He could even mount M42 Super Taks and SMC Takumars on his Canon T90.
That was a great camera. I still have mine.
Jim A.
At a camera club night a younger meber (using a analog Canon 90
-something)
was looking at all the DSLR's - aiming to choose/buy one.
He liked the Pentax, it felt
Igor,
Your question led me to doubt my memory of the last test I did with
the Ultra II SD card so I ran the test a second time with the Sandisk
Ultra II card, 60x nominal speed, for both RAW and JPEG *** and
updated the page with these additional results and corresponding
QuickTime
On 14.07.2006, at 06:01 , Peter Loveday wrote:
Hmm, interestingly this forum (I think?) seems to indicate DNG
support:
http://hobby7.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/dcamera/1140771650/
I hope this is only fake. With photographing setting inside MENU, AF
mode is changed single AF (AF.S)/continuous
Den 14. jul. 2006 kl. 03.11 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In a message dated 7/13/2006 9:13:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
One of
the leading professors in Copyright issues in Norway has stated that
the painting is illegal, and things seem to be going my way, but it
Wow - that's quite a story about the lightning. Glad you got out of it
alive.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph Tainter
Sent: 14 July 2006 04:40
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Photography Travel: The Great
Hi guys and gals,
The next PUG deadline approacheth. Time to get the submissions ready, folks.
The apology is for not having the submission form currently up and
running. The ISP has been notified, and I await response. News of the
condition will be coming.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/13 Thu PM 06:44:52 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New favourite body
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jul 13, 2006, at 1:11 AM, mike wilson wrote:
To the melody of American Pie
I once transposed the Polish words for Italian and hairy. Which explained the
confused look on my hostess's face when I asked her about the Italian tiles in
her bathroom
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/13 Thu PM 09:31:00 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hi Skye,
You have to check out the local copyright laws where you live to be
sure, but I would say that owner X is not allowed to make further
copies unless that is specifically agreed upon. That's basically what
copyright is all about. The buyer only buys the right to own the item,
not to make
Hi Dag,
That's pretty arrogant behaviour from the painter. Hope you get the
painting destroyed. Make sure that he agrees also to destroy any
sketches he made prior to the final painting, and to confirm his
action in writing.
Jostein
On 7/13/06, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to keep your
Jens Bladt wrote:
At a camera club night a younger meber (using a analog Canon 90 -something)
was looking at all the DSLR's - aiming to choose/buy one.
He liked the Pentax, it felt good to the hands, he thought.
I told him about the backwards comaptibility - how he could use 50 year old
There's not much about Norm that could be described as normal.
You mean, in the same way that there's not much about Jack that could
be described as jackal?
Jostein-al
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
When reading this thread I was sure you would chime in with my little
mess-up with certain biting insects...:-)
Jostein
scratching his leg
On 7/14/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I once transposed the Polish words for Italian and hairy. Which explained
the confused look on my
Hi, G
Thanks for doing all this. Even though there seems not to be much of an in
camera advantage to using a card faster than about 80X. I think I'm going
to get the 150X Transcend card anyway. The price/capacity ratio is too
good to pass up, the faster downloading may be helpful (I
Thanks, Godders ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Good stuff! That's a great shot.
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/greenunderleaf.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/14 Fri AM 05:47:54 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Excitement in Cottyland
On Jul 14, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
I can understand how an RAF plane crashing is news, but the pub part?
Isn't
hm let's see, to mount m42 (50 year old) lenses on a Pentax DSLR
you need an adapter To mount Canon FD lenses on a Canon DSLR you
need an adapter Same kind of computability I'd say.
Except that the newest FD lenses are not 50 years old. :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
No: Canon Fd register is shorter than EOS, so with an adapter you either
loose infinity focus, or you need an optical adapter: essentially a weak
TC. That is different, and arguably inferior, to M42-to-K...
The original statement was that it was not possible to
Op Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:32:20 +0200 schreef Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jens Bladt wrote:
At a camera club night a younger meber (using a analog Canon 90
-something)
was looking at all the DSLR's - aiming to choose/buy one.
He liked the Pentax, it felt good to the hands, he thought.
