just a blank page for me.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Francis
Sent: 18 April 2008 06:03
To: Pentax List
Subject: GESO - The Difference Engine
Now everybody knows what the mystery object is,
here are a few more
That's very striking.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
Sent: 18 April 2008 04:23
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: Pipedreams
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7176602size=lg
--
PDML
Tonight I've begun the process of posting to my new gallery all my best work
from the past eight years, starting with the first good photo I took upon
switching majors from Geology to Art Studio back at UC Davis. It was fall
of 2000, and I was just learning how to develop and print on my own.
On 17/4/08, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7176602size=lg
Excelent pic Paul.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
very pretty
funny . to me the word poppies means red so I was quite
surprised when the photo opened . I had forgotten about californian
poppies.
lol good old web : reminding us there is an outside world ...
there are fewer and fewer poppies over here .. pity, because it's one
Get another blank page. When I go to the home page to navigate, there is a
Hacked message. 8-(((
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/18 Fri AM 05:02:42 GMT
To: PDML@pdml.net (Pentax List)
Subject: GESO - The Difference Engine
Now everybody knows what the mystery object
Eauh, but Eau..
mike wilson wrote:
A smelly trainer fetish would do it.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/17 Thu PM 06:12:53 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photographer's rights - UK
You'd have to have a personal relationship with the
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:02 PM, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now everybody knows what the mystery object is,
here are a few more of the photographs from that afternoon:
http://www.jfwaf.com/Babbage/
I can see the photos just fine -- Firefox 3 beta on Ubuntu 8 beta,
but I also
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/17 Thu PM 10:29:15 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - Vulcan Bomber for the airheads
On 17/4/08, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
Mind you, for sheer noise, it's hard to beat the eventual home of
the Olympus Two -
Vulcans and other planes used to practice low-level flying over the Scout camp
I went to as a child. It became commonplace during the week for the crews to
wave back to us as they went past - I am sure some of them came round for a
second go.
The lowest flyers of all were the RNAS Buccaneers.
How about ZZTop in concert from the second row, or Motorhead inside a
suburban pub. Mere jet aeroplanes pale into insignificance.
But seriously, what most impressed me about Concorde was that it could cross
the Atlantic at supersonic speed with its afterburners lit the whole time.
Its military
A smelly trainer fetish would do it.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/17 Thu PM 06:12:53 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photographer's rights - UK
You'd have to have a personal relationship with the subject to find that
particularly erotic.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trabpled??
If you don't know, I certainly have no idea.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
ann sanfedele wrote:
I read your first post first...
So didnt' know you looked at all of them when you responded...
Shalley had an amazing knack for sitting down in front of intersting
stuff -- although D may have
realized it was there... as he asked me to take a photo of her looking
up
Hi all,
I still have for sale an MZ-S Body with grip asking price lowered to
$350,00 or best offer, I am also selling a K10D body with the kit lens
no card, make a reasonable offer, the film body has maybe 1000 shots
and the K10D about 3000 shots. Both with boxes etc. If interested
Brian said:
I was once approached by a security guard when I photographed the outside of
the Taxation Office in Penrith from across the other side of the street
(part of a project on architectural horrors...) :-)
Perfect subject for your project...!
Ciao,
Peter in western
Oh that's fun Paul. Terrific idea and subject. Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7176602size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:16:44 +1000, Peter McIntosh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Brian said:
I was once approached by a security guard when I photographed the outside
of
the Taxation Office in Penrith from across the other side of the street
(part of a project on architectural horrors...) :-)
The tulip eating wretches have gotten too bold. A few years ago I
never could have gotten close enough to shot him with the 50-135.
Last year I saw very few rabbits and quite a few coyotes. This y ear
we're overrun with the hop hop boys again.
Paul
On Apr 17, 2008, at 11:43 PM, Ken Waller
'evening all,
On the road into Gulargambone there are a series of corrugated iron
cockatoos mounted on poles along the roadside. This one was
particularly photogenic as the iron had weathered nicely to give a range
of textures and colours.
Unfortunately, when I passed through the sky was dull
Sharp image. Terrific camera/lens combo!
Jack
--- On Thu, 4/17/08, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Where have all the coyotes gone?
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, April 17, 2008, 8:20 PM
Good crop and Grace beautifully positioned, Paul.
Jack
--- On Thu, 4/17/08, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Pipedreams
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, April 17, 2008, 8:22 PM
Thanks for comments, Dominique. Pretty is the reason for this particular shot.
