PUG themes for 2008 wanted

After all the input abiut 2008 PUG themes, it seems to me it's about time to make these visible at the PUg submission site, isn't it? I foud out, that if I make notes in my Outlook calendar, I may just remember to submit to the gallery :-) Thanks Regards Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56

Re: PAW 2007 - 48 - GDG

There's too much tension with his foot _almost_ touching the edge of the frame. Some more space on that side would've done it good. Nice tones though. Cheers, Paul Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Only a few weeks to go in 2007... > >http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48.htm > > Comment

Re: PAW 2007 - 48 - GDG

>> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48.htm From: ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > looks staged to me, Godders... or at least she knew you were taking > the > photo... > so not so interesting as your other work , to me. Interesting comment. It wasn't staged. These two boys were

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On Nov 19, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Cotty wrote: > Must be about time for one. > > Actually I was reading something on a different list about > expectations > and fulfilments with regard to DSLR cameras. No need to be precise > about > brands here, it can be any DSLR, but please limit to this sort o

Re: PESO: Cutter 2

Rick, the original works better for me. The one you just posted is a bit too busy... Boris Rick Womer wrote: >>From the Seattle series, another view of the Coast > Guard cutter in the harbor: > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6653609&size=lg > > K10D, FA 70-200, ISO 1600, f/4.5 @ 1/6

Re: Peso Upsala wood church

It really feels November to me!!! Great stuff. Boris David J Brooks wrote: > http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/General/photo#513454392259234 > > This is an old wooden church, now unused, in Upsala Ontario, about 1 > 1/2 hours west of Thunder Bay. > > I tried shooting this about 15 yea

Re: PESO: Beep Ware

Rick Womer wrote: >Sign in a Seattle brewpub. This is intended as >Amusement, not Art. > >http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6654609 > >Rick > O. :) I saw this as I browsed your recent stuff on Photonet and I like it of course. ann "we are amused" san > > > > _

PESO: Beep Ware

Sign in a Seattle brewpub. This is intended as Amusement, not Art. http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6654609 Rick Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage. http://w

Re: PESO: Seattle Ferry 2

Oh, okay, I'll give a link: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6654611&size=lg (The plain white screen had less noise, though!) Rick --- Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's a cool shot of a white boat in a snowstorm. > > -- > > Christian > http://photography.skofteland.ne

Re: PAW 2007 - 48 - GDG

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >Only a few weeks to go in 2007... > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48.htm > >Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. > >enjoy >Godfrey > > > looks staged to me, Godders... or at least she knew you were taking the photo... so not so interesting as yo

Re: PESO: Seattle Ferry 2

Rick Womer wrote: > Another ferry shot, in the kind of weather Seattle is > famous for. > > K10D, FA 70-200, ISO 1600, f/5.6 @ 1/350, RAW via > Lightroom. > > If I had it to do again, I would have dialed back the > ISO to reduce the noise. Ah, well. That's a cool shot of a white boat in a snows

Re: Seattle Ferry 2

cbwaters wrote: >Um... Rick... > Note he said the NEXT picture would be in daylight :) ann > > >- Original Message - >From: "Rick Womer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: >Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 9:41 PM >Subject: PESO: Seattle Ferry 2 > > > > >>Another ferry shot, in the kind of weat

Re: Peso Longlac wood church

Very cold and desolate-looking, Dave. Nicely done. Rick --- David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/General/photo#5134676760981182386 > > This is the the other church i have always wanted to > get a shot of. > > On Longlac IR Number 58, its all gated o

Re: Seattle Ferry 2

Um... Rick... - Original Message - From: "Rick Womer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 9:41 PM Subject: PESO: Seattle Ferry 2 > Another ferry shot, in the kind of weather Seattle is > famous for. > > K10D, FA 70-200, ISO 1600, f/5.6 @ 1/350, RAW via > Lightroom

PESO: Seattle Ferry 2

Another ferry shot, in the kind of weather Seattle is famous for. K10D, FA 70-200, ISO 1600, f/5.6 @ 1/350, RAW via Lightroom. If I had it to do again, I would have dialed back the ISO to reduce the noise. Ah, well. The next pic will be in daylight! Comments appreciated. Rick ___

Re: PESO: Lighthouse

You know, when I printed a larger version we accidentally cropped the top quite a bit. I intended to print an 8x10 but somehow printed a borderless 8.5 x 11 and either Elements or the HP did the adjustment to make it fit. Anyway, I do like it better with some of the sky gone. Thanks Godfrey,

