Eauh, but Eau..
mike wilson wrote:
A smelly trainer fetish would do it.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/17 Thu PM 06:12:53 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photographer's rights - UK
You'd have to have a personal relationship
A smelly trainer fetish would do it.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/17 Thu PM 06:12:53 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photographer's rights - UK
You'd have to have a personal relationship with the subject to find that
particularly erotic
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know. They all seemed so nice at the time.
So do baby aligators at the time.;-)
I escorted 7 wind tower pieces over the winter, and only on the last
trip, did i notice a signe saying no photography equipment beyond the
fence, in
Actually they weren't in the right. Owners, or their agents, can ask
you not to photograph, but unless it's a defense installation, (even in
Canada, not just the US), they can't legally confiscate your film. They
can only tell you to stop and ask you to leave, or have you ejected if
you
Cotty
As a professional who has to deal with this on a regular basis you
have much more experience than most of us in dealing with this
problem. It may sound a bit OTT to describe the issue as one of
principle, but while there is no doubt that one can manage jobsworth
officials by a variety of
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:34 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually they weren't in the right. Owners, or their agents, can ask
you not to photograph, but unless it's a defense installation, (even in
Canada, not just the US), they can't legally confiscate your film. They
can
On 18/4/08, Peter Fairweather, discombobulated, unleashed:
As a professional who has to deal with this on a regular basis you
have much more experience than most of us in dealing with this
problem. It may sound a bit OTT to describe the issue as one of
principle, but while there is no doubt that
I was prohibited from taking pictures of my grandson's under 10
football team by a league official
I looked up the Football Association guidelines which were eminently
sensible and pointed out the legal rughts we have to take pictures in
public places.
I did make one unpardonable error which
I remember getting some suspicious looks from security guards when I
was shooting the Gherkin. NYC cops aren't any better though.
Amita
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting read:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7351252.stm
I think those officials are trying to stop us grubby, pervert
snappers from taking shots like this:
You'd have to have a personal relationship with the subject to find that
particularly erotic.
David Savage wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting read:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7351252.stm
I think those officials are
:-)
Cheers
DS
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:12 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'd have to have a personal relationship with the subject to find that
particularly erotic.
David Savage wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting
David Savage wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting read:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7351252.stm
I think those officials are trying to stop us grubby, pervert
snappers from taking shots like this:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting read:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7351252.stm
I think those officials are trying to stop us grubby,
I hate to say this, but you elected them...
Bob W wrote:
I'm slightly alarmed to see that someone has started a petition on the
No 10. website about this. If we draw it to the attention of the
sleazeballs in Parliament the chances are they will clarify the law -
by making it illegal to take
I'm slightly alarmed to see that someone has started a petition on the
No 10. website about this. If we draw it to the attention of the
sleazeballs in Parliament the chances are they will clarify the law -
by making it illegal to take photos anywhere (for security reasons).
Bob
-Original
I know. They all seemed so nice at the time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of P. J. Alling
I hate to say this, but you elected them...
Bob W wrote:
I'm slightly alarmed to see that someone has started a
petition on the
No
On 17/4/08, Peter Fairweather, discombobulated, unleashed:
I was prohibited from taking pictures of my grandson's under 10
football team by a league official
I'm ambivalent about this - but not for the reasons you are thinking.
If I was a punter (just an everyday bloke who likes taking
On 18/4/08, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
BTW, humour interlude - standard wise-ass comments with my standard retorts:
Comment: Hey did you get any good shots?
Retort: I only ever get good shots.
Comment: we're going to have to shoot quickly in this area...
Retort: oh, that's a shame
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comment: You can't film here!
Retort: Hey, you're right - you're stood in the way!
Photographing in Germany isn't much fun either. There's always some
self-appointed warden around who'll tell you you can't photograph here
or pass there. Walk into a derelict and
20 matches
Mail list logo