Jack
--- On Fri, 4/18/08, dominique romeyer-dherbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: dominique romeyer-dherbey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Poppy Meadow
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date:
As a former airline employee, the loudest I can remember is an FH-227
Rolls-Royce turboprops whining.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: Friday, 18 April 2008 8:29 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: OT - Vulcan Bomber
Beautiful machinery. Well captured in obviously less than ideal
conditions.
Paul
On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:02 AM, John Francis wrote:
Now everybody knows what the mystery object is,
here are a few more of the photographs from that afternoon:
http://www.jfwaf.com/Babbage/
--
PDML
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/18 Fri PM 01:07:27 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GESO - The Difference Engine
Beautiful machinery. Well captured in obviously less than ideal
conditions.
Paul
On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:02 AM, John Francis
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/18 Fri PM 01:07:27 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GESO - The Difference Engine
Beautiful machinery. Well captured in obviously less than ideal
conditions.
Paul
On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:02 AM, John Francis
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/18 Fri PM 01:04:55 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Where have all the coyotes gone?
The tulip eating wretches have gotten too bold. A few years ago I
never could have gotten close enough to shot him with
On Apr 18, 2008, at 6:12 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
'evening all,
On the road into Gulargambone there are a series of corrugated iron
cockatoos mounted on poles along the roadside. This one was
particularly photogenic as the iron had weathered nicely to give a
range
of textures and
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7176602size=lg
Very nicely done, Paul!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Concorde was almost all gas tank and all low-drag go-fast, military
designs have to be much more flexible, and don't actually want to go
that fast except in sprints (which in some cases, like the B-1B, are a
lot longer than a few minutes). Going supersonic is loud and obvious
and drastically cuts
That's a cool shot, John. Great texture and geometries, nice
tonalities and feel. Content wise, it's the opening overture, a
prelude to things to come. An excellent starting point.
Godfrey
On Apr 18, 2008, at 12:37 AM, John Celio wrote:
Tonight I've begun the process of posting to my new
Agreed
Dave
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beautiful machinery. Well captured in obviously less than ideal
conditions.
Paul
On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:02 AM, John Francis wrote:
Now everybody knows what the mystery object is,
here are a few
Very good.
I like how the flowers stop abruptly.
Dave
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=298
Jack
Be a
Good eye Paul.
Like the framing and depth to the shot.
Dave
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7176602size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi all.
Just got word, that 2 of the 4 photos i submitted for the 2009 Town
Planner calender, local distrivuted
in Stouffville, Port Perry and Uxbridge, will be used.
One is a shot of a cabin in the snow
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6924723
and i'm not sure if the other is the
Good light and angle for the shot. Lots of detail
Dave
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'evening all,
On the road into Gulargambone there are a series of corrugated iron
cockatoos mounted on poles along the roadside. This one was
particularly
Just got the 16-50 yesterday. So far it looks like it works (despite
all of the horror stories I've been reading). Focus field seems flat,
and it focuses to infinity. Yay!
I was REALLY surprised by how LONG this thing is with the hood on.
Barely fits into my Tamrac Velocity 3 bag. :-(
Congratulations! Well deserved.
Jack
--- On Fri, 4/18/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Two of my shots are to be used for a local calendar.
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net, Barbara Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, April 18,
Thanks, David.
Jack
--- On Fri, 4/18/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Poppy Meadow
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Friday, April 18, 2008, 7:50 AM
Very good.
I like how the flowers stop abruptly.
John,
Enjoyed seeing this.
My first attempt at the web site was trapped by the virus scanner.
(Asked if I wanted to yield control to something like activeX)
Works OK now.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beautiful machinery. Well captured
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:16 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters
Subject: Re: OT: Speaking of Photographers rights...
trabpled??
Is the QR spokesman serious? We've had people take photos of luggage
lockers and that
Brian,
Interesting artwork and picture. The colors look OK from here.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'evening all,
On the road into Gulargambone there are a series of corrugated iron
cockatoos mounted on poles along the roadside.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:56 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Just got word, that 2 of the 4 photos i submitted for the 2009 Town
Planner calender, local distrivuted
in Stouffville, Port Perry and Uxbridge, will be used.
One is a shot of a cabin in the snow
Snapped earlier this afternoon. The scene reminded me of a certain
style of fashion photography from the 50s/60s by Norman Parkinson or
David Bailey.
http://www.web-options.com/Bud.jpg
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Hello everyone!
