DagT wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
K20D, da*16-5...@16mm, 1/90s, f/8, ISO200
Oh YEAH!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
DagT wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
K20D, da*16-5...@16mm, 1/90s, f/8, ISO200
Oh YEAH!
Great shot!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
By this time next year, it'll be about half that. If my time is worth any
money at all, it's practically not worth the time to go through the bother
of deleting them.
Whenever I can't think of a better reason for keeping a shot than how
I concur. There is no point in keeping stuff just because it is cheap to do
so. It may only equate to 1TB per year, but it is also a whole lot of
filing, cataloguing etc that I don't have time to do. There is no point in
me keeping stuff that is average at best. I don't ever want to be an
John Sessoms said:
I just replaced my cheap Chinese radio-slaves, which come to think were
Interfit Branded with Paul C. Buff Cybersync. Didn't go the CyberCommander
route yet, but the receivers transmitter I have will work with it if I
ever get that far advanced.
Yeah, I am going to go with
--
From: Tanya Love
Subject: RE: Out of curiosity: A question for the pros
I concur. There is no point in keeping stuff just because it is cheap to
do
so. It may only equate to 1TB per year, but it is also a whole lot of
filing, cataloguing
Sad news Ann, my condolences. Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
My oldest (in terms of years known) and one of two of my very dearest
closest long term friends passed away on Friday ... so I'm off to Chicago to
her home and family One of
So sorry to hear this Ann. I know you had been concerned for her for some
time. But expecting the worst doesn't make coping with the situation all that
much easier.
stan
On Oct 5, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
My oldest (in terms of years known) and one of two of my very dearest
On 10/5/2010 7:01 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 01:49:18PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:43 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Well ... not a real car.
I'd get my MG running again, but that's not really for transportation.
I need to get my MGBGT back on the road too.
I should think that would be one of the best times to take pictures.
Pretty shots of pretty places are easy...
On 10/5/2010 6:27 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
The PAW project came about as a result of the same thing we tend to do here
(talk about equipment rather than taking pictures...but I
Just try to add an interesting background to a good foreground shot in
color in a chemical darkroom. It was difficult enough to do in BW,
Photoshop's a snap.
On 10/5/2010 4:59 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thanks, P. J.
Good point about storage. I guess I still think of hard drive space
On 10/5/2010 8:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:30 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:57:04AM +1000, Tanya Love wrote:
I know this is an opposing view to what most have posted here, but it works
for me. And when I am shooting 2-3000 frames
In general I try to only keep those images that don't require an explanation
for the viewer as far as technical deficiencies go. And I don't keep images
that I wouldn't be proud to show others.
Upon download, I make a fast ruthless selection of keepers and trash the
rest. I'll do that again
Hello there.
If you receive this message more than once please reply. Otherwise, you
don't /really/ have to bother.
Cheers.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
From: Larry Colen
On Oct 5, 2010, at 3:10 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Problem number 2 is what's really kept it off the road.
Vandals smashed the windshield and driver's side window and I
can't get the broken glass out of the existing interior. I'm
going to have to strip it out and completely
From: P. J. Alling
On 10/5/2010 7:01 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 01:49:18PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:43 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Well ... not a real car.
I'd get my MG running again, but that's not really for transportation.
I need to get my
A, Lucas, the Prince of Darkness
I still like my RED '87 Alfa Romeo Quadrafoglio
http://i896.photobucket.com/albums/ac164/gelewis_2010/Bisbee%20Blues%20Fest%202010/_ORI8154A1.jpg
Jerry
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: It
Be strong, Ann!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 10/5/2010 2:01 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
If Pentax's customers lose the perception that Pentax offers superior
value, they will no longer be Pentax's customers.
Very well said indeed. This is probably what I've been trying to tell
all along but did not manage it with proper brevity. I am
On 9/30/2010 8:21 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Boris,
Tell Galia I like her army better than yours.
She seems to have 3 cohorts on the attack,
and the stage(?) appears more parallel to the front rank in her shot.
The waves are just waves.
In the chair study, I especially like the choice of row 10.
It
On 10/1/2010 12:19 AM, Bob W wrote:
I think you were both very clever to get that shot of the chairs, and to see
it in that way. Excellent.
Bob
Thanks, Bob. I did not know what Galia shot until we got home :-).
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 10/1/2010 3:59 AM, paul stenquist wrote:
What Bob said. Well seen.
Paul
Thanks, Paul!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 10/1/2010 2:06 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Good on you for taking the time to patiently teach and encourage her.
