http://42graphy.org/misc/ru-2013/_IR00358.html
Taken from the Omni hotel in downtown Dallas about a year ago.
Larry: Here is an earlier example of my use of the 8mm fisheye.
And here where the subject gets ouch!-close to the lens:
http://42graphy.org/misc/ru-2013/_IR00364.html
All comments
I like the colors and it really reminds me of chocolate:)
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:26 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
I don't know what it says about me that out in the middle of the Nevada
desert, about 40 minutes south from Las Vegas, I looked at the hills and
saw... chocolate. Yum, yum.
Figured as much. Great price.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Zos Xavius wrote:
Do you still have this? I really want a version 3 and this is a fair price.
Oh, sorry. It's gone now. I should have mentioned that.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography
That's a great use of 8mm, Igor. Nice!
I'd have moved that shoe or cloned it out, though. :-)
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
http://42graphy.org/misc/ru-2013/_IR00358.html
Taken from the Omni hotel in downtown Dallas about a year ago.
Larry: Here is an
The caption totally makes this shot, Dave. Great!
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:05 PM, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
A bucolic scene I passed while out for an easy bike ride today. I stopped on
the way back to take a photo :)
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/741/#peso
Cheers,
Dave
Like them both, but the first image is excellent! I agree with Bruce
about the shoe, but that's very easy to fix.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
http://42graphy.org/misc/ru-2013/_IR00358.html
Taken from the Omni hotel in downtown Dallas about a year ago.
Strange farm you have there, looks unreal:)
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:05 AM, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
A bucolic scene I passed while out for an easy bike ride today. I stopped on
the way back to take a photo :)
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/741/#peso
Cheers,
Dave
--
It probably means your subconscious is telling you that if you made any
new year's resolutions to lose weight, get fit or eat healthy ...
you're doomed to failure. 8-D
On 1/26/2014 7:26 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
I don't know what it says about me that out in the middle of the Nevada
desert,
Nice painterly minimalism, chocolate or no - and the kind of landscape
shot that is very you Marnie. Having spent a lot of time in the area,
this photo really resonates with me..
ann
On 1/27/2014 03:50, Attila Boros wrote:
I like the colors and it really reminds me of chocolate:)
On Mon,
Very brave new worldish or invasion of the body snatchers something
ominous to be sure in those odd lumps scattered about.
ann
On 1/27/2014 08:33, Bruce Walker wrote:
The caption totally makes this shot, Dave. Great!
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:05 PM, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
A
KEH currently has one in Bargain condition for $59.00 They also have
one in EX condition for $84.00.
On 1/27/2014 7:03 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Figured as much. Great price.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Zos Xavius wrote:
Do you still have
I'm going to wait. I need to see what a couple of M lenses will cost
me to fix up right now.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:38 AM, P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
KEH currently has one in Bargain condition for $59.00 They also have one in
EX condition for $84.00.
On 1/27/2014 7:03
Boy, I hope not.
LOL. Marnie aka Doe
In a message dated 1/27/2014 7:56:20 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
johnsess...@yahoo.com writes:
It probably means your subconscious is telling you that if you made any
new year's resolutions to lose weight, get fit or eat healthy ...
you're doomed to
Thanks, ann. Nice words.
Marnie aka Doe :-) Said I had some real photographs too. Heh.
In a message dated 1/27/2014 8:08:34 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
ann...@nyc.rr.com writes:
Nice painterly minimalism, chocolate or no - and the kind of landscape
shot that is very you Marnie. Having
Fortunately not a we evil.
On 1/26/2014 4:05 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Is that as opposed to lesser evil or greater evil.
On 1/26/2014 2:34 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
has that mid evil feel to it
Dave
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
On 1/26/2014 12:08 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-14x-sdm-teleconverter-surfaces.html
I was looking at the picture and something bothered me.
The curvature of the text does not match the curvature of the tc body.
The item may exist, but that picture is not
Wasn't really about photography though. It was all about museums curators.
On 1/26/2014 1:59 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
I read it thoroughly. It was worth my while.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:38 PM, P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I skimmed it, there may actually be a new thought
Not so non-trivial and laborious, Boris. Here's my layer stack, from the bottom:
copy of the original with 30px gaussian blur;
curves adjustment to brighten that;
the original, blending mode set to Soft Light;
copy of the original High-Pass'ed at 1px, blending mode set to overlay.
I think the
P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
KEH currently has one in Bargain condition for $59.00 They also have
one in EX condition for $84.00.
