On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 03:23:21PM +0800, Lee Standen wrote:
Thanks for that information, Bert.
I had seen the documentation before... perhaps I should provide some more
information.
Here are the options I'm using at the moment (I've tried several values):
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:29:57AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
% pdns_recursor
% uname -a
NetBSD golgoth 5.0.1 NetBSD 5.0.1 (GENERIC) #0: Thu Oct 1 15:46:16 CEST 2009
steph...@golgoth:/usr/obj/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC i386
Hi
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:18:43AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
It was properly compiled but the Makefile contains a 'strip
$(DESTDIR)/$(SBINDIR)/pdns_recursor' :-( Debugging the non-installed
For installed binaries, this is common.
OK, the ACL parsing is not robust enough. What is
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:01:38AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
[BTW, it would be better to do so on a ticketing system but I cannot
find a way to create a new ticket in the PowerDNS Trac.]
There is some anti-spam trickery:
TO FILE BUGS, OR CHANGE THE WIKI, CLICK 'LOGIN' ABOVE, USERNAME
Derek, Dave, Stephane,
(a rare top-post!), your points are well understood, and will be addressed.
The immediate reason that the pdns-recursor did not have full auto*, and
is unlikely to get it, was the deep dissatisfaction we felt with this suite
of programs.
It turned out to be difficult to
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:15:34PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:57:13PM +0200,
bert hubert bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl wrote
a message of 85 lines which said:
The immediate reason that the pdns-recursor did not have full auto*,
and is unlikely to get
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:12:29AM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
This has happened a further twice in the last week, output sent off
list, please let me know if you need any further information.
Simon,
Could you apply this patch:
http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/1623
And periodically
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 06:40:18PM +0200, Christof Meerwald wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:12:45 -0500, Naked Short-Selling wrote:
I read your post regarding multithreaded epoll_wait behavior on lkml a
couple of months ago:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/3/441
My understanding is that
Garry,
2.6.1 WKS WKS records are deprecated in [RFC 1123]. They serve no known
useful function, except internally among LISP machines
Normally we'd whip up an implementation just to have the issue go away, but
it is a pretty weird record type too, containing a bitmap of protocols.
Unknown
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:32:00AM +0200, Thomas Mieslinger wrote:
when I set the Webseverport to 80 and run powerdns as user a non root user
then the powerdns fails to start with the message permisson denied.
Powerdns seems to drop the root priviledges too early.
Is someone willing to fix
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 04:08:17PM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
Simon,
Could you apply this patch:
http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/1623
And periodically run 'rec_control get tcp-clients' ?
Hi Bert, I have just returned from annual leave and began to look into
this
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:23:04PM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
It contains some other exciting stuff too, and it appears to be stable for
production use.
I have now built a static package and installed to 2 of the 8
servers after testing in isolation, they appear to be running fine
and I can
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 05:10:11PM -0600, Darren Gamble wrote:
We just wanted to get some information on how the recursor behaves when
presented with a NS record set containing both IPv6 and IPv4 addresses,
and/or if a NS record name has both A and records.
If there a preference by the
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:34:30AM +0200, Uroš Gruber wrote:
Hi,
here is result from one of IP
Try adding -x to the command line. From the 'dig' manpage:
'The default query type is A, unless the -x option is supplied to indicate
a reverse lookup.'
[r...@host1 ~]#dig @91.185.194.202
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:10:29AM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
I have been running the 'get tcp-clients' every 5 mins in cron on
both servers, one is very low 10 and fluctuates, the other is just
growing and growing and is currently at 55, hope this info is of
value for debug.
Is there any
at 04:16:50PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 03:14:39PM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
Bert, its now climbing and not seeming to close any clients on both
servers now, although one is much worse than the other, one is at 11
and the other is at 108 tcp-clients at the moment
Hi everybody,
I'll be part of the 'DNSSEC Workgroup' over at ICANN in Brussels this coming
week. There, I will present 'PowerDNSSEC' plus our vision of DNSSEC on the
resolver side of large ISPs.
More details can be found on http://brussels38.icann.org/node/12491 and you
can even join in
Simon,
the solution to your issue is almost certainly in
http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/1640
Even though you do not see the log messages, I'm pretty sure this is it.