Even well intentioned people get busy and tired and family time
becomes nothing but a shared DVD. You never know how her thinking i
general develops because she learned how to
On 10/3/2010 5:46 PM, frank theriault wrote:
I love the two armies of ~each~ of you, and I really like Galia's Wave Study!
Excellent shots
cheers,
frank
Me too, Frank. I was very pleasantly surprised by these pictures. Thanks!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 10/4/2010 11:22 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Lovely
Dave
Thanks!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 10/1/2010 12:24 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
My upbringing won't permit me to express in properly brutal terms the
unmitigated spite and envy I'm currently feeling toward a mere child.
Beyond that ... nice work!
-- Walt
Thanks, Walt... :-)
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Mark Roberts wrote:
I was just voting on photos for the Pentax Photo Gallery and what
should come up but a shot titled Cormorants at Sunset...
I think if it was one of us, it would say Cormorants (Official Bird of
the
PDML[tm]. All Rights Reserved. Do Not Fold, Spindle, or Mutilate.
My impression is that Lightroom isn't really intended for moving photos
around.
Thanks, John. That's not what I had in mind, at least not in perpetuity.
Rather
I was imagining that immediately after importing all the images into a
single
folder there would be categories of images that in
On Oct 4, 2010, at 21:54 , Joseph McAllister wrote:
Well PDML'rs, you forced me to break out my DA* 50-135 ƒ2.8 today. I
hadn't used it since I tested it when I bought it almost two years
ago, at least as far as I can recall. I used the DA* 16-50 ƒ2.8 and
the DA* 60-250 ƒ4.0 for all my
My following comments are a duplicate of what I sent under the title
It ain't like it used to be but are a follow up in this thread as
well, perhaps even more germane.
On Oct 2, 2010, at 09:16 , Carlos R wrote:
El 02/10/2010 13:26, paul stenquist escribió:
What's DC? Have you had trouble
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:35 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
I've finally found something worth firing up the K-x's HD video. I just need
to find funding for the trip.
Anybody care to float me a loan? Any New Zealand Pentaxians have a couch I
can crash on for a day or two?
On Oct 2, 2010, at 11:28 , Ken Waller wrote:
Dave, seems like you have a very cooperative group of squirels Jays!
IMO the backgrounds in most of your squirrel/Jay images are
distracting. Repositioning (higher, lower, left or right) the camera
to capture their antics without the
Jump on the spiral up staircase why don't ya!
Bigger Sensor? More Mega-Pixel$… Fa$ter proce$$or in the camera,
faster larger $D card$, longer tran$fer times to your computer, Fa$ter
computer, more RAM, Larger $torage, new I/O $pecification$ to enable
better transfer times, means another
On 10/5/2010 9:30 AM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
I think I will let this slide for now, even though it is a crappy system
that makes these kinds of side-show shenanigans (worked that into a
sentence) with Pentax's top of the line DA optics.
Joe, with all due respect, I think that you might be
On 10/5/2010 8:54 AM, Bob W wrote:
in general you'll find things easier if you keep everything in one folder
and use keywords and collections to organise things within LR. This is the
approach I take (LR creates date folders for me as I import, but since I
never look into the photo folder using
On Sep 27, 2010, at 07:23 , William Robb wrote:
It like having a whole group of ADHD anal retentives in the same
room griping about how the new caramel Mars bar isn't as nice as the
white chocolate Mars bar because there is goo inside the caramel bar.
Wrong!
We'd gripe about how the
On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:07 PM, David Parsons wrote:
There are two ways of moving files when using LR.
1. Move files inside of LR. It will move the files and update all
the database references automatically.
2. Move the files using your OS. You will need to tell LR where the
new
On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:11 PM, David Parsons wrote:
The tagging allows me to have multiple ways to find my pictures, but
I'm usually shooting a group of pictures around a central theme or
location, so having the folders will allow me to find them later if
there is a problem with LR.
Thanks
On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:29 PM, William Robb wrote:
As Stan says, keywords are so important to learn to use. With keywords you
can pull up every file on a particular subject/theme in moments.