I am a bit confused about that lens. Is it a no buy because of the
focus problem at infinity? A better not buy?
Thank you all.
GB
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Like the shot, Bob - good eye on picking up on the scene.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, April 18, 2008, 8:49:00 AM, you wrote:
BW Snapped earlier this afternoon. The scene reminded me of a certain
BW style of fashion photography from the 50s/60s by Norman Parkinson or
BW David Bailey.
BW
On Apr 18, 2008, at 10:54, Gaetan Beauchamp wrote:
Hello everyone!
I am a bit confused about that lens. Is it a no buy because of the
focus problem at infinity? A better not buy?
I've seen a lot of fear to purchase around this lens but I just
purchased one from BuyDig.com ($649!) and it
David J Brooks wrote:
Hi all.
Just got word, that 2 of the 4 photos i submitted for the 2009 Town
Planner calender, local distrivuted
in Stouffville, Port Perry and Uxbridge, will be used.
One is a shot of a cabin in the snow
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6924723
Dave, that's
On Apr 18, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Bob W wrote:
Snapped earlier this afternoon. The scene reminded me of a certain
style of fashion photography from the 50s/60s by Norman Parkinson or
David Bailey.
http://www.web-options.com/Bud.jpg
I like that; yes it does remind me of an advertising campaign
Okay...here's another one:
http://tinyurl.com/6lt4fl
Reminds me of Rollex and iPOOD
:-D
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Beaker
Subject: Re: Correction : Pentax NED Camera : WAS RE: full frame rumours
andinnuendo
On Apr 18, 2008, at 8:54 AM, Gaetan Beauchamp wrote:
I am a bit confused about that lens. Is it a no buy because of the
focus problem at infinity? A better not buy?
The one I have focuses very nicely and produces beautiful quality
images.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Excellent, congratulations.
Godfrey
On Apr 18, 2008, at 7:56 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Just got word, that 2 of the 4 photos i submitted for the 2009 Town
Planner calender, local distrivuted
in Stouffville, Port Perry and Uxbridge, will be used.
One is a shot of a cabin in the snow
Thanks, Keith!
I'm waiting to see if they pick anymore from the thumbs
ann
keith_w wrote:
ann sanfedele wrote:
I read your first post first...
So didnt' know you looked at all of them when you responded...
Shalley had an amazing knack for sitting down in front of intersting
stuff --
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:54:04AM -0400, Adam Maas wrote:
Concorde was almost all gas tank and all low-drag go-fast, military
designs have to be much more flexible, and don't actually want to go
that fast except in sprints (which in some cases, like the B-1B, are a
lot longer than a few
Same here. I have shot several weddings with it - got many pics. I
am very satisfied with it.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, April 18, 2008, 9:13:15 AM, you wrote:
GD On Apr 18, 2008, at 8:54 AM, Gaetan Beauchamp wrote:
I am a bit confused about that lens. Is it a no buy because of the
There have been some problems with manufacturing defects. I've only
heard one report of problems with infinity focus, and that my have
been camera related. The most common defect is an uneven focus plane.
That's easily tested for and recognized. I think that Pentax has
probably resolved
Bob W wrote:
Snapped earlier this afternoon. The scene reminded me of a certain
style of fashion photography from the 50s/60s by Norman Parkinson or
David Bailey.
http://www.web-options.com/Bud.jpg
Bob
Budweiser in England? ?? Yikes! That seems almost disrespectful.
all I remember about
Nice shot. Excellent framing and rendering.
Paul
On Apr 18, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Bob W wrote:
Snapped earlier this afternoon. The scene reminded me of a certain
style of fashion photography from the 50s/60s by Norman Parkinson or
David Bailey.
http://www.web-options.com/Bud.jpg
Bob
--
If they were simply idiots we could laugh at them. Unfortunately
they're not just idiots.
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:16 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters
Subject: Re: OT: Speaking of Photographers
Brian Walters wrote:
'evening all,
..
Anyway, here 'tis. The colours look more realistic to my eye but have I
overworked it?
http://www.blognow.com.au/PESO/86183/Corrugated_Cocky.html
Cheers
Brian
I don't think you overworked it at all -- looks completely natural to me
- and
Congratulations, Dave!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Dag, the portrait shot is excellent indeed. I do feel for you for having
lost your K10D and the lens. It is good though that you had at least
partial insurance on your gear.
Be sure to enjoy your new camera. It is going to have some emotional
value for you now.
Boris
DagT wrote:
What a
Hi!
