For some reason my eyes ended up watching the boats at the bridge shot. I
kind of like what you have done, but it doesn't do anything with me. (At
least not after a first look).
The concert shots are very good, me think, despite the lack of focus. Or
perhaps it is the lack of focus that makes
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/28/05, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
mirror slap isn't that critical).
Hi!
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
mirror slap isn't that critical).
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index5/05_11_lavender/10.htm
Frankly (no pun intended), I think it does not
On 11/28/05, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
mirror slap isn't that critical).
Even if the mirror rattled for nearly a
second, shaking the camera like a leaf,
it would still be only ~3% of the
exposure time -- nothing at all to worry
about.
Don
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/28/05, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated
In a message dated 11/28/2005 4:16:54 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
mirror slap isn't that critical).
6 matches
Mail list logo