I'm pretty good at that. In work, with paper files, my colleagues often came to
me for copies of
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Personally, I organize my stuff in folders in such a way that if tomorrow LR
goes banana (or orange, or even tomato), I still will have some notion of
what is where
Thanks, Boris. Again, that puts the finger on my interest. I think it's
On 10/5/2010 1:38 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Personally, I organize my stuff in folders in such a way that if
tomorrow LR goes banana (or orange, or even tomato), I still will
have some notion of what is where
Thanks, Boris. Again, that puts the
True enough, but I figured it would be a while before I heard back
from any of the Vanuatuan Pentaxians on the list. So far, it's been my
experience that they tend to keep pretty much to themselves. As do the
Fijian Pentaxians, lamentably enough.
Thanks for the crash space offer, though.
On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:54 AM, Bob W wrote:
in general you'll find things easier if you keep everything in one folder
and use keywords and collections to organise things within LR. . .
Bob
Eric - by now you have heard two somewhat opposing views on folder/file
organization for your photos
On Oct 4, 2010, at 9:39 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
My impression is that Lightroom isn't really intended for moving photos
around.
Lightroom poses no restrictions on moving files around, but it's not
the most efficient way to work.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net
My perspective is simple: I'm utterly and terminally bored with new
equipment discussions. Cool new things to buy is not why I'm
interested in Photography. With one or two small exceptions, I've got
all the equipment I need to do Photography and am only interested in
new things occasionally when
Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
My perspective is simple: I'm utterly and terminally bored with new
equipment discussions. Cool new things to buy is not why I'm
interested in Photography. With one or two small exceptions, I've got
all the equipment I need to do Photography and am only
On 10/5/2010 4:14 PM, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgigdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
My perspective is simple: I'm utterly and terminally bored with new
equipment discussions. Cool new things to buy is not why I'm
interested in Photography. With one or two small exceptions, I've got
I'm getting to be that way as well. I usually drive a car for at least 100,000
miles before even thinking about getting a new one, and that is only when
keeping the old car running costs the same as a monthly payment on a new car.
What has surprised me a bit is that prime lenses choices are
On Oct 5, 2010, at 9:20, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I'm getting to be that way as well. I usually drive a car for at least
100,000 miles before even thinking about getting a new one, and that is only
when keeping the old car running costs the same as a monthly payment on a new
car.
Hell, I
On 6 October 2010 01:19, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting that you say that, Mark. Not recently, if I understand
correctly, you bought into Sony Alpha system with A-850 and lenses.
Doubtless you did some research on the matter before committing your money.
I wonder if part
I find it helpful to keep abreast of what's new, what's problematic,
and what works well. And digital technology progresses rather quickly.
To get the best results for my clients, I want to use the best
options. I also believe in a replacement cycle. As a relatively heavy
volume user, I
On 10/5/2010 4:29 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 6 October 2010 01:19, Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting that you say that, Mark. Not recently, if I understand
correctly, you bought into Sony Alpha system with A-850 and lenses.
Doubtless you did some research on the matter before
Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/5/2010 4:14 PM, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgigdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
My perspective is simple: I'm utterly and terminally bored with new
equipment discussions. Cool new things to buy is not why I'm
interested in Photography.
--
From: Jeffery Smith
Subject: Re: It ain't like it used to be.
I'm getting to be that way as well. I usually drive a car for at least
100,000 miles before even thinking about getting a new one, and that is
only when keeping the old car running
--
From: m...@robertstech.com
Subject: Re: It ain't like it used to be.
Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
My perspective is simple: I'm utterly and terminally bored with new
equipment discussions. Cool new things to buy is not why
paul stenquist wrote:
Nice informal portrait. Great expression. Good tonality.
Paul
On Oct 4, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
http://dougbrewer.posterous.com/sometimes-shes-still
enjoy
thanks, Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Alright,
I guess we should branch out a little
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: John Mullan k...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: How to fix a missing mode dial
Yew crack me up.
jm
On 10/5/2010 4:56 PM, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Nope. My research consisted of almost everything but equipment
discussions (on this and in various other fora).
But I do, as Godfrey says,now have pretty much the gear I need to do
the photography I want to do. I see few equipment purchases in
On 10/5/2010 12:48 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
http://dougbrewer.posterous.com/sometimes-shes-still
enjoy
Mischief managed :-)
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
A question I've run across.
I'm working toward building a RAID system for local storage of image
files. I'm paranoid that I don't currently have enough
redundancy.[Off-site backup is another thread.]
But with regard to having my image files on a local network, I've heard
that Lightroom
You can put the image files anywhere you want. LR does not work well
when the catalog is stored on a network drive. The catalog wants to
live on your local computer.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:17 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
A question I've run across.
