Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On 5/12/2011 16:58, Jaume Lahuerta wrote: So...does this have something to do with Boris being HAL? (That's one of the problems of having the films translated to your own language) I was once compared with Lt. Commander Data of USS Enterprise from Star Trek The Next Generation... Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
From: Boris Liberman On 5/12/2011 16:58, Jaume Lahuerta wrote: So...does this have something to do with Boris being HAL? (That's one of the problems of having the films translated to your own language) I was once compared with Lt. Commander Data of USS Enterprise from Star Trek The Next Generation... Boris Favorably I hope. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 6:40 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote: From: Boris Liberman I was once compared with Lt. Commander Data of USS Enterprise from Star Trek The Next Generation... Favorably I hope. I'm sure he's fully functional. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On May 11, 2011, at 11:23 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: Steve, obviously the way you and I read things are different. This has to do with the differences between our cultural backgrounds. This is far too civilised. When is someone going to start yelling? - Jerry Springer -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On 5/12/2011 09:55, David Mann wrote: This is far too civilised. When is someone going to start yelling? I don't intend to start yelling, sorry, Dave. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
Thu May 12 03:32:15 EDT 2011 Boris Liberman wrote: On 5/12/2011 09:55, David Mann wrote: This is far too civilised. When is someone going to start yelling? I don't intend to start yelling, sorry, Dave. Boris I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that. :-) Igor PS. (For those who missed the reference: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/quotes ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On 5/12/2011 11:38, Igor Roshchin wrote: I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that. :-) Igor This ought to be a triple negation, methinks... Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
LOL! Best chuckle of the day - thanks, Igor! ann Igor Roshchin wrote: Thu May 12 03:32:15 EDT 2011 Boris Liberman wrote: On 5/12/2011 09:55, David Mann wrote: This is far too civilised. When is someone going to start yelling? I don't intend to start yelling, sorry, Dave. Boris I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that. :-) Igor PS. (For those who missed the reference: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/quotes ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
So...does this have something to do with Boris being HAL? (That's one of the problems of having the films translated to your own language) - Mensaje original De: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Enviado: jue,12 mayo, 2011 13:56 Asunto: Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo LOL! Best chuckle of the day - thanks, Igor! ann Igor Roshchin wrote: Thu May 12 03:32:15 EDT 2011 Boris Liberman wrote: On 5/12/2011 09:55, David Mann wrote: This is far too civilised. When is someone going to start yelling? I don't intend to start yelling, sorry, Dave. Boris I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that. :-) Igor PS. (For those who missed the reference: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/quotes ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
From: Boris Liberman On 5/12/2011 11:38, Igor Roshchin wrote: I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that. :-) Igor This ought to be a triple negation, methinks... Boris I think you missed the cultural reference. After Stanley Kubrick was a photo-journalist in Chicago, he became a film maker: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkyUMmNl4hk ... and then there is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GICdWLXYp4 8-D -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
Well that's what made me chuckle... worked so well since Dave's name is Dave :-) ann Jaume Lahuerta wrote: So...does this have something to do with Boris being HAL? (That's one of the problems of having the films translated to your own language) - Mensaje original De: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Enviado: jue,12 mayo, 2011 13:56 Asunto: Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo LOL! Best chuckle of the day - thanks, Igor! ann Igor Roshchin wrote: Thu May 12 03:32:15 EDT 2011 Boris Liberman wrote: On 5/12/2011 09:55, David Mann wrote: This is far too civilised. When is someone going to start yelling? I don't intend to start yelling, sorry, Dave. Boris I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that. :-) Igor PS. (For those who missed the reference: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/quotes ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: http://goo.gl/5LmLv Here is a response: http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2011/05/11/lady-problems/hillary1/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Sessoms I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that. :-) Igor This ought to be a triple negation, methinks... Boris I think you missed the cultural reference. After Stanley Kubrick was a photo-journalist in Chicago, he became a film maker: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkyUMmNl4hk ... and then there is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GICdWLXYp4 that was my 2nd Kubrick. This was my first. I was about 16. It was awesome. Still is. An oomny chelloveck like Boris should appreciate the yazick. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sLX8bcgwGsNR=1 B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Ann Sanfedele Well that's what made me chuckle... worked so well since Dave's name is Dave :-) I thought it was Rodney. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orER_S1jrgg -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 07:20:40PM +0100, Bob W wrote: that was my 2nd Kubrick. This was my first. I was about 16. It was awesome. Still is. An oomny chelloveck like Boris should appreciate the yazick. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sLX8bcgwGsNR=1 A friend of mine picked up one of the toys from the film company: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ltwX603Ft4 I never got to play with it on my own, though. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On May 13, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Well that's what made me chuckle... worked so well since Dave's name is Dave :-) At last, my life has meaning. Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
