LMAO. I can see how the keys are next to each other and it thinks you
want to say short for Kansas City.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> The KC is what happens when I try to type LX on my phone. It’s a typo.
>
>> On Mar 1, 2017, at 10:37 AM,
The KC is what happens when I try to type LX on my phone. It’s a typo.
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Gonz wrote:
>
> What is the KC? Is it some kind of focus equipment?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> I've found
What is the KC? Is it some kind of focus equipment?
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I've found the K-1 quite easy to focus manually, and my vision is no longer
> good. I'll have to try it vs. the KC one of these days, but I think it will
>
Stan, I've been using the O-ME53 for about 10 years. Had the rubber
fall apart on two of them. I'm pretty sure that it will vignette
heavily on a Full Frame viewfinder. Of course it won't effect the
photo, but it will make evaluating composition a bit of a pain. I found
it very helpful
I'm not sure what the terminology is, but I know AF-c with a single point
selected and a nine point range seems to work best for critters in the brush.
I'll take a look at my camera tomorrow and confirm. Autofocus is tricky and
occasional misses in a busy environment are inevitable.
Paul via
> On Feb 28, 2017, at 4:43 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Hi Stan,
>
> Are you using single-point focus? I can usually slip around branches to shoot
> a bird in the bush if I carefully place the focus point on the bird’s head.
> With multi-point focus, the camera will
KC = LX sheesh!
Paul via phone
> On Feb 28, 2017, at 7:54 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> I've found the K-1 quite easy to focus manually, and my vision is no longer
> good. I'll have to try it vs. the KC one of these days, but I think it will
> compare favorably. Of
I've found the K-1 quite easy to focus manually, and my vision is no longer
good. I'll have to try it vs. the KC one of these days, but I think it will
compare favorably. Of course I haven't used my KC in 15 years, and my memory
might be failing me.
Paul via phone
> On Feb 28, 2017, at 7:49
I am of the opinion that a good manual focus screen is invaluable
because AF just sucks under those circumstances. Too bad Pentax no
longer makes a good manual focus screen.
On 2/28/2017 4:22 PM, Stanley Halpin wrote:
On Feb 28, 2017, at 3:58 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
… I
Hi Stan,
Are you using single-point focus? I can usually slip around branches to shoot a
bird in the bush if I carefully place the focus point on the bird’s head. With
multi-point focus, the camera will always lock onto whatever is in the
foreground.
Paul
> On Feb 28, 2017, at 4:22 PM,
> On Feb 28, 2017, at 3:58 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> … I just went through the photos of one of the bands from this weekend,
> having shot a bit with the 80-200 on the K-3, with wider primes on the K-1
> that night, and was reminded of just how well the K-3 can focus on
>
P. J. Alling wrote:
I'm pretty sure it's the bus speed of the camera. Everything I've read
about it implies that the K-1 can only take advantage of a middling fast
card. I think the best high speed Pentax is the K-3 or K-3II maybe the
KP will clear it's buffer faster, or equal the K-3 with
I'm pretty sure it's the bus speed of the camera. Everything I've read
about it implies that the K-1 can only take advantage of a middling fast
card. I think the best high speed Pentax is the K-3 or K-3II maybe the
KP will clear it's buffer faster, or equal the K-3 with better
autofocus, but
APS-C mode is lower resolution and the buffer doesn't fill rapidly. I don't
machine gun critters but I frequently shoot more than a dozen shots in rapid
succession. But even in full frame mode I can shoot at a pretty good pace. I
use two 95 mb/s sandisk extreme pro 64 gb cards with the camera
14 matches
Mail list logo