Before anyone buys either of those lenses from KEH be sure to phone
them and ask if the lens has the A setting on the aperture ring. I
think most
Heheheheheheh.
Marnie aka Doe So THAT is what they are doing with those blocks.
In a message dated 1/26/2014 8:05:22 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
dmann...@gmail.com writes:
A bucolic scene I passed while out for an easy bike ride today. I stopped
on the way back to take a photo :)
Nice. I wish the top of the window frame wasn't cut off, but that is a
quibble, really.
I like the second one too. The mismatched feet make it for me.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 1/27/2014 12:11:39 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
s...@komkon.org writes:
Interesting street, looks like a Harry Potter type street. Nice photo. I'd
probably tone down the clouds a tiny tad.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 1/22/2014 6:34:12 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
rwomer1...@yahoo.com writes:
Another from last March: Dinon is a medieval town in
I rather like it, Jack.
Maybe, maybe, maybe, bump up the contrast a little.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 1/11/2014 9:26:41 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
jdavi...@yahoo.com writes:
Tried the state wildlife area yesterday. Fog had set in fairly heavily and
made it a soupy day.
As
I'd thought of the caption long ago when I saw some bales like that... it's
only yesterday that I had a good opportunity to stop for a photo :)
Thanks to everyone who looked!
Cheers,
Dave
On Jan 28, 2014, at 2:33 am, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
The caption totally makes this
What Bruce said.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO - Looking at the big world
That's a great use of 8mm, Igor. Nice!
I'd have moved that shoe or cloned it out, though. :-)
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org
Simo.. err. Bruce says... :-)
Thank you, Ken, Atilla and Bruce.
Do you mean that the waiting for the second shoe is keeping it too tense? ;-)
I was afraid to clone the shoe out, as it is a crucial part of the
history. I thought A_social PDML (AP) would kick me out from the list. ;-)
(It might
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london1/7de01340.html
If you've followed the news from London in the past couple of months
you'll get the title...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Marnie,
I agree, probably, if the top of the windows were present, it would
have been better. The optimization of framing was done for the main subject.
I have not seen a kid with matching feet yet. One is always left, and
the other one is right.
As for the socks, until the age of about 2
That's funny it's so startling. Good shot, too, of course.
Marnie aka Doe :-) Heh.
In a message dated 1/19/2014 12:58:47 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
apathy...@lyons-ryan.org writes:
I thought about using this image for the February PUG ('Feathered
Friends'). Then I remembered it doesn't
There's still cold around here, but at least now it's pretty:)
http://1x.com/photo/460677
Taken with Sony RX100 II.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Oh dear..
ann
On 1/27/2014 12:26, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london1/7de01340.html
If you've followed the news from London in the past couple of months
you'll get the title...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
yes, indeed. Nicely captured
ann
On 1/27/2014 14:05, Attila Boros wrote:
There's still cold around here, but at least now it's pretty:)
http://1x.com/photo/460677
Taken with Sony RX100 II.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Mon Jan 27 10:08:24 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
On 1/26/2014 12:08 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-14x-sdm-teleconverter-surfaces.html
I was looking at the picture and something bothered me.
The curvature of the text does not match the curvature of the tc
I am sure I missed some of the photos from the series, but
I like some of the HDR shots, especially this one:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london1/7de0141122.html
The one you posted to the list,
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london1/7de0122932.html
is nice as well.
But in the
CollinB coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
On Mon Jan 27 10:08:24 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
On 1/26/2014 12:08 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-14x-sdm-teleconverter-surfaces.html
I was looking at the picture and something bothered me.
The curvature of the text
Thanks, Marnie!
I like your word, rather. That's, also, about as emphatic as I can get about
this image.
I'll try punching it up a little. (if I can locate it in the trash bin).
Not that you've indicated such, but this isn't a conversion. Just the way the
day looked.
Jack
Really nice image, Attila.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Attila Boros attila.p...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 11:05 AM
Subject: PESO: Winter Dream
There's still cold around here, but at least now it's pretty:)
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
(which he says Pentax is calling a Full Frame Converter)
WUTT
If this is true, is it possible that the converter will allow DA
lenses (that don't quite cover full frame) to cover them adequately
(albeit at 1.4x the
Marnie, decided to try your Punch Up idea.
Think I rather prefer this version.
Thanks for suggestion.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=751
- Original Message -
From: eactiv...@aol.com eactiv...@aol.com
To: pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 27,
wouldn't the lack of a 1.54 crop factor that APC-S sensor cameras have
over 35mm frame more-or-less cancel out the 1.4x converter effect so
that a DA14mm + 1.4TC on a 35mm frame would end up being a 14/1.54 x
1.4 = 12.7mm FOV on full frame?