Bert
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
we made at least solves A bug just not your bug.
Sent from my phone.
- Reply message -
From: Simon Bedford sbedf...@plus.net
Date: Tue, Jun 22, 2010 09:44
Subject: [Pdns-users] Possible tcp listener issue
To: bert hubert bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl
Cc: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
From: pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com
[pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com] On Behalf Of bert hubert
[bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl]
Sent: 23 June 2010 12:47
To: Simon Bedford
Cc: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] Possible tcp listener issue
Simon
, you find
that BIND and PowerDNS resolve about the same amount of domains correctly.
There will be some domains that work well in PowerDNS and not in BIND and
the other way around.
So please ask 'register.it' to solve their nameserver.
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
PS: in powerdns recursor 3.3
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:49:19PM -0700, Brandon Lee wrote:
Therefore, we turned on logging by setting the log level to 6 in the
pdns.conf
file and only on the master server we saw hundreds of queries like below
being
logged whereas on the slave server this was not happening. Not sure
Briefly diving into this:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:12:54AM -0400, Dave Sparro wrote:
I see this all the time on BIND resolvers. The keys to the situation are:
* Domain's old NS records have a relatively long TTL (from old auth.
servers)
* Domain owner changes auth. servers with registrar
[mailto:pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com] On Behalf Of bert hubert
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 9:01 AM
To: Mike
Cc: Brad Dameron; pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] Possible tcp listener issue
The issue has now been reproduced on one of the PowerDNS servers
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 02:24:04PM +0100, Richard Poole wrote:
We're seeing crashes in powerdns 2.9.22 when calling pdns_control
rediscover. We have a cron job that does this, currently twice an hour,
and on average about once a day it results in a crash, looking like this
in
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:55:17AM +0200, Yves Goergen wrote:
On 12.08.2010 08:28 CE(S)T, bert hubert wrote:
If configured with 'master' in the configuration, it will periodically
retrieve a list of all SOA serial numbers, and determine which ones changed.
Does anybody know what time
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:20:52PM +0400, Dmitry Rybin wrote:
$ dig +short my.smsfeedback.ru @78.108.89.252
click.smsbliss.ru.
$ dig +short click.smsbliss.ru @ns1.nameself.com
79.125.121.14
All fine, bind resolves this domain, unbound too, but pdns-recursor - not.
It is broken. There are
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:37:42AM +0100, Simon Bedford wrote:
Just returned from annual leave to this welcome news, has anyone had
a chance to try it as yet and investigate whether the bug still
manifests? And does it no longer happen when running Brad's test
script?
Simon,
Sadly we found
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 04:56:14PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
We've fixed yet another bug that might be causing the issue, and we are
currently testing that.
This drop can be found on
http://svn.powerdns.com/snapshots/pdns-recursor-3.3-pre.tar.bz2
Our testing shows that the problem
Hi,
This message is for everyone using the PowerDNS Recursor with Solaris 10 on
x86 (non-UltraSPARC) hardware.
It turns out that Solaris 10 on x86 has some issues standing in the way of
high performance for the PowerDNS Recursor. With some care, good results can
be achieved however.
If you need
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 08:31:45PM +0300, George wrote:
I have CentOS 5.5 and powerdns 2.9.21 set up as a slave server. My
problem is that pdns does not reply to queries that come from outside
on any secondary IP . Here's the full story:
Can you run:
grep local-address /etc/powerdns/pdns.conf
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 08:44:01PM +0300, George wrote:
Here are the outputs:
[r...@webprod02 ~]# grep local-address /etc/pdns/pdns.conf
# local-address Local IP addresses to which we bind
local-address=0.0.0.0
(...)
pdns[6269]: It is advised to bind to explicit addresses with the
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 09:17:01PM +, Brad Dameron wrote:
The release process for 3.3 can now start - only 1 feature request left
to
finish.
Good to hear Bert. I'll run it through the ringer on Monday and see if we can
reproduce the problem. Cross fingers that it is fixed.
Brad,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 12:10:53AM +0300, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Indeed, I have confirmed that pdns does not send a complete set of
records during AXFR, by executing:
# dig example.com AXFR @dns.example.com
where dns.example.com is the pdns/ldap server. The output is exactly
the
save you an
upgrade.
