Re: OT: Test Message

On 7/11/2019 7:20 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: A have never heard of a "pro bono" class action. That is very much a contradiction in terms. In Canada, anyway, the majority of class action lawsuits are initiated by a handful of ambulance chasers. These are people who are very much in it for th

Re: OT: Test Message

On 7/11/2019 7:20 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: A have never heard of a "pro bono" class action. That is very much a contradiction in terms. In Canada, anyway, the majority of class action lawsuits are initiated by a handful of ambulance chasers. These are people who are very much in it for th

Re: OT: Test Message

A have never heard of a "pro bono" class action. First, the cost of conducting that type of litigation is enormous -- even excluding attorney fees. Second, one purpose of creating a class action is to get the court to award attorneys fees paid by the defendant to the attorneys for the class. Dan

Re: OT: Test Message

wrote: > > FWIW, I'm having no issues with my E-link account re PDMLPENTAX. > > > > > > -Original Message- > >> From: John > >> Subject: Re: OT: Test Message > >> > >> Thanks. I can see it with Yahoo, but it's still not showin

Re: OT: Test Message

Earthlink "tech support" about it and they DON'T CARE. On 7/9/2019 10:16:40, Ken Waller wrote: FWIW, I'm having no issues with my E-link account re PDMLPENTAX. -Original Message- From: John Subject: Re: OT: Test Message Thanks. I can see it with Yahoo, but it

Re: OT: Test Message

It appears to have gotten to the list. On 7/9/2019 5:50 AM, John Sessoms wrote: Still trying to sort out my email problems. Can't tell for sure if only PDML is affected. -- America wasn't founded so that we could all be better. America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well ple

Re: OT: Test Message

FWIW, I'm having no issues with my E-link account re PDMLPENTAX. -Original Message- >From: John >Subject: Re: OT: Test Message > >Thanks. I can see it with Yahoo, but it's still not showing up in my Earthlink >account inbox. > >On 7/9/2019 06:32:13,

Re: OT: Test Message

Thanks. I can see it with Yahoo, but it's still not showing up in my Earthlink account inbox. On 7/9/2019 06:32:13, Ralf R Radermacher wrote: Am 09.07.19 um 11:50 schrieb John Sessoms: Still trying to sort out my email problems. Can't tell for sure if only PDML is affected. Received loud an

Re: OT: Test Message

Am 09.07.19 um 11:50 schrieb John Sessoms: Still trying to sort out my email problems. Can't tell for sure if only PDML is affected. Received loud and clear in Cologne. Ralf -- Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com Audio : http://aporee.o

Re: OT: Test

That's Ok. Since I was sending from Yahoo, I expected gmail would deliver it to SPAM folders. I hoped some others might see it in their inbox or PDML folders. Which they did. What I was really looking for was whether Roadrunner would deliver it to me. It didn't, but roadrunner email does seem t

Re: OT: Test

Mine as well. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > Now you're appearing in my spam folder. (not by my doing) > You can't win... > > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:30 PM, John Sessoms wrote: >> I already paid for "some

Re: OT: Test

Now you're appearing in my spam folder. (not by my doing) You can't win... On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:30 PM, John Sessoms wrote: > I already paid for "something better". > > Now, I'm just trying to get what I'm paying for to work. > > On 5/24/2014 1:20 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: >> >> John, >> Got

Re: OT: Test

I had several of those happen to me while on Yahoo. Am now, comcast. Jack - Original Message - From: "Daniel J. Matyola" To: "PDML" Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2014 11:50:40 AM Subject: Re: OT: Test I received the test email, but it was in my SPAM folder, so I did no

Re: OT: Test

I received the test email, but it was in my SPAM folder, so I did not notice it at first. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:12 PM, John wrote: > Time-Warner Roadrunner appears to be hosed up again. > > I have received no email since 12:01am t

Re: OT: Test

Test received! J - Original Message - From: "Bob Sullivan" To: "PDML" Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2014 10:20:52 AM Subject: Re: OT: Test John, Got your message, but something is wrong. Some 10% to 20% of the messages on this list are you having problems or complain