Alastair
On 28 January 2014 08:42, Darren Addy
- Forwarded Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: Peso: Duck Soup Redo
Marnie, decided to try your Punch Up idea.
Think I rather prefer this version.
Thanks for
Thanks, Ann and Jack.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
No, the 14mm x 1.4x will become a 19.6mm f/4 in itself, whichever camera (if
any) you put behind it.
In case the resulting image will be large enough to cover the 24x36mm format
(not yet confirmed), it will project a FOV corresponding to a 19.6mm f/4
lens.
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
In other words, a 14mm x 1.4x becomes a true 19.6mm lens - hence
irrespectively of sensor size - and not an equivalent to XY mm on a given
format.
The question to be answered is whether such a combo of lens and TC will give
an image circle covering 24x36mm format or not.
Dario
-Messaggio
You are close. What get's cancelled out is that the effective FOV
becomes close to the actual FOV of the converted lens. But the focal
length and speed changes (1.4x and 1 stop of light).
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Alastair Robertson
kiwibiolog...@gmail.com wrote:
wouldn't the lack of a
If Asahiman is right and this is the name (and functionality) of the
product, then it wouldn't make sense for Ricoh/Pentax to formally
announce it before also formally announcing a full frame Pentax
model. (Unless Pentax anticipates that there a lot of people looking
to use theirs with their pZ-1p
Interesting (?) question: in case the 1.4x TC will allow DA lenses to cover
FA sensor format, one could think it's a great way to make all DA lenses
work with their intended FOV on a FA body. E.g. a 14mm used alone on a DA
body will become a 20mm by using it via the 1.4x TC on a FA body, thus
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
Great, but what's the point of spreading the same amount of light gathered by
the same front lens on a larger sensor having say the same pixel count (e.g.
24 MP) while losing one stop for exposure?
To smooth the
To me, the point is that you make a full frame DSLR body attractive to
people who own mostly APS-C lenses. They only have to buy one
accessory (the 1.4x teleconverter) to make them useable.
Rather than seeing FF body and lens kits, don't be surprised if you
see FF body and full frame converter
We may not have long to wait to find out. Asahi Man posted this
not-so-cryptic teaser in a thread entitled:
Ricoh Imaging at CP+ 2014 (February 13th-16th):
Should be a nice show :-D ;-)
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/52977166
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Darren Addy
I have not, so I don't :-(
Cheers,
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 27 January 2014 12:26, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
On Jan 27, 2014, at 3:24 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
To me, the point is that you make a full frame DSLR body attractive to
people who own mostly APS-C lenses. They only have to buy one
accessory (the 1.4x teleconverter) to make them useable.
But the DA* lenses are superb on
Someone suggests taking any 1.4x teleconverter and putting one of the
problematic (non-full-frame-covering) DA lenses on a full frame Pentax
film camera and seeing what it looks like.
So I just took a DA 16-45mm and stuck it on a ME body. Vignettes hard
at the corners at 16mm. Then I put a Rear
I would argue that it makes at least as much sense as it always has
(which is to say particularly on the longer lenses).
If a DA* 300mm f/4 could become a 420mm f/5.6 that is not a bad thing
(and the teleconverter surely would cost less than a lens of that
focal length and speed would... one would
on 2014-01-27 12:20 Mark Roberts wrote
I think the text on the barrel was Photoshopped in but I think it's a
genuine Pentax product shot done from a pre-production prototype.
i think the whole thing is a fake; every detail of mount surface has highlights
indicating a light source to the left,
I would think that also, except for the fact that Asahi Man is saying
the things that he is saying.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:42 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2014-01-27 12:20 Mark Roberts wrote
I think the text on the barrel was Photoshopped in but I think it's a
genuine
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have a 1.4x to test here at work with me, but I'm pretty sure
that would allow it to cover the corners at 24-63mm also.
Note that DA lenses have to have an image circle somewhat larger than
APS-C, in order to
Don't you think such images supplied at the time of news releases can just
be photo-realistic renderings?
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: steve harley
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 9:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
on 2014-01-27 12:20 Mark
on 2014-01-27 13:44 Darren Addy wrote
I would think that also, except for the fact that Asahi Man is saying
the things that he is saying.
as poor Asahi Man's reputation is on the line, i will allow that the product
may be real, but the image is a simulation
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
I've been having that feeling for some time now, as the picts of latest
Limited lenses look too perfect. And also consider the camera bodies offered
in different colors: they are not the same camera model of a different color
shot in a similar placement. They are in the same identical
The pure geometry would say yes, it would cover almost a 24x36mm sensor,
if there is no vignetting. However I expect light fall off, (which is a
somewhat different issue), to be a problem, it almost always is.
