Sometimes I wonder if anyone here ever took an accounting course. Let's take a
look at the D-Rebel from that viewpoint.
It costs a certain amount to develop a digital camera (or any new product). Then
you have to figure out at what point you want to recoup that cost. Say you
budget it at a
I kind of doubt that Phillips chip ever reached the production level where they
sold for the $1000 price.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27 Oct 2003 at 15:49, alex wetmore wrote:
The last thing that I found said that the sensor in the Pentax *ist D
and Nikon
Mpixel price breakthough
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I just saw on TV that gateway has a 5Mpixel
digital PS for $249.99
I think 35mm film's days are really numbered.
Why does a DSLR cost $1250.00 more WITHOUT
a lens???
The CCD in a DSLR has about 10x the surface area (23.4mm
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Mr. William M. Kane wrote:
Perhaps the Rebel doesn't have a quality sensor in it?
I think it's a quantity issue, actually. It's the same sensor as the
10D. If nothing else, they are already tooled up to make it.
Canon has said, however, that they have made progress in
And then there are those who have run and enterprise, and all your
internal figuring is useless if you don't price competitively. Forget
the theory. Lets look at reality. If your entering a mature market or
dynamic new market with lots of aggressive players you may not ever make
any money
no place like 127.0.0.1
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 5 Mpixel price breakthough
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 13:47:08 -0600 (CST)
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I just saw on TV that gateway has a 5Mpixel
digital PS
on 28.10.03 3:19, J. C. O'Connell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still dont believe that camera has a sensor that cost
CANON $700 if thats what your trying to say.
Why not? Analog EOS-300V (EOS Rebel Ti) costs about 200$ and it has far more
built-in mechanics than its digital sibbling.
Hi!
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 08:50:14 +0100
Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 28.10.03 3:19, J. C. O'Connell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still dont believe that camera has a sensor that cost
CANON $700 if thats what your trying to say.
Why not? Analog EOS-300V (EOS Rebel Ti) costs
On 28/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
The last thing that I found said that the sensor in the Pentax *ist D
and Nikon D100 cost about $700 each in quantity.
Well that's what they'd like you to think, makes the bitter pill more
palatable
if there is some other entity to blame.
I blame the
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27 Oct 2003 at 15:49, alex wetmore wrote:
The last thing that I found said that the sensor in the Pentax *ist D
and Nikon D100 cost about $700 each in quantity.
Well that's what they'd like you to think, makes the bitter pill more palatable
if there
On 28 Oct 2003 at 7:29, Mark Roberts wrote:
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27 Oct 2003 at 15:49, alex wetmore wrote:
The last thing that I found said that the sensor in the Pentax *ist D
and Nikon D100 cost about $700 each in quantity.
Well that's what they'd like you to
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I just saw on TV that gateway has a 5Mpixel
digital PS for $249.99
I think 35mm film's days are really numbered.
Why does a DSLR cost $1250.00 more WITHOUT
a lens???
Apples and Oranges. Why does a pro SLR cost so much more than a film
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: 5 Mpixel price breakthough
Apples and Oranges. Why does a pro SLR cost so much more than a film
point-and-shoot? The sensor size is the same (35mm
On 28 Oct 2003 at 10:43, Mark Roberts wrote:
I was the Components Engineer responsible for optical sensors (as well
as discrete semiconductors, crystals, filters, oscillators and several
other commodities) at Harris Corp's RF Communications Division at the
time I got the $1000.00 per unit
: 5 Mpixel price breakthough
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I just saw on TV that gateway has a 5Mpixel
digital PS for $249.99
I think 35mm film's days are really numbered.
Why does a DSLR cost $1250.00 more WITHOUT
a lens???
The CCD in a DSLR has about 10x the surface area (23.4mm
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I just saw on TV that gateway has a 5Mpixel
digital PS for $249.99
I think 35mm film's days are really numbered.
Why does a DSLR cost $1250.00 more WITHOUT
a lens???
The CCD in a DSLR has about 10x the surface area (23.4mm by 15.6mm vs
7.2mm by
-Original Message-
From: alex wetmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 6:49 PM
To: pentax discuss
Subject: Re: 5 Mpixel price breakthough
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I just saw on TV that gateway has a 5Mpixel
digital PS
I just saw on TV that gateway has a 5Mpixel
digital PS for $249.99
Why does a DSLR cost $1250.00 more WITHOUT
a lens???
Without knowing the features and the specs of the Gatweay camera,
as well as its build quality, the quality of the lens, and the
resuktant image quality, there's no way
, 2003 6:49 PM
To: pentax discuss
Subject: Re: 5 Mpixel price breakthough
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I just saw on TV that gateway has a 5Mpixel
digital PS for $249.99
I think 35mm film's days are really numbered.
Why does a DSLR cost $1250.00 more WITHOUT
a lens
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: 5 Mpixel price breakthough
That cant be right or CANON couldnt be selling
the 6Mpixel rebel digital for 999.99 retail.
The Canon sensor is a CMOS, which apparently is much less expensive to
produce.
It wouldn't surprise me
- Original Message -
From: Comcast Mail
Subject: Re: 5 Mpixel price breakthough
Gateway's 5 megapixel model is a rebadged Argus DC3810. The review of this
particular model can be found here:
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/argus/dc3810-review/index.shtml
While cheap, the camera
21 matches
Mail list logo