so I started voting...
btw it turned out I'd been in for 4 years... had forgotten I was.
Glad that it is anonymous on all fronts... but after spending about 45
minutes doing the voting chore
I wondered if the site automatically screened out the voters submissions
- since I didnt see mine come
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
so I started voting...
What I did notice was that out of perhaps 75 images I looked at , only two
were taken with film cameras and scanned,
and only one was taken with the ist D.
All 5 of my accepted photos are with the
Your wonderment is right, you don't get the chance to vote on your own stuff.
None of us do. ;)
Jack
--- On Wed, 1/19/11, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
Subject: Pentax Gallery observation - this should be safe from controversy
To: Pentax
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:31 -0500, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
wrote:
so I started voting...
Anyway, at the moment I'm kind of fascinated.
Don't worry, that will pass :-)
(especially after you've see your 200th out-of-focus butterfly)
Cheers
Brian
David J Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
so I started voting...
What I did notice was that out of perhaps 75 images I looked at , only two
were taken with film cameras and scanned,
and only one was taken with the ist D.
:
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
Subject: Pentax Gallery observation - this should be safe from controversy
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2011, 10:31 AM
so I started voting...
btw it turned out I'd been in for 4 years... had
forgotten I was.
Glad
Brian Walters wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:31 -0500, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
wrote:
so I started voting...
Anyway, at the moment I'm kind of fascinated.
Don't worry, that will pass :-)
(especially after you've see your 200th out-of-focus butterfly)
so far just
7 matches
Mail list logo
