On 11/03/06 4:22 PM, Joseph Tainter, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This time the GX10 image is at ISO 800 while the *ist D image is at
1600. Again, very quick and dirty.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/535671/display/7101932
This is an ISO 800 sample (liquour bottles)
Hard to see anything from any of them. The contrast is too different.
DagT
Den 3. nov. 2006 kl. 22.22 skrev Joseph Tainter:
This time the GX10 image is at ISO 800 while the *ist D image is at
1600. Again, very quick and dirty.
On 11/03/06 5:07 PM, Joseph Tainter, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what to make of my comparison shots. In the image from the
GX10, the table top appears rather noisy to me, especially compared to
the *ist D shot at ISO 800. Looking just at the table, the GX10 shot at
800 looks more
On 11/3/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an ISO 800 sample (liquour bottles)
http://form.allabout.co.jp/1/210637/1/product/210637_01.htm
I know its too small to make any sort of intelligent judgment, but it looks
OK to me.
Generally, folks in Japan who actually saw
On 11/03/06 5:59 PM, Ken Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an ISO 800 sample (liquour bottles)
http://form.allabout.co.jp/1/210637/1/product/210637_01.htm
I know its too small to make any sort of intelligent judgment, but it looks
OK to me.
Generally, folks in Japan who
- Original Message -
From: K.Takeshita
Subject: Re: Test: ISO 800 vs. 1600
These are actually Pentax's samples but no EXIF data, and
non-clickable,
unfortunately. But they are now beginning to show ISO800 samples.
It's no wonder they are so slow getting the thing to market
On 11/3/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's no wonder they are so slow getting the thing to market, they are
spending all their time in bars and at amusement parks.
Perhaps Koreans might be a bit more sophisticated? :-).
These are some Samsung stuff with high ISO (800/1600
7 matches
Mail list logo