I
I think everyone should tell their _own_ story 8-)
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/14 Fri AM 08:33:32 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Thanks to Godfrey and others
When reading this thread I was sure you would chime in with my little
On 14/7/06, Lucas Rijnders, discombobulated, unleashed:
You can mount almost everything on EOS, due to the short register and
lerge diameter, but not K-mount, unless you castrate the lens. Ask Cotty
:o)
I prefer to think of it as a circumcision.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On 14/7/06, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
He has been pretty successful, so it is possible. The fact that there
are adapters commercially available for it (with or without taking a
hacksaw to the lens) means it is possible. Useful or practical is
another question. :-)
Not only
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/greenunderleaf.html
Very nice shot, you old fart.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 14/7/06, Jostein Øksne, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's pretty arrogant behaviour from the painter. Hope you get the
painting destroyed. Make sure that he agrees also to destroy any
sketches he made prior to the final painting, and to confirm his
action in writing.
If it was me I'd
On 14/7/06, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
I like how they interviewed a guy who'd been attending a training
course at the pub. To me, that sounds like a very relaxed
interpretation of either training or pub... probably for the
purposes of explanation to the boss and/or wife :)
I
If a lens is female - that would be close to illegal in Denmark ;-
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Cotty
Sendt: 14. juli 2006 11:39
Til: pentax
Isn't all you need a tiney Screw Mount adapter? Most Pentax users have one
... no problem at all.
I guess the spring aperture from a Spotmatic lens will work, won't it.
And the T90 isn't 50 years old - 20-25 years perhaps - like an SMC-M or
SMC-A lens - which won't need the adapter.
Jens Bladt
On 13/7/06, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
Isn't everything over there near a pub?
Mercifully yes.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I don't know...an aftermarket screwmount? It could be a total POS.
IMO, you could better spend your money elsewhere.
Tom Reese
-- Original message --
From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope, that's for sure.
Looks well made and by the diameter and length I
Op Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:39:21 +0200 schreef Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 14/7/06, Lucas Rijnders, discombobulated, unleashed:
You can mount almost everything on EOS, due to the short register and
lerge diameter, but not K-mount, unless you castrate the lens. Ask Cotty
:o)
I prefer to think
Op Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:18:21 +0200 schreef Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
No: Canon Fd register is shorter than EOS, so with an adapter you either
loose infinity focus, or you need an optical adapter: essentially a weak
TC. That is different, and arguably inferior, to
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
If you allow for optical adapters, you can mount everything on everything,
so the discussion becomes meaningless...
ding ding ding! we have a winner!
You were supporting the 20D owners who said 'our 20D can do that too',
while practically it can't.
yes it
The course consisted of one exercise which involved a radial motion
using the forearm, raising a pint pot from bar to lips, and back. Repeat.
My tutor gave me 100%.
Har. Everyone knows you can't get more than 96%.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Quite relevant, as the young member was considing purchasing, and probably
actually using, a camera (brand)...
So he would choose Pentax because it has backwards compatability for
lenses he doesn't own? Why? If he chooses Canon (and I am not saying
he should) at
Cotty wrote:
I prefer to think of it as a circumcision.
Cruel. As any rites of passage. :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Sounds like fun.
Hard to imagine Dag doing it, though...:-)
Jostein
On 7/14/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/7/06, Jostein Øksne, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's pretty arrogant behaviour from the painter. Hope you get the
painting destroyed. Make sure that he agrees also to
First, allow my disclaimer: I don't know if this is a worthwhile tool, if
there's an easier or better way to calibrate ACR, or if it even needs doing
at all. Still, based on conversations in another venue, there is interest
in what this program does, although not specifically ~this~ program.
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Tom Reese wrote:
[Original Message]
From: Don Sanderson
?
Now that I've lost this auction, does anyone know exactly what it was?
I smelled a fast 85 or something like that.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=110005873742
I don't know...an aftermarket
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Christian wrote:
You were supporting the 20D owners who said 'our 20D can do that too',
while practically it can't.
yes it CAN! practically with an adapter it CAN. just as practical
with Pentax or Canon with a screw mount adapter!
Yes, but not as practical as Pentax D
I don't use this, but i bought an Expodisk in the spring and so far i thing
very highly of
it. My D2H used to have what i
thought were exposure fluctuations, or more lilely WB problems. Since using
this disk, my
shots all have the same
exposure and nice feel to them. Very little if any
Hah! I can do wonders with an axe .-)
Even more fun: Send three kids with paint into the gallery and go for
a walk. Just imagine the two boys in the painting coming into the
gallery and start painting on their own picture.