Re: OT: Test

Copy that! J - Original Message - From: "John" To: "PDML" , johnsess...@yahoo.com Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2014 10:12:16 AM Subject: OT: Test Time-Warner Roadrunner appears to be hosed up again. I have received no email since 12:01am this morning. Checking that against my Yahoo account,

Re: OT: Test

I already paid for "something better". Now, I'm just trying to get what I'm paying for to work. On 5/24/2014 1:20 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: John, Got your message, but something is wrong. Some 10% to 20% of the messages on this list are you having problems or complaining of problems with your ser

Re: OT: Test

John, Got your message, but something is wrong. Some 10% to 20% of the messages on this list are you having problems or complaining of problems with your service. You need to bite the bullet and pay for something better. Regards, Bob S. On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:12 PM, John wrote: > Time-Warne

Re: OT - Test of Gmail threading

2010/5/21 John Sessoms : > From: eckinator >> >> who is this anon person anyway? >> >> 2010/5/20 Anthony Farr : >>> >>> > Just checking again. >>> > >>> > regards, Anthony >>> > >>> > ? ?"Of what use is lens and light >>> > ? ?to those who lack in mind and sight" >>> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Re: OT - Test of Gmail threading

From: eckinator who is this anon person anyway? 2010/5/20 Anthony Farr : > Just checking again. > > regards, Anthony > > ? ?"Of what use is lens and light > ? ?to those who lack in mind and sight" > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (Anon) Some guy named Al. -- PDML Pentax-Discus

Re: OT - Test of Gmail threading

Last name is Ymous Den 20. mai 2010 kl. 21.59 skrev eckinator: > who is this anon person anyway? > > 2010/5/20 Anthony Farr : >> Just checking again. >> >> regards, Anthony >> >>"Of what use is lens and light >>to those who lack in mind and sight" >>

Re: OT - Test of Gmail threading

Just because... On 5/20/2010 4:22 PM, eckinator wrote: What makes you so sure? 2010/5/20 P. J. Alling: Someone you don't know. On 5/20/2010 3:59 PM, eckinator wrote: who is this anon person anyway? 2010/5/20 Anthony Farr: Just checking again. regards, Anthony "Of

Re: OT - Test of Gmail threading

What makes you so sure? 2010/5/20 P. J. Alling : > Someone you don't know. > > > On 5/20/2010 3:59 PM, eckinator wrote: >> >> who is this anon person anyway? >> >> 2010/5/20 Anthony Farr: >> >>> >>> Just checking again. >>> >>> regards, Anthony >>> >>>    "Of what use is lens and light >>>    to t

Re: OT - Test of Gmail threading

Someone you don't know. On 5/20/2010 3:59 PM, eckinator wrote: who is this anon person anyway? 2010/5/20 Anthony Farr: Just checking again. regards, Anthony "Of what use is lens and light to those who lack in mind and sight" (Anon)

Re: OT - Test of Gmail threading

who is this anon person anyway? 2010/5/20 Anthony Farr : > Just checking again. > > regards, Anthony > >    "Of what use is lens and light >    to those who lack in mind and sight" >                                               (Anon) > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http:

Re: OT: Test

Har Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:08 +0100, "Bob W" wrote: > Looks like it's going to be an interesting day at Lord's tomorrow! > > Bob > -- -- http://www.fastm

RE: OT: Test

From: "Bob W" Looks like it's going to be an interesting day at Lord's tomorrow! Droll! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: OT - test

Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: "Rob Studdert" Subject: Re: OT - test On 24/06/2009, Anthony Farr wrote: Nothing in the inbox and nothing in the PDML archive for hours. Just thought I'd ping the list and see how long i

Re: OT - test

Slow night. Anthony Farr wrote: Nothing in the inbox and nothing in the PDML archive for hours. Just thought I'd ping the list and see how long it takes for the pong to come back around ;-) regards, Anthony "Of what use is lens and light to those who lack in mind and sight"

Re: OT - test

Evening, Rob. Been a quiet time on PDML tonight, eh. For once I'm up-to-date on this weeks mail, thanks to the lull. Last month's is another story. Once it goes back to the second page of Gmail and beyond it's out of sight and out of mind and I aint never gonna read it. regards, Anthony   "Of