Re: PESO: Ferry

Alas, lightening things makes the noise go crazy, and the details remain mushy. Gotta go back and shoot again someday! Rick --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - The tones are just a hair too dark in the middle > ground and that > makes the detailing seem mushy. Just a littl

Re: PAW 2007 - 48 - GDG

That's a really good pic. Nicely composed, and it piques curiosity... Rick --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Only a few weeks to go in 2007... > > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48.htm > > Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. > > enjoy > Godfrey > >

PAW 2007 - 48 - GDG

Only a few weeks to go in 2007... http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48.htm Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. enjoy Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link di

Re: SMC Takumar vs Takumar

On 11/20/07, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Best $20 lens I ever bought (Takumar Bayonet 135/2.5). Awesome portrait > lens, great performance all around, just don't point it at the sun. I have a Super Tak 135/3.5 that I paid the same for. It's got some of the creamiest bokeh I've ever see

Re: OT: Speaking of WIDE angle zooms..

On 11/20/07, Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 20, 2007, at 15:24, Jens Bladt wrote: > > > I just got a Sigma EX 10-20mm 1:4-5.6 DC. > > Rectiliniar. > > Not too bad at all and a pleasure to use too: > > http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157603252126527/ > > I sold couplle of

Re: To those who submit to the Pentax Photo Gallery

William Robb wrote: >From: "Mark Roberts" > >>>I think Pentax had a wonderful idea, but by refusing to put the ongoing >>>resources required into the gallery, they have diluted the concept. >> >> I strongly suspect it isn't so much a matter of "refusing" as not >> having the money. This ain't Cani

Re: PESO: Ferry

On Nov 20, 2007, at 2:02 PM, John Graves wrote: > There is the *expectation* that the ferry is going *up* river. > This may > or may not be desired, depending on your destination. I *desire* to engage in polite discussion/critique regards photographs posted, with an *expectation* that the con

Re: To those who submit to the Pentax Photo Gallery

- Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" Subject: Re: To those who submit to the Pentax Photo Gallery >>I think Pentax had a wonderful idea, but by refusing to put the ongoing >>resources required into the gallery, they have diluted the concept. > > I strongly suspect it isn't so much

Re: OT: Speaking of WIDE angle zooms..

On Nov 20, 2007, at 15:24, Jens Bladt wrote: > I just got a Sigma EX 10-20mm 1:4-5.6 DC. > Rectiliniar. > Not too bad at all and a pleasure to use too: > http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157603252126527/ > I sold couplle of old lenses, which just about paid for the Sigma > zoom :-) > I am

Re: To those who submit to the Pentax Photo Gallery

Not recently. I used to--regularly--when the voting started early this year. After a month or so, it became sporadic. It is hard work... On Nov 19, 2007 8:13 PM, AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just curious; > > Do you care to cast votes when you don't have any of your own images > in for

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On 11/20/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20/11/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >And in that statement, you articulate exactly what I mean: they are > >two things, linked for sure, but two separate things. ;-) > > I don't give in *that* easily. I am British! > > I nee

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On 11/20/07, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:19:44PM +0100, Jens Bladt wrote: > > Just two: > > 1) Pentax *ist D and > > 2) Pentax K10D. > > There's a significant proportion of survey replies > that show exactly this - a *ist D and a K10D. I threw my Nikon gear

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:19:44PM +0100, Jens Bladt wrote: > Just two: > 1) Pentax *ist D and > 2) Pentax K10D. There's a significant proportion of survey replies that show exactly this - a *ist D and a K10D. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_

Re: PESO: Ferry

Godfrey, There is the *expectation* that the ferry is going *up* river. This may or may not be desired, depending on your destination. John Graves WA1JG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > On Nov 19, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > > >> A Seattle ferry at sunset. >> http://p

Re: PESO: Ferry

Well, using the larger display option on photo.net, the top of the light-colored band of water is 2.8 cm from the bottom of the pic on the left and 2.8 cm from the bottom on the right. Said light band of water is thinner and brighter on the right, and I think gives an illusion of non-horizontality

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

Cotty wrote: >On 20/11/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>Here's a hint: At the time of purchase, expectations and desires are >>very close if not exactly equivalent: I seldom buy a piece of gear >>unless I *expect* it's going to do what I *desire*. > >That's very good. > >i've al