Would this work for you?
Bert.
Sent from my phone.
- Reply message -
From: Simon Bedford sbedf...@plus.net
Date: Mon, Sep 6, 2010 14:16
Subject: tcp listener issue - hopefully fixed
To: bert hubert bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl
Cc: Brad Dameron brad.dame
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:20:07AM +0200, Christian Kuehn wrote:
Hi,
today I installed the Recursor 3.2 in a new Solaris 10 x86 and the
process crashed immediately:
Hi Christian,
Sadly this is well known - see
http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-users/2010-August/006956.html
Dear PowerDNS community,
PowerDNS Recursor 3.3 Release Candidate 1 is now available! It is in wide
production use already, but we'd like everyone to take a good look at it
before we release it as 3.3-final. If nothing crops up, RC1 will be the
exact same as the 3.3 release.
Tar, RPM Deb for 32
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 06:43:08PM +0700, Dmitriy Lyfar wrote:
Hi,
I'm using pdns with my own backend. Previous version I've used was 2.9.21
(from centos repo) and my backend works fine. But we decided to
move to last version (pdns-static, 2.9.22, x86_64) and it can't even run
with my
Dear PowerDNS community,
PowerDNS Recursor 3.3 Release Candidate 2 is now available! It is in wide
production use already, but we'd like everyone to take a good look at it
before we release it as 3.3-final. If nothing crops up, RC2 will be the
exact same as the 3.3 release.
RC1 had some
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:37:30PM +0200, Detlef Peeters wrote:
pdns_recursor[32068]: objects-test.deviantart.com.edgesuite.net.:
our root expired, repriming from hints and retrying
pdns_recursor[32068]: s.de.net.: our root expired, repriming from
hints and retrying
Hi Detlef,
Can you list
Found it solved in http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/1716
This issue is harmless, but it is good to have it solved for the 'real'
release.
Thanks for the vigilance!
Bert
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:39:11PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:37:30PM +0200, Detlef
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:32:51AM +0200, Thomas Mieslinger wrote:
we're using pdns recursor for out company internal name resolution.
We have some strange setups to support that can't easily be removed.
In some of our offical Zones are CNAMEs. The A records to these
Names are in our
Odd - can you paste some 'stats:' lines from the log files?
stats: 4331362754 questions, 1003788 cache entries, 100987 negative entries,
27% cache hits
stats: throttle map: 2752, ns speeds: 76672
stats: outpacket/query ratio 3205%, 2% throttled, 0 no-delegation drops
stats: 263614
Dear PowerDNS community,
PowerDNS Recursor 3.3 Release Candidate 3 is now available! It is in wide
production use already, but we'd like everyone to take a good look at it
before we release it as 3.3-final. If nothing crops up, RC3 will be the
exact same as the 3.3 release.
RC1 had some
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:08:33AM +0200, Detlef Peeters wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:22:40 +0200, bert hubert
bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl wrote:
PowerDNS Recursor 3.3 Release Candidate 3 is now available! It is in wide
production use already, but we'd like everyone to take a good look
Thomas,
Please provide real domain names, otherwise I can't test.
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:53:22PM +0200, Thomas Mieslinger wrote:
On 09/20/10 07:53 AM, bert hubert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:32:51AM +0200, Thomas Mieslinger wrote:
we're using pdns
you will get NXDomain and AUTHORTIY = 1, but internally
db686.YYY.de is known.
Would you add an option to try recursing cnames even if an answer
has the authority bit set?
Regards Thomas
On 09/22/10 04:54 PM, bert hubert wrote:
Thomas,
Please provide real domain names, otherwise I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
We're proud to announce the release of the PowerDNS Recursor 3.3!
It can be downloaded from http://www.powerdns.com/ or via the following
direct links:
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-recursor-3.3.tar.bz2
Indeed. And for this purpose we have:
http://doc.powerdns.com/recursor-stats.html ;-)
This states:
It should be noted that answers0-1 + answers1-10 + answers10-100 +
answers100-1000 + packetcache-hits + over-capacity-drops = questions.
You are currently missing the 'packetcache-hits'.