Re: OT - test

On 24/06/2009, Anthony Farr wrote: > Nothing in the inbox and nothing in the PDML archive for hours. > > Just thought I'd ping the list and see how long it takes for the pong > to come back around ;-) There must be good light world wide ;-) -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-41

Re: OT - test

Less than a minute. Guess your all either sleeping or out taking pictures. Carry on. regards, Anthony   "Of what use is lens and light to those who lack in mind and sight" (Anon) 2009/6/24 Anthony Farr : > Nothing in the inbox and nothing i

Re: OT: Test

I hate to tell you this, but I think you're a figment of my imagination. I'm sure Frank is... John Sessoms wrote: I apologize, but I just got a mail bounce saying it couldn't verify that I exist. Wanted to see if it's going to do it again. This Message was undeliverable due to the following

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

I tried once. Got 19 and I ain't gonna do it again. My eyes are tired now. David Savage wrote: > > > 0 is a perfect score > > I got 111 > > Cheers, > > Dave > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/p

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

heh. 15 on a 15" laptop screen from 2003... Look forward to do this on a brighter and more accurate screen. Didn't take that long... 4 minutes, maybe? Do a round of voting in the Pentax Gallery if you _really_ want to burn time :-) Jostein 2008/9/15 David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:38 AM, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Rubik's Cube is a lot easier if you just peel all the stickers off >> > before you start. > > My middle daughter (who just started college fer gawd's sake!) was > around

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

I got an 18, and I'm not sure I want to do that again. My eyes went a little wonky. I kept blinking to try and get refocused. Thanks for posting that, Dave. Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Sunday

RE: OT Test your Colour IQ

[...] > > We got busy calling Harvard, Yale and Oxford seeking her early > admission, lining her up on the Tonight Show and Merv Griffin, but > before any of them got back to us, we spied her (I think it was a day > later), pulling stickers off and replacing them in the appropriate > places. She

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:38 AM, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rubik's Cube is a lot easier if you just peel all the stickers off > before you start. My middle daughter (who just started college fer gawd's sake!) was around 2 1/2 or 3 when the Rubik's Cube craze hit our part of the wo

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I started and got as far as moving three blocks until I realised that > this task was pissing me off in a major way. > > Yah, and I throw my Rubik's Cube at the wall as well. > > Sod that! Rubik's Cube is

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

On Sep 16, 2008, at 12:28 , Paul Stenquist replied: > > Okay, I did it. Took me at least five minutes. I scored 11. All of > my errors were in the blue/green spectrum. Since I work largely with > skin tones, I can live with that:-). Now, back to work. > Paul Congratulations! (I knew if I t

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

Okay, I did it. Took me at least five minutes. I scored 11. All of my errors were in the blue/green spectrum. Since I work largely with skin tones, I can live with that:-). Now, back to work. Paul On Sep 16, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote: > > On Sep 16, 2008, at 09:00 , Paul Stenqu

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

On Sep 16, 2008, at 09:00 , Paul Stenquist wrote: > snip > > Paul > (Who did one row and decided he didn't have time for games at the > moment:-). What time? It took less than 30 seconds a row. Pick the color on the left, move all hues with that color in them to that side, closest match fi

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

That sounds like a challenge. I'll get to it sooner or later. I think. Paul On Sep 16, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Paul Stenquist > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> (Who did one row and decided he didn't have time for games at the >> moment:-). > > Baw

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

ss Mail List >Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ > > > >Maxime Thériault wrote: > > > >>Does calibration really matter? I have two non-calibrated Dell E228FP, both >>connected with dvi-d cables. I scored 0 on both of them. >> >> >> >How o

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

ss Mail List >Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ > > > >Maxime Thériault wrote: > > > >>Does calibration really matter? I have two non-calibrated Dell E228FP, both >>connected with dvi-d cables. I scored 0 on both of them. >> >> >> >How o