Yesterday I saw (for most of it, at least) The Spiderman the movie.
Regardless of the content, I noticed one very strange thing. When Peter
Parker is shown with his camera taking shots for the newspaper, he seems
to use his left hand to trigger the shutter. As if the whole camera he
is
I just gotta get one o' them!
Bong Manayon wrote:
Okay...here's another one:
http://tinyurl.com/6lt4fl
Reminds me of Rollex and iPOOD
:-D
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Beaker
Subject: Re: Correction :
Just saw on TV that you midwesterners near the Wabash fault had a bit of
shaking going on this morning... (5.2 north of Evansville)
Bob S, did you feel it in Chicago? Paul, in Detroit? and Doug Brewer?
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Only in Hollywood...
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Yesterday I saw (for most of it, at least) The Spiderman the movie.
Regardless of the content, I noticed one very strange thing. When Peter
Parker is shown with his camera taking shots for the newspaper, he seems
to use his left hand to
The only lefty cameras I can remember were the Exactas ... they had
a left hand shutter release.
http://captjack.exaktaphile.com/Exakta%20VXIIb%20%20Varex%20IIb%
20Page.htm
Godfrey
On Apr 18, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Yesterday I saw (for most of it, at least) The
Budweiser in England? ?? Yikes! That seems almost disrespectful.
it's the original Czech Budweiser, not the revolting American rip-off.
Although the American stuff is available here. Personally I'd rather
drink strychnine than American Bud.
Bob
http://www.web-options.com/Bud.jpg
Bob
I don't need one, but I've also wondered.
If only in a single scene, it might have been a film reversal for artistic
considerations. Otherwise..(?)
Jack
--- On Fri, 4/18/08, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Peculiar idea and/or
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:29 PM, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:54:04AM -0400, Adam Maas wrote:
Concorde was almost all gas tank and all low-drag go-fast, military
designs have to be much more flexible, and don't actually want to go
that fast except in
Well, it's not really a left handed camera per se, but the Exacta had
it's film release on the front left side of the camera body.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e5/Exakta.jpg
Jack Davis wrote:
I don't need one, but I've also wondered.
If only in a single scene, it might have
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know. They all seemed so nice at the time.
So do baby aligators at the time.;-)
I escorted 7 wind tower pieces over the winter, and only on the last
trip, did i notice a signe saying no photography equipment beyond the
fence, in
frank theriault wrote:
No big deal. A small cycling magazine from Vancouver, Momentum, will
be publishing a couple of my photos in their upcoming issue.
http://tinyurl.com/4rf3vg
http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/5806/2203/1600/96886/handlebars.jpg
and
http://tinyurl.com/3np7eo
It's a sinister left-wing conspiracy.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Davis
Sent: 18 April 2008 19:01
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Peculiar idea and/or question
I don't need one, but I've also wondered.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Budweiser in England? ?? Yikes! That seems almost disrespectful.
it's the original Czech Budweiser, not the revolting American rip-off.
Although the American stuff is available here. Personally I'd rather
drink strychnine
Bob W wrote:
Budweiser in England? ?? Yikes! That seems almost disrespectful.
it's the original Czech Budweiser, not the revolting American rip-off.
Although the American stuff is available here. Personally I'd rather
drink strychnine than American Bud.
You coming to GFM? We can arrange
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Yesterday I saw (for most of it, at least) The Spiderman the movie.
Regardless of the content, I noticed one very strange thing. When Peter
Parker is shown with his camera taking shots for the newspaper, he seems
to use his left hand to trigger the shutter. As
Spent a bit of time experimenting with the Lightroom 2 Public Beta
this morning, using copies of some exposures I made while visiting
Alcatraz in 2006 with the Pentax *ist DS as a test image set. I did a
monochrome rendering of this photo a year or more ago, decided to
give it a whirl in a
Boris Liberman wrote:
Yesterday I saw (for most of it, at least) The Spiderman the movie.
Regardless of the content, I noticed one very strange thing. When Peter
Parker is shown with his camera taking shots for the newspaper, he seems
to use his left hand to trigger the shutter. As if the
Actually they weren't in the right. Owners, or their agents, can ask
you not to photograph, but unless it's a defense installation, (even in
Canada, not just the US), they can't legally confiscate your film. They
can only tell you to stop and ask you to leave, or have you ejected if
you
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip Personally I'd rather
drink strychnine than American Bud.
You mean there's a difference?