I'm working toward
From: Jerry in Arizona
Taken at the vineyard of Callaghan Winery in Sonoita, AZ.? Pentax K20D, Pentax
SMC DA 1:3.5-5.6 18-55mm w/2X telextender.? The plaque recognizes the area as a
Backyard Habitat.
Jerry
http://i896.photobucket.com/albums/ac164/gelewis_2010/_ORI8190A1_peso.jpg
Seems like
Gear, for me, is irrelevant until the lack of a particular piece prevents me
from capturing an image as I want.
Gear discussions help me to keep up with new developments, whether I need
them or not.
Its all about the output.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
From: Tanya Love
Following the advice of the oh-so-wise Thomas Van Veen, I set myself up with
Alien Bees when I was in the US for my GFM trip. They were awesome. I then
sold off most of my gear when I retired from photography, circa 2007, and
have just finished re-enabling myself with a studio
Agreed (particularly the LE models). I was thinking more like Sony and Olympus
four-thirds. Zooms have gotten much better in the past 30 years. I used to have
a Komuranon zoom that was rated as good as a prime lens back in the 1970's. The
other zooms often lacked contrast because (I assume) all
From: Boris Liberman
On 10/5/2010 8:54 AM, Bob W wrote:
in general you'll find things easier if you keep everything in one folder
and use keywords and collections to organise things within LR. This is the
approach I take (LR creates date folders for me as I import, but since I
never look
2010/10/5 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
Joe, with all due respect, I think that you might be making a mistake here.
What Boris said.
a) don't buy a lens and let it rot in your basement
b) if a lens is bad and still near warranty end date get it fixed
c) if SDM is bad get it fixed all the
Finally, he withdrew his page.
Michel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
From: Charles Robinson
On Oct 5, 2010, at 9:20, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I'm getting to be that way as well. I usually drive a car for at
least 100,000 miles before even thinking about getting a new one,
and that is only when keeping the old car running costs the same
as a monthly payment on a new
My oldest (in terms of years known) and one of two of my very dearest
closest long term friends passed away on Friday ... so I'm off to
Chicago to her home and family One of the reasons I could talk myself
into the expense of the photo show at the Dank last spring was my
concern that there
From: P N Stenquist
I find it helpful to keep abreast of what's new, what's problematic,
and what works well. And digital technology progresses rather quickly.
To get the best results for my clients, I want to use the best
options. I also believe in a replacement cycle. As a relatively heavy
2010/10/3 Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com:
Comments, critiques, recommendations, and insider trading tips welcome.
Buy low, sell high - psst, its a secret so keep it under your hat
buy Uranium related shares - prices are going through the ceiling
almost as fast as DU charges...
--
PDML
Ann,
Please let me be among the first to share my condolences for your loss.
Thank you for sharing.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
On 5/10/10, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I expect we'll be reading this again on New Year's Day...
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 5/10/10, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
but you can see why
I've been quiet for a bit
Take care Ann XX
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 10/5/2010 12:04 PM, eckinator wrote:
2010/10/5 Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com:
Joe, with all due respect, I think that you might be making a mistake here.
What Boris said.
a) don't buy a lens and let it rot in your basement
b) if a lens is bad and still near warranty end date get it fixed
2010/10/5 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
Yes, but mostly feelings of rage and disappointment.
you can tell by how far the front element bulges out... fisheye lenses
often tend to have distorted views of reality... there were even cases
of walleye vision reported in scientific
As it happens, I live less than five miles from a uranium enrichment
plant. I can't believe it never occurred to me to enrich myself via
uranium. I mean, it's been right there in front of my face the whole
time! Glowing, even!
On 10/5/2010 11:10 AM, eckinator wrote:
2010/10/3 Ken
I think you should sell the seperatly, you'll probably only get about
$200 for it with or without the grip. If you can sell the grip
separately it's gravy.
On 10/5/2010 12:09 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: P N Stenquist
I find it helpful to keep abreast of what's new, what's problematic,
On 10/3/2010 5:43 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Comments, critiques, recommendations, and insider trading tips welcome.
Buy low, sell high - psst, its a secret so keep it under your hat
As my Econ 101 professor said, tell me when it's low, then tell me when
it's high.
Kenneth Waller
Thanks Dan and Bob W!
DagT
Den 3. okt. 2010 kl. 23.48 skrev Daniel J. Matyola:
Stunning!
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 3:07 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
K20D, da*16-5...@16mm, 1/90s, f/8, ISO200
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
Feel my wrath, dirty equipment talker!
I had the same thought, actually.
