From: Darren Addy
If this is a bucket list quest and virtually the entire point is that
is to be a photographic journey, then I certainly wouldn't skimp on
the lenses I'm taking.
Instead I would be tempted to take very few clothes and make my first
stop a thrift shop when I hit my destination
On May 20, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Collin Brendemuehl
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would
you carry as a minimum photographic kit?
The 30 lbs has to include all clothing
If this is a bucket list quest and virtually the entire point is that
is to be a photographic journey, then I certainly wouldn't skimp on
the lenses I'm taking.
Instead I would be tempted to take very few clothes and make my first
stop a thrift shop when I hit my destination where I would
On 20/05/2012 18:50, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Collin Brendemuehl
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would
you carry as a minimum photographic kit?
The 30 lbs has to include all clothing other necessities.
The stuff in my pockets doesn't count towards the weight
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would
you carry as a minimum photographic kit?
The 30 lbs has to include all clothing other necessities.
The stuff in my pockets doesn't count towards the weight limit, nor does
the clothing I'm wearing.
Well, I'd budget 20 lbs to
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Collin Brendemuehl
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would
you carry as a minimum photographic kit?
The 30 lbs has to include all clothing other necessities.
The stuff in my pockets
A while back I went on a photowalk and didn't want to carry much. I
took one camera body, the DA-21, 40 and 70 and the 10-17mm fisheye
zoom.
I never took the 40 out of the bag. While I wouldn't want to go on a
safari with this mix, I think I could be quite happy on typical
vacation. I'd
From: Larry Colen
On May 19, 2012, at 12:09 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: P. J. Alling
Take the 18-55 and 80-200 it's easier to get by with a gap between 55
and 80 than losing the wide end, and unless your shooting circumstance
is very peculiar, you'll want a moderate wide more than a super
[...]
It's a military aircraft about the size of a Learjet the weight check
is when you surrender the bag to the crew chief just before boarding.
...peers out of the window to check the size of his Learjet...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Collin Brendemuehl
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would
you carry as a minimum photographic kit?
The 30 lbs has to include all clothing other necessities.
The stuff in my pockets doesn't count towards the weight limit, nor does
the clothing I'm wearing.
On 5/19/2012 03:59, John Sessoms wrote:
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would
you carry as a minimum photographic kit?
K-5 + FA 50/1.4
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
From: Stan Halpin
On May 18, 2012, at 8:59 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what
would you carry as a minimum photographic kit?
The 30 lbs has to include all clothing other necessities.
The stuff in my pockets doesn't count towards the
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would
you carry as a minimum photographic kit?
The 30 lbs has to include all clothing other necessities.
The stuff in my pockets doesn't count towards
Take the 18-55 and 80-200 it's easier to get by with a gap between 55
and 80 than losing the wide end, and unless your shooting circumstance
is very peculiar, you'll want a moderate wide more than a super wide.
If you have something smallish and fast, say a 50 f1.4 take that too.
You may
From: P. J. Alling
Take the 18-55 and 80-200 it's easier to get by with a gap between 55
and 80 than losing the wide end, and unless your shooting circumstance
is very peculiar, you'll want a moderate wide more than a super wide.
If you have something smallish and fast, say a 50 f1.4 take that
, Australia
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: Saturday, 19 May 2012 12:28 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Minimum Kit?
The same minimal kit I frequently carry: K5, DA* 16-50, DA*60-250 and AF 540
flash
IMHO, the F35-70mm is a no-brainer. It is small, light and has close
focusing capabilities that will probably come in handy. You'll
probably take the majority of your shots on that that lens. In fact,
if I had to choose just one lens to take, it would probably be that
one. I'm a huge fan of the
I'm not sure I'd take all that with a total weight limit of only 30lb.
But that's a very handy selection; it's close to what I have in my bag.
I don't have the diffuser, so I squeeze in the 10-17 and my A50/1.5.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:28:11PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The same minimal
I'd probably say that my absolute minimum kit would be
K-5
18-250
FA 31/1.8
That would give me a full range of focal lengths, plus a fast standard lens.
There is good argument to substitute the 16-50/2.8 for the 18-250, because on
the K-5 you can get by with f/2.8 in most lighting, it's
On May 18, 2012, at 11:16 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
For portable storage/backup, to which you can download without a
computer, I have been pleased with the HyperDrive (3 generations
now.) Built-in rechargeable battery. You can buy the case (including
its logic board, power source etc.) and
On May 19, 2012, at 12:09 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: P. J. Alling
Take the 18-55 and 80-200 it's easier to get by with a gap between 55
and 80 than losing the wide end, and unless your shooting circumstance
is very peculiar, you'll want a moderate wide more than a super wide.
If you
On 18/5/12, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would
you carry as a minimum photographic kit?
The 30 lbs has to include all clothing other necessities.
The stuff in my pockets doesn't count towards the weight limit, nor
:-)
On May 19, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 18/5/12, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would
you carry as a minimum photographic kit?
The 30 lbs has to include all clothing other necessities.
The stuff in my
be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Cotty cotty...@mac.com
Sent: May 19, 2012 5/19/12
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Minimum Kit?
On 18/5/12, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you were going
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would
you carry as a minimum photographic kit?
The 30 lbs has to include all clothing other necessities.
The stuff in my pockets doesn't count towards the weight limit, nor does
the clothing I'm wearing.
--
PDML
1 body and a 50 21 mm. Cheers, Christine
Christine Aguila, Asst. Professor
Communications Dept.
Truman College
FC4 President
On May 18, 2012, at 7:59 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would you
carry as a minimum
K5, 21, 31, 43, 77, and that other stuff.
Sent from my iPad
On May 18, 2012, at 19:59, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would you
carry as a minimum photographic kit?
The 30 lbs has to include all clothing other
Depends on where you are going and possible subjects but my most basic
kit is the K-5 and a Sigma 18-125mm zoom. This offers a good range of
focal lengths.
Second choice woud be the K-5 and the Tamron 17-50mm zoom more compact
and larger f2.8 max aperture. Slightly better at wider focal
Hey Philip, he allowed 30 pounds, but I appreciate your support for Sigma and
Tamron. They are underrated. I don't have the 21mm limited, but love the other
Pentax limited lenses.
Sent from my iPad
On May 18, 2012, at 20:49, Philip Northeast rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Depends on where
The same minimal kit I frequently carry: K5, DA* 16-50, DA*60-250 and AF 540
flash with Omni-Bounce diffuser.
Paul
On May 18, 2012, at 8:59 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would you
carry as a minimum photographic kit?
The 30 lbs
On May 18, 2012, at 8:59 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
If you were going to be restricted to 1 bag max wt 30 lbs, what would you
carry as a minimum photographic kit?
The 30 lbs has to include all clothing other necessities.
The stuff in my pockets doesn't count towards the weight limit, nor
31 matches
Mail list logo
