Say WHAT? They do what they have to do to come up with what the
engineers and marketing have specified. Whatever they have to do to
get there is fair game.
I suggest that they are showing their keen expertise, by using all
tools/techniques at hand, to come up with meeting those
specifications.
You
Who changed this thread's Subject to "Option S?" keith w.
Steve Desjardins wrote:
>
> All of my Digtials use CF cards. What are SD memory card/MMC-removable
> media like?
>
> Steven Desjardins
> Department of Chemistry
> Washington and Lee University
> Lexington, VA 24450
> (540) 458-8873
> F
You are right Mike,
I thought for a moment that the original poster was telling me that an f/2.6
lens in a digital camera was equal to an f/1. lens in 35mm format.
On another note, I own a Dimage 7 but still get more enjoyment out of my 6x9
totally mechanical beasts. Photography hasn't been so m
> Focal length. f/l, not f/1. :)
The term "focal length," at least according to my standard references (_The
Focal Encyclopedia of Photography_ and _The ICP Encyclopedia of
Photography_), should not be abbreviated. Its symbol is (stylized or
italic f, in case it doesn't come through ascii) in
And did you like this 600mm?
Alek
PS Piece of glass
Użytkownik Bojidar Dimitrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>Hi Heiko,
>
>> You lucky one. BTW - is there an official possibility to visit
>> Pentax Germany and have a look at their facilities and work?
>
>I don't think that the offer any "guided tou
Thanks.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Congrats, you did take pics???
feroze
- Original Message -
From: "Arnold Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: I had a nice day (LX images)
> I woul happily like to share with the list the
Lawrence Kwan wrote:
>
> > Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
> > Quite a bit nicer than imagined, eh?
> > Speeds from 1 second to 1/2000 second. Nice too, eh?
>
> Is there manual exposure in Optio S? There is no "Metered Manual"
> mentioned in the Exp
Lawrence Kwan wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Mike Johnston wrote:
> > > Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
> >
> > A 35mm f/2.6 is not shabby at all for a lens that size. Pretty impressive,
>
> Actually, because of the diminishing CCD sensor size and t
Jeff wrote:
>
> Can you elaborate on the 35mm equivalent "f/1."?
>
> Jeff.
Sure. That was meant to be the shortcut way of expressing focal
length. "f/l." Eff slash ell. Not "f/1."
The lower case L looks mighty like a ONE, doesn't it?
Sorry about the confusion.
keith
> Paul Franklin Stregev
> Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
> Quite a bit nicer than imagined, eh?
> Speeds from 1 second to 1/2000 second. Nice too, eh?
Is there manual exposure in Optio S? There is no "Metered Manual"
mentioned in the Exposure mode. There is a "User" setting
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Mike Johnston wrote:
> > Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
>
> A 35mm f/2.6 is not shabby at all for a lens that size. Pretty impressive,
Actually, because of the diminishing CCD sensor size and the requirement
of only a small image c
Focal length. f/l, not f/1. :)
chris
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Jeff wrote:
> Can you elaborate on the 35mm equivalent "f/1."?
>
> Jeff.
>
> Paul Franklin Stregevsky wrote:
> > Big grin...
> > Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
> > Quite a bit nicer than i
Can you elaborate on the 35mm equivalent "f/1."?
Jeff.
Paul Franklin Stregevsky wrote:
Big grin...
Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
Quite a bit nicer than imagined, eh? Speeds from 1 second to 1/2000 second.
Nice too, eh?
Wow, Keith, was I wrong. Impr
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:35:21 -0800, Keith Whaley wrote:
>Pentax USA site says MSRP is going to be $425, and admit 'street
>price' will most likely be somewhat lower.
>Go To:
>http://www.pentax.com/products/cameras/camera_overview.cfm?productid=18263
Damn, Keith. Don't know how I missed it. Was al
Sure. What do you want first?
Pentax USA site says MSRP is going to be $425, and admit 'street
price' will most likely be somewhat lower.
Go To:
http://www.pentax.com/products/cameras/camera_overview.cfm?productid=18263
Fourth item down, on left hand panel, is "price list." Click on it.
keith
Big grin...
Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
Quite a bit nicer than imagined, eh?
Speeds from 1 second to 1/2000 second. Nice too, eh?
Lots of good things about it...
Keith Whaley
Paul Franklin Stregevsky wrote:
>
> Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Keith Whaley wrote:
> What's an SD memory card? I probably know it, but can't think of it
> right now.
