On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:38:02 -0500
P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
M42 lenses don't work the same way as K lenses. In manual the lens
is always stopped down to shooting aperture and the meter will give
you the correct exposure, as long as you're within the meter's
operable EV
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 14:03, Subash wrote:
hi,
anybody have experience with this lens? pretty heavy, a little over
1.5kg, but i saw one today for sale, it's in almost mint condition and
so badly needs a caring home :)
On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:00, Sam L wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 14:03, Subash wrote:
hi,
anybody have experience with this lens? pretty heavy, a little over
1.5kg, but i saw one today for sale, it's in almost mint
Don't forget the Hyper Manual mode.
http://www.ok1000pentax.com/2009/04/pentax-hyper-program-and-hyper-manual.html
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=36220193
Shooting with m42 lenses is best on a Pentax, because of Hyper Manual.
Also, you should try to use an old preset
actually, a usable live view mode with magnification has proven to be
of most use to me.
i've shot m42 takumars with pentax k10d and a canon 5d mkII and the
use with the latter is much more pleasurable and much more useful,
especially towards the wide end (not only the angle of view, but also
the
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:34 AM, CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't forget the Hyper Manual mode.
http://www.ok1000pentax.com/2009/04/pentax-hyper-program-and-hyper-manual.html
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=36220193
Shooting with m42 lenses is best on
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Luka Knezevic-Strika
lukastr...@gmail.com wrote:
actually, a usable live view mode with magnification has proven to be
of most use to me.
i've shot m42 takumars with pentax k10d and a canon 5d mkII and the
use with the latter is much more pleasurable and much
M42 lenses don't work the same way as K lenses. In manual the lens is
always stopped down to shooting aperture and the meter will give you the
correct exposure, as long as you're within the meter's operable EV
range. In auto the lens will never stop down, but you'll get the
correct exposure
On 11/5/2010 10:15 AM, Sam L wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:34 AM, CheekyGeekcheekyg...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't forget the Hyper Manual mode.
http://www.ok1000pentax.com/2009/04/pentax-hyper-program-and-hyper-manual.html
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=36220193
:01 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: m42 takumar 300/4
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com
wrote: On Nov 4, 2010, at 14:03, Subash wrote:
hi,
anybody have experience with this lens? pretty heavy, a little over
1.5kg, but i saw one today for sale
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: m42 takumar 300/4
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com
wrote: On Nov 4, 2010, at 14:03, Subash wrote:
hi,
anybody have experience with this lens? pretty heavy, a little over
1.5kg, but i saw one today for sale, it's in almost
hi,
anybody have experience with this lens? pretty heavy, a little over
1.5kg, but i saw one today for sale, it's in almost mint condition and
so badly needs a caring home :) the one i saw today is the one on this
page:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/Takumar-300mm-F4-1962.html
i guess
It worked well with my LX -- sharp and contrasty. But it might produce a lot of
CA on a digital camera. Most of the older telephotos tend to do that.
Paul
On Nov 4, 2010, at 3:03 PM, Subash wrote:
hi,
anybody have experience with this lens? pretty heavy, a little over
1.5kg, but i saw one
On Nov 4, 2010, at 14:03, Subash wrote:
hi,
anybody have experience with this lens? pretty heavy, a little over
1.5kg, but i saw one today for sale, it's in almost mint condition and
so badly needs a caring home :) the one i saw today is the one on this
page:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 15:10:16 -0400
paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
It worked well with my LX -- sharp and contrasty. But it might
produce a lot of CA on a digital camera. Most of the older telephotos
tend to do that.
thanks Paul, that's nice to know. it isn't too expensive so i
15 matches
Mail list logo
