On 12/26/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice shot Frank.
Grain is just about right to jazz,a little soft for blues.vbg
The wall light is a bit of a distraction, but only slightly
Dave
Thanks, Dave.
I agree about the wall light, but given that I just had the 40m lens
with
Nice shot Frank.
Grain is just about right to jazz,a little soft for blues.vbg
The wall light is a bit of a distraction, but only slightly
Dave
It's still pretty fuzzy (except that the bass
is kind of sharp g),
as I had to shoot handheld at 1/15th, but
In a message dated 11/29/2005 11:41:16 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3910767size=lg
I when I left my house that morning, I had no idea that I'd be
catching this concert that afternoon; I was completely unprepared for
shooting
On 12/6/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice frank. Not your best, but not bad. I'd be tempted to crop off the light
on the left (and the wall line) and see if it doesn't improve it.
I like the sax player. I might, also, like just a crop of him alone.
snip
Thanks,
Hi!
It's still pretty fuzzy (except that the bass is kind of sharp g),
as I had to shoot handheld at 1/15th, but I like this much better than
the first one:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3910767size=lg
I when I left my house that morning, I had no idea that I'd be
catching this
On 12/5/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank, I think this time you did not really succeed.
The distracting bright whites on the top and on the right are too
strong. To my eyes they virtually destroy the shot...
Since I know that you can do much better, all I can say - it is
Hi!
I expect nothing but honesty from you, Boris. I don't think you were
brutal at all.
You simply said what you thought about the photo - I can ask for no
more, or less.
Now if you had said, that's a bad photo, and I don't like you, I
might be upset... g
Frank, if, purely hypothetically,
On 12/2/05, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 2005, at 4:23 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
No, Perry White was Clark Kent's boss, Superman's alter-ego.
Superman had
no boss.
Until he got married.
LOL
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 11/29/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/11/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just joking, of course. Seriously, thanks for the comment. g
Seriously, did you put that up as a red herring, so to speak, or do you
like it? Seeing as it's your PAW, how about you comment
On 2/12/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
The comments I've received here (and elsewhere) have helped me become
more objective with regard to this photo (and other such photos I've
posted in the past).
Then this place must be working ;-]
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
Frank, Frank, Frank. You're way off base on this one. Once again you're
demonstrating that you don't know what you're talking about.
Perry White was Superman's boss.
Paul :-))
On 11/29/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/11/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just
No, Perry White was Clark Kent's boss, Superman's alter-ego. Superman had
no boss.
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 12/2/2005 6:48:38 AM
Subject: Re: PAW: The Dave Young Quartet, Take 2
Frank
Subject: Re: PAW: The Dave Young Quartet, Take 2
Frank, Frank, Frank. You're way off base on this one. Once again you're
demonstrating that you don't know what you're talking about.
Perry White was Superman's boss.
Technically speaking, you are of course correct, Shel.
So, who
On 12/2/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, who was Spiderman's alter ego, Peter Parker's boss? Google time...
Ahh, right, Mr. Jameson!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
J. Jonah Jameson, the editor/publisher of the Daily Bugle?, is Spiderman's
boss Again, however, that's not quite correct. Jameson is the editor of
the paper for which Peter Parker provides photos, and the relationship is
similar to the Perry White/Clark Kent relationship. One thing I'm not
: 12/2/2005 6:48:38 AM
Subject: Re: PAW: The Dave Young Quartet, Take 2
Frank, Frank, Frank. You're way off base on this one. Once again you're
demonstrating that you don't know what you're talking about.
Perry White was Superman's boss.
Technically speaking, you are of course
Parker's been both stringer and employee at various points in the comic.
For the movies, he's a stringer.
-Adam
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
J. Jonah Jameson, the editor/publisher of the Daily Bugle?, is Spiderman's
boss Again, however, that's not quite correct. Jameson is the editor of
the
On Dec 3, 2005, at 4:23 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
No, Perry White was Clark Kent's boss, Superman's alter-ego.
Superman had
no boss.
Until he got married.
- Dave
Amazing. You sent this message Sunday; it spun around
in cyberspace for 4 days and landed in my mailbox
today. Your resent message got here first!
Rick
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's still pretty fuzzy (except that the bass is
kind of sharp g),
as I had to shoot handheld
I didn't see the original. I'll bet it never made it here. This doesn't
do a lot for me. I'm left feeling that I'm looking at this scene from
the wrong angle. I do like the tonality and contrast level.
Paul
On Nov 29, 2005, at 11:12 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Hey, Frank! I never got the
Frank,
I never saw the original. Neither the original nor
your repost are in the archives. The comments I
posted last night aren't on the list or in the
archives this morning, either.
Things seem screwed up in cyber-land.
The essence of my comments was that I rather like the
motion blur,but
Message-
From: E.R.N. Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29. november 2005 21:18
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PAW: The Dave Young Quartet, Take 2
frank theriault wrote:
I sent this two days ago, and got not a single comment. Maybe lots of
people looked, and simply
frank theriault wrote:
I sent this two days ago, and got not a single comment. Maybe lots of
people looked, and simply weren't compelled to comment. However, just
in case it didn't make the list, I'll resend it.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3910767size=lg
Frank, I don't
Frank,
I didn't even see this come through last time. It's a nice shot, with
some good atmosphere.
-Adam
frank theriault wrote:
I sent this two days ago, and got not a single comment. Maybe lots of
people looked, and simply weren't compelled to comment. However, just
in case it didn't
On 29/11/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
I sent this two days ago, and got not a single comment. Maybe lots of
people looked, and simply weren't compelled to comment. However, just
in case it didn't make the list, I'll resend it. If you weren't
inclined to comment the first
On 11/29/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't see it the first time. Sorry mate, doesn't do a thing for me.
Geez, Cotty, you didn't have to be so harsh, did you? You could hurt
a guy's feelings.
LOL
Just joking, of course. Seriously, thanks for the comment. g
--
Sharpness is a
On 29/11/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just joking, of course. Seriously, thanks for the comment. g
Seriously, did you put that up as a red herring, so to speak, or do you
like it? Seeing as it's your PAW, how about you comment on it, give me
an insight into what you prefer
Hi Frank ...
The photo just doesn't do anything for me. Usually I've got ~something~ to
say, good or bad, but this one just strikes me as very bland ... sorry, ol'
buddy.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3910767size=lg
Shel
Frank,
I didn't see this come around earlier, either.
The fuzziness is motion blur, and I rather like that.
The composition doesn't grab me, though: the subjects
are spread out across the frame, and seem disunited,
visually speaking. If they were closer together, or
if you had been able to
Hey, Frank! I never got the original, either. I don't mind the
composition or the blur. I rather like the blur, actually. It's the
brightness that doesn't do it for me. Not that it's a bad
characteristic, but it just doesn't have that dark, gritty night time
feel that I've come to expect
30 matches
Mail list logo