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On Nov 19, 2007 5:28 PM, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own? 2 - both Pentax DL (but one I brought used to give to my sister shortly). > 2/ How many have you owned in the past? 0 > 3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR? 1.5 > 4/

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

Mark Roberts wrote: > mike wilson wrote: > > >>>From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>>Bob W wrote: >>> >>> >>11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to answer >>this. In fact, better if you don't). > >I had sex on a motorcycle once. >>

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On 20/11/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed: >Here's a hint: At the time of purchase, expectations and desires are >very close if not exactly equivalent: I seldom buy a piece of gear >unless I *expect* it's going to do what I *desire*. That's very good. i've also had more to drink th

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

Cotty wrote: > 1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own? one > 2/ How many have you owned in the past? none > 3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR? 1.5 > 4/ What's the longest length of time you've owned a single DSLR camera? 1.5years > 5/ When you purchased yo

Re: PESO: Harbor sunset

Thanks, Peter. --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like this, it works very well. > > Rick Womer wrote: > > Another Seattle shot, self-explanatory. > > > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6650358 > > > > K10D, DA 16-45, ISO 800, f/8 @ 1/350, RAW via > > Lightroom. > > > > C

OT: Speaking of WIDE angle zooms..

I just got a Sigma EX 10-20mm 1:4-5.6 DC. Rectiliniar. Not too bad at all and a pleasure to use too: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157603252126527/ I sold couplle of old lenses, which just about paid for the Sigma zoom :-) Regards Jens http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

Cotty wrote: >I need 24 hours to gather my thoughts. Knowing you I wonder if that will be sufficient ;-) Here's a hint: At the time of purchase, expectations and desires are very close if not exactly equivalent: I seldom buy a piece of gear unless I *expect* it's going to do what I *desire*.

RE: DIGITAL SURVEY

Just two: 1) Pentax *ist D and 2) Pentax K10D. Both nice cameras :-) Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248 -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Cotty Sendt: 20. november 2007 00:28 Til: pentax

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On 20/11/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: >And in that statement, you articulate exactly what I mean: they are >two things, linked for sure, but two separate things. ;-) I don't give in *that* easily. I am British! I need 24 hours to gather my thoughts. -- Cheers, Cotty

Re: PESO: Harbor sunset

I like this, it works very well. Rick Womer wrote: > Another Seattle shot, self-explanatory. > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6650358 > > K10D, DA 16-45, ISO 800, f/8 @ 1/350, RAW via > Lightroom. > > Comments cordially invited. > > Rick > > > > >

PESO: Margarets Garden

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/MargaretsGarden.jpg I love the way the sun drives out enough water vapor to create a mist that allows the sun's rays to be seen. Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE fro

Re: Kinda my first published photo

Kind of good for me too. Thank you for giving me this mysterious look. It suits the context very well, I think. Tim Typo The Radio Photographer. - Original Message - From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 8:50 PM Subje

Re: Kinda my first published photo

I remeber that shot. Good for you Boris,. Dave On 11/20/07, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Tim requested permission to take one of my photos from our most recent > trip to Norway for his use. Permission was naturally granted. Here is > what came out of this: > > http://www.m

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

> 1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own? Two > 2/ How many have you owned in the past? Two > 3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR? Whenever the *ist DF came out > 4/ What's the longest length of time you've owned a single DSLR camera? Whenever the *ist D cameout

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

Below... Regards, Bob... - Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own? 2

Re: To those who submit to the Pentax Photo Gallery

Yes. Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: "AlunFoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: To those who submit to the Pentax Photo Gallery > Just curious; > > Do you care to cast votes when you don't have any of your own images > in for review? > > Thanks,

Re: RE: DIGITAL SURVEY

Sex in (or with) chaps means something rather different on Cotty's side of the Atlantic, though ... On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 12:49:59PM -0500, Steve Desjardins wrote: > One word: Chaps, baby, chaps. > > >>> Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/20/2007 9:30 AM >>> > Bob W wrote: > > >> > 11/ Have

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On Nov 20, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Cotty wrote: > If I have a desire for something, and I try and fulfil that desire, > then > I also have an expectation. And in that statement, you articulate exactly what I mean: they are two things, linked for sure, but two separate things. ;-) G -- PDML Pen