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

2008/9/17 Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Maxime Thériault wrote: >> Does calibration really matter? > > No, but it's a convenient excuse for people who scored poorly, and an > "in your face" for those who did well without a calibrated monitor. Let > them have their fun, please. We'll get b

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

Hello Doug, Yes, Halloween is almost here. Nice one. -- Best regards, Bruce Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 5:25:59 AM, you wrote: D> On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:27 PM, David Savage wrote: >> >> >> 0 is a perfect score >> >> I got 111 D> I got a ro

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

Maxime Thériault wrote: > Does calibration really matter? No, but it's a convenient excuse for people who scored poorly, and an "in your face" for those who did well without a calibrated monitor. Let them have their fun, please. We'll get back to doomsday discussions sooner or later. -- Sco

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (Who did one row and decided he didn't have time for games at the > moment:-). Bawk bawk bawk bawk BAKK! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSC

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

l > E228FP, both > connected with dvi-d cables. I scored 0 on both of them. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Doug > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:26 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: OT Te

RE: OT Test your Colour IQ

24, it took me a little while in both try though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ann sanfedele Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:02 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ Maxime Thériault wrote: >D

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

CTED] On Behalf Of Doug >Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:26 AM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ > > >On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:27 PM, David Savage wrote: > > > >><http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77> >>

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

d. Your eyes are better than mine then.:-) Dave > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:26 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ > > > On

RE: OT Test your Colour IQ

List Subject: Re: OT Test your Colour IQ On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:27 PM, David Savage wrote: > <http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77> > > 0 is a perfect score > > I got 111 I got a rock. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/list

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

Had a few moments and did the test. Score of 24 on my Samsung SyncMaster 753df, CRT moniotor, Spyder I version. Had some bars in the yellow, purple and light green areas. Dave On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:27 PM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:27 PM, David Savage wrote: > >> >> >> 0 is a perfect score >> >> I got 111 > > I got a rock. Now you just need a hard place and your all set. Dave > > -- >

Re: OT Test your Colour IQ

On 14-Sep-08, at 5:27 PM, David Savage wrote: > > > 0 is a perfect score I scored 38, using a 4 year old Apple Powerbook 12". My eyes are pretty tired now! Mike -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/

Re: OT: Test

From: Charles Robinson > On Sep 16, 2007, at 9:45, John Sessoms wrote: > >> Got my main email computer back operating, but having some trouble with >> the mail and news servers. This is to test whether I can send to the list. >> > > Seems you can. Or did I imagine it? The News server kept reje

Re: OT: Test

gotcha rg2 On 9/16/07, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Got my main email computer back operating, but having some trouble with > the mail and news servers. This is to test whether I can send to the list. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/li

Re: OT: Test

On Sep 16, 2007, at 9:45, John Sessoms wrote: > Got my main email computer back operating, but having some trouble > with > the mail and news servers. This is to test whether I can send to > the list. > Seems you can. Or did I imagine it? -Charles -- Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OT Test

I didn't get it. Dave S. -- "All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy." - Spike Milligan

Re: OT Test

The messages got caught in a time warp and are just now arriving (Sept 23). Rob Studdert wrote: Received absolutely nothing from the list since the 20th at 10am, are we still here? Am I still a subscriber? These questions and more will be answered shortly Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel

Re: OT - test, again

At this time of year it will have been light for over an hour, wouldn't it? regards, Anthony Farr - Original Message - From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 6am Sunday morning and you expect a reply? > > -- >

Re: OT - test, again

6am Sunday morning and you expect a reply? -- Anthony Farr wrote: This is sad, I'm talking to myself. Hellooo. Did everyone but me unsubscribe and start a new list? Reminds me of the time my parents moved away while I was at school

Re: OT - test, again

Careful, I might believe you ;-) regards, Anthony Farr - Original Message - From: "Tom Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > We're busy writing private e-mails about you. I can't believe not one person > is defending you. > > > > Tom Reese > > >

Re: OT - test, again

Anthony Farr's paranoia acted up and he wrote: "This is sad, I'm talking to myself. Hellooo. Did everyone but me unsubscribe and start a new list? Reminds me of the time my parents moved away while I was at school :-( Just kid

