On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Joseph McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks even better now.
Of course we've aged at the same rate she has, except in our minds.
: )
On Dec 4, 2008, at 15:35 , David J Brooks wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Joseph McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and I'm on a adsl
line. Perhaps its gallery script you using, have you tried lightbox?
Why are you encouraging downloads?
PN Stenquist wrote:
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless
in HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least
i'm up and running. It's
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dreamweaver, its a nightmare. and 14 javascripts btw, I'd love to meet the
designer :)
I'd rather meet Heather Locklear.
Dave
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 12/3/08, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your site uses css so theres no
As long as Angelina Jolie still looks like she does, no other woman can
do it for me :)
David J Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dreamweaver, its a nightmare. and 14 javascripts btw, I'd love to meet the
designer :)
I'd rather meet
On Dec 4, 2008, at 09:16 , David J Brooks wrote:
I'd rather meet Heather Locklear.
Someone watched Leno last night, eh?
Joseph McAllister
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
From: PN Stenquist
Thanks for the help Feroze. I didn't know I was encouraging downloads,
but it doesn't really matter if someone does download the photos. All
my packages come with a full set of hi-res files, and all of these are
from weddings that are paid in full.
Might matter to the
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Joseph McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 4, 2008, at 09:16 , David J Brooks wrote:
I'd rather meet Heather Locklear.
Someone watched Leno last night, eh?
Nope, mush past my bed time.
T J Hooker reruns
Dave
Joseph McAllister
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks even better now.
Of course we've aged at the same rate she has, except in our minds.
: )
On Dec 4, 2008, at 15:35 , David J Brooks wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Joseph McAllister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 4, 2008, at 09:16 , David J Brooks wrote:
I'd rather meet
Your site uses css so theres no limit to the type of editing you want to
do. The pics load pretty slow for me and I'm on a adsl line. Perhaps its
gallery script you using, have you tried lightbox?
Why are you encouraging downloads?
PN Stenquist wrote:
i put together a wedding photography
for you :-). Cheers,
Christine
- Original Message - From: PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 4:33 PM
Subject: OT: Wedding Photography Website
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless
, have you tried lightbox?
Why are you encouraging downloads?
PN Stenquist wrote:
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in
HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm
up and running. It's a bit pretentious, but so are young Michigan
brides
site uses css so theres no limit to the type of editing you want
to do. The pics load pretty slow for me and I'm on a adsl line.
Perhaps its gallery script you using, have you tried lightbox?
Why are you encouraging downloads?
PN Stenquist wrote:
i put together a wedding photography website
. The pics load pretty slow for me and I'm on a adsl
line. Perhaps its gallery script you using, have you tried lightbox?
Why are you encouraging downloads?
PN Stenquist wrote:
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless
in HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting
CSS=cascading style sheets, think of your web page as those Babushka
dolls, each layer wrapped around the next layer, css its a way to
separate content and markup, so if you wanted to change the colour or
appearance of the site you'd only change the style sheet and the changes
would happen
Thanks Feroze. Very helpful.
I rarely shot weddings on film, but I did turn over the negs a couple
of times. It was just too much hassle to try to manage orders. But
that was many years ago, and I shot very few of them.
I don't plan on doing many weddings. My main occupation is
You may want to restate that in such a way that you specify that you
retain the copyright but are granting them unlimited reproduction rights
for their personal use. You might also include that by signing the
contract they are also providing you with a model release. Who knows,
some day you
using, have you tried lightbox?
Why are you encouraging downloads?
PN Stenquist wrote:
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in
HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm up and
running. It's a bit pretentious, but so are young Michigan
Dreamweaver is hardly the best software for creating websites, it tends
to bloat the html code with garbage, larger page sizes makes for
inefficient page loads. You can edit your site with any html editor,
even notepad. The most used style now to XHTML, css, js and for the
future wml
On 12/3/08, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your site uses css so theres no limit to the type of editing you want to do.
The pics load pretty slow for me and I'm on a adsl line. Perhaps its gallery
script you using, have you tried lightbox?
Take a look at the page source. Paul's site is
In a message dated 12/3/2008 8:24:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been watching this msnbc (I think) and it seems that anyone even
remotely related to the motor industry is having a hard time, they
interviewed the CEO of GM yesterday and he stated that if they
In a message dated 12/3/2008 8:12:46 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.w3schools.com/CSS/
Hope this helps...
Merlin
===
I used them for learning CSS. Agreed, best around.
Marnie :-)
-
Warning: I am
10 million in Detroit? OMG, the population of the whole of South Africa
is 46 million
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/3/2008 8:24:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been watching this msnbc (I think) and it seems that anyone even
remotely related to
In a message dated 12/3/2008 10:10:28 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
10 million in Detroit? OMG, the population of the whole of South Africa
is 46 million
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/3/2008 8:24:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dreamweaver, its a nightmare. and 14 javascripts btw, I'd love to meet
the designer :)
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 12/3/08, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your site uses css so theres no limit to the type of editing you want to do.