DagT
Den 14. jul. 2006 kl. 12.29 skrev Jostein Øksne:
Sounds like
On Jul 14, 2006, at 5:18 AM, Christian wrote:
The original statement was that it was not possible to mount a FD lens
on an EOS body. based on one attempt at a camera club without the
required adapter. Regardless of tradeoffs (optical adapter) it IS
possible. Different and inferior is for
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, DagT wrote:
Hah! I can do wonders with an axe .-)
Even more fun: Send three kids with paint into the gallery and go for
a walk. Just imagine the two boys in the painting coming into the
gallery and start painting on their own picture.
DagT
Wrong Dag, this will sell
Op Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:23:36 +0200 schreef Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Quite relevant, as the young member was considing purchasing, and
probably
actually using, a camera (brand)...
So he would choose Pentax because it has backwards compatability for
lenses he
William Robb wrote:
From: Bob W
anybody using a WhiBal?
http://www.rawworkflow.com/products/whibal/index.html
If so, are they any use, or is it just more crap adding weight to my
camera bag?
They want enough for it.
Go to your local framing shop and aske them for a window from a white mat
On 7/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/13/2006 9:18:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So the
limit between painting and photography is not really too clear.
Regards
Jens Bladt
===
Definitely. Agreed. Big time.
Nope. Gotta
On 7/13/06, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vic,
This list is a special place. The level of civility is high for an
internet group as is the desire to be genuinely helpful. snip
snip We see the participants
as other human beings and friends.
Stick around for a while, the feeling
Den 14. jul. 2006 kl. 11.36 skrev Cotty:
On 14/7/06, Jostein Øksne, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's pretty arrogant behaviour from the painter. Hope you get the
painting destroyed. Make sure that he agrees also to destroy any
sketches he made prior to the final painting, and to confirm
What's the need for cards and things when the white balance can be set in
raw converters? Maybe they're useful when shooting JPEG or TIFF?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 7/14/2006 4:51:35 AM
Subject: Re:
On Jul 14, 2006, at 8:01 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What's the need for cards and things when the white balance can be set
in
raw converters? Maybe they're useful when shooting JPEG or TIFF?
I've been in places that do not conform to any of the normal white
balance options -- it's useful
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/13/2006 9:18:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So the
limit between painting and photography is not really too clear.
Regards
Jens Bladt
===
Definitely. Agreed. Big
Well, photographers sometimes paint on thier images - or adds stuff made
by hand or machine. Painters certaily use photographs. Either as a starting
point or the iamge was projected on tto the cancas by lenses and mirrors -
then painted.
Brushes and CCD's/film are both tools for human image making
On Jul 13, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Bob W wrote:
Hi,
anybody using a WhiBal?
http://www.rawworkflow.com/products/whibal/index.html
If so, are they any use, or is it just more crap adding weight to my
camera bag?
Thanks,
Bob
Obviously this company is a subsidiary of the P.T. Barnum School of
This doesn't make sence to me Mark. The painter often starts with the same
thing - what he sees with his eyes - or what he imagines in his mind.
So does the photographer. It's really the same: Humans making images with
what ever tools he/she finds suitable to work with.
What count's is - IMO - the
On 7/14/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As correct as your argument is, I can mount a Canon FD lens on my
Volkswagen Golf.
Err...Aaron it's called a 1Ds Mark II.
It's big, but not that bad.
;-)
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Christian wrote:
You were supporting the 20D owners who said 'our 20D can do that too',
while practically it can't.
yes it CAN! practically with an adapter it CAN. just as practical
with Pentax or Canon with a screw mount adapter!
Yes,
Is Tri-X no longer King of the Hill? Do digi shooters care?
http://www.lookingglassphoto.com/funwfilm.html
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Jul 14, 2006, at 4:17 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
Dunno how this changes after the photographer's demise.
Simple, he doesn't care anymore.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Ironically, the 20D has absoluetly no issues with mounting M42 lenses
via an adaptor, just like Pentax. Nikon F mount is also quite doable,
along with Leica R, Contax/Yashica and OM mount. Of the major mounts
only FD, MD and Minolta AF cannot be adapted with a plain adaptor (K
mount can be
He misread the markings. It's YS-PE, not VS-PE . The YS lens mount
system was from Sigma, so this is most likely a Sigma lens. YS
adapters are like T-mounts, interchangeable to make the lens work on
different cameras, but with auto diaphragm. Early to mid-70s vintage.