On 1/27/2014 3:08 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
In other words, a 14mm x 1.4x becomes a
on 2014-01-27 13:53 Dario Bonazza wrote
Don't you think such images supplied at the time of news releases can just be
photo-realistic renderings?
to produce images prior to production, i would think Ricoh would render from a
3D model rather than sloppily paste together a mount, a body and
It must be something that grows on its head. :-)
Mon Jan 27 08:45:38 EST 2014
Attila Boros wrote:
Strange farm you have there, looks unreal:)
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:05 AM, David Mann dmann.nz at gmail.com
wrote:
A bucolic scene I passed while out for an easy bike ride today. I
stopped
I believe they actually have highlighted the fact that these are A
lenses. Not sure though, calling would be a good idea.
On 1/27/2014 12:01 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
KEH currently has one in Bargain condition for $59.00 They also have
one in EX
Unrelated to the 1.4x, but I've been reviewing the recent posts of
Asahi Man on dpreview. He recently said this:
Yes, Ricoh is the best for Pentax since a very long time.Hoya...Hoya
fired Jun Hirakawa...Anybody knows who Jun Hirakawa is?
Well I didn't, but I do now:
On 1/27/2014 3:21 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
Great, but what's the point of spreading the same amount of light
gathered by the same front lens on a larger sensor having say the
same pixel count (e.g. 24 MP) while
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Go you one better -- What is reality?
Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
Lessee -- five million quatloos to the first person who identifies the
author.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
Converting a focal length to a longer one, can be seen like getting an image
area and make it larger.
So a tele-converted image MUST BECOME larger than the original one projected
by the lens, hence a DA-lens image is necessarily enlarged, more or less as
much as a 24x36mm needs (unless it is
Edited here and there, for the sake of precision:
Converting a focal length to a longer one can be seen like getting an image
area and make it larger.
So a tele-converted image MUST become larger than the original one projected
by the lens alone.
Then a DA-lens image + a 1.4x TC is enlarged
Philip K. Dick, a science fiction writer.
On Jan 27, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Go you one better -- What is reality?
Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
Lessee -- five million
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:28 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
I expect it is full-frame in the sense that it would not vignette the
image from a full-frame lens. I don't see how it would make an APS-C
lens have a larger image circle.
Enlarging the image is what teleconverters do. If it
Ah shit. So Hoya fired the guy who created my fave lens, the DA*
55/1.4. Unbelievable. What a bunch of maroons.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Unrelated to the 1.4x, but I've been reviewing the recent posts of
Asahi Man on dpreview. He recently said
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah shit. So Hoya fired the guy who created my fave lens, the DA*
55/1.4. Unbelievable. What a bunch of maroons.
He probably didn't want to do endoscopes.
(The bokeh looks like shit!)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Reality: It's a nice place to visit, but you wouldn't want to live there.
On 1/27/2014 4:28 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Go you one better -- What is reality?
Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
Lessee -- five
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:28 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
I expect it is full-frame in the sense that it would not vignette the
image from a full-frame lens. I don't see how it would make an APS-C
lens have a larger image circle.
You can demonstrate it for yourself with a card held
Was surprised to find 3 Pentax lenses in a thrift shop today.
DA18-55. Metal mount version.
F35-135. Have never had one before. Will be good to compare against the
FA28-105.
AT-X 50-250. Shot a couple shots with it. Standard Tokina cool results but
quite sharp and pretty compact.
Now for
IMHO that AT-X 50-250mm is a hidden gem. I'd be very curious to see
it compared to the $1400 Pentax SMC DA* 60-250mm f/4 ED IF SDM, head
to head.
Nice haul!
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Collin Brendemuehl
coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
Was surprised to find 3 Pentax lenses in a thrift shop
Very nice! How are you finding the camera? Would you say it has taken
shots/work away from your DSLR or has it just added to the number of
shots that you make?
I have been taking more shots overall since I acquired the camera and
lugging about a back-pack that I'm often reticent/unable to delve
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah shit. So Hoya fired the guy who created my fave lens, the DA*
55/1.4. Unbelievable. What a bunch of maroons.
He probably didn't want to do
I hope this 1.4x does not act as a pseudo-adapter. Canon did that way back
with their early DSLRs.
