On 1/13/07 8:13 AM, "Boris Liberman", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce, if you mean "man's intrusion" to nature's world, then I am sorry
> to tell you but you missed the target in the eyes of this very viewer.
>
> Technically excellent as usual, but I am confused by what I see and the
> title.
Bruce, if you mean "man's intrusion" to nature's world, then I am sorry
to tell you but you missed the target in the eyes of this very viewer.
Technically excellent as usual, but I am confused by what I see and the
title.
Boris
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Taken on a morning walk yesterday.
>
> Pen
Well, I'll need to go back and see if I can improve.
One interesting aspect to this discussion is what you have termed
'ordinary' - the reason I say this is because of what each of us
perceive. The location that you live has a lot to do with what
ordinary things are.
I have some friends who grew
I find the scene a little too ordinary, a little too busy, and a
little underwhelming in establishing a contrasting context to be
worth of a grandiose title like "Man's Intrusion". Sure, it's a
pretty common scene of not-very-pretty pilings, but so what? It's a
jumble of bits of trees and s
Mmmm ... not exactly. What I am saying is that the title takes away from
what I think you're trying to do with this, and that while it may be
stronger without the title, revisiting the scene and working with it some
more may garner a stronger result and greater impact.
After thinking about the pi
Sort of my thoughts, too. I'll probably revisit and see if I can
improve on the shot.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, January 9, 2007, 12:24:00 AM, you wrote:
MM> It reminds me of the ugly expressway bridge the built directly over the
MM> river Sihl here in the city of Zurich.
MM> A good exam
So are you saying that without a title it hits the mark? This is
something that I intend to revisit and see if I can improve upon this
at all.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, January 9, 2007, 5:55:42 AM, you wrote:
SB> I think I understand what you're trying to do with this one, but, imo, it
SB> misses the
On 1/09/07 8:55 AM, "Shel Belinkoff", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I understand what you're trying to do with this one, but, imo, it
> misses the mark (as i see the mark to be). I believe the photo could be
> stronger with a different (or even non-existent) title, as the title has
> led m
I think I understand what you're trying to do with this one, but, imo, it
misses the mark (as i see the mark to be). I believe the photo could be
stronger with a different (or even non-existent) title, as the title has
led me to some expectations. It's nicely done from a technical point,
that's f
It reminds me of the ugly expressway bridge the built directly over the
river Sihl here in the city of Zurich.
A good example how it should not be done :-(
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Bruce Dayton
Sent: Monday, January 08
Why do I like this shot? Hmmm...Maybe it's the irony
of finding concrete pillars standing where one expects
trees to be standing. Compositonally, the pillar 2/3
of the way to the right is a bit of a problem.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taken on a morning walk yesterday.
Nicely seen, Bruce.
I think it would, also, work well if the horizontal span were cropped
off. It might even make a more intriguing statement.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taken on a morning walk yesterday.
>
> Pentax K10D, A 70-210/4, Handheld
> ISO 400, f/8
>
> http://w
12 matches
Mail list logo