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

In a message dated 11/20/2007 10:21:57 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 6.the degree of probability that something will occur: There is little expectation that he will come. == Heh. Probability. The probability that they would make a camera (any brand) that w

Re: SMC Takumar vs Takumar

Steve Desjardins wrote: > You're forgetting the most infamous one of all. The Takumar 135 F2.5. > We used to have regular arguments on the list about whether or not it > was worth spending even $25 on one. I had one but gave it away. ;-) Best $20 lens I ever bought (Takumar Bayonet 135/2.5). A

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On 20/11/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: >What I'm disagreeing with you about is that I feel a "desire" is not >the same thing as an "expectation". > >EG: In 1975, I wanted a Lamborghini 350GT and I had many expectations >of it regards performance, etc. Once I bought one, I f

Re: SMC Takumar vs Takumar

There's a very big difference. SMC coated lenses deliver higher contrast, more saturated colours and are far more flare resistant. Personally, I like my Super-Taks for portraiture, but prefer SMC lenses for most other uses. -Adam .timber>>code wrote: > Is there any real, visible differenc bet

Re: SMC Takumar vs Takumar

That's one of the newer 'Takumar(Bayonet)' lenses. IMHO it's quite sharp but flares easily. Had my mitts on one for a couple weeks (loaner from a friend with GAS) and was favourably impressed. Will probably look for an M42 Super or SMC Tak version instead though. -Adam Steve Desjardins wrote:

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On 20/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed: >Well, I took the survey to mean expectations, not desires My interpretation of 'expectations' and 'desires' has nothing to do with the survey Marn. I will collate the data and show percentages, and in addition I will offer some of my o

Re: RE: DIGITAL SURVEY

One word: Chaps, baby, chaps. >>> Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/20/2007 9:30 AM >>> Bob W wrote: >> > 11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to >answer >> > this. In fact, better if you don't). >> >> I had sex on a motorcycle once. > >what gear where you in? Eh? I'd ha

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

In a message dated 11/20/2007 9:37:19 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW, just because something doesn't meet my expectations, doesn't mean I don't like it. If i didn't like it, I'd get rid of it. In fact, I haven't picked up the 1DmarkII in ages. I love the L1/A20 combo

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On Nov 20, 2007, at 9:35 AM, Cotty wrote: > I have to disagree bro. In my book, an expectation can be a desire. > It's > all very well to read up on specs and things before a purchase, but > (in > my case) I have to feel it with my heart. It's not something that I > can > easily put words to

Re: Rumours continued... 24th january we will know if this is all correct (or not)

For me it would be enough if Pentax DSLR would have AF from MZ-S ;-) On 2007-11-20, at 17:22, Jaume Lahuerta wrote: > Faster AF in low light, please. > I think that AF in general is the main failed subject of Pentax DSLRs > (I would say of Pentax SLRs in general but I haven't tested the MZ- > S

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

That is the first sign of wisdom, grasshopper. == Well, I took the survey to mean expectations, not desires. My expectations re cameras (film or digital) are usually much lower than my desires. Marnie aka Doe :-) - Warning: I am now

Re: PESO: Lighthouse

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > http://cwaters.smugmug.com/gallery/3314121#223236908-A-LB Very nice colors and tones, a little darker in the foliage (details tend to mush together) than I'd prefer. The cropping is a little too tall/oblong to my eye. Trimming a little off the bottom and about t

Re: PESO: Ferry

On Nov 19, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > A Seattle ferry at sunset. > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6650355 > K10D, FA 70-200, ISO 800, f/5.6 @ 1/45, RAW via LR. I like the idea. - Horizon is slightly tilted (always drives me batty with pictures like this). - The tones are j

Re: SMC Takumar vs Takumar

You're forgetting the most infamous one of all. The Takumar 135 F2.5. We used to have regular arguments on the list about whether or not it was worth spending even $25 on one. I had one but gave it away. ;-) >>> ".timber>>code" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/20/2007 11:31 AM >>> Is there any real, visi

Re: SMC Takumar vs Takumar

> Is there any real, visible differenc between the multi coated > SMC-Takumars and the normal (older) Takumar? Could anyone show the > difference between non coated, single coated and multicoated lens? My only point of direct comparison between Takumar and SMC Takumar has been with the smc-Penta

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On Nov 19, 2007, at 11:51 PM, Cotty wrote: > On 19/11/07, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> What DSLR did you recently buy that fails to meet your >> expectation? > > Panasonic L1. It's a neat camera, and I do like it. But my > expectations > were of something smaller with a better v

