On 23 Jul 2004 at 21:23, Herb Chong wrote:
> Thumbs Plus doesn't show them right anyway, so i have to open in Photoshop.
> thus, no benefit.
I'd check your settings, I have no such problems with mine.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
On 23 Jul 2004 at 0:00, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> Also how many are setting custom white balance and not using the presets? What's
> your process when you set the white balance?
The pre-sets are quite good, if you are used to shooting daylight film and
adding warming (shade/cloudy)/cooling (tungst
Thumbs Plus doesn't show them right anyway, so i have to open in Photoshop.
thus, no benefit.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: *istD settings
>
On 23 Jul 2004 at 20:49, Herb Chong wrote:
> no effect.
Well they are the values that will be adopted by the RAW convertor if used
unassisted. I set pre-set the settings when shooting RAW just as I would when
shooting jpg. IMHO it's not just good practice it's lazy not to do so and can
make po
te balance to
have a certain effect, (eg if I am trying to mimmick cross-processing) in
which case, I'd set it manually...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 24 July 2004 1:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *istD settings
I&
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
> In his former life as a egzotic dancer alex wetmore wrote on 23.07.04 17:57:
> > If you can afford the storage costs RAW is really the way to go.
>
> That's not only storage costs, but it is also time spent to convert all
> these RAWs with right sett
In his former life as a egzotic dancer alex wetmore wrote on 23.07.04 17:57:
> If you can afford the storage costs RAW is really the way to go.
That's not only storage costs, but it is also time spent to convert all
these RAWs with right settings :-) Something a'la digital darkroom work.
--
Best
In his former life as a egzotic dancer Kenneth Waller wrote on 23.07.04
17:54:
> I've had my ist D for a few weeks & like using it. However, I don't think I'll
> give up shooting slides any time soon.
> I've pretty much kept things simple by going with the default settings.
> I saw Tan's post wher
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> I've had my ist D for a few weeks & like using it. However, I don't
> think I'll give up shooting slides any time soon. I've pretty much
> kept things simple by going with the default settings. I saw Tan's
> post where she talked about the settings fo
I've had my ist D for a few weeks & like using it. However, I don't think I'll give up
shooting slides any time soon.
I've pretty much kept things simple by going with the default settings.
I saw Tan's post where she talked about the settings for an imasge she posted and saw
that she was shootin
According to the manual, it keeps track of the sharpening done in camera.
Following is excerpt from Epson:
The solution is P.I.M. Using P.I.M, the camera saves the settings set by the
user prior to taking a photo. This is carried with the image and
subsequently instructs the P.I.M enabled printer
Print Image Matching doesn't have anything to do with sharpening. it is only
color profile matching.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: istD Settin
osure. I've
tried it with images from the Optio S and the results are really awesome.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: istD Settings
> the Nikon man
I agree with Mark and Bill. If you plan on doing any post processing you
should do the sharpening there and not in the camera. This is something that
I think Pentax got right on the *ist-D. A good workflow suggestion for
Photoshop, or any other image processing program, is to do all of your
correct
: Saturday, October 04, 2003 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: istD Settings
> One of the things that i don't like about a lot of digital images is that
> they seem overly sharp, to the point of not looking natural.
> It's easy to do, done it myself recently, as another list member pointed
out
> :) recently.:-)
- Original Message -
From: Robert James
Subject: Re: istD Settings
> I just got my new istD. First impressionit's SMALL! Very nice
design, and I love the hyper programs like the PZ1p.
> Question: So far, I like to set the sharpening setting at it's highest.
Do
Marl is right. In fact the amount of shapening needed depends on the use
and final size of the image. So how can one setting fit all.
Mark Roberts wrote:
"Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I just got my new istD. First impressionit's SMALL! Very nice
design
17 matches
Mail list logo