I'll risk incurring the wrath of the people who despise equipment talk to
mention that Pentax still makes a very nice selection of prime lenses
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Oct 5, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Stan Halpin wrote:
I personally have found that the Option B or Option C approach is far
superior. I use the date subfolder approach, and have one higher-level folder
for each year. Using a keyword hierarchy within LR to tag and locate images
is far less
On Oct 5, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Apparently (almost forgot) I wrote a wordy and lengthy blog entry on this
subject. You can read it here:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2009/03/on-workflow-and-archiving.html
if you don't mind its length.
Thanks, Boris. Haven't checked it
Best of Luck Ann.
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
As I hasten to stipulate at every opportunity, I'm pretty new to
photography, and I have what may seem to be a stupid question. So,
please indulge me.
That said, what do all of you real photographers do with images that may
be flawed, but still have some redeeming qualities to them. For
My perspective is simple: I'm utterly and terminally bored with new
equipment discussions. Cool new things to buy is not why I'm
interested in Photography. With one or two small exceptions, I've got
all the equipment I need to do Photography and am only interested in
new things occasionally
I'm getting to be that way as well. I usually drive a car for at least
100,000
miles before even thinking about getting a new one, and that is only when
keeping the old car running costs the same as a monthly payment on a new
car.
Hell, I usually only buy a car AFTER it has 100,000 miles
On Oct 5, 2010, at 10:58 , Bob W wrote:
I'm getting to be that way as well. I usually drive a car for at
least
100,000
miles before even thinking about getting a new one, and that is
only when
keeping the old car running costs the same as a monthly payment on
a new
car.
Hell, I
As it happens, I live less than five miles from a uranium enrichment
plant. I
can't believe it never occurred to me to enrich myself via uranium. I
mean,
it's been right there in front of my face the whole time! Glowing, even!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqwS0Ew77WE
--
PDML
As I hasten to stipulate at every opportunity, I'm pretty new to
photography, and I have what may seem to be a stupid question. So, please
indulge me.
That said, what do all of you real photographers do with images that may
be
flawed, but still have some redeeming qualities to them. For
While we can't talk about bodies and lenses, there is always photo bags! And
Godfrey carefully sidestepped the issue of bags. As you are no doubt aware, he
has gone by the name Bagmelda Marcos in the past. ;-)
Jeffery
On Oct 5, 2010, at 12:56 PM, Bob W wrote:
My perspective is simple: I'm
I would post it and say how do y'all like the bokeh in this shot? Dealing
with focus and shutter lag when trying to photograph a flying bird (not to
mention my poor reflexes) have convinced me never to even try them with my
current equipment. So, you'll never hear me criticizing another one's
On 10/5/2010 1:56 PM, Bob W wrote:
My perspective is simple: I'm utterly and terminally bored with new
equipment discussions. Cool new things to buy is not why I'm
interested in Photography. With one or two small exceptions, I've got
all the equipment I need to do Photography and am only
Tanya,
If you can get me the same deal, I'll take two!
Thanks for chiming in on this. The U2410 was one of the top 5
professional monitors on cnet.com - which was my first stop on the way
down this rabbit hole... It's still in the running... Good to hear
that you like it!
-c
On Tue, Oct 5,
Apply some blur, some motion striping and call it art...
Hell, I seldom throw anything out, (unless it's just silly, like 100
pictures of a doorknob), storage is cheap, and you never know when a
great idea for combined images will strike you.
Somewhere on film I have a very nice
John -
Did you have the original Buff slaves or the newer ones? They weren't
happy with the original ones and had a recall and an upgrade offer to go
with the newer models. You might check that out with them. The older
models were purchased off the shelf from somewhere in the Far East.
So sorry to hear that, Ann. Was she the friend you visited in Zion?
FWIW, I leave you with a quote which has been beneficial to me from time
to time...Don't know the author...
What you leave behind is not what is engraved in stone monuments, but
what is woven into the lives of others.
-p
From: Walter Gilbert
As I hasten to stipulate at every opportunity, I'm pretty new to
photography, and I have what may seem to be a stupid question. So,
please indulge me.
That said, what do all of you real photographers do with images that may
be flawed, but still have some redeeming
Sorry for you loss, Ann. Thanks for the link to your gallery - very
heartwarming to see a friendship last that long.
--- Scott Catron - z...@yahoo.com ---
http://www.flickr.com/photos/zaui/collections/
- Original Message
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
To: Pentax-Discuss
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
