From: Tom C
Subject: Re: RE: PESO: One that got accepted
So just now in 2007 a camera/imaging company discovers this??? It's
still
relying on the mountain to come to Mohammed.
Are you presuming that the gallery will be a 100% stand alone entity,
completely divorced from any advertising
I think Pentax is selling most every unit they can produce. Pentax is
almost certainly selling every lens, that can be shipped.
Tom C wrote:
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: RE: PESO: One that got accepted
So just now in 2007 a camera/imaging company discovers this??? It's
still
Paul, I agree with you. No, Mark, I don't think you should be surprised.
This is really good shot.
Boris
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Not surprising. It's a strong, graphic image that demonstrates the
capability of camera and lens. Good work.
paul
On Mar 21, 2007, at 9:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: RE: PESO: One that got accepted
Yes. Becuase I'm trying to think of the last *big* memorable advertising
campaign for a Pentax SLR or DSLR and I'm not coming up with anything.
Also
- why is there not a big advertising campaign as we
in the USA).
Give a free K10D to every American Idol finalist... or something...
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: One that got accepted
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:03:09 -0400
: PESO: One that got accepted
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:03:09 -0400
Not surprising. It's a strong, graphic image that demonstrates the
capability of camera and lens. Good work.
paul
On Mar 21, 2007, at 9:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I expected the Pentax Gallery to reject this one
television.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom C
Sent: 22 March 2007 19:38
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: One that got accepted
Does Pentax really think they are going to appreciably
increase sales
would.
American Idol's not international ;-)
Tom C.
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO: One that got accepted
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:59:49 -
They are likely to lose sales
On 3/21/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I expected the Pentax Gallery to reject this one but they confounded me
again...
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
It's the Conemaugh Dam, about an hour's drive from Pittsburgh, which I
photographed while on a Sierra Club hike. Seems a bit
view.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom C
Sent: 22 March 2007 20:40
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO: One that got accepted
I'm glad you wrote (more or less) normal people'. ;-)
To my way of thinking, most
This pic doesn't need 4x5.
But if you get a 4x5 body and add a roll film back, it's cheaper than
getting a 6x7 with tilt/shift lens.
Then add a 210mm and crop all you need.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://www.brendemuehl.net
http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: One that got accepted
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:03:09 -0400
Not surprising. It's a strong, graphic image that demonstrates the
capability of camera and lens. Good work.
paul
On Mar 21, 2007, at 9:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I
into a retailer and say I'd like to see the Pentax K-whatever.
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: One that got accepted
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:19:21 -0400
Eye catching
Bob W wrote:
Not having something like this would say some very negative
things about the company which could contribute a lot to losing
sales, in my view.
Sums it up nicely.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: RE: PESO: One that got accepted
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:04:47 -0400 (EDT)
Bob W wrote:
Not having something like this would say some very negative
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: RE: PESO: One that got accepted
So just now in 2007 a camera/imaging company discovers this??? It's still
relying on the mountain to come to Mohammed.
Are you presuming that the gallery will be a 100% stand alone entity,
completely
My lens buying decisions (Canon) have been affected by pictures I've seen
that someone took with a particular lens. So the gallery doesn't seem totally
off the mark to me. Although, sure, ads would help too. But I see it as a
fairly smart move on their part.
Remember there are still a lot
I expected the Pentax Gallery to reject this one but they confounded me
again...
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
It's the Conemaugh Dam, about an hour's drive from Pittsburgh, which I
photographed while on a Sierra Club hike. Seems a bit Margaret
Bourke-White influenced to me.
--
PDML
Actually I'm not surprised - seems up their alley, based on what I
have seen so far.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 6:20:28 PM, you wrote:
MR I expected the Pentax Gallery to reject this one but they confounded me
MR again...
MR http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
MR It's the Conemaugh
Not surprising. It's a strong, graphic image that demonstrates the
capability of camera and lens. Good work.
paul
On Mar 21, 2007, at 9:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I expected the Pentax Gallery to reject this one but they
confounded me
again...
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
It's
It's sharp, detailed with good tonal separation. It makes the lens
camera combination look good even if you're not satisfied with it.
Mark Roberts wrote:
I expected the Pentax Gallery to reject this one but they confounded me
again...
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
It's the Conemaugh
21 matches
Mail list logo