To be honest, Boris, I went back through this thread to look at the individual posts. One in particular is harsh. The rest express different versions of the view that it would have been better not to publish the photo than to modify it. I hardly think this is a overly reactionary position, so I'm a bit puzzled by your reaction. On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/9/2011 16:56, Mark Roberts wrote: Igor Roshchin wrote: http://goo.gl/5LmLv Very creepy. Also, they're probably violating copyright unless their licensing for that photo included the creation of derivative works (very unlikely). Creepy indeed. And wrong. There is a post in The Online Photographer on the matter: http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/05/hillary-clinton.html And frankly, I am frightened by some of the comments under this post. I produced a reply therein that hasn't been moderated yet, so you don't see it. So to re-iterate it here - I think that what the newspaper did is wrong on more than one (or even two) levels, including whatever limited understanding of Judaism that I have. However, the tone and the wording of the comments is such that it clearly shows (to me, at least) that judge a person by their actions and not by what they are principle is, how to put it, still remains rather theoretical one. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On 5/11/2011 14:06, Steven Desjardins wrote: To be honest, Boris, I went back through this thread to look at the individual posts. One in particular is harsh. The rest express different versions of the view that it would have been better not to publish the photo than to modify it. I hardly think this is a overly reactionary position, so I'm a bit puzzled by your reaction. Steve, obviously the way you and I read things are different. This has to do with the differences between our cultural backgrounds. However, if you want to discuss this further - we can always go off the list. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
Sandy Harris wrote: Then there's the superhero version: http://yfrog.com/gzlctaoj So, that one would be from USA Today... -- Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On 10/05/2011 11:38 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: judge a person by their actions and not by what they are principle is, how to put it, still remains rather theoretical one. We are what we do Boris. -- William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
So goes documentarian veracity. They should be ashamed of themselves: if the photo is unacceptable for religious or cultural reasons, just don't use it: don't modify it. Stupid. On Monday, May 9, 2011, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: http://goo.gl/5LmLv Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On 5/11/2011 15:28, William Robb wrote: On 10/05/2011 11:38 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: judge a person by their actions and not by what they are principle is, how to put it, still remains rather theoretical one. We are what we do Boris. That's right, Bill. I think that what you say and what I say is essentially the same. The idea is that either A calls B by the word C and then A is ready to be called by the same word or A doesn't use that word all together. Looking in the mirror can be a powerful weapon, you know. The above remark is totally impersonal. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Sandy Harris wrote: Then there's the superhero version: http://yfrog.com/gzlctaoj So, that one would be from USA Today... The League, dumbfounded by the success of mere mortals, watches the DEVGRU live feed while Superman surfs the Craigslist want-ads . -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ __o _'\,_ (*)/ (*) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
-Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: 11 May 2011 13:28 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo On 10/05/2011 11:38 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: judge a person by their actions and not by what they are principle is, how to put it, still remains rather theoretical one. We are what we do Boris. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8TRoMSG-5I -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
From: Boris Liberman On 5/9/2011 16:56, Mark Roberts wrote: Igor Roshchin wrote: http://goo.gl/5LmLv Very creepy. Also, they're probably violating copyright unless their licensing for that photo included the creation of derivative works (very unlikely). Creepy indeed. And wrong. There is a post in The Online Photographer on the matter: http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/05/hillary-clinton.html And frankly, I am frightened by some of the comments under this post. I produced a reply therein that hasn't been moderated yet, so you don't see it. So to re-iterate it here - I think that what the newspaper did is wrong on more than one (or even two) levels, including whatever limited understanding of Judaism that I have. However, the tone and the wording of the comments is such that it clearly shows (to me, at least) that judge a person by their actions and not by what they are principle is, how to put it, still remains rather theoretical one. Boris I'm curious which comments you found frightening? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
From: Mark Roberts Sandy Harris wrote: Then there's the superhero version: http://yfrog.com/gzlctaoj So, that one would be from USA Today... http://beautytipsforministers.com/2011/05/09/reading-the-times/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
Brian Walters wrote: On Mon, 09 May 2011 09:56 -0400, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Igor Roshchin wrote: http://goo.gl/5LmLv Very creepy. Also, they're probably violating copyright unless their licensing for that photo included the creation of derivative works (very unlikely). I wondered about that too but apparently images released by the White House are in the public domain: “Pursuant to federal law, government-produced materials appearing on this site are not copyright protected. The United States Government may receive and hold copyrights transferred to it by assignment, bequest, or otherwise.” Whether that allows manipulation of the photos in the way Der Tzitung has done, I'm not sure. Cheers Brian Definitely was mentioned as not permitted here... ... but it was altered by the White house already by pixilating the top secret Document on the table by Hillary... and when they showed the shot in the media here they mentioned that specifically. I thought it was a great shot. Those individual faces say so much. ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