Lens looks like a
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Jul 14, 2006, at 8:01 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What's the need for cards and things when the white balance can be set
in raw converters? Maybe they're useful when shooting JPEG or TIFF?
I've been in places that do not conform to any of the normal white
balance
Thanks for the reminder! Got the pic chosen
(architecture theme), just need to locate it and see
if I prepared it properly. Or did I already submit it
a few months ago??
Too much going on, too little brainpower...
Rick
--- Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys and gals,
The
On 7/14/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This doesn't make sence to me Mark. The painter often starts with the same
thing - what he sees with his eyes - or what he imagines in his mind.
So does the photographer. It's really the same: Humans making images with
what ever tools he/she
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: Backwards Compatibility
At a camera club night a younger meber (using a analog Canon
90 -something)
was looking at all the DSLR's - aiming to choose/buy one.
He liked the Pentax, it felt good to the hands, he thought.
I told him about
Actually the difference between Painting and Photography is that
Painters can have long detailed discussions without once mentioning
paintbrushes, canvas or brush strokes.
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/13/2006 9:18:29 AM
On Jul 14, 2006, at 9:05 AM, William Robb wrote:
Aparently, it is possible to mount FD lenses to an EOS body with an
adaptor.
Yes it is. Canon themselves even made such an adapter in the early
days of EOS. But the adapter has an optical element in it to correct
for the fact that you
The missing focal length in the series 17.5, 25, 35, 50, 70*, 100, 140,
200, 280, 400, etc.
*Except for the 70 there has always been something within a few percent
of that square-root-of-two series.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof ==
On 7/14/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually the difference between Painting and Photography is that
Painters can have long detailed discussions without once mentioning
paintbrushes, canvas or brush strokes.
That's such crap.
I've not once heard a photographer talk about
I can imagine! However, the lens makes sense for cropped framed digital
as it gives the same effect as a 100mm macro on 35mm. That was probably
the best selling and most profitable lens in the line up. No wonder
someone has come out with a 70mm macro for the DSLR's.
--
graywolf
Interesting. Before I went digital I had switched to the T-Max films for the
most part after about thirty years of shooting mainly Tri-X. I was very happy
with the T-Max 100 in either T-Max developer or D-76, and liked the 400 when it
was rated at 200 and souped in something gentle like D-76
Bob Shell wrote:
On Jul 14, 2006, at 9:05 AM, William Robb wrote:
Aparently, it is possible to mount FD lenses to an EOS body with an
adaptor.
Yes it is. Canon themselves even made such an adapter in the early
days of EOS. But the adapter has an optical element in it to correct
Op Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:43:18 +0200 schreef frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 7/14/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually the difference between Painting and Photography is that
Painters can have long detailed discussions without once mentioning
paintbrushes, canvas or brush
That gets into some strange territory. Copyright in most countries
protects your image (the photo) from commercial use by others. The
painting is clearly a derivative work. In some countries derivative
works are not allow without permission, in others they are. Even the
courts do not seem to
Perhaps so, perhaps not. I don't know enough painters to know ;-)
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af P. J.
Alling
Sendt: 14. juli 2006 15:40
Til:
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, graywolf wrote:
The missing focal length in the series 17.5, 25, 35, 50, 70*, 100, 140,
200, 280, 400, etc.
*Except for the 70 there has always been something within a few percent
of that square-root-of-two series.
Yes, but there has usually been an 85.
70 is too short
I took the lawn mower to the city today to be repaired. It's still under
guarantee -- and Aino and I walked about a bit and visited an impressive
Manor House nearby; and then our favourite place Viherlandia (the big
nursery I've mentioned before). I took the opportunity of testing the
Tokina
On 7/14/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/14/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually the difference between Painting and Photography is that
Painters can have long detailed discussions without once mentioning
paintbrushes, canvas or brush strokes.
That's such
Yes, they are the only ones who should do that!
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/13/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is clearly a case where one
Thank you Jostein, I will pass the info on. It was an interesting
topic of conversation on that night (or maybe we're a boring group :),
so I may do more research in the future, in my spare time...
--s
On 7/14/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Skye,
You have to check out the local
Yep, quite interesting.
I've never had good results with any TMax emulsion other than TMZ, no
matter what developer used. Tmax Dev produced the best results, but
Acros proved far superior than TMax 100, and I still get better
(although grainier) results from Tri-X.
