Re: Sigma Mini Zoom Macro question and Pentax body recommendation?

2003-01-08 Thread Ed
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 21:44:32 -0600 (CST), Chris Brogden You are not right here with such generalization on entire Optio range. Optios 220 an 330GS has different macro mode. They can be focused as close as 10 cm in ANY zoom position. Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll agree with Stan on most thin

Re: Sigma Mini Zoom Macro question and Pentax body recommendation?

2003-01-07 Thread Stan Halpin
A range of six to 18 inches for the macro focus range isn't bad. I don't know the effective ratio but you can fill the image with a flower easily. The digital has the advantage over a film P&S that you can see a. what you are shooting and b. if you are in focus. For someone who basically is looking

Re: Sigma Mini Zoom Macro question and Pentax body recommendation?

2003-01-07 Thread Chris Brogden
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Joe Wilensky wrote: > What's the combo you'd recommend? Is there a Pentax zoom with a macro > function even close to the Sigma's specs? And what body? the ZX-7? > ZX-60? ZX-5N? ZX-L? Actually, if price isn't a huge object, Nikon's 28-105 is well-built and has a 1:2 macro at th

Re: Sigma Mini Zoom Macro question and Pentax body recommendation?

2003-01-07 Thread Bruce Dayton
Joe, A friend of mine has that lens in Canon mount. It is sharpest near 50mm and so-so through the rest of the range. Contrast is a little flat and most of his pictures don't have the punch that he wants. It does focus close and is cheap (both price and build quality). Recently he bought a 50mm

Re: Sigma Mini Zoom Macro question and Pentax body recommendation?

2003-01-07 Thread Keith Whaley
Pentax make an FA 50mm f/2.8 lens that focuses down to 7 5/8" in macro mode. Is that close enough? With FA capabilities, it could be used with many of their later reputedly easy-to-use camera bodies. keith whaley gfen wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Joe Wilensky wrote: > > What's the combo you'

Re: Sigma Mini Zoom Macro question and Pentax body recommendation?

2003-01-07 Thread gfen
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Joe Wilensky wrote: > What's the combo you'd recommend? Is there a Pentax zoom with a macro > function even close to the Sigma's specs? And what body? the ZX-7? > ZX-60? ZX-5N? ZX-L? The ZX-L is probably the way to go for a body. Its new, and user friendly, and has lots of blin

Sigma Mini Zoom Macro question and Pentax body recommendation?

2003-01-07 Thread Joe Wilensky
I'm helping a co-worker who initially wanted a point-and-shoot camera with a "macro" function to take pictures of small flower and jewelry arrangements at workshops she attends. She tried the Fuji Zoom Date 1000 (1:4 or so in its "macro" mode at 100mm), but quickly saw the limitations of even a