. Was possibly held for further review which could very well
be a compliment to the image. Unfortunately they don't provide a grade.
Jack
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
, 8/31/09, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 6:39 PM
I had another of those frustrating
experiences with the PPG.
Almost a month ago, I
: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 6:39 PM
I had another of those frustrating
experiences with the PPG.
Almost a month ago, I submitted several old scanned images,
including this one:
http
. Unfortunately they don't provide a
grade.
Jack
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 6:39 PM
I had another of those
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Wed, 8/26/09, Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com
Subject: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 7:44 PM
After a long spell, I uploaded
something in PPG
On 31/08/2009, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote:
Rick,
You're not connecting via dialup or mobile 3G by any chance? I really
don't recognise your description...
I have been running ADSL 1.5Mb and it was clumsy and slow as a wet
week to load, I do not allow any of my Browsers (IE, FF, Chrome
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Wed, 8/26/09, Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com
Subject: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 7:44 PM
After a long spell, I uploaded
something
/31/09, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 6:37 AM
Jostein,
On occasion, somebody here will link to the gallery for a
photo.
I watch it post
connection.
Jack
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 6:37 AM
Jostein,
On occasion, somebody here will link to the gallery
What I was clumsily trying to say, the TOTAL time needed from clicking on PPG
to the opening of a selected artist's image is 'prox 4 - 6 secs.
Jack
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG quota
To: Pentax
Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 6:37 AM
Jostein,
On occasion, somebody here will link to the gallery for a
photo.
I watch it post a gallery header page then spin up more
internally.
Finally
to the opening of a selected artist's image is 'prox 4 - 6 secs.
Jack
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 9:54 AM
Jack,
I'm paying
...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 9:54 AM
Jack,
I'm paying for a premium ATT broadband connection here.
The initial splash page takes 5 seconds or so to load.
I brought up 10 recent additions in 32 seconds, one after
I had another of those frustrating experiences with the PPG.
Almost a month ago, I submitted several old scanned images, including this one:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9522634
All the others were rejected. in about 2 weeks. I submitted several
more, and they were rejected, but
Magnificent shot. Was possibly held for further review which could very well be
a compliment to the image. Unfortunately they don't provide a grade.
Jack
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG quota
Nice shot. Better than the majority of landscapes in the gallery.
I think when a pic sits that long it means it passed peer review but
was rejected by the gallery gods.
Paul
On Aug 31, 2009, at 9:39 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I had another of those frustrating experiences with the PPG.
On 29/8/09, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
I tried to look at people's photos, and found the interface to be slower
than an Apple II in Job's garage.
Rick, I have totally underestimated you! What was a it **really** like
in there?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
Me four.
Dave
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Bob Sullivanrf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Me three! And I signed up before the gallery opened too!
Nice images, but a pain in the butt to view or join.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:18 PM, John Francisjo...@panix.com wrote:
On
I agree, Dan. It has, doubtless, been a photo stimulus to many.
Jack
--- On Sat, 8/29/09, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009, 8:17 PM
On 30/08/2009, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Me four.
Me also, signed up during Beta phase but was disgusted by the
interface and a few other issues so elected not to contribute.
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter,
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Rob Studdertdistudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/08/2009, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Me four.
Me also, signed up during Beta phase but was disgusted by the
interface and a few other issues so elected not to contribute.
I contributed during the
On Aug 29, 2009, at 19:41 , Rick Womer wrote:
I tried to look at people's photos, and found the interface to be
slower than an Apple II in Job's garage.
Did anyone see the program How It's Made? that I saw last night
(made in 2008) where they showed how player piano rolls were
--- On Wed, 8/26/09, Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com
Subject: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 7:44 PM
After a long spell, I uploaded
something in PPG and discovered that we
now have a quota of 1
Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com
Subject: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 7:44 PM
After a long spell, I uploaded
something in PPG and discovered that we
now have a quota of 1 upload a week
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:41:18PM -0700, Rick Womer wrote:
rant on
I filled in the data form for a PPG account shortly after it opened a few
years ago.
Then, I read here and elsewhere about the ridiculous review system, which has
only gotten more ridiculous.
I tried to look at
Me three! And I signed up before the gallery opened too!
Nice images, but a pain in the butt to view or join.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:18 PM, John Francisjo...@panix.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:41:18PM -0700, Rick Womer wrote:
rant on
I filled in the data form
It seems that PPG is now limiting each submitter to 10 images UnderReview.
Previously, there were ten input boxes when you went to the unload
page, and you could submit more than one page (10 photos) at a time.
Now, you are limited to one page. When I went to upload today, there
were nine input
Btw, how do you get into ppg?
I I wrote them via contact us at ppg site quite some time ago but
never got anything from them.
--Sasha
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Daniel J. Matyoladanmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that PPG is now limiting each submitter to 10 images UnderReview.
Sasha:
I sent in your name and email address to PPG in accordance with their
instructions. They should send you a photographer ID that will allow
you to register.
They don't seem to be responding as quickly as they once did.
Dan
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Sasha Sobolsa...@asobol.com
Daniel, Thanks!
I think it was few weeks ago when I e-mailed them.
Seems pretty slow.
--Sasha
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Daniel J. Matyoladanmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Sasha:
I sent in your name and email address to PPG in accordance with their
instructions. They should send you a
:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG quota
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 12:08 PM
It seems that PPG is now limiting
each submitter to 10 images UnderReview.
Previously, there were ten input boxes when you went to the
unload
Okay, I get it now ... we have a quota of 10 per week. I was not
paying attention when I uploaded something like 9 photos and came back
a day later to find there was only 1 box available. Still tames the
beast :-)
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Bong Manayonbongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
After
After a long spell, I uploaded something in PPG and discovered that we
now have a quota of 1 upload a week. Should make voting easier...
--
Bong Manayon
http://www.bong.uni.cc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
In a message dated 8/26/2009 4:44:51 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
bongmana...@gmail.com writes:
After a long spell, I uploaded something in PPG and discovered that we
now have a quota of 1 upload a week. Should make voting easier...
--
Bong Manayon
==
I guess that means that
34 matches
Mail list logo