Re: OT - test, again

Somebody had to keep the list ticking over. You can have a turn now. regards, Anthony Farr - Original Message - From: "Henri Toivonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Well, your monologue did arrive to my mailbox atleast. You were starting > to look a bit stir-crazy, talking to yourself like th

Re: OT - test, again

Anthony Farr wrote: You've done nothing wrong, Henri. In fact, I'm very happy to see someone else out in listland, I was going a little stir-crazy in solitary confinement. The explanation can be read by tracking this thread at:

Re: OT - test, again

You've done nothing wrong, Henri. In fact, I'm very happy to see someone else out in listland, I was going a little stir-crazy in solitary confinement. The explanation can be read by tracking this thread at: (the chrono

Re: OT - test, again

Anthony Farr wrote: Damn!!! Henri Toivonen got one into the archive. That's a run of 5 messages to me, according to the rule below. Beat that! regards, Anthony Farr Who? Wha? What? What did I do? :-) /Henri

Re: OT - test, again

Damn!!! Henri Toivonen got one into the archive. That's a run of 5 messages to me, according to the rule below. Beat that! regards, Anthony Farr - Original Message - From: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The rule is that I have to both receive my previous message back, AND see

Re: OT: Test

On 16/7/04, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, offered: >I am not receiving messages from the list. > >If this gets through, I request that someone please reply to the list >with a cc to my email address to let me know. Reading you loud and clear Dan Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) |

Re: OT: Test?

This one did, I guess you pass. Don Sanderson wrote: I've sent several posts now, they don't seem to get through. Don

Re: OT: Test?

À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: OT: Test? I've been trying to send one asking some questions about Film vs Digital. Doesn't seem to want to work. I'll get it figured out eventually. BTW: PAW = Photographer At Work??? Thanks Don -Original Message- From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: OT: Test?

n -Original Message- From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: Test? This is the second message I've got from you on this list in a short time.. keith whaley Don Sanderson wrote: I've sent several posts no

RE: OT: Test?

Whan we are at it, what about the meaning of PESO ? Thibouille -Message d'origine- De : Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi 1 juillet 2004 14:40 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: OT: Test? I've been trying to send one asking some questions about Film

RE: OT: Test?

1, 2004 7:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: Test? This is the second message I've got from you on this list in a short time.. keith whaley Don Sanderson wrote: > I've sent several posts now, they don't seem to get through. > > Don > > >

Re: OT: Test?

This is the second message I've got from you on this list in a short time.. keith whaley Don Sanderson wrote: I've sent several posts now, they don't seem to get through. Don

Re: OT - test

On 30/6/04, John Forbes, discombobulated, offered: >Steve, > >Congratulations on landing the Beeb job. I seem to recall you were >interviewing them around the time of the London PDML event. > >John I'll bet he *was* interviewing them as well ;-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | P

Re: OT - test

Steve, Congratulations on landing the Beeb job. I seem to recall you were interviewing them around the time of the London PDML event. John On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 23:58:21 +0100 (BST), Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Cotty wrote: I kid you not: the VJ is the first to

Re: OT - Test - pls ignore

it's *working* Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps _

Re: OT - Test - pls ignore

On 28/6/04, graywolf, discombobulated, offered: >Must be that easy to use Mac software... Don't start!!! Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps _

Re: OT - Test - pls ignore

Must be that easy to use Mac software... Cotty wrote: On 28/6/04, Frits Wüthrich, discombobulated, offered: still doesn't work? No! Bloody £$%&£$%&*$!! thing. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ --

Re: OT - Test - pls ignore

He has managed to filter out all e-mail from the PDML, or people on the PDML. GRIN Frits Wüthrich wrote: still doesn't work? On Sunday 27 June 2004 21:24, Cotty wrote: FJW> On 27/6/04, Cotty, discombobulated, offered: FJW> FJW> >>bloody thing FJW> > FJW> >refuses to work FJW> > FJW> FJW> try agai

Re: OT - Test - pls ignore

On 28/6/04, Frits Wüthrich, discombobulated, offered: >still doesn't work? No! Bloody £$%&£$%&*$!! thing. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps _

