Re: Wheee

You guys are not doing enough to placate Bill Robb. He's mighty to behold when he's wrathful. More sacrifices! Cleave unto the Law for it is meet and right so to do. Glad you're OK. B > On 14 Nov 2016, at 19:21, Malcolm Smith wrote: > > David Mann wrote: > > Just

Re: Wheee

Good to hear you're safe and well, David. Just saw your post and the news this morning. (I've been somewhat disconnected from news and email this weekend. There has been a lot going on in my little world the past few days, most of it fair good but distracting. :-) G >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016

RE: Wheee

David Mann wrote: Just reporting in safe & well after another decent shake. It wasn't too intense but seemed to go on for a long time. GNS have it at 6.6 but USGS say 7.4. It was a little way north from here but was enough to wake up half the country. Our baby slept right through, daddy will be

Re: Wheee

Glad to hear you are safe, David! (Read your message on Sunday, but was on the road, couldn't respond.) Stay safe! I guess you are "shaken not stirred". :-) Two large earthquakes on the sort-of opposite side of the Earth, NZ and Argentina. All those after Italy, ... Gee... what's happening. I

Re: Wheee

The news reports are painting a pretty terrible picture. Glad to hear you're all right. On 11/13/2016 7:45 AM, David Mann wrote: Just reporting in safe & well after another decent shake. It wasn't too intense but seemed to go on for a long time. GNS have it at 6.6 but USGS say 7.4. It was a

Re: Wheee

Glad to hear you're safe. Hope that applies widely down there. On 11/13/2016 7:45 AM, David Mann wrote: Just reporting in safe & well after another decent shake. It wasn't too intense but seemed to go on for a long time. GNS have it at 6.6 but USGS say 7.4. It was a little way north from here

Re: Wheee

Good to hear you are okay. 7.5 is quite a strong one indeed! Jostein Den 13. november 2016 22.07.04 CET, skrev David Mann : >Thanks for the thoughts, everyone. GNS revised their reading to 7.5 so >it was a pretty big one. I went back to bed around 3am and haven't >noticed

Re: Wheee

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, at 10:04 AM, David Mann wrote: > Last I heard is there have been two fatalities but details are pretty > scant. I think Wellington had more damage than we did; the USGS info > seems to indicate the quake propagated northwards. You're right about > Kaikoura. The coastal

Re: Wheee

Thanks, Ann. It's interesting that different agencies seem to calculate the same quake as different magnitudes. They're thinking at the moment that it was two quakes with the first triggering a second larger one but it'll be a while before they untangle all of the data. Just getting a good

Re: Wheee

Just now looking here after hearing on our news in the USA they said 7.8 in New Zealand ! wow! Glad it wasn't any closer to you... didn't know what your WH post was about earlier when I skimmed - very busy here but certainly wanted to say something to you , Dave... ann On

Re: Wheee

Last I heard is there have been two fatalities but details are pretty scant. I think Wellington had more damage than we did; the USGS info seems to indicate the quake propagated northwards. You're right about Kaikoura. The coastal highway north of there is very scenic. Good whale-watching

Re: Wheee

I heard about the quake just before we went to bed last night - glad to hear that Christchurch seems to have escaped serious damage. I wondered about Kaikoura - I remember it as a beautiful coastal town with majestic snow-capped mountains to the west. I hope damage there is minimal and that no

Re: Wheee

Thanks for the thoughts, everyone. GNS revised their reading to 7.5 so it was a pretty big one. I went back to bed around 3am and haven't noticed anything since. It's nice when it's far enough away that you don't get aftershocks waking you up every few minutes. Looks like there's a bit of

Re: Wheee

Glad to hear your are safe. Sounds like a real disaster. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 7:45 AM, David Mann wrote: > Just reporting in safe & well after another decent shake. It wasn't too > intense but seemed to go on

Re: Wheee

Dave, Good to see all is well with you and family. Thinking about you here. Stay safe. Regards, Bob & Lynn S. On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 6:45 AM, David Mann wrote: > Just reporting in safe & well after another decent shake. It wasn't too > intense but seemed to go on for a

Re: Wheee

Just finished scanning the headlines of the New Zeland Herald. Glad you’re ok, Dave! Thought of you first thing when heard about the earthquake. christine http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1=11747414 > On

Re: Wheee

Your report of survival is happily received, Dave! J Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 13, 2016, at 4:45 AM, David Mann wrote: > > Just reporting in safe & well after another decent shake. It wasn't too > intense but seemed to go on for a long time. > > GNS have it at 6.6 but

Re: Wheee

Please keep safe... On 13 Nov 2016 14:46, "David Mann" wrote: > Just reporting in safe & well after another decent shake. It wasn't too > intense but seemed to go on for a long time. > > GNS have it at 6.6 but USGS say 7.4. It was a little way north from here > but was

Re: Wheee

Thanks for the status report! Just saw the news flash and wondered if you were affected. Stan Sent from my iPad > On Nov 13, 2016, at 3:45 AM, David Mann wrote: > > Just reporting in safe & well after another decent shake. It wasn't too > intense but seemed to go on for

Wheee

Just reporting in safe & well after another decent shake. It wasn't too intense but seemed to go on for a long time. GNS have it at 6.6 but USGS say 7.4. It was a little way north from here but was enough to wake up half the country. Our baby slept right through, daddy will be awake for a