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On 20/11/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: >That's not an expectation ... that's a desire. You knew the size and >viewfinder before you bought it. > >Expectations should be things that you expected the camera to do, in >features or performance, based on what you knew of it from

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On 11/19/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own? 1 > 2/ How many have you owned in the past? I've only ever owned the one. > 3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR? 1 year ago. I'm behind the curve. > 4/ What's the longest le

Re: RE: DIGITAL SURVEY

On 11/20/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mike wilson wrote: > > >> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> Bob W wrote: > >> > >> >> > 11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to > >> >answer > >> >> > this. In fact, better if you don't). > >> >> > >> >> I ha

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On 20/11/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed: >Ahh...that should be skirt, not skit. I think skit is more 'Australian'. Sort of a cross between a skid and a skirt... -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com

Re: To those who submit to the Pentax Photo Gallery

I have not submitted anything except from the very beginning of the gallery. Today i submitted several photos i'm quite fond of, and i'll see hwo they go. I did go into the site and looked at photos to vote on. The few pages i saw, i doubt mine will go to far. Dave > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On 20/11/07, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed: > >So we will learn if our responses satisfied your curiosity? :-) Percentages and observations next week! -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com __

Re: SMC Takumar vs Takumar

On 11/20/07, .timber>>code <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any real, visible differenc between the multi coated > SMC-Takumars and the normal (older) Takumar? Could anyone show the > difference between non coated, single coated and multicoated lens? Actually, there's a little bit more of a d

Re: Lindsey Has Legs

Thanks for looking. I agree. She was better in the first shoot, although she was good here with Grace. The choices are fewer, among the bathing suit pics. I think she was more self conscious. But we have at least two that will work right now (8.1 and 7.5), and I have at least fifty more to conv

Re: SMC Takumar vs Takumar

Yes, the SMC Takumars are better than the Super Taks in that they are more flare resistant. One would have to take the same flare-prone shot with both lenses to illustrate the difference. But my experience with both says it's substantial. Some lens lines were upgraded optically in the switch fro

Re: Kinda my first published photo

In a message dated 11/19/2007 9:20:57 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi! Tim requested permission to take one of my photos from our most recent trip to Norway for his use. Permission was naturally granted. Here is what came out of this: http://www.mundimapa.com/jooml

Re: Lindsey Has Legs

I don't like this as much as the other shots of her that you have posted. She doesn't look quite as attractive here. On Nov 18, 2007 8:05 PM, Ken Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The sweater/hoodie seems oui of place. > > Kenneth Waller > http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f > > - Original Messag

Re: Rumours continued... 24th january we will know if this is all correct (or not)

Faster AF in low light, please. I think that AF in general is the main failed subject of Pentax DSLRs (I would say of Pentax SLRs in general but I haven't tested the MZ-S one, that is supposed to be a good one). - Mensaje original De: Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para: Pentax-Discuss M

SMC Takumar vs Takumar

Is there any real, visible differenc between the multi coated SMC-Takumars and the normal (older) Takumar? Could anyone show the difference between non coated, single coated and multicoated lens? Thanks, .t -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pd

Re: Rumours continued... 24th january we will know if this is all correct (or not)

Haaa better Fps, nice addition indeed :) Better tracking AF IMO wouldn't be bad too but I'm not holding my breath on that one ... On Nov 20, 2007 1:56 PM, Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not that much, but I think continuos drive mode in K20D is really > worth consideration ;-) > >

Asking about stock agencies

Hi! In particular what do you think of www.alamy.com and www.imagekind.com... I am thinking to start posting my work for a bit of profit if such a thing is really possible these days. Thanks in advance. -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/p

Re: 900x600-_IGP0442-EQ.jpg (low sun)

I can see what attracted you to this scene. Very nice lighting. I do want to level the camera, however. Not knowing what I might see if I were to get somewhat higher, I'd have to take a look with that idea in mind. I'd, also, want to eliminate the immediate foreground (murky and soft) and limit it

Re: RE: DIGITAL SURVEY

mike wilson wrote: >> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Bob W wrote: >> >> >> > 11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to >> >answer >> >> > this. In fact, better if you don't). >> >> >> >> I had sex on a motorcycle once. >> > >> >what gear where you in? >> >> Eh?

