Jeff T. wrote:
> I had the opportunity to shoot the 2001 Tokyo Motor Show with my
> brother's D30 and while it was a pleasure shooting digital with a proper
> SLR rather than a point and shoot, the D30 ergonomics and interface
> leave much to be desired... btw, I got my first picture published in
E: New Pentax digital SLR
Well, whatever chip they use, they better bring on the Pentax digital
body awfully bloody soon!
I had the opportunity to shoot the 2001 Tokyo Motor Show with my
brother's D30 and while it was a pleasure shooting digital with a
proper
SLR rather than a point and sho
From: Jeff Tsai
... btw, I got my first picture published in
Car & Driver this month! Look for the write-up on the TMS by Peter Lyon;
I took the prototype Skyline GT-R pic for the article!
Cheers.
Jeff
http://www.lumine.net/driving/
Jeff,
Congratulations! I will have to look at t
Well, whatever chip they use, they better bring on the Pentax digital
body awfully bloody soon!
I had the opportunity to shoot the 2001 Tokyo Motor Show with my
brother's D30 and while it was a pleasure shooting digital with a proper
SLR rather than a point and shoot, the D30 ergonomics and in
iginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Lawton
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Pentax digital SLR
Several times now people have alluded to this Olympus interchangeable lens
digital camera. Is there a
Several times now people have alluded to this Olympus interchangeable lens
digital camera. Is there any information available on it? It seems like
olympus might really have the upperhand hand here since (I assume) they will
be designing an entirely new lens line specifically for digital - may
pros who bought into the LX were. And I guess that is the
gist of it.
Ciao,
graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Pål Audun Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:22 AM
Subject: RE: New Pentax digital SLR
But you can't sell a
ål Audun Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:22 AM
Subject: RE: New Pentax digital SLR
Cesar wrote:
>I don't see how the MZ-D is already obsolete.
It is obsolete because the chip is far more expensive than those the
competition, and
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pål Audun Jensen
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: New Pentax digital SLR
>
< They only ones who can justify this cost are
> But isn't this exactly what Pentax have done? They have said
that theres no
> point in releasing the MZ-D prototype as showed at Photokina
because its
> essentially obsolete already. Hence, they will make a more
competitive
> digital camera based on the same platform instead.
>
>
> Pål
> -
I th
> Mark wrote:
>
>
>
> >So you are right - it does not make sense to devote a lot of effort to
> >building a high end digital that will soon be obsolete. However, given
> the
> >inevitability of digital, some articulation of a plan to adapt to the new
> >technology from Pentax would be wise. G
Mark wrote:
>So you are right - it does not make sense to devote a lot of effort to
>building a high end digital that will soon be obsolete. However, given the
>inevitability of digital, some articulation of a plan to adapt to the new
>technology from Pentax would be wise. Given that this com
01 3:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Pentax digital SLR
Mark wrote:
>I think that full-frame CCDs and smaller ones may well coexist. Mike
Johnston
>recently mentioned professional wildlife photographers who don't want to
>"upgrade" to the latest Canon D30 beca
I think the issue is more of a concern that Pentax will not move fast
enough and will miss an opportunity. I for one would be happy to just hear
a statement form Pentax about what they intend to do.
Your analogy to computers is a little off the mark. Computers offered new
functionality right
Pål Audun Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark wrote:
>
>>I think that full-frame CCDs and smaller ones may well coexist. Mike Johnston
>>recently mentioned professional wildlife photographers who don't want to
>>"upgrade" to the latest Canon D30 because it's CCD yields "only" 1.3x focal
>>len
Mike wrote:
>The only effort to standardize chip size that I'm aware of is being led by
>Kodak, who are urging adoption of a 4/3rds-inch chip size. Small chip sizes,
>far from being a dead end, will are what will be used in consumer cameras.
>The market for these will be vast--actually, already
Mark wrote:
>I think that full-frame CCDs and smaller ones may well coexist. Mike Johnston
>recently mentioned professional wildlife photographers who don't want to
>"upgrade" to the latest Canon D30 because it's CCD yields "only" 1.3x focal
>length magnification. For most of us a full-frame CCD
system.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Mustarde
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Pentax digital SLR
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 14:12:41 -0600, you wrote:
snip
> If Pentax co
Mike Johnston
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Pentax digital SLR
And, now, Pal, here we are totally DISagreeing.
Pal wrote:
> Although, I have some sympathy with those who want faster Pentax equipment
> introductions, I fail to see the se
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 14:12:41 -0600, you wrote:
snip
> If Pentax could duplicate [the D30] its quality
>for 1/2 to 2/3rds the price and make use of K-mount lenses it would have a
>sure winner on its hands in no time.
A 3.3mp or better K-mount digital for $1000 - 1500 sounds like a
winner to me, t
I just re-read the following, and my reply doesn't make sense. Read a
revision after for some semblance of sanity...
Pal wrote:
>>Although, I have some sympathy with those who want faster Pentax equipment
>>introductions, I fail to see the sense in wanting an utterly out of date
>>digital slr
Cotty wrote:
>PÂl wrote:
>
>>Although, I have some sympathy with those who want faster Pentax equipment
>>introductions, I fail to see the sense in wanting an utterly out of date
>>digital slr. Firstly, its generally assumed industrywise that the small
>>size chips are a dead end. Full frame chip
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Audun Jensen"
>Firstly, its generally assumed industrywise that the small
> size chips are a dead end. Full frame chip is the way of the future.
>Thirdly, Pentax have clearly stated that they want to
> make a COMPETITIVE digital slr in the near future. In f
Ooh! An on-topic thread, what a find! Ooh, I even started it. Yippee ;-)
PÂl writes:
>Although, I have some sympathy with those who want faster Pentax equipment
>introductions, I fail to see the sense in wanting an utterly out of date
>digital slr. Firstly, its generally assumed industrywise t
Although, I have some sympathy with those who want faster Pentax equipment
introductions, I fail to see the sense in wanting an utterly out of date
digital slr. Firstly, its generally assumed industrywise that the small
size chips are a dead end. Full frame chip is the way of the future.
Secon
Well said Cotty!
Exactly my own point of view at the moment ...
(delaying buying a 3-set of limited lenses until things clear up :-)
Regards, JvW
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:43:22 +, Cotty wrote:
>
>If there is anyone at Pentax reading this, or anyone knows anyone at
>Pentax, please copy and
Well, I just got the the engineers from Philips Semiconductor to buy me
lunch so the day wasn't a total loss ;-)
The people I met with today didn't have any information on any of the Philips
CCD products (as I expected) but one of them said he could easily find out
if Contax is using the Philips p
This seems to be in keeping with the look of how things are panning out.
It must be obvious to the whole industry that the success of the Canon
D30 has highlighted the need for medium-priced pro/am digi SLR. With the
previous 6MP Pentax vapoware, the price would have been well within the
Nikon
Pål wrote:
>I've been told (something that doesn't prevent it from being bull***, but
>anyway) that Pentax have decided to use another chip in the MZ-D.
>Theres no reason to automatically assume that it will be a different camera
>and that it will use a chip smaller than 24x36. In fact, you
29 matches
Mail list logo