The
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 02:09:16PM +0200, Florent Lerat wrote:
We slave about 20 domains for most of which one of our 5 servers is the
master.
We are slave for 90 different masters. Some of those masters are indeed
generating timeout or different types of error such as :
- Query to
!
Bert Hubert
PowerDNS
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 03:36:35PM -0600, Jivko Sabev wrote:
Greetings,
I have released yet another control panel for Power DNS. Some of the
key features include:
- support for all Power DNS features
- support for fancy records
- built on an enterprise platform
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:05:26PM +0800, Xscape wrote:
hi,
I will manage one dns zone(or one domain) with pdns authoritative server
(mysql backend). Is there any problems without soa record.
SOA means 'start of authority'. Without SOA, there is no authority and no
zone.
So yes, it is
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:32:31PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
The PowerDNS Recursor is currently being extended with additional Lua hooks
and extra infrastructure to support flexible DNS64 operations, plus perform
on-the-fly IPv4 or IPv6 renumbering.
(...)
Known defects are:
postresolve
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 12:40:40PM -0600, Jeremy Utley wrote:
load balancer which handles sharing the load between them. This
implementation has been in place for about a year with no issues.
We also use Cacti graphs for collecting performance data, by
extending SNMP with output from the
:04
To: bert hubert
Cc: Mike; pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] tcp listener issue - hopefully fixed
Bert,
I re-downloaded the src and rebuilt my RPM. It appears to be up and running
now. Unknown why the first compiles had this issue. I have been testing the
last
;
dr.d_label=label;
dr.d_clen=ah.d_clen;
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
McAfee responded within minutes, and they are on the case. Thanks for the
hint!
Bert
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:05:24AM -0500, Curtis Maurand wrote:
You might try posting a message to the nanog list.
--Curtis
On 12/8/2010 7:43 AM, bert hubert wrote:
Dear PowerDNS Recursor users
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:35:47AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:30:18AM +0100,
bert hubert bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl wrote
a message of 286 lines which said:
Dec 13 09:23:54 [1] all-wikileaks.bortzmeyer.fr.: truncated bit set,
retrying via TCP
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 06:24:56PM +0100, Florian Krolikowski wrote:
Hi Bert!
Here the requested tcpdump. I hope it is meaningful for you. Thanks a
lot for your help.
Hi Florian,
It appears that there is no PowerDNS issue - PowerDNS is sending correct
root priming queries, but getting no
Please everybody do not respond ;-)
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:49:11AM +, Pramod Bodla wrote:
LinkedIn
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Pramod Bodla
Pramod Bodla
Senior Soft ware Engineer at Kodiak Networks
Bengaluru Area, India
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 05:13:47PM -0500, Morgan Osborne wrote:
The first is 'red.com' with a record type of 'CNAME' and content of
'blue.com' , then the second record is 'blue.com' with a record type of
'A' and the correct IP address of '150.145.15.1' So now when I do a http
search for
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 03:20:13PM +0800, Conan wrote:
We know the option export-etc-hosts=on will export records from
/etc/hosts to pdns recursor. But I found the records are not always
available.
Hi Conan,
The export-etc-hosts feature is not meant to override the internet, but to
supplement
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:27:22PM -0500, Morgan Osborne wrote:
Does anyone have a specific list of the required packet types (and response
settings) needed for DNS servers to fully operate on the net?
I know UDP is a must, but more to the point, are ICMP (ping, tracert)
responses
Dear PowerDNS Community,
With the help of many of you, we've now brought 'PowerDNSSEC' to the point
where it might make sense for you to trial it on test domains. We expect to
make move some of our own important domains over to PowerDNSSEC early next
week. PowerDNS.COM underlies the commercial
Hi 'abcdef ghijkl' with your newsubdomain.domain.com on dns.comain.com,
I'm afraid I can't help you this way.
Please provide real domain names and IP addresses.
You might want to consider upgrading to 2.9.22.
Bert
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:00:46PM +0100, abcdef ghijkl wrote:
Hello
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:12:19AM -0800, dialsc wrote:
www.vggr.ch has been registered as a cname record pointing to vggr.ch which
is an A type record. randomly one or more powerdns servers are unable to
resolve www.vggr.ch. once i restart the recursor of the server having this
problem,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:32:19AM +0100, Christian Kuehn wrote:
any idea why the pdns-recursor 3.3 gives different answers to the same
query??