Re: OT - Test - pls ignore

still doesn't work? On Sunday 27 June 2004 21:24, Cotty wrote: FJW> On 27/6/04, Cotty, discombobulated, offered: FJW> FJW> >>bloody thing FJW> > FJW> >refuses to work FJW> > FJW> FJW> try again FJW> FJW> FJW> -- Frits Wüthrich

Re: OT - test

Actually, I never checked that. For some reason I noticed your email's in the past did that, and I didn't realize it was related to reading the digest. I noticed you used to reply to your own email messages when you replied to other threads, so I was wondering why this happened, now I understand

Re: OT - test

On 27/6/04, Frits Wüthrich, discombobulated, offered: >And nice to see that your email client now properly uses threading. So >your email messages show up in the thread, instead of creating a new one. In digest, you have to copy and paste the subject line into the reply email - was this action yo

Re: OT - test

And nice to see that your email client now properly uses threading. So your email messages show up in the thread, instead of creating a new one. On Thursday 24 June 2004 19:30, Cotty wrote: FJW> On 24/6/04, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, offered: FJW> FJW> >Aha! Congratulations! FJW> >Good to se

Re: OT - test

On 25/6/04, Bob W, discombobulated, offered: > >>> Why Frank, all your posts I have printed off and sent to a specialist >>> signwriter and glass-blower who constructs 20 - foot high billboards in >>> glowing neon and rabbit fur of your missives, that are then paraded >>> endlessly outside my hous

Re: OT - test

On 25/6/04, Steve Jolly, discombobulated, offered: >Hmmm, I've been playing with a Sony DCR-VX2000E lately, which is the >standard camera the BBC's issuing its video journalists with right now (a >video journalist is one person doing all the jobs of a reporter, camera >operator, sound operator

Re: OT - test

On 25/6/04, John Francis, discombobulated, offered: >> Why _ever_ do those cameras weigh 25 lbs? >> You would think that with the advances in image recording technology in >> the past 10 years, they'd be able to shrink the size of those cameras >> considerably! > >At Portland last weekend I noti

Re: OT - test

On 25/6/04, Steve Jolly, discombobulated, offered: >> Why Frank, all your posts I have printed off and sent to a specialist >> signwriter and glass-blower who constructs 20 - foot high billboards in >> glowing neon and rabbit fur of your missives, that are then paraded >> endlessly outside my hous

Re: OT - test

Hi, Friday, June 25, 2004, 8:43:04 PM, Steve wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Cotty wrote: >> Why Frank, all your posts I have printed off and sent to a specialist >> signwriter and glass-blower who constructs 20 - foot high billboards in >> glowing neon and rabbit fur of your missives, that are the

Re: OT - test

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Cotty wrote: You asked about size. Other things that stipulate a camera's size: acquisition format (tape, basically). Betacam is made by Sony and a camera tape is physically identical in size to the old Betamax tapes you may recall that died after JVC won the domestic market in

Re: OT - test

> > Open letter to Cotty! > > Why _ever_ do those cameras weigh 25 lbs? > You would think that with the advances in image recording technology in > the past 10 years, they'd be able to shrink the size of those cameras > considerably! At Portland last weekend I noticed a small remote camera per

Re: OT - test

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Cotty wrote: Why Frank, all your posts I have printed off and sent to a specialist signwriter and glass-blower who constructs 20 - foot high billboards in glowing neon and rabbit fur of your missives, that are then paraded endlessly outside my house by a fleet of purpose-made t

Re: OT - test

Well I can answer that one. They don't weigh 25 lbs. The big fast zoom lens, and big heavy batteries (remember they need to run that thing for up to a couple of hours) are most of that weight. The rest is simply ruggedness. Those camcorders get thrown around and beat up a lot. Something like Ade

Re: OT - test

On 25/6/04, Frits Wüthrich, discombobulated, offered: >Good thing England lost that game, else you had another night in a pub >coming in a few days, with even more shoulder pain. Funny, I thought exactly the same thing ;-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||

  1   2   >