The pics load pretty slow for me and I'm on a adsl line.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dreamweaver is hardly the best software for creating websites, it tends to
bloat the html code with garbage, larger page sizes makes for inefficient
page loads. You can edit your site with any html editor, even notepad. The
most
I wasn't refering to to his code in particular, just from experience in
general. Like you say you've been using it for years, you'd know what
the code needs and what needs to be deleted. Paul says his still
learning, dreamweaver is going to be pretty heavy for someone who just
wants to edit
, December 03, 2008 6:07 AM
Subject: Re: Wedding Photography Website
What kind of internet connection do you have? The pics load rapidly here
over comcast high speed internet on both Firefox and Safari. I don't have
Explorer, so I haven't tried it, but I'll try on my daughter's PC.
On Dec 2
Maybe som problems can cause the fact that some javascripts are loaded
from other website :D
And yes, the designer should be punished - if not for CSS then for
javascript for sure...
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dreamweaver, its a nightmare. and 14 javascripts
In a message dated 12/1/2008 2:34:12 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in
HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm up
and running. It's a bit pretentious, but so are young
On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/1/2008 2:34:12 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in
HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm up
put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in HTML, I
used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm up and running.
It's a bit pretentious, but so are young Michigan brides:-). Any feedback is
welcome.
It's here:
http://www.paulstenquist.com
I also set up
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:52 PM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several of the thumbs won't show on my screen. Other than that, I
like the presentation and the photos.
What I meant is that the thumbs show, but when clicked upon they don't
show as enlargements. Also, when navigating
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:33 PM, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in HTML, I
used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm up and running.
It's a bit pretentious, but so are young Michigan brides:-). Any feedback
Hmmm. i'll have to check that out. It works on my Mac, but I'll have
to try on my daughter's PC.
Thanks for the input.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2008, at 4:54 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:52 PM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several of the thumbs won't show on my
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:03 PM, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. i'll have to check that out. It works on my Mac, but I'll have to try
on my daughter's PC.
Thanks for the input.
I'm running Mozilla Firefox on a PC (don't ask me any more questions
than that) it it makes any
I should have said, you need something to make someone pick you rather than
some other wedding photographer. Sounds better. (I felt it came across kind
of heavy.)
Later, Marnie :-)
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored.
it
yields big bucks for you :-). Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 4:33 PM
Subject: OT: Wedding Photography Website
i put together a wedding photography website. Since
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in
HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm up
and running. It's a bit pretentious, but so are young Michigan
brides:-). Any feedback is welcome.
It's here:
http://www.paulstenquist.com
I also set
:
From: PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Wedding Photography Website
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, December 1, 2008, 5:33 PM
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm
clueless in HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's
limiting, but at least
: Wedding Photography Website
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, December 1, 2008, 5:33 PM
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm
clueless in HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's
limiting, but at least i'm up and running. It's a
bit pretentious, but so
On 1/12/08, PN Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in
HTML, I used iWeb and templates. That's limiting, but at least i'm up
and running. It's a bit pretentious, but so are young Michigan
brides:-). Any feedback is welcome.
It's
Paul,
I would lose the reflections under the picture gallery.
They begin OK, but get tedious after a while.
Your prices are too low.
Otherwise, it looks good to me.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:33 PM, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i put together a wedding photography website
the picture gallery.
They begin OK, but get tedious after a while.
Your prices are too low.
Otherwise, it looks good to me.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:33 PM, PN Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i put together a wedding photography website. Since I'm clueless in
HTML, I
used iWeb
Hi Brian
I had a only quick glance at your website (first page and pets) and the
following comments:
I like the golden font writing.
I imagine you tried to make the website really simple, that's good.
But a little bit more navigation would be useful, the hyperlinks alone are
not enough for some
Hello Brian
again me, I forgot to ask:
Why does *editing a photograph cost so much more than *taking* a
photograph? $35 versus $50.
That does not make sense to me. The price difference is not justified. I
think it is much harder
and needs more skills to shoot a wedding well than to manipulate a
Brian,
A couple of comments:
I wouldn't charge the way you do, because it looks complicated and the clients don't
know how much they are going to be billed in the end. State what they are going to get
and how much it will cost. For instance: Engagment Session - 2 hrs + x# y sized prints
for
: Wedding Photography website
After many changes in the last few months, I'd like some of you to critique'
my website at:
http://www.bdphotographic.com
I did a wedding with a pair of K1000s and a ZX-M, while my wife used a
Minolta 600si. I used a flash bracket, Vivitar 285HV, and a second 285
47 matches
Mail list logo