Hello!! ;-)
You probably run with threads=2, and one of the threads has had problems
resolving cecilmen.se, and the other hasn't.
3.3.1 which will be
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:27:13AM +0100, Detlef Peeters wrote:
On 27.01.2011 23:37, bert hubert wrote:
(the short version, there is a snapshot worth looking at, packages on
http://powerdnssec.org/downloads - documentation on http://powerdnssec.org )
I have upgraded to the snapshot
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:38:12 +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
That's really excellent news - I have just migrated my 2 nameservers
to SVN revision 1928 and signed one of the zones (btw, the setup is:
master using bind backend
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 08:44:08AM +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
I kind of expected this to happen today - the master (ns.cmeerw.net)
with the keying material has now updated the RRSIG records, but the
slave (ns2.cmeerw.net, no keying material) still returns the old RRSIG
records:
Indeed,
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 09:25:04PM +0100, M Techter wrote:
being interested in DNSSEC support of pdns, I tried
to build from the
pdns-3.0-pre.20110202.1964
Good catch - we fixed the issue in SVN already. Meanwhile,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:17:29AM +, Maroon Ibrahim wrote:
As for the file descriptors, I already added the following:
- in sysctl.conf : fs.file-max = 65535
- in /etc/init.d/pdns-recursor
#!/bin/sh
# chkconfig: - 80 75
# description: pdns_recursor is a versatile high
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:24:53PM +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
Ok, think I have found it - Microsoft DNS doesn't seem to like the
EDNS options in the AXFR packets. Guess that's why it says WRONG in
tcpreceiver.cc, line 410...
Our EDNS-in-AXFR has been brought in line with RFC 5936 now. I
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:32:45AM +, Tom Boland wrote:
Do out of zone additional processing. This means that if a malicious
user adds a '.com' zone to your server, it is not used for other
domains and will not contaminate answers. Do not enable this setting
if you run a public
Dear PowerDNS users,
As of yesterday, 103 tickets were open in the PowerDNS bugtracker, available
on http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/report/1
Today, 87 are left.
As most tickets have been filed anonymously, if you ever created one, please
check our timeline on
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:45:43PM -0600, Mark Felder wrote:
Is there any connection pooling work done by PowerDNS that would
negate any possible performance benefits of pgbouncer?
Hi Mark,
During typical PowerDNS operation, you will see a number over very longlived
database connections, plus
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 02:15:26PM +0800, p8x wrote:
zone transfer from the primary PowerDNS seems to mangle the records
slightly replacing occurrences of the domain with an @ in some cases.
This seems to work for all of the records except for the MX record. As
an example, here is a copy of
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 01:33:24PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Simon Bedford, Brad Dameron and Laurient Papier discovered
relatively high TCP/IP loads could cause TCP/IP service to shut down
over time. Addressed in commits 1546, 1640, 1652, 1685, 1698.
Additional information provided by
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:06:12PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
this definitely sounds like 3.3 material!
So far so good, nearly 500,000 tcp queries without any lingering sockets.
Good!
Totally unrelated, but I see a stat that's not mentioned in the
docs: no-packet-error 492682. What
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:44:01PM +0100, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
As noted in the comment, I'm not sure whether this small error is on
PDNS' part or in ldns, but an example in RFC 5702 suggests BIND's format
is correct.
As far as I can tell, this private key format has no formal
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:53:05AM +, Richard Poole wrote:
We have a setup with a non-public master and two publicly visible
slaves. All three servers are using the bind backend. Sometimes we need to
change many zones, say about 2000, at the same time, causing the master to
send out 2000
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:38:36PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
We have a record set up with the BIND backend as follows:
testing IN CNAME
gci-prod-lb-0.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com.
When you query it right after a service restart, you get:
Wow, that is weird.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 07:34:15PM +0100, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
To my knowledge there is no such back-end. What I have done is a
PowerDNS pipe back-end to CouchDB. Performance is lousy of course, but I
did it as a proof of concept, and it works ok. I've written about it at
If the performance is
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:33:39PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
So it seems to me that there are multiple places here that can't
handle \032 in a query name or in a record label. Just changing
backend is not going to get this working for me, right?
