Re: Test: ISO 800 vs. 1600

2006-11-03 Thread K.Takeshita
On 11/03/06 4:22 PM, Joseph Tainter, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This time the GX10 image is at ISO 800 while the *ist D image is at 1600. Again, very quick and dirty. http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/535671/display/7101932 This is an ISO 800 sample (liquour bottles)

Re: Test: ISO 800 vs. 1600

2006-11-03 Thread DagT
Hard to see anything from any of them. The contrast is too different. DagT Den 3. nov. 2006 kl. 22.22 skrev Joseph Tainter: This time the GX10 image is at ISO 800 while the *ist D image is at 1600. Again, very quick and dirty.

Re: Test: ISO 800 vs. 1600

2006-11-03 Thread K.Takeshita
On 11/03/06 5:07 PM, Joseph Tainter, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know what to make of my comparison shots. In the image from the GX10, the table top appears rather noisy to me, especially compared to the *ist D shot at ISO 800. Looking just at the table, the GX10 shot at 800 looks more

Re: Re: Test: ISO 800 vs. 1600

2006-11-03 Thread Ken Takeshita
On 11/3/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an ISO 800 sample (liquour bottles) http://form.allabout.co.jp/1/210637/1/product/210637_01.htm I know its too small to make any sort of intelligent judgment, but it looks OK to me. Generally, folks in Japan who actually saw

Re: Test: ISO 800 vs. 1600

2006-11-03 Thread K.Takeshita
On 11/03/06 5:59 PM, Ken Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an ISO 800 sample (liquour bottles) http://form.allabout.co.jp/1/210637/1/product/210637_01.htm I know its too small to make any sort of intelligent judgment, but it looks OK to me. Generally, folks in Japan who

Re: Test: ISO 800 vs. 1600

2006-11-03 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: K.Takeshita Subject: Re: Test: ISO 800 vs. 1600 These are actually Pentax's samples but no EXIF data, and non-clickable, unfortunately. But they are now beginning to show ISO800 samples. It's no wonder they are so slow getting the thing to market

Re: Re: Test: ISO 800 vs. 1600

2006-11-03 Thread Ken Takeshita
On 11/3/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's no wonder they are so slow getting the thing to market, they are spending all their time in bars and at amusement parks. Perhaps Koreans might be a bit more sophisticated? :-). These are some Samsung stuff with high ISO (800/1600