From the instruction manual of the KR-10...
The RICOH XR WINDER-1 can be used with the KR-10. By operating the shutter
release button on the winder, it can be used for rapid sequence photography
at approximate 2 frames per second (at shutter speed of 1/125 sec.) By just
setting the selection
I have a non-original TTL flash (30 guide number) for my Z1p. If I use it
together with the built-in flash (14 guide number), is it equal to 44 guide
number?
The equation is:
SquareRoot(30*30 + 14*14) = 33
regards,
Alan Chan
Ok. I got a broken SF-10.
Mount matches dimensions of ZX-M perfectly on the face.
I removed the mount from the SF-10. Easy. Lifts right off.
Then ... I try to take the mout off the ZX-M.
It's ok until... it won't lift off the area where the pins are located.
Does it need -- rotated, flexed,
Damn, he doesn't ship internationally, now I am missing out on this hot buy,
a one in a life time change to get a advanced professional camera like this.
I will forget about getting a LX or MZ-S now, those have only one finder.
Frits
Or the Acronymic design. Puts OSHA's new standard to
My suggestion to crop was only intended to correct the symmetry of the
two sides. If you look at the photo, you'll see the two arch shapes on
each side are almost identical. However, the area on the right is
slightly wider and its midpoint appears to be just a slight amount
lower. If you were to
Frank Theriault, Gingerbread
I'm a big fan of Victorian architecture, and Frank's rendering of
gingerbread detail invokes a warm and fuzzy feeling. I'd love to pull up
a chair on that porch and spend an afternoon sipping iced tea -- or,
better yet, a good single malt. From a technical
Original Message -
From: "Jarosaw Brzeziski" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Snap-in Focus in MZ/ZX-7?
I am sorry, but you must be wrong: if you use a non-AF lens, no AF body in
the world is
capable of giving an AF-assist light.
I didn't mean AF-assist light - I mean a sign in
- Original Message -
From: "Jarosaw Brzeziski" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MZ-S is comming to Poland
Being Polish I beg you to use correct English:
Sorry for that...
Artur
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
Collin Brendemuehl wrote on PUG this months
[ Collin, that's a great job commenting on every one of them! There were lots of
images]
[...]
Arch/Whale by Frantisek Vlcek, Czech Republic
Definitely eye-catching.
Did it take you long to find the right angle to shoot?
It looks
- Original Message -
From: Douglas E Harmon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Snap-in Focus in MZ/ZX-7?
He's possibly confusing the terms AF Assist for AF Confirmation. A common
confusion on the list.
Actually I am:) Sorry for that...
A note about the Snap-in, it doesn't work
Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My opinion, FWIW --- just pick up any older functional body
and use it for IR, as there is no need for fancy metering or
any other camera features to achieve great results w/ IR film.
In fact, automation is almost
Len wrote:
Remember that polarizers on wide angle lenses can give strange
results because of the angle of view, especially on scenics or
landscapes showing a lot of sky ...
this is correct - you will get shades of blue-darkening
across the wide expanse of sky = rather
Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously, I'm quite impressed. I think you ought to put up a web page when
you are done and embarass the hell out of Kodak with it. Hope you saved
some of your before slides so you can do some side by sides.
I agree. It sounds like a product that has great
Dear list members,
I got the FA 28-105 f/3.2-4.5 AL (IF) yesterday and here comes the votes
from the swedish jury (oups sorry, an inter-euro joke).
I won't comment on optical performance, since I haven't shot a single
roll with it yet.
* Design and build quality
It's incredible small! It's
On 5 Jun 2001, at 15:43, Patrick Genovese wrote:
First, let me thank all who replied to my post for the great feedback.
Since I like using filters esp my circular polariser a non rotating front
element is highly desirable. I know that the sigma 20mm and the 17-35
both have non rotating
The fish-eye zoom has filter thread (sort of) but
no rear gelatin filter holder. I strongly suspect that filters may cause
vignetting with this lens; at least at the 17mm setting. Haven't really
tried...
Pål
- Original Message -
From:
Eric
Platt
To: PDML
Sent:
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Stiff aperture rings
I've noticed that the aperture rings on my A 35/2.8 and A
24/2.8 are getting progressively stiffer. You almost need to use
force on the 24mm. Is this normal..any remedies...
I've had that happen on a couple of
Sigma 17-35mm f2.8-4.
Not for ya if you like to have filters on them. At most it will
take is a UV or remove it for a CPL.
With CPL and Lenshood, slight vigetting but I still love the extra 3mm
and what i can get for 1/3
the price for a lens comparable to the canon equivalent.
My 2 cents,
Jason
I saw one of these (or something very similiar) on the street recently. What
I saw was certainly large enough to be more than 35mm format, and looked a
lot more impressive than the picture suggests. If nothing else the
owner/carrier looked the part - a bit like one of those French extreme
sports
You can't use filters at all with the 17-28mm fisheye zoom.
the front has a little build in hood and no facility to attach a filter,
there is no rear filter holder either. It's still a fun lens.