This may have been mentioned, but the woman back near the door has, also, been redacted. Either that or the picture is too soft and under exposed to make her out.(?) Jack --- On Tue, 5/10/11, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote: From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com Subject: Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Tuesday, May 10, 2011, 6:33 AM Brian Walters wrote: On Mon, 09 May 2011 09:56 -0400, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Igor Roshchin wrote: http://goo.gl/5LmLv Very creepy. Also, they're probably violating copyright unless their licensing for that photo included the creation of derivative works (very unlikely). I wondered about that too but apparently images released by the White House are in the public domain: “Pursuant to federal law, government-produced materials appearing on this site are not copyright protected. The United States Government may receive and hold copyrights transferred to it by assignment, bequest, or otherwise.” Whether that allows manipulation of the photos in the way Der Tzitung has done, I'm not sure. Cheers Brian Definitely was mentioned as not permitted here... ... but it was altered by the White house already by pixilating the top secret Document on the table by Hillary... and when they showed the shot in the media here they mentioned that specifically. I thought it was a great shot. Those individual faces say so much. ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On May 10, 2011, at 9:23, Jack Davis wrote: This may have been mentioned, but the woman back near the door has, also, been redacted. Either that or the picture is too soft and under exposed to make her out.(?) Yup, noticed that. The cute one has been removed. :-( -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
Then there's the superhero version: http://yfrog.com/gzlctaoj -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On Wed, 11 May 2011 09:06 +0800, Sandy Harris sandyinch...@gmail.com wrote: Then there's the superhero version: http://yfrog.com/gzlctaoj ROFLMAO but I think that violates the White House's terms of use as well. :-) Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and love email again -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On 5/9/2011 16:56, Mark Roberts wrote: Igor Roshchin wrote: http://goo.gl/5LmLv Very creepy. Also, they're probably violating copyright unless their licensing for that photo included the creation of derivative works (very unlikely). Creepy indeed. And wrong. There is a post in The Online Photographer on the matter: http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/05/hillary-clinton.html And frankly, I am frightened by some of the comments under this post. I produced a reply therein that hasn't been moderated yet, so you don't see it. So to re-iterate it here - I think that what the newspaper did is wrong on more than one (or even two) levels, including whatever limited understanding of Judaism that I have. However, the tone and the wording of the comments is such that it clearly shows (to me, at least) that judge a person by their actions and not by what they are principle is, how to put it, still remains rather theoretical one. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
http://goo.gl/5LmLv Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On May 9, 2011, at 8:24, Igor Roshchin wrote: http://goo.gl/5LmLv Just like Soviet Russia... :-( Better to not publish it at all, than to publish it like that. -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
A more accurate headline would have been: Ultra-Orthodox Paper Erases Women From Iconic Situation Room Photo -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
Igor Roshchin wrote: http://goo.gl/5LmLv Very creepy. Also, they're probably violating copyright unless their licensing for that photo included the creation of derivative works (very unlikely). -- Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
Supposedly, they think it violates modesty to publish pictures of women or women showing their hair, I don't understand which. Obviously, they just shouldn't publish the photo or just black them out to be honest about what they did. On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Igor Roshchin wrote: http://goo.gl/5LmLv Very creepy. Also, they're probably violating copyright unless their licensing for that photo included the creation of derivative works (very unlikely). -- Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
They're just a bunch of back-sliding apostates. If they were really, really ultra orthodox they would not make unto themselves any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. B Supposedly, they think it violates modesty to publish pictures of women or women showing their hair, I don't understand which. Obviously, they just shouldn't publish the photo or just black them out to be honest about what they did. On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Igor Roshchin wrote: http://goo.gl/5LmLv Very creepy. Also, they're probably violating copyright unless their licensing for that photo included the creation of derivative works (very unlikely). -- Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Newspaper erases people from the iconic photo
On Mon, 09 May 2011 09:56 -0400, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Igor Roshchin wrote: http://goo.gl/5LmLv Very creepy. Also, they're probably violating copyright unless their licensing for that photo included the creation of derivative works (very unlikely). I wondered about that too but apparently images released by the White House are in the public domain: “Pursuant to federal law, government-produced materials appearing on this site are not copyright protected. The United States Government may receive and hold copyrights transferred to it by assignment, bequest, or otherwise.” Whether that allows manipulation of the photos in the way Der Tzitung has done, I'm not sure. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