Andy,
Can you try to reproduce the issue with
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:35:15AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Anyone has comment on this patch? Is there a better place I can send
it for review and (possible) inclusion?
Hi Sandro,
It has been added to revision 2084, which can be downloaded from
http://powerdnssec.org/snapshots/
It will also
invalid: --fork is gone in recent versions
Ticket #305 (Disable a zone / domain / record) closed by ahu
wontfix: To do this, please customize the SQL queries to have an 'active' field.
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users
,
Bert Hubert
PowerDNS
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:39:42AM +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
Just wanted to check what the status is on having a PowerDNS master
with a non-PowerDNS slave for DNSSEC signed zone - we had briefly
discussed this some time ago and I think the slave (if it's not
PowerDNS) currently won't do
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:36:14PM +0400, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
I'm build current svn trunk, something work's fine, but sometimes i get
this error:
Hi Vasiliy,
Can you verify that the crash always starts:
pdns[28785]: /usr/sbin/pdns_server-instance(_ZN11GSQLBackend8setFreshEj
+0x73)
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:59:34PM +0400, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
If it doesn't always start there, can you paste some other traces?
Thanks!
pdns[31390]:
/usr/sbin/pdns_server-instance(_ZN17CommunicatorClass12slaveRefreshEP13PacketHandler+0x1a8b)
[0x8169c2b]
Mar 30 14:52:25 monitoring
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:10:00PM +0400, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
Another problem (may be not related to current trunk..)
Received NOTIFY for clodo.ru from 188.127.236.4 which is not a master
But pdns on 188.127.236.4 already master for zone clodo.ru ? Why this
happened?
This is a master
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:44:56PM +0200, Udo Rader wrote:
Before promising something I can't keep: yes, I will give my best to fix
the issues above and if things go well, it is not unlikely that either
I myself or one of our developers will invest some more time into
enhancements, but one
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 09:57:47PM +0400, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
Hello. Where i can find release date for powerdns 3 ? roadmap in wiki
says nothing...
The open source plan is always to release when ready ;-)
Tomorrow (Monday) will see RC1, I expect three subsequent releases (RC2, RC3
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
Release Candidate 1 of the PowerDNS Authoritative Server 3.0 is available from:
http://powerdnssec.org/downloads/pdns-3.0-rc1.tar.gz
http://powerdnssec.org/downloads/packages/pdns-static-3.0rc1-1.i386.rpm
/
Regards,
Kees
On 4-4-2011 16:50, bert hubert wrote:
Hi everybody,
Release Candidate 1 of the PowerDNS Authoritative Server 3.0 is available
from:
http://powerdnssec.org/downloads/pdns-3.0-rc1.tar.gz
http://powerdnssec.org/downloads/packages/pdns-static-3.0rc1-1.i386.rpm
http
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:14:31PM -0400, Mohamed Lrhazi wrote:
I hope you guys don't mind a couple of non pdns specific questions...
For once ;-)
- When you declare 2 or 3 NS records for your domain, does the order
of those names correlate with their usage? by that I mean can I expect
a
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 04:53:16PM +0200, Thor Spruyt wrote:
Last week I discovered an issue with recursor v3.2.
This is probably fixed in 3.3.1:
Discovered by John J and Robin J, the PowerDNS Recursor did not process
packets that were truncated in mid-record, and also did not act on the
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:11:41PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 04:53:16PM +0200, Thor Spruyt wrote:
Last week I discovered an issue with recursor v3.2.
Hi Thor,
Thanks! You've uncovered an interesting bug which was quite devious. It has
been solved in http
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:53:35AM -0700, Alfred B. M. Cordero wrote:
Using the postresolve hook in lua to alter TTL that are too low.
I log queries that hit the lua code and I see log events for
that same host that occur within the same one second period
and sometimes within a few or more
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:40:58AM -0700, Alfred B. M. Cordero wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:11:34 -0700 bert hubert
bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl wrote:
Try reproducing with 'threads=1'. You may be seeing hits from
multiple separate caches.
You are telling me that each thread maintains its
301 - 400 of 844 matches
Mail list logo