;-)
I agree with you - I'm not such a fan of American mainstream beers
(nor Canadian mainstream brews, come to think of it), but
Bud's the worst of a bad lot...
Obviously you've never had a Narragansett.
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip Personally I'd rather
drink strychnine than American Bud.
You mean there's a difference?
;-)
I agree with
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The only lefty cameras I can remember were the Exactas ... they had
a left hand shutter release.
http://captjack.exaktaphile.com/Exakta%20VXIIb%20%20Varex%20IIb%
20Page.htm
Godfrey
Indeed. I have one of these http://captjack.exaktaphile.com/EXAIIB.htm
and the
Cotty
As a professional who has to deal with this on a regular basis you
have much more experience than most of us in dealing with this
problem. It may sound a bit OTT to describe the issue as one of
principle, but while there is no doubt that one can manage jobsworth
officials by a variety of
F22 is more than 3 decades advanced over Concorde, which I was praising
against its contemporaries. Even the B1B is a decade more advanced.
Actually the concept of supercruise is more contentious than I had believed.
It turns out that a lot of older craft, including Concorde, could
supercruise,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:34 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually they weren't in the right. Owners, or their agents, can ask
you not to photograph, but unless it's a defense installation, (even in
Canada, not just the US), they can't legally confiscate your film. They
can
Ah, the Arrow. The Wikipedia discussion page on supercruise that I quoted
previously also mentioned the Arrow,
. I suspect some Canadians are convinced the thing could fly at
supersonic speeds backwards underwater on one engine...--Robert Merkel
05:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
... and upside
On Apr 18, 2008, at 11:53 AM, mike wilson wrote:
The only lefty cameras I can remember were the Exactas ... they had
a left hand shutter release.
http://captjack.exaktaphile.com/Exakta%20VXIIb%20%20Varex%20IIb%
20Page.htm
Indeed. I have one of these http://captjack.exaktaphile.com/
try comparing [EMAIL PROTECTED] and fa 50 1.4 field of view. you'll be surprised
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Several people around here have told me they felt it, but you could have
had an elephant stampede in my yard and wouldn't have heard it.
ann sanfedele wrote:
Just saw on TV that you midwesterners near the Wabash fault had a bit of
shaking going on this morning... (5.2 north of Evansville)
On Apr 18, 2008, at 12:35 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
try comparing [EMAIL PROTECTED] and fa 50 1.4 field of view. you'll be
surprised
What difference are you pointing out? I see a variation in what the
50mm marked setting produces in the case of the 16-50 vs the 50-135:
16-50 @ 50mm
Yes, the one you got with your istD/DS/K100/K10/whatever. I know
someone out there has one collecting dust, and I'm putting together a
lightweight kit for motorcycle trips. The 16-45 is just a bit too
bulky to fit nicely into the tank bag.
Yes, it's motorcycle season again. :-D
-Mat
--
PDML
I have played a bit with mine.
It is not the same prime killer as the 50-135. But, so far, it looks
like a mighty fine lens.
MaritimTim
2008/4/18, Gaetan Beauchamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello everyone!
I am a bit confused about that lens. Is it a no buy because of the
focus problem at infinity?
ann sanfedele wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Snapped earlier this afternoon. The scene reminded me of a certain
style of fashion photography from the 50s/60s by Norman Parkinson or
David Bailey.
http://www.web-options.com/Bud.jpg
Bob
Budweiser in England? ?? Yikes! That seems almost
$50? NIB...
On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:42 PM, Mat Maessen wrote:
Yes, the one you got with your istD/DS/K100/K10/whatever. I know
someone out there has one collecting dust, and I'm putting together a
lightweight kit for motorcycle trips. The 16-45 is just a bit too
bulky to fit nicely into the
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:45 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bud's the worst of a bad lot...
Obviously you've never had a Narragansett.
Narragansett is a mainstream beer? I've not seen it advertised lately
on the Buffalo TV stations. Perhaps Buffalo is behind the times.
I'd only be surprised if they were actually the same.
Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
try comparing [EMAIL PROTECTED] and fa 50 1.4 field of view. you'll be
surprised
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
-- Dr. Jerry Pournelle
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Congratulations !
Any monetary compensation?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Two of my shots are to be used for a local calendar.
Hi all.
Just got word, that 2 of the 4 photos i submitted for the
Very nice Godfrey. A clear case of more is less!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO 2008 - 65 - GDG
Spent a bit of time experimenting with the Lightroom 2 Public Beta
this morning, using copies
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