- MCC
At 03:13 PM 6/9/01 -0600, you wrote:
I was just
wondering about the SMCP-F Fisheye Zoom
Sometimes they're close.
Today some goodies for anyone interested.
The man passed away a year ago @ 96, and so
left behind some treasures that his family
is parting with. Mostly from the 50s early 60s,
by all appearances..
Here are some things available. I'd rather some artist
or budding
Well you can tape filters in place :-)
Actually on closer inspection what looks like
filter threads aren't...
Pål
- Original Message -
From:
Mark
Cassino
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 12:04
AM
Subject: Re: Filters for the SMCP-F
Fisheye
Some rethoric questions:
- Is it a good idea to have the multiple exposure function on a switch that can easily
be set accidentally?
- Whats the theory behind having the exposure bar oriented vertically when exposure is
controlled by horizontal movement; left - right?
Pål
-
This message is
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: Filters for the SMCP-F Fisheye Zoom 17mm-28mm
f/3.5-4.5
Well you can tape filters in place :-)
Actually on closer inspection what looks like filter threads
aren't...
How big is the rear element on that lens? The reason why I ask
os
Pål Jensen wrote:
Some rethoric questions:
- Is it a good idea to have the multiple exposure function on a switch that can
easily be set accidentally?
Not sure, but I'd think you'd notice the motor drive not advancing if
you accidently set it.
- Whats the theory behind having the
There is often a advertising deal made by producers with
vendors. That is why so often everyone in a movie is driving
the same brand of car. The auto maker has cut a deal with
the producers. One such deal that I remember is a comedy of
Coca Cola trying to break into the Soviet market. In the
vary
Under current international copyright law someone always
owns the copyright. Just who that is seems to vary from
country to country as Bill Robb and I discovered a while
back in a rather long discussion on this list.
The Library is not violating copyright, no more than you are
when you lend a
Well, Tom, there is the law and there is reality. It would
cost far more than it is worth to sue people for making
copies for their own use, not to mention the difficulty even
finding out about it. If you run off a couple of thousand
copies to sell then you are probably in trouble. The rub
that
Jaume wrote:
Steve Larson's 'Cinderella's Castle'
A really nice idea. The illumination of this
castle-toy is perfect for 'night shots'. I have
problems with my scanner (HP Photosmart S20) with dark
pictures like this one, that is why I guess that the
digital conversion of your picture
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
I made a couple earlier, but wanted to do the whole thing this time.
My perspective on photographic art:
There seem to be two basic kinds of art -- art that evokes feelings and
art
that speaks.
Some that feel seem to have little feeling, while others can make us
http://www.robertstech.com/g_father.htm
A few select items from my trip to North Carolina.
--
Mark Roberts
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
Well, it boils down to the fact that the size of the lens has to do with
the size of the image it has to make. When the image size has to get
bigger, the lenses get larger, they become harder to make without defects,
and more expensive. That's also why TV cameras and some digitals can have
On 9 Jun 2001, at 19:47, Pål Jensen wrote:
When designating equal lenses (MF and 35mm) I was thinking of overall
performance. Eg the two lenses projects the same information content (total
number of lines for instance) but on circles with different size.
I think that this is where our
--- Pål_Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some rethoric questions:
- Is it a good idea to have the multiple exposure
function on a switch that can easily be set
accidentally?
I would say no.
- Whats the theory behind having the exposure bar
oriented vertically when exposure is
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 00:50:01 +0200, Pl Jensen wrote:
Some rethoric questions:
- Is it a good idea to have the multiple exposure function on a switch that can
easily be set accidentally?
Possibly not.
- Whats the theory behind having the exposure bar oriented vertically when exposure
is
Hi Friends,
I would like to hear recommendations from you guys out there on the most
suitable light/flash meter for me.
I have been using the MZ-7 for about a year and would be upgrading in a
month or two with the MZ-S.
I mainly do outdoor landscape and portrait shots and occasion still
Hi Team,
I am interested in looking at some photo oriented back-packs to use for both
short or extended treks into bush. I need it to be weather proof and have
provisions for easily attaching a tripod.
I have a brochure on the LowePro AW series packs they seem to fit the bill
however I would
Hi Team,
I need to purchase some spare parts for some of my older A series lenses.
The local Australian Pentax distributors have told me that the parts that I am
after are no longer available however I suspect that these comments are
more likely due to their reticence to enquire about the
Pål Jensen wrote:
Isaac wrote:
It's easy, you can't change a lens' illumination angle. Coverage of a
lens is defined by its illumination angle, not the size of the circle of
illumination. If what you say above is true, I should be able to shoot
8x10 film with my SMC 50mm f1.4, and I
39 matches
Mail list logo
