From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/26 Wed PM 11:08:04 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: List Question
Well THAT'S STUPID! One would think the software would be smart enough to
see that the header line had changed and start a new thread. Do you mean
I've been
Tom C wrote:
Well THAT'S STUPID! One would think the software would be smart enough
to see that the header line had changed and start a new thread.
Sometimes you want to change the subject line but keep to the old thread
- eg I sometimes add OT: to the start of the subject if my reply is
I don't think it's the mail client. It may be me by doing something
similar to what Tom does. There are times when I'll reply to a message
that I've read in the archive and use the same subject line. It seems that
starts a new thread.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Steve Jolly
OTOH,
Tom C wrote:
I, as many others are having problems receiving all the messages fron
the list, often not my own. I'm not blaming this on any of the PDML
list inner workings. Is is in general aggravating.
I am curious though... Sometimes I'll reply to an existing PDML e-mail
in order to
I believe it is a competency issue with the list maintainer. Send him an
email Tom!
Norm
From: Tom C
I, as many others are having problems receiving all the messages fron the
list, often not my own. I'm not blaming this on any of the PDML list
inner workings. Is is in general aggravating.
I, as many others are having problems receiving all the messages fron the
list, often not my own. I'm not blaming this on any of the PDML list inner
workings. Is is in general aggravating.
I am curious though... Sometimes I'll reply to an existing PDML e-mail in
order to have the
Tom C wrote:
I, as many others are having problems receiving all the messages fron
the list, often not my own. I'm not blaming this on any of the PDML
list inner workings. Is is in general aggravating.
I am curious though... Sometimes I'll reply to an existing PDML e-mail
in order to have
@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 12:50 AM
Subject: List Question
I, as many others are having problems receiving all the messages
fron the list, often not my own. I'm not blaming this on any of the
PDML list inner workings. Is is in general aggravating.
I am curious though... Sometimes
Properly formated threads don't depend on the subject line. Properly
formed threads use the in reply to field, in the message header IIRC.
Tom C wrote:
I, as many others are having problems receiving all the messages fron
the list, often not my own. I'm not blaming this on any of the PDML
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: List Question
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:16:47 -0400
Properly formated threads don't depend on the subject line. Properly
formed threads use the in reply to field, in the message header IIRC.
Tom C wrote:
I
]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: List Question
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:16:47 -0400
Properly formated threads don't depend on the subject line. Properly
formed threads use the in reply to field, in the message header IIRC.
Tom C wrote:
I, as many others
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: List Question
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:16:47 -0400
Properly formated threads don't depend on the subject line. Properly
formed threads use the in reply to field, in the message header IIRC.
Tom C wrote
and know one here
has
SCREAMED THEIR HEAD OFF at me?
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: List Question
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:16:47 -0400
Properly formated threads don't depend on the subject
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: List Question
Do you mean
I've been screwing up the archives all these years and know one here has
SCREAMED THEIR HEAD OFF at me?
Screaming at you is pointless.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: List Question
Did I happen to mention that I hate the fact that even though I know
better, and would guess I'm fairly intelligent, that my misapplication of
homophones (words that sound the same but are spelled differently and
usually
In a message dated 4/26/2006 3:51:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am curious though... Sometimes I'll reply to an existing PDML e-mail in
order to have the
pentax-discuss@pdml.net appear automatically in the To: field. I then erase
the body of the message and
I am pretty sure the list software uses msg ID or some other part of
the header for threading.
Here's another odd thing. I *only* read PDML via the archive on the
Web. I respond by creating a completely new msg in Eudora and put
RE in the subject line along with the topic I am responding
The mail program is threading the messages automatically. If you select
Write instead of Reply you will start a new thread. Depending upon
your email program you may be able to just type the first few letters of
the To: line, pentax-discuss@pdml.net, or you may need to copy and
paste it from
: Re: List Question
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:16:47 -0400
Properly formated threads don't depend on the subject line.
Properly
formed threads use the in reply to field, in the message header
IIRC.
Tom C wrote:
I, as many others are having problems receiving all the messages
fron the
list
SCREAMED THEIR HEAD OFF at me?
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: List Question
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:16:47 -0400
Properly formated threads don't depend on the subject line. Properly
formed threads use
AAAGH!!!
That's just awful.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Tom C
Subject: Re: List Question
Did I happen to mention that I hate the fact that even though I know
better, and would guess I'm fairly intelligent, that my
misapplication of homophones (words
HAR!!
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: List Question
AAAGH!!!
That's just awful.
Gads, now you are becoming homophonic.
Hi;
My ME Super has jammed. The mirror is in the up position, the advance lever
feels cocked. The take up reel and the sprocket wheel turn freely. I have
tried to manually put the mirror down but it won't stay and I've replaced
the batteries. Any suggestions before I send it out for repair.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Butch Black
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:09 PM
To: Pentax discussion group
Subject: jammed me super and list question
Hi;
My ME Super has jammed. The mirror is in the up position, the advance lever
feels cocked. The take up reel
to
it freezing up on me, so I think it's ready for a CLA at least.
Butch
- Original Message -
From: Dale Leeper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 5:52 PM
Subject: RE: jammed me super and list question
Because you have already indicated you have pulled
- Original Message -
From: Butch Black
Subject: Re: jammed me super and list question
Hi;
Thanks for the suggestion. It didn't work but after
re-inserting the
batteries a few times and hitting the base a few times with
the heel of my
hand if freed up, although my LED's are flashing
26 matches
Mail list logo