Did not go over very well, though their adaptation was handled than what is
talked about here.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Reality is living in one of the 48 states that dont have legalized
recreational marijuana.
On 1/27/2014 5:04 PM, John wrote:
Reality: It's a nice place to visit, but you wouldn't want to live there.
On 1/27/2014 4:28 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
I was wondering if any K-3 owners have had a chance to evaluate how
focus peaking/live view works on the K-3. How far in can you zoom and
still have focus peaking? Is it pretty straightforward to implement?
Thanks in advance.
--
Photographers must learn not to be ashamed to have their
Miserere wrote:
On 27 January 2014 12:26, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london1/7de01340.html
If you've followed the news from London in the past couple of months
you'll get the title...
I have not, so I don't :-(
As you can see from the
Follow-up question:
I may be wrong about this, but since [Focus Peaking] is set to [ON] in
[Live View] of the [Camera 3] menu, is it possible to save this (along
with other preferences) to one of the three USER modes.
The Saving Frequently Used Settings on page 75 of the manual says
that [Camera
Glad you asked this. I have only tried FP on mine a couple of times
and gotten mixed results. I assumed it was just me being klutzy with
it and not reading the manual. My manual is in almost pristine
condition -- barely cracked open. :-)
I tried it initially with my DA* 16-50 (or was it the DA*
Several days of high winds and cool temps make for quite spectacular stuff down
at the Lake. I'll do a GESO later but for now:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2014/01/surfs-up.html?m=1
The first 20 yards or so from shore is actually floating balls of ice - they
appear as a white-ish band
Ooof! That has visceral impact, Frank.
It looks underexposed to me though. I think that all the white in that
calls for a few clicks of +EV comp.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:12 PM, knarf knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Several days of high winds and cool temps make for quite spectacular stuff
Brightened it up a bit in curves, Bruce. May be better now?
Thanks for the comment!
Cheers,
frank
Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ooof! That has visceral impact, Frank.
It looks underexposed to me though. I think that all the white in that
calls for a few clicks of +EV comp.
On
Two thumbs wholeheartedly up, Frank. :-)
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:29 PM, knarf knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Brightened it up a bit in curves, Bruce. May be better now?
Thanks for the comment!
Cheers,
frank
Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ooof! That has visceral impact,
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:12:18PM -0500, knarf wrote:
Several days of high winds and cool temps make for quite spectacular stuff
down at the Lake. I'll do a GESO later but for now:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2014/01/surfs-up.html?m=1
Awesome photo.
The first 20 yards or so from
Curious indeed! No dog, and a daytime picture! (and an intriguing one, at that)
On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:26 , Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london1/7de01340.html
If you've followed the news from London in the past couple of months
you'll get the title...
--
on 2014-01-26 23:10 eactiv...@aol.com wrote
Interesting. Never heard of that, at all.
see if your library has any books of Man Ray's work
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Justin is a photographer friend who was taking pictures at a bike messenger
race last weekend. I think he has a very interesting face:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2014/01/j-mo.html?m=1
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
Cheers,
frank
“Analysis kills spontaneity.” -- Henri-Frederic Amiel
On Jan 27, 2014, at 6:55 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if any K-3 owners have had a chance to evaluate how
focus peaking/live view works on the K-3. How far in can you zoom and
still have focus peaking? Is it pretty straightforward to implement?
Not sure of
On Jan 27, 2014, at 7:27 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Follow-up question:
I may be wrong about this, but since [Focus Peaking] is set to [ON] in
[Live View] of the [Camera 3] menu, is it possible to save this (along
with other preferences) to one of the three USER modes.
Sounds like you had a great trip, Mark! And I know you had great company among
our British PDMLers! Great folks! Cheers, Christine
On Jan 20, 2014, at 7:24 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Hi, boys and girls! We're back form old blighty after a splendid week
in London
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Stanley Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
On Jan 27, 2014, at 6:55 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if any K-3 owners have had a chance to evaluate how
focus peaking/live view works on the K-3. How far in can you zoom and
He's gorgeous - and I said that pretty much on facebook too :-)
nice shot
ann
On 1/27/2014 22:45, knarf wrote:
Justin is a photographer friend who was taking pictures at a bike messenger
race last weekend. I think he has a very interesting face:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Bruce Walker
Brilliant!
Cheers,
frank
David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
A bucolic scene I passed while out for an easy bike ride today. I
stopped on the way back to take a photo :)
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/741/#peso
Cheers,
Dave
“Analysis kills spontaneity.” -- Henri-Frederic Amiel
--
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
