[PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8512] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-28 Thread Howard Pattee
At 09:20 AM 4/28/2015, Frederik Stjernfelt wrote: HP: Or are [logic and math] conditions for describing laws? Indeed they are, but more than that. Parts of mathematics which are not (yet?) applied in any science are unproblematically developed. So I would not subscribe to Quine's idea that

[PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8511] Re: Natural

2015-04-28 Thread gnox
Howard, Frederik, Emerging momentarily from being too busy to participate in these excellent conversations about NP, Howard, I have a question about your use of the term phenomenon in your message prior to the one copied below. As it's normally used in physics, I think a phenomenon is an

Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8511] Re: Natural

2015-04-28 Thread Howard Pattee
At 09:47 AM 4/28/2015, Gary F wrote: As it’s normally used in physics, I think a phenomenon is an observable occurrence. The implication is that it occurs (or perhaps recurs) at a time. Wouldn’t the Big Bang be a better candidate for “first phenomenon” than the first self-replication?[snip] It

[PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8508] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-28 Thread Howard Pattee
At 05:18 AM 4/28/2015, Frederik Stjernfelt wrote: [snip] - Dicisigns - applies to biosemiotics as well. To me, this forms part of a naturalization of semiotics. But, simultaneously, a naturalization which takes generalities such as empirical universals as well as mathematics/logic as parts of

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8508] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-28 Thread Frederik Stjernfelt
Dear Howard, lists - Den 28/04/2015 kl. 12.44 skrev Howard Pattee hpat...@roadrunner.commailto:hpat...@roadrunner.com At 05:18 AM 4/28/2015, Frederik Stjernfelt wrote: [snip] - Dicisigns - applies to biosemiotics as well. To me, this forms part of a naturalization of semiotics. But,

RE: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8468] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-28 Thread Jeffrey Brian Downard
Hi Cathy, Lists, Peirce and Mill have developed competing philosophical theories of how to classify and explain the validity of deductive, inductive and abductive arguments. Mill's theory is contained in System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive, and Peirce's theory is spread across a wide

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8508] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-28 Thread Frederik Stjernfelt
Dear Howard, lists, Den 28/04/2015 kl. 14.47 skrev Howard Pattee hpat...@roadrunner.commailto:hpat...@roadrunner.com : At 07:04 AM 4/28/2015, Frederik Stjernfelt wrote: [Howard's] questions about your view: (1) What parts of nature do you include in naturalization of semiotics? I am not sure I

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8508] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-28 Thread Sungchul Ji
Frederik, Howard, Lists, Frederik answered By the first semiosis to Howard's question, When in the history of the universe do you say the *first proposition* occurs? Frederik, can you speculate on what you think was the first semiosis like ? Would you agree that whatever it was, it must have

[PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8515] Re: Natural

2015-04-28 Thread gnox
Howard, interesting definition! [A phenomenon is information resulting from an individual subject’s detection of a physical interaction.] Applying this to your proposition, then, I have to ask: Who or what was the individual subject who detected the first self-replication, so that the

[PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8517] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-28 Thread Frederik Stjernfelt
Dear Sung, Howard, lists - I tend to agree with Kauffman that some some sort of proto-metabolism must have been the earliest quasi-life (like his autokatalytic sets), rather than DNA first or membranes first etc - for the reason that self-sustaining cycles seem to be the first candidate to

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8517] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-28 Thread Sungchul Ji
Frederik, Howard, lists, I agree. In my opinion, what is widely called autocatalytic is more or less synonymous with self-organization. As you can see in the 4/14/2015 post partly reproduced below, Step 4 in Figure 1 is autocatalytic in that the intermediate X reproduces itself with the help of

Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8468] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-28 Thread Helmut Raulien
Dear Catherine, List, All I want to put in is my opinion, that there are two kinds -or basic parts- of metaphysics, clearly distinguished: One is experience (axioms), and the other is tautology (mathematics). Ok, mathematics too is based on axioms, but axioms are nothing but themselves, and

[PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8505] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-28 Thread Frederik Stjernfelt
Dear Gary, John, lists - John wrote: I think we have converged a lot, and I think the issues are much more clear. My nagging doubt at this point is that as a naturalist I want to see a continuity between biosemiotics and cognitive semiotics (if I can call it that). I agree. This is why I

Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8515] Re: Natural

2015-04-28 Thread Howard Pattee
At 10:59 AM 4/28/2015,Gary F.wrote: Howard, interesting definition! [A phenomenon is information resulting from an individual subject's detection of a physical interaction.] HP: This definition is just an extension of the classic definition to subhuman organisms.As a broad academic discipline