It stands for "Secure Digital." Interchangeable with MMC (MultiMedia
Cards), but with additional security features built in.
> Just found out, but don't know a lot more...
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Keith Whaley wrote:
> Which reminds me. Am I the _only_ PDMLer who is impressed with the
> little OptioS?
It's a cute little camera, but I'm not overawed.
> 35-105mm equivalent (3x) zoom
Pretty much everything these days has that. It's impressive in a camera
this small, th
Congratulations!
chris
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Arnold Stark wrote:
> This morning my beloved wife Yuliya gave birth to our first child
> Alexander!! All went rater swift and easy, and we all are healthy and
> very very happy! :-
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:01:57 -0500, Paul Franklin Stregevsky wrote:
>Do those specs include maximum aperture? I didn't see this vital spec in the
>original article. That should be a red alert. I'll bet it's something like
>f/4.5 at "35mm" to f/6.7 at "105mm".
Where can you find "street" pricing
Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am I the _only_ PDMLer who is impressed with the little OptioS? Until now,
via Boz' post, I've not heard one person comment on this little jewel. Well,
other than a lot of palaver about how it will fit inside an Altoids box...
Granted, it's not out yet. Maybe
Keith Whaley wrote:
>
[...]
> Second, how does it focus? IR? By icon? Choose one of the icons, and
> it sets aperture accordingly?
> Just found out, but don't know a lot more... it uses what's called TTL
> Contrast Detection Autofucus. Now, what THAT means, who knows?
Ooops! That's SUPPOSED t
Congratulations
Best to Alexander and to you two.
Cotty
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/
__
Congratulations, Arnold. Now is when the fun begins.
At 01:38 PM 1/23/03, you wrote:
I woul happily like to share with the list the reason for which I could
not (as had been planned) join Boz on his successfull Pentax Day, which I
had arranged:
Even for a Pentax enthusiast sometimes there are
That was the whole point...
When I'm out and about, and don't want to look like your standard
camera-toting nerd tourist, this thing in my shirt pocket would be
absolutely ideal!
Two unanswered qustions...
What's an SD memory card? I probably know it, but can't think of it
right now.
Don't know a
> This morning my beloved wife Yuliya gave birth to our first child
> Alexander!! All went rater swift and easy, and we all are healthy and
> very very happy! :-
Hey Arnold! Great news! Congratulations to you and Yuliya!
It's a kick, ain't it? I feel your happiness. My son is 9 and I'm sti
Many glad tidinggs of the day, Arnold. Blessings on the mother and child.
keith whaley
Arnold Stark wrote:
>
> I woul happily like to share with the list the reason for which I could
> not (as had been planned) join Boz on his successfull Pentax Day, which
> I had arranged:
> Even for a Pentax e
Arnold Stark wrote:
> This morning my beloved wife Yuliya gave birth to our first child
> Alexander!! All went rater swift and easy, and we all are healthy and
> very very happy! :-
Congratulations!
A real priority change for you :-)
I look forward to your polls on;
- Best nappies
- Be
Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
>
[...]
> While at Pentax, I did get to hold the new Optio S and I also saw it
> taken apart. I did ask about a K-mount digital, and they said that they
> really have no information... other than Pentax Japan has said that they
> will show such a camera on the PMA in F
Congratulations!!!
This will likely be your most significant life-changing event.
Michael Cross
Arnold Stark wrote:
I woul happily like to share with the list the reason for which I
could not (as had been planned) join Boz on his successfull Pentax
Day, which I had arranged:
Even for a Penta
I woul happily like to share with the list the reason for which I could
not (as had been planned) join Boz on his successfull Pentax Day, which
I had arranged:
Even for a Pentax enthusiast sometimes there are events more important
than Pentax:
This morning my beloved wife Yuliya gave birth to ou
Hi Heiko,
> You lucky one. BTW - is there an official possibility to visit
> Pentax Germany and have a look at their facilities and work?
I don't think that the offer any "guided tours," but you can always call
them and ask. The place is actually rather small, and the photo storage
is not in Ham
Hi All,
It is truth that digital can rule very soon! It is amazing you can see you photos so
quickly and in case it is not up to your expectation one can repeat them.Recently I
carried out weathering research in my department and took some destroyed specimens
using digital old Kodak 215 and some
34 matches
Mail list logo