-Adam
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 7/14/2006 6:04:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like Michael Reichmann's contrast between photography and painting:
They're exact opposites because the painter starts with a blank canvas
and can put anything he or she can imagine on it, whereas the
But his heirs and licensees do. In fact they care more than the original
copyright holder because they are only interested in the money.
I did kind of like that Heinlein story where copyrights went to the
Galactic Government at the authors death. There were no other taxes
whatsoever since the
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. Before I went digital I had switched to the T-Max films for the
most part after about thirty years of shooting mainly Tri-X. I was very
happy with the T-Max 100 in either T-Max developer or D-76, and liked the 400
when it was
On Jul 14, 2006, at 9:45 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
Canon actually made two different adaptors. One was the 1.28x TC
Adaptor, the other was the FD Macro converter, which lacked the
optical
element, but was solely intended for Macro use. The latter is far more
common as Canon made them for a
Just because the original is destroyed does not make the copy an original.
I always have a problem with these kind of ideas, because it is clear to
me that a copy of me is not me. One book I read about interstellar
teleportation made that clear because the original after being copied
just went
On Jul 14, 2006, at 10:00 AM, graywolf wrote:
That gets into some strange territory. Copyright in most countries
protects your image (the photo) from commercial use by others. The
painting is clearly a derivative work. In some countries derivative
works are not allow without permission, in
Don't know many painters, do you? No matter what trade you are in you
discuss your tools and techniques with your peers.
Of course someone who buys a hammer does not think that makes him a
carpenter.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof ==
What Paul said.
Marnie
=
In a message dated 7/13/2006 10:44:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nice shot. An interesting look at a side of life seldom seen. In many ways,
this accomplishes the portrait mission of your earlier post.
Paul
-- Original
Bob,
How are the cards used to set white balance? Various cards held in
front of the lens, at a given distance, while the balance is adjusted
'til the desired degree of warmth is perceived to have been met?
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 13, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Bob W wrote:
On 7/14/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course someone who buys a hammer does not think that makes him a
carpenter.
A nail gun does though.
Dave ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
That is because most of the folks so commenting are snapshooters they
make images of what is found in front of their cameras (found objects).
Photographers use a camera to make images of their ideas. They can and
do stage and pose them if that is what is needed to present the idea.
Many of the
I used Delta 3200 for the most part, generally in 6x7 format. I rated it at
1600 but developed it for 3200. I found the negs were too thin when processed
according to Ilford's recommendation for 1600. I used both T-Max developer and
D-76. The results were vewry similar. I found T-Max 3200 to be
On Jul 14, 2006, at 2:44 AM, Cotty wrote:
...I have now consolidated my lens lineup to these:
Pentax K15mm 3.5
Canon 24-70 2.8 L
Canon 65mm MP-E macro
Pentax A*85mm 1.4
Canon 70-200 2.8 L IS
matched 2X converter
About the same number of lenses as I use, similar field of view
range.
Jack,
I'm not Bob ...
You simply use one of the three graded cards to set a custom white
balance, from neutral white to warm.
Bob, this is an attractive looking set for $65. I see it as
particularly helpful for video work where you can't easily color
balance after the fact with out very
Well spoken - or rather - written, Graywolf!
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
graywolf
Sendt: 14. juli 2006 16:56
Til: Pentax-Discuss
I'm going to Rome and London (from Seattle) in early October. Also
heading to Tuscany but that's a rather amorphous area.
Does anyone there want anything from here (that will fit in a suitcase)?
Any recommendations on things I absolutely should not miss
photographing in the two cities? Primarily
Thanks, Godfrey. Now, how do you phically use the cards to determine
the desired WB?
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
I'm not Bob ...
You simply use one of the three graded cards to set a custom white
balance, from neutral white to warm.
Bob, this is an
He's a IT student. He cant' spend a samll fortune on modern Canon-L lenses
etc.
But he can pick up - or at least find - excellent lenses for very litle
money - less than 100 USD each, that will mount and work well on a Pentax
DSLR.
There's a huge amount of excellent K-mount lenses around at the
I grok it.
Tom C.
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A weird little story of Copyright
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:19:49 -0400
But his heirs and licensees do. In fact they care more than
In a message dated 7/14/2006 7:46:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Actually the difference between Painting and Photography is that
Painters can have long detailed discussions without once mentioning
paintbrushes, canvas or brush strokes.
==
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
