takeshita wrote:
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/lens/roadmap.pdf
DA16-50/2.8!
Is anyone else more than a little confused over the inclusion of a DFA55/2.8
and DA70/2.4LTD?
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anyone else more than a little confused over the inclusion of a
DFA55/2.8
and DA70/2.4LTD?
I am confused over the D-FA 55/2.8 but not the 70/2.4 Limited.
On 2/23/06 10:37 PM, Rob Studdert, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DFA55/2.8
This is for 645D
Ken
On 2/23/06 9:32 PM, John Francis, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:20:47PM -0500, K.Takeshita wrote:
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/lens/roadmap.pdf
DA16-50/2.8!
Now we know why there's a rebate on the 16-45/4
There's a DA 50-135/2.8 on the way as well.
Looks
- Original Message -
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DFA55/2.8
This is for 645D
That make sense. It will be the new standard lens. The D FA label probably
(almost certainly) indicate that it will be full frame and that it will fit
film 645 as well. That strongly indicate
On 24 Feb 2006 at 3:41, Pål Jensen wrote:
I am confused over the D-FA 55/2.8 but not the 70/2.4 Limited.
Yes I guess it would look good next to my 77/1.8LTD if I was trying to find the
smallest least usable lenses.
All I can think is what the hell are they thinking, how many lenses at or
On 23 Feb 2006 at 21:42, K.Takeshita wrote:
On 2/23/06 10:37 PM, Rob Studdert, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DFA55/2.8
This is for 645D
Thanks Ken, that makes much more sense now, still doesn't account for the 70mm
though?
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)
Weird...
Tom C.
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Lens Road Map revised
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:37:24 +1000
On 23 Feb 2006 at 21:20, K.Takeshita wrote:
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/lens/roadmap.pdf
On 2/23/06 10:48 PM, Rob Studdert, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I guess it would look good next to my 77/1.8LTD if I was trying to find
the
smallest least usable lenses.
Didn't the original road map say something about pancake type?
Maybe lens designers are having too much fun.
But 70/2.4
701 - 800 of 1009 matches
Mail list logo