Re: Peso Longlac wood church

On 11/20/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 20, 2007 7:10 AM, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/General/photo#5134676760981182386 > > > > This is the the other church i have always wanted to get a shot of. > > And a lovely shot it

Re: PESO: Ferry

Thanks, Brian. Me too, but this image has (or is intended to have) a completely different mood. Rick --- Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Excellent composition but I much prefer your > "Cutter" images. This one seems a bit flat. > > > > Cheers > > Brian > > +++

Re: RE: DIGITAL SURVEY

On Nov 20, 2007 11:37 PM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > into someone's skit/pants or whatever? Ahh...that should be skirt, not skit. Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the

Re: 900x600-_IGP0442-EQ.jpg (low sun)

On Nov 20, 2007, at 7:57, Roman Melihhov wrote: > http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/900x600-_IGP0442-EQ.jpg > > ^^^ Low hanging sun creates typical for this time of the year > red-to-purple cast. That's I like about this time of the year in > northern Europe. Do you? > The colors are nice... but t

Re: RE: DIGITAL SURVEY

On Nov 20, 2007 11:30 PM, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bob W wrote: > > >> > 11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to > >answer > >> > this. In fact, better if you don't). > >> > >> I had sex on a motorcycle once. > > > >what gear where you in? > > Eh? I'd have thou

RE: DIGITAL SURVEY

> > From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/11/20 Tue PM 02:30:14 GMT > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: RE: DIGITAL SURVEY > > Bob W wrote: > > >> > 11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to > >answer > >> > this. In fact, better if you don't). > >>

Re: To those who submit to the Pentax Photo Gallery

William Robb wrote: >I think Pentax had a wonderful idea, but by refusing to put the ongoing >resources required into the gallery, they have diluted the concept. I strongly suspect it isn't so much a matter of "refusing" as not having the money. This ain't Canikon we're dealing with. -- PDML

Re: Peso Longlac wood church

On Nov 20, 2007 7:10 AM, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/General/photo#5134676760981182386 > > This is the the other church i have always wanted to get a shot of. And a lovely shot it is too. I like the muted colours. > On Longlac IR Number 58, it

Re: RE: DIGITAL SURVEY

Bob W wrote: >> > 11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to >answer >> > this. In fact, better if you don't). >> >> I had sex on a motorcycle once. > >what gear where you in? Eh? I'd have thought he'd have taken his gear off for that... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML

Re: PESO: Jelly

On Nov 20, 2007 2:01 AM, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks pretty good to me - would be slightly nicer with more of the > trailing tentacles showing rather than cut off, but the rest of the > presentation is excellent. G'day Bruce, ...I'm done now ;-) I tend to agree, more of the

Re: PESO: Cutter 2

I prefer the view of the second one too, but I like the exposure of the first more so. Cheers, Dave On Nov 20, 2007 10:23 AM, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >From the Seattle series, another view of the Coast > Guard cutter in the harbor: > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6653

Re: PESO: Lighthouse

Excellent shot mate. The composition & colours work really well. Cheers, Dave On Nov 20, 2007 3:49 AM, cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://cwaters.smugmug.com/gallery/3314121#223236908-A-LB -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net t

Re: PESO: Jelly

On Nov 20, 2007 1:05 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated 11/19/2007 3:49:22 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > It's a very nice jelly. I took shots of jellies in Monterey

Re: PESO: Jelly

On Nov 20, 2007 6:25 AM, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Nothing special" - God, you're picky! Sometimes yes, sometimes not enough :-) > If it was mine I'd be pretty happy Thanks Brian. > The only thing is I find the intensity of the blue background a bit > distracting. Hmmm

Re: PESO: Jelly

Thanks Dave. It's the jelly fish/background colour combination that drew me to this shot when I was browsing my archives (Looking for a PUG submission to help keep Scott with his evil JD threats of our backs). Cheers, Dave On Nov 20, 2007 3:20 AM, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ni

Re: PESO: Jelly

Thanks Paul. Cheers, Dave On Nov 19, 2007 11:46 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Very nice. Well framed and beautiful color. > Paul > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml

Re: DIGITAL SURVEY

On Nov 19, 2007 6:28 PM, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Must be about time for one. > > Actually I was reading something on a different list about expectations > and fulfilments with regard to DSLR cameras. No need to be precise about > brands here, it can be any DSLR, but please limit to this

  